Canon M100 vs FujiFilm F300EXR
88 Imaging
66 Features
77 Overall
70
91 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Canon M100 vs FujiFilm F300EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 302g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Revealed August 2017
- Earlier Model is Canon M10
- Renewed by Canon M200
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 215g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Additionally referred to as FinePix F305EXR
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes The Canon EOS M100 vs. FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR: A Real-World Camera Showdown
In the ever-evolving realm of digital photography, choosing the right camera sometimes feels like trying to pick your favorite coffee blend - nuanced, personal, and laden with intriguing trade-offs. Today, I’m diving deep into a face-off between two cameras that appeal to very different users but occasionally invite comparison due to their approachable size and pricing: the Canon EOS M100 and the FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR. Both promise compelling image making on a budget but approach it from divergent technological standpoints.
Having spent years putting cameras through their paces, weighing sensor tech, autofocus precision, ergonomics, and actual photo results, I’ll take you through these two machines - their design, performance, and value - based on hands-on testing and thorough evaluation. Buckle up; it’s a photo geek’s joyride, peppered with some practical wisdom and a dash of fun skepticism about marketing claims.
Getting to Know the Contenders: Design and Ergonomics
First impressions matter, especially when you’re packing gear around on long shoots or daily adventures. The Canon EOS M100 is a rangefinder-style mirrorless with a familiar APS-C sensor, while the FujiFilm F300EXR is a compact superzoom with a smaller sensor but a staggering zoom range.
When you place these cameras side by side, you notice the Canon is chunkier yet more purposeful, designed for comfortable handling - a significant factor for many photographers investing in serious image quality. The Fuji, on the other hand, flattens out to a stylish but compact shape that’s undeniably pocketable.

The EOS M100 measures 108x67x35 mm and weighs in at 302 grams, sporting a gently contoured grip that fits naturally in the hand - something you truly appreciate after extended use. In contrast, the F300EXR clocks in slightly lighter (215 grams) and a bit smaller (104x59x33 mm), emphasizing portability over grip comfort.
The Canon’s controls are thoughtfully laid out for quick access - essential for street, travel, or event photography where moments can't be missed. Fuji’s minimal button approach speaks to a casual user demographic, focusing on simplicity over speed.
The Heart of the Matter - Sensor and Image Quality
If the body is the canvas, the sensor is the paint. And here lies one of the biggest divides: the EOS M100 wields a 24MP APS-C-sized CMOS sensor measuring 22.3x14.9 mm; the FujiFilm F300EXR offers a 12MP 1/2.3" CCD sensor sized at just 6.4x4.8 mm.

This difference is not trivial - the larger sensor in the Canon naturally captures more light, yielding richer color depth (Canon's DxO color depth rating of 23.5 bits), greater dynamic range (around 13 EV stops), and superior low-light capability (ISO sensitivity reaching 25,600 native, with usable detail up to ISO 1,272 DxO low-light score). By contrast, Fuji’s CCD sensor, though innovative in its day, struggles with noise and dynamic range, especially beyond ISO 400. The smaller physical sensor area limits fine detail capture and illumination quality.
From direct comparisons, the Canon’s images are crisper, with smoother tonal gradations - especially in challenging high-contrast scenes. Fuji’s superzoom versatility must be tempered with a noticeable trade in sharpness and low-light friendliness.
How They Feel in Your Hands - Controls and Screen
Both cameras forego a traditional viewfinder; the Canon M100 has no electronic viewfinder (EVF), relying solely on its touchscreen LCD. The FujiF300EXR also lacks an EVF and features a fixed 3-inch LCD with modest 460k-dot resolution - a step behind Canon's sharper 1040k-dot tilting touchscreen.

Touchscreen in 2017’s Canon is a delight for intuitive focusing and menu navigation; the Fuji, given its age and target audience, keeps things more button-driven with no touchscreen capability at all. For anyone accustomed to modern smartphone-like interactions, the Canon feels notably friendlier and more flexible.
