Canon M10 vs YI M1
88 Imaging
61 Features
70 Overall
64
87 Imaging
59 Features
66 Overall
61
Canon M10 vs YI M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 301g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Introduced October 2015
- Renewed by Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 350g - 114 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed September 2016
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon M10 vs YI M1: A Hands-On Field Test of Two Entry-Level Mirrorless Cameras
Picking your next camera? Especially in the entry-level mirrorless category, the sheer options can spin you around. Today, I’ll put two intriguing choices head-to-head: the Canon EOS M10 and the YI M1. Both launched in the mid-2010s to woo enthusiasts stepping into interchangeable-lens territory, yet they differ quite a bit under the hood and in practical use. Having put both through my usual rigorous, real-world shooting scenarios (portrait sessions, wildlife chases, landscape hikes - you name it), I’m ready to unfold an honest, deeply detailed comparison you can lean on.
Let’s dive into their core design and sensor technologies first, because that’s where image quality takes root.
Size, Shape & Handling: Which Fits Your Hands and Style?
If you’re an enthusiast who shoots on the move or sneaks street snaps, size and ergonomics become non-negotiable. The Canon M10 is a compact APS-C sensor camera built around the Canon EF-M mount. Its 108x67x35 mm, 301 g body gives you a surprisingly comfortable, responsive grip despite that petite footprint. The YI M1, with dimensions 114x64x34 mm and a weight of 350 g, is a bit thicker but slightly narrower, owing to its Micro Four Thirds mount design.

Notice here how the M10 has a chunkier but more contoured grip, versus the flatter profile of the YI M1.
The Canon’s rangefinder-style mirrorless body feels sturdier and slightly more refined in control placement, though it lacks any overt weather sealing. The YI M1 meanwhile is minimalist and lightweight but trades weather resistance considerations for portability.
For those who prioritize comfort in extended handheld shooting, the Canon’s slightly bigger grip wins out. But if pocketability and traveling light is your game, YI’s M1 is just as easy to tote - with a modern touch-screen interface keeping things slick.
Top and Rear Controls: Does Design Help or Hinder Creativity?
Handling doesn’t stop at shape - it’s also about how intuitively you can tweak settings. I spent several sessions toggling through menus and controls on both cameras.

Canon packs in the traditional mode dial and dedicated buttons like ISO, while the YI M1 strips it back, relying heavily on touchscreen interaction.
The Canon EOS M10 sticks to classic design cues: front shutter release, top mode dial (with P, Tv, Av, M modes), and a multi-function button cluster that photographers migrating from DSLRs will instantly appreciate. Meanwhile, the YI M1 is much more digital-first - few physical buttons, no mode dial, and most adjustments through the touchscreen. It’s liberating or limiting depending on your workflow. Personally, I prefer tactile dials and buttons when speed matters, like in street or wildlife photography, so the Canon earns points here.
On the back, both share the same 3-inch tilting touchscreen LCD at 1040k dots. But only the Canon’s screen tilts upward for selfie compositions - perfect for vloggers or social media enthusiasts. The YI M1’s fixed screen can tilt but not upward; a missed opportunity for those selfie shooters among us.

The touch interfaces on both cameras are responsive, but Canon’s tilting, selfie-friendly design gives it a user-centric edge.
Sensor & Image Quality: Canon’s APS-C vs YI’s Micro Four Thirds
This sartorial difference lies at the heart of their image quality conflict. The Canon M10 uses an 18MP APS-C sensor sized 22.3x14.9 mm (about 332 mm²), while the YI M1 packs a 20MP Four Thirds sensor at 17.3x13 mm (225 mm²). On paper, the Canon boasts nearly 50% more sensor surface - generally a huge plus for dynamic range, noise handling, and shallow depth of field control.

In my testing against challenging landscapes and low-light scenes, the Canon’s bigger sensor consistently delivered richer colors, smoother tonal transitions, and better high ISO performance. Noise becomes a noticeable factor on the YI M1 beyond ISO 1600, while the Canon remains cleaner up to ISO 3200 from my observations.
Canon’s 22-bit color depth and impressive 11 EV dynamic range measured via DXOmark confirm this advantage, while the YI M1 doesn’t have formal DXO testing but is reputable within MFT constraints.
For portrait shooters, the Canon’s APS-C sensor really shines with smoother skin tone gradations and more appealing background blur, thanks to the larger sensor and inherent 1.6x crop factor giving lenses an effective reach advantage.
Autofocus Performance: How Quick and Accurate Is the Focus?
Autofocus can make or break candid moments, sports shots, and wildlife photography - so testing AF speed, tracking, and face detection was high on my priority list.
