Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SP-820UZ
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
69 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Earlier Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
- Later Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Olympus 9000 versus Olympus SP-820UZ, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both produced by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the SP-820UZ (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 9000 was revealed 4 years prior to the SP-820UZ and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the 9000 scores versus the SP-820UZ for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ. The full galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus SP-820UZ
| 9000 | SP-820UZ |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Olympus 9000
| SP-820UZ | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2012 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 39 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Olympus SP-820UZ
| 9000 | SP-820UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus 9000 provides physical dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Olympus SP-820UZ has measurements of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") and a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 9000 versus Olympus SP-820UZ in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the 9000 versus the SP-820UZ.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and SP-820UZ is 92 and 69 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at technical specs. The graphic here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and SP-820UZ.
As you have seen, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus SP-820UZ to give you more detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older 9000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ |
| Otherwise known as | mju 9000 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2012-08-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 22-896mm (40.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.4-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 15.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 225g (0.50 lbs) | 485g (1.07 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $299 |