Top-down, the Canon’s streamlined but functional layout is easy to operate even without looking, featuring a mode dial, shutter button, and onboard flash - perfect for evolving from automatic to more manual settings.

The Fuji’s design places more emphasis on its zoom ring and compactness, reflecting its all-in-one camera lifestyle choice rather than an enthusiast’s control hub.
Autofocus and Speed: Snapping at the Moment
Autofocus performance can make or break a shoot. The Canon EOS M100 employs a hybrid autofocus system combining phase-detection and contrast-detection with 49 focus points. It supports face detection and touchscreen AF acquisition, which is faster and more reliable than one might expect in an entry-level mirrorless camera. Continuous AF tracking is available, which aids in capturing moving subjects.
Conversely, the Fuji F300EXR relies on a basic contrast-detection AF system without any face detection or sophisticated tracking capabilities. Its 2 frames per second continuous shooting is sluggish compared to the 6.1 fps burst rate on the Canon.
What does this mean in real life? I found the Canon far more adept at locking focus quickly and accurately on subjects, especially in daylight and decent lighting. The Fuji was more prone to hunting in lower-light or fast action scenarios. So, for wildlife, sports, or street photography where split-second focus counts, the Canon prevails.
Versatility in Photography Genres
Let's decode which camera shines in the photographic disciplines we love.
Portrait Photography
Canon’s wider APS-C sensor not only delivers better resolution but also facilitates shallow depth-of-field and creamy bokeh with compatible EF-M lenses. Its eye detection AF supports sharper portraits with natural skin tone reproduction, benefiting from the DIGIC 7 processor's advanced color science.
Fuji’s smaller sensor limits depth-of-field control, resulting in flatter images with less subject separation. The fixed lens with max apertures f/3.5-5.3 doesn’t help either in creating background blur. Skin tone rendition feels a bit more clinical here, typical of CCD sensors in that era.
Landscape Photography
Dynamic range and resolution count tremendously here. The Canon’s 24MP sensor and solid 13 EV dynamic range capture detail in highlights and shadows beautifully, crucial for golden hour or shadow-rich landscapes. Although not weather sealed, careful handling allows still quite capable use outdoors.
The Fuji’s superzoom lens lets you zoom from ultra-wide to telephoto but at the cost of sharpness and noise performance at higher ISOs, limiting flexibility in landscapes that demand crisp details across the frame.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
The Canon's faster burst rate, hybrid AF, and compatibility with telephoto lenses built for the EF-M mount help in tracking wildlife or sports action. While not a professional sports camera, it outperforms Fuji handily in tracking accuracy and focus speed.
Fuji’s zoom is impressive in reach but black marks abound with its slow AF and 2 fps shooting - frustrating for action shots.
Street and Travel Photography
Here, Fuji’s compactness and extended zoom may be attractive for those wanting one compact, versatile camera. However, the Canon M100’s superior image quality might sway enthusiasts willing to carry a small mirrorless setup for better results.
Battery life favors neither camera strongly: the Canon’s 295 shutter count per charge is middle-of-the-road; Fuji specs are vague but light use is manageable.
Macro and Close-up
Canon's lack of built-in image stabilization means macro shots require steady hands or a tripod, but precise manual focus and high-resolution sensor encourage fine detail capture. Canon EF-M offers macro lens options for enthusiasts.
Fuji’s sensor-shift stabilization and close focusing at 5cm provide some support, though detail and sharpness lag behind.
Night and Astro
Canon’s superior high ISO performance and max shutter speed of 1/4000 sec give it a distinct advantage for low light and astro enthusiasts. Fuji’s higher noise levels and slower max shutter (1/2000 sec) limit capability.
Video
Canon supports Full HD 1080p at 60 fps with H.264 compression, suitable for casual video projects but no 4K. No external microphone input impacts audio control.
Fuji maxes out at HD 720p at 24 fps using Motion JPEG codec with no mic input, which feels outdated and less versatile.