Both cameras feature contrast detection autofocus with touch-capable AF point selection. The Canon M10’s 49-point AF system includes phase detection pixels embedded on sensor for hybrid AF, while the YI M1 relies solely on contrast-based systems with 81 focus points.
In practical daylight conditions, both locked focus promptly on static subjects. But when it came to moving targets - especially birds in flight or kids playing soccer - the Canon’s hybrid AF showed visibly better tracking stability and catch-up speed. It also supports continuous AF modes better, letting you keep a moving subject sharp across a burst series.
The YI M1’s AF struggled a bit with erratic motion and lower contrast subjects, occasionally hunting and missing critical moments. Face detection was reliable on Canon but less so on YI, stumbling slightly in uneven light.
Shooting Speed and Buffer: Burst Mode in Action
For sports, wildlife, or any action-packed scenario, frames per second and buffer depth are critical.
Canon EOS M10 offers a respectable 4.6 fps continuous shooting. The YI M1 edges slightly faster at 5 fps.
However, the difference is academic when you consider buffer clearing speed and focus tracking fluidity. Canon’s buffer fills more slowly but processes images efficiently thanks to DIGIC 6 processor. The YI M1’s buffer clears just as fast but can occasionally stutter during prolonged bursts.
In high-pressure action shooting, that reliability counts. So overall, a marginal edge to Canon again here.
Lens Availability & Ecosystem: Choices Matter More Than Ever
Neither camera features a full-frame sensor, so lens options and quality are chief considerations before spending.
The Canon M10 mounts Canon’s EF-M system, which at launch had 23 native lenses. This number has grown but is still relatively slim compared to Canon’s extensive EF/EF-S DSLR lineup - which you can’t directly mount without adapters. That said, EF-M lenses tend to be compact and affordable but offer fewer professional-level optics.
The YI M1 rides on the Micro Four Thirds system - a stalwart among mirrorless platforms with over a hundred native lenses (107 lenses at last count!). This offers vast variety, from ultra-fast primes to long telephotos, all in smaller packages.
Notice the subtle bokeh and sharpness differences between the two - Canon’s APS-C sensor delivers a shallower depth of field on portrait work (left), while YI’s MFT sensor yields more expansive focus (right), beneficial for landscapes.
If you want lens versatility and access to one of the deepest mirrorless ecosystems that’s well supported by Panasonic, Olympus, and third-party brands like Sigma, the YI M1 is your clear pick.
Video Capabilities: Is 4K Becoming a Necessity?
Today, many photographers double as videographers or social-media content creators, so video specs are crucial to assess.
Canon M10 shoots Full HD 1080p up to 30fps. This is good for casual video but lacks the sharpness and flexibility serious videographers crave. The camera does not offer 4K recording, and audio input options are non-existent, limiting creative control.
YI M1 surprises here with 4K UHD video capture at 30fps and a respectable 75 Mbps bitrate. Although no microphone or headphone port is provided, the higher resolution and frame specs give YI an undeniable edge in video quality.
If video alongside stills is part of your plan, YI M1 is the smarter buy, full stop.
Battery Life and Storage: Can These Keep You Shooting?
Battery endurance impacts travel photography and day-long shoots.
Canon M10’s 255-shot per charge performance, rated by CIPA standards, is on the lower end, so carrying spares is advised. The camera runs on the LP-E12 battery pack, which is common in many Canon mirrorless models.
YI M1 stretches this to about 450 shots per charge - quite remarkable for the class. The larger capacity translates to fewer interruptions and less gear bulk.
Both cameras use a single SD/SDHC/SDXC slot, no dual storage redundancy here, so keep that in mind for professional reliability.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Ruggedness Factor
Neither camera sports official weather sealing, which limits use in harsh or wet environments. The Canon’s slightly more robust-feeling plastic body might survive drops and bumps a little better, but overall, you’ll want protective gear if you shoot outdoors aggressively. The YI M1’s lighter chassis is fine for casual use.
Connectivity and Features: Wireless Convenience
Both cameras incorporate built-in Wi-Fi for easy file transfer, but with nuances.
Canon M10 includes NFC, allowing quick pairing with compatible phones - a nice touch if you have NFC-enabled devices.
YI M1 counters with Bluetooth support, aiding sustained connections and reduced power consumption during transfers. However, it lacks NFC.
Neither camera supports GPS geotagging, which might be a downside for travel photographers tracking their shoots.
Putting It All Together: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Who Should Buy Which?
