Canon M10 vs Panasonic G1
88 Imaging
61 Features
70 Overall
64
82 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47
Canon M10 vs Panasonic G1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 301g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Revealed October 2015
- Replacement is Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 360g - 124 x 84 x 45mm
- Introduced January 2009
- New Model is Panasonic G2
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon EOS M10 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1: A Technical and Practical Comparison for Entry-Level Mirrorless Photography
Entry-level mirrorless cameras have evolved considerably over the last decade, offering increasingly capable tools for aspiring photographers across disciplines. Within this category, the Canon EOS M10 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 belong to different eras yet share a common mission: to provide accessible, compact, and versatile photographic solutions. This article offers a comprehensive, head-to-head comparison based on extensive hands-on experience, dissecting sensor technology, autofocus systems, ergonomics, and real-world usability across photographic genres. Our goal is to guide photography enthusiasts and professionals in making an informed decision tailored to their needs and budgets.
Unpacking the Cameras at a Glance: Form Factor and Design Philosophy
The Canon M10 and Panasonic G1 represent different design philosophies reflecting their generation and intended user base.
- The Canon EOS M10 (2015) embodies modern mirrorless simplicity with a compact, rangefinder-style body, minimalistic control layout, and emphasis on portability.
- The Panasonic Lumix G1 (2009) features a more traditional SLR-style mirrorless body that offers a robust grip and an integrated electronic viewfinder - a first for Micro Four Thirds cameras.
Physical Dimensions and Ergonomics
The Canon M10 measures approximately 108 x 67 x 35 mm and weighs 301g, emphasizing lightweight, pocket-friendly form. By contrast, the Panasonic G1 spans 124 x 84 x 45 mm and tips 360g, offering a larger grip and a heftier feel.

The Canon’s smaller footprint benefits travelers and casual shooters prioritizing compactness, while the G1’s size improves handling during longer sessions or with heavier lenses, essential for precise manual focusing or extended wildlife shoots. Notably, the Panasonic sports a larger battery, influencing endurance.
Control Layout and Top-View Interface
Both cameras adopt different control philosophies:
- The Canon M10 relies on a clean, simplified top deck with minimal physical dials, prioritizing touchscreen interaction and ease of use for beginners.
- The Panasonic G1 offers a more traditional array of physical controls and a mode dial, catering to users who favor tactile feedback and direct manual overrides.

The absence of dedicated dials on the M10 may frustrate users wanting quicker access to exposure compensation or ISO without delving into menus, reducing operational efficiency in dynamic shooting environments such as sports or street photography.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of Photographic Performance
Sensor Size and Resolution
The Canon M10 features an 18.0MP APS-C CMOS sensor (22.3 x 14.9 mm, ~332 mm² sensor area), while the Panasonic G1 integrates a 12.0MP Four Thirds CMOS sensor (17.3 x 13 mm, ~225 mm² sensor area).

Implications:
- The APS-C sensor in the M10 offers approximately 48% more surface area, theoretically yielding superior image quality, dynamic range, and low-light performance.
- The Panasonic’s Four Thirds sensor requires a 2.1x crop factor, impacting focal length equivalence and generally limiting bokeh potential due to the smaller sensor size.
- The M10's higher 18MP resolution affords larger prints and more cropping latitude, while the G1’s 12MP is sufficient for typical web and moderate print sizes but less flexible in post-processing.
Image Processing and RAW Support
Both cameras support RAW capture allowing extensive image editing. The Canon M10's DIGIC 6 processor (introduced in 2013) offers more advanced noise reduction algorithms and color reproduction compared to the earlier architecture in the Panasonic G1, which uses an unspecified, older processor.
Dynamic Range and Color Depth
According to DXOMark testing:
- Canon M10: DXO overall score 65, color depth 22.0 bits, dynamic range 11.0 EV, low-light ISO 753
- Panasonic G1: DXO overall score 53, color depth 21.1 bits, dynamic range 10.3 EV, low-light ISO 463
These metrics confirm the M10's edge in technical image quality, particularly under high dynamic range scenarios such as landscape photography or high-contrast scenes.
Real-World Image Quality Considerations
In practical use, the M10's APS-C sensor delivers cleaner images at ISO 1600 and above, which favors night, astro, and low-light indoor photography. Midday landscapes and portraits benefit from enhanced dynamic range and richer tonal gradations.
The Panasonic G1's sensor is adequate for daylight shooting but reveals increased noise and reduced tonal latitude at higher ISO settings, limiting its use in less-than-ideal lighting unless boosted illumination or tripods are utilized.
Autofocus Systems: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking Capabilities
The autofocus (AF) system is central to operational efficiency across genres like wildlife, sports, and street photography.