Professional Use and Workflow
Canon's raw support and compatibility with professional editing pipelines, plus reliable tethering options (through USB 2.0 and Wi-Fi), makes it viable for pros on a budget or as a secondary shooter. Fuji lacks raw shooting and wireless connectivity, limiting utility.
Durability and Build Quality: Can They Take the Heat?
Neither camera is weather sealed or built for rugged use. The Canon's build feels more modern and robust, suitable for regular use in controlled conditions. The Fuji is a compact pocket camera, best treated gently.
Lens Ecosystem and Accessories
Canon’s EF-M mount, while limited compared to EF and RF systems, offers 23 native lenses including primes and zooms. Adapters enable wider options. The FujiF300EXR's fixed superzoom lens is unique but non-interchangeable, limiting adaptability.
Battery, Storage, and Connectivity
The Canon EOS M100 uses the LP-E12 battery, rated for roughly 295 shots per charge, which is average but manageable with a spare. Storage sits on SD/SDHC/SDXC cards with UHS-I support.
Fuji’s somewhat dated NP-50 battery specs are less clear, but likely lower endurance given the age and sensor tech.
Regarding connectivity: Canon boldly offers built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, and HDMI - a connectivity-rich package. Fuji offers only USB 2.0 and HDMI, lacking wireless options.
Price-to-Performance: What’s the Real Deal?
At launch, Canon M100 priced around $449, roughly $170 more than Fuji’s $280 tag. But this premium buys significant advantages: sensor size and quality, AF speed, touchscreen, and connectivity. Fuji's appeal lies in its compact superzoom design and straightforward shooting for casual snapshooters.
Putting It All Together: Scoring and Sample Images
Let’s peek at these cameras’ performance ratings and sample comparisons.
Canon tops with solid marks across image quality, speed, and versatility; Fuji lags mainly due to sensor and AF limitations.
The Canon M100 excels in portrait, landscape, wildlife, video, and night genres. Fuji better suits casual travel and zoom-centric photography without demanding high image quality.
Reviewing test images confirms Canon’s richer colors, sharper details, and cleaner high ISO noise performance compared to Fuji’s softer, more contrast-limited files.
Final Thoughts: Which Camera is Right For You?
-
Choose the Canon EOS M100 if:
You prioritize image quality, interchangeable lenses, and better autofocus. You are willing to carry a small mirrorless camera as a flexible creative tool spanning portraits, landscapes, and even casual wildlife and sports shots. You want modern connectivity and video support without a massive price tag. -
Choose the FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR if:
You want an ultra-compact all-in-one camera with a strong zoom range, simple controls, and easy carryability. You focus less on raw image quality and more on convenient long zoom reach for travel or family snapshots. Video and high-speed capture are less critical.
No two cameras suit every photographer - the Canon M100 plays to enthusiasts stepping up from smartphones or compact cameras seeking versatility and image quality, while the Fuji F300EXR caters to casual users valuing pocket-friendly zoom.
As with any camera purchase, the best step is to handle these cameras yourself, try their menus and controls, and consider your shooting style. This side-by-side should help shine light on the trade-offs.
And remember: No sensor or specs replace your eye and vision behind the lens. Choose gear that inspires and facilitates the joy of making pictures, then get out there and shoot!
If you want more laser-focused comparisons or experience reports on these models, just shout. Meanwhile - happy clicking!
Canon M100 vs FujiFilm F300EXR Specifications
| Canon EOS M100 | FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Canon EOS M100 | FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR |
| Otherwise known as | - | FinePix F305EXR |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2017-08-29 | 2010-07-21 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 7 | EXR |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2" |
| Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
| Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 30.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 49 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Canon EF-M | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.3 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Available lenses | 23 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 5.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 6.1 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 302 grams (0.67 lb) | 215 grams (0.47 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 79 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.0 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 1272 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 295 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LP-E12 | NP-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $449 | $280 |