Canon EOS M10: The Comfortable, Entry-Level APS-C Option
Strengths:
- Larger APS-C sensor delivering better image quality and dynamic range than MFT
- Hybrid AF system with better tracking and face detection
- Classic control layout with tactile buttons and mode dial
- Tilting touchscreen with selfie capability
- Compact but ergonomic grip
Weaknesses:
- No 4K video support, limited video inputs
- Shorter battery life (255 shots)
- Smaller native lens selection (EF-M mount)
- No weather sealing
Who should buy?
If you want a capable entry-level camera that prioritizes still image quality, experience-friendly controls, and reliable autofocus for portraits, street, and casual wildlife photography, the Canon M10 fits well. It’s also better for users stepping up from compact cameras or first DSLRs who prefer familiar Canon ergonomics.
YI M1: The Feature-Forward, Versatile MFT Shooter
Strengths:
- 20MP Four Thirds sensor with extensive lens ecosystem
- 4K video recording at 30fps, higher bitrate video quality
- Longer battery life (450 shots)
- Slightly faster burst shooting (5 fps)
- Lightweight design geared for travel and video content creation
- Advanced bracketing and timelapse features
Weaknesses:
- Contrast-only autofocus lags in continuous AF and tracking
- Lack of built-in flash; external flash support only
- No tilting/selfie-friendly screen
- Minimal physical controls; heavy dependence on touchscreen
- No official weather sealing
Who should buy?
If video recording, lens versatility, and battery endurance top your priorities, or if you prefer a lighter camera with solid 4K output for hybrid shooting, then YI M1 is appealing. It suits travel photographers, vloggers, and enthusiasts exploring Micro Four Thirds lenses.
Real-World Discipline Spotlight: How They Stack Up Across Photography Genres
Since each photography genre stresses different capabilities, here’s a quick rundown based on my field tests:
Portrait: Canon M10 wins for natural skin tones and creamy bokeh, thanks to sensor size and AF reliability.
Landscape: Canon edges out with superior dynamic range, though YI benefits from a wider lens ecosystem including ultra-wide MFT lenses.
Wildlife: Canon’s better tracking AF and faster subject locking plus crop factor makes it more versatile here.
Sports: Marginally better burst handling and AF on Canon, but neither is ideal for pro sports shooters.
Street: YI’s discreet size and lighter weight appeal, but Canon’s tactile controls enable faster response.
Macro: Similar performance; depends more on lens choice.
Night/Astro: Canon’s lower-noise sensor delivers cleaner images at high ISO.
Video: YI M1, due to 4K capability and better frame rates.
Travel: YI’s extended battery life and lighter build edge out, despite fewer physical controls.
Professional Use: Neither camera is flagship-grade - Canon edges out for stills workflow and file formats.
Final Performance Scores: The Numbers Behind the Experience
Canon M10 showcases advantage in image quality and autofocus, YI M1 leads on video and battery.
Wrapping Up: Your Next Camera Depends on What You Value Most
I always say there’s no one-size-fits-all camera; your choice boils down to the kind of photography you pursue and how much you value portability versus control, stills versus video, and price versus ecosystem.
-
If you’re a stills-first shooter, want a user-friendly camera that feels familiar and delivers classic Canon quality, and don’t need 4K video, invest in the Canon EOS M10. It’s a sturdy entry point with an intuitive interface that will carry beginners and enthusiasts well into mid-level photography.
-
If you’re more video-oriented, crave a lightweight mirrorless with access to a massive range of lenses, and want the efficiency of longer battery life, the YI M1 is a smart choice that punches well above its price class.
Whichever camera you pick, bear in mind both reflect their 2015-2016 heritage. Since then, many mirrorless options have emerged with eye detection AF, in-body stabilization, and touchscreen improvements that eclipse both. But if budget or system investment matters, these remain worthy contenders.
I hope this detailed comparison helps you understand the strengths and quirks of the Canon M10 and YI M1. For my video review and sample galleries where you can scrutinize raw and JPEG outputs, be sure to check my full test suite archives.
Happy shooting - and may your next camera bring you many inspiring frames!
All specifications cited as per manufacturer data and hands-on testing conducted over multiple sessions in varied conditions.
Canon M10 vs YI M1 Specifications
| Canon EOS M10 | YI M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | YI |
| Model | Canon EOS M10 | YI M1 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2015-10-12 | 2016-09-19 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 6 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5184 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 49 | 81 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Canon EF-M | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 23 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.6 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Red-Eye Slow |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 75 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 301g (0.66 lb) | 350g (0.77 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 114 x 64 x 34mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 65 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.0 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 753 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 255 shots | 450 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LP-E12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $599 | $320 |