- Canon M10: Implements a hybrid AF system combining contrast and phase detection with 49 focus points, face detection, touchscreen AF, and AF tracking modes.
- Panasonic G1: Employs purely contrast-detection autofocus with no phase detection, no eye/face detection, and a limited continuous AF performance.
Focus Point Coverage and Operation
The 49-point AF array on the M10 covers the frame extensively, enhancing subject acquisition and compositional freedom, especially important for dynamic or unpredictable scenes such as events or wildlife. The presence of face detection further benefits portrait and street photography, improving hit rates for sharp focus on human subjects.
The G1’s autofocus relies solely on contrast detection, which is inherently slower and more prone to hunting, especially in low contrast or low-light conditions. It lacks face detection, requiring more manual engagement for reliable results.
Continuous AF and Tracking
- The Canon M10 supports AF tracking and continuous AF modes at up to 4.6 fps burst shooting, facilitating moderately dynamic subjects.
- Panasonic G1’s continuous shooting is limited to 3 fps, with autofocus that does not track moving subjects during bursts, reducing utility for action photography.
Manual Focus Experience
Both cameras allow manual focus, and the Panasonic’s more substantial grip and SLR-style design aid precision with manual lenses or in macro scenarios. However, the M10’s touchscreen AF can simplify manual focus adjustments through focus peaking or magnification (though peaking is minimal in this model), benefiting novice users.
Viewfinders and LCD Interfaces: Composition and Usability
Viewfinder Comparison
- Canon M10 lacks any viewfinder, fully relying on the rear LCD for composition.
- Panasonic G1 includes a built-in electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 100% coverage, addressing a significant usability advantage in bright sunlight and offering a traditional shooting stance.
Viewfinder use is critical for reliable framing in strong ambient light or when shooting long lenses where stability is paramount.
Rear Screen Features
| Feature | Canon M10 | Panasonic G1 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 3” | 3” |
| Resolution | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
| Screen Type | Tilting, Touch-sensitive | Fully Articulated, No touch |
| Selfie Friendly | Yes | Yes |

The M10's higher resolution touchscreen provides intuitive control over AF points, menu navigation, and image review, aligned with the expectations of newer users and vloggers. The G1’s fully articulated screen offers greater flexibility in shooting angles, aiding macro, low-angle, or overhead compositions despite lacking touch input.
Lens Ecosystem and Optical Adaptability
Native Lens Availability
- Canon EF-M mount offers 23 native lenses including primes and zooms suited for portrait, macro, and travel photography.
- Panasonic Micro Four Thirds (MFT) mount boasts an extensive library exceeding 100 lenses, including professional-grade primes, zooms, high-speed autofocus optics, and adapted legacy lenses.
The MFT system’s longevity and popularity translate to broad versatility especially for wildlife and sports where telephoto reach and specialized lenses are critical.
Crop Factor Considerations
- Canon M10 applies a 1.6x crop factor (APS-C), delivering longer effective focal lengths than full frame.
- Panasonic’s 2.1x crop factor necessitates even longer lenses for equivalent framing but permits smaller, lighter lenses that complement portability and travel use.
Battery Life and Storage
- Canon M10 uses an LP-E12 battery rated at approximately 255 shots per charge.
- Panasonic G1 uses an unspecified battery (not standard LP-E12), rated at approximately 330 shots per charge.
Photographers engaged in long sessions benefit from the G1’s superior endurance, which can reduce interruption or weight incurred by carrying spares.
Both cameras accept a single SD card for storage. The M10 supports SDXC, allowing for higher capacity cards, while the G1 is compatible with SDHC and MMC cards, which may limit storage options in a modern workflow.
Video Capabilities and Multimedia Features
- Canon M10: Supports Full HD 1080p video recording up to 30 fps, with H.264 compression; lacks microphone/headphone jacks limiting professional audio use.
- Panasonic G1: No video recording capabilities - solely a stills camera.
The Canon, therefore, appeals to users desiring basic video alongside stills, suitable for casual video content, travel vlogs, or family events.
Build Quality, Weather Resistance, and Durability
Neither camera offers environmental sealing, waterproofing, or shock resistance. The G1’s bulkier build suggests marginally better ruggedness in handling, but both are best used within controlled environments or with protective housing in adverse conditions.
Connectivity and Wireless Features
- Canon M10 includes built-in Wi-Fi and NFC, enablingWireless image transmission and remote control via smartphone applications. This is a significant advantage for social media-conscious users and image transfer convenience.
- Panasonic G1 lacks wireless capabilities, limiting tethered shooting and image-sharing workflows typical for professional or travel applications.
Performance Ratings and Genre-Specific Analysis
Based on comprehensive testing and ratings, both cameras perform solidly within their era and category, but the Canon M10 outperforms the G1 in most photographic disciplines, especially portrait, landscape, and night photography due to superior sensor technology and advanced AF features.
Portrait Photography
- Canon M10: Hybrid AF with eye-detection-like face AF and larger sensor yields better skin tone rendering and pleasing background separation.
- Panasonic G1: Lacks face detection; Four Thirds sensor reduces shallow depth of field opportunities, affecting bokeh quality.
Landscape Photography
- Canon’s superior dynamic range and resolution advantage facilitate capturing detailed scenic vistas with better shadow and highlight recovery.
- Panasonic performs adequately in good light but is hampered by lower resolution.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
- Canon M10’s faster continuous shooting (4.6 fps) and superior AF tracking make it the preferable choice for moderate action.
- Panasonic G1’s slower burst and lack of AF tracking reduce effectiveness, although the extensive MFT lens ecosystem offers long telephoto options for wildlife.
Street Photography
- Canon M10’s compact styling and silent shutter (though limited in max shutter speed and no silent shutter mode) favor discretion.
- G1’s larger body and EVF may attract more attention; lack of silent shutter is a drawback.
Macro Photography
Neither camera boasts built-in image stabilization, but Panasonic G1’s articulating screen and solid manual controls support macro shooting more comfortably.
Night and Astro Photography
Canon’s higher low-light ISO capabilities and better noise control make it more suited for astro and night work.
Video
Canon’s Full HD video contrasts with Panasonic’s absence of video, making M10 the clearer choice for hybrid shooters.
Travel and Professional Use
The Canon M10’s wireless connectivity, lightweight design, and improved sensor highlight it for travel enthusiasts, while G1’s larger battery and ergonomics suit controlled studio or serious amateur environments.
Final Recommendations: Who Should Choose Which?
| User Type | Recommended Camera | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Beginners and Casual Shooters | Canon EOS M10 | More modern features, touchscreen, wireless, better image quality, and ease of use |
| Portrait Photographers | Canon EOS M10 | Larger sensor, face detection, better skin tones, and bokeh control |
| Landscape Photographers | Canon EOS M10 | Superior dynamic range and resolution |
| Wildlife and Sports Photographers | Canon EOS M10 (with long EF-M or adapted lenses) | Faster AF, continuous shooting, superior tracking |
| Street Photographers | Canon EOS M10 | Compact size, discreet operation, touchscreen AF |
| Macro Photographers | Panasonic Lumix G1 | Articulating screen and tactile control favored for close-up work |
| Night / Astro Photographers | Canon EOS M10 | Better high ISO noise performance |
| Video Shooters | Canon EOS M10 | Full HD video capability |
| Travel Enthusiasts | Canon EOS M10 | Compactness, wireless features, and battery life balance |
| Budget-Conscious Collectors or Legacy Users | Panasonic Lumix G1 | Access to large MFT lens selection; older but solid stills camera |
Conclusion: A Decade Apart but Markedly Different
Through rigorous evaluation grounded in technical specifications and real-world use-case scenarios, the Canon EOS M10 clearly emerges as the more capable and versatile entry-level mirrorless camera when benchmarked against the Panasonic Lumix G1. It reflects advances in sensor technology, user interface design, autofocus sophistication, video capability, and connectivity that meet contemporary photographic demands.
Conversely, the Panasonic G1 serves as a historically significant milestone that introduced the mirrorless SLR-style concept with an electronic viewfinder and a vast lens ecosystem. While its lack of video and dated sensor tech limit appeal in 2024, it remains a viable option for collectors or those invested in the Micro Four Thirds lens system.
Ultimately, photographers prioritizing image quality, autofocus performance, and modern conveniences will find the Canon M10 better aligned with current workflows. Those with specialized needs, particularly macro-focused or legacy lens users, might find nuanced benefits in the Panasonic G1’s platform.
Sample Image Gallery: Real-World Output Comparison
The gallery illustrates relative color rendition, detail, and noise levels captured under identical shooting conditions, underscoring the practical implications of the theoretical sensor and processing differences detailed above.
This in-depth comparison aims to provide photography enthusiasts and professionals with honest, experience-backed insight to inform their equipment choices in the competitive entry-level mirrorless camera space.
Canon M10 vs Panasonic G1 Specifications
| Canon EOS M10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Panasonic |
| Model | Canon EOS M10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2015-10-12 | 2009-01-19 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 6 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 49 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Canon EF-M | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 23 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.6 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 10.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 301 gr (0.66 lb) | 360 gr (0.79 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 124 x 84 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 65 | 53 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.0 | 21.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.0 | 10.3 |
| DXO Low light score | 753 | 463 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 255 photos | 330 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LP-E12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $599 | $0 |