Canon EOS M200 vs Canon EOS M6: An In-Depth Mirrorless Battle for Enthusiasts

When Canon’s mirrorless lineup is on the table, discerning photographers seeking a compact, capable camera often find themselves choosing between models like the Canon EOS M200 and Canon EOS M6. Both share the EF-M mount system, APS-C sensors, and Canon’s familiar design language. Yet, they target quite distinct users: the M200 leans towards beginners and content creators looking for simplicity and value, while the M6 courts advanced amateurs craving speed, manual control, and a more versatile interface.

Having spent weeks shooting with both cameras across genres - from studio portraits and urban street scenes to wild landscapes and a few fast-paced sports meets - I can share insights only possible through hands-on, methodical testing. This comparison will walk through their design, imaging technology, autofocusing, and real-world usability to help you decide which Canon mirrorless fits your needs best.

Let’s dive in.

First Impressions: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics

Handling is the first sensory clue when comparing cameras, especially in mirrorless systems where body size varies widely.

At 299 grams and measuring 108 x 67 x 35mm, the Canon M200 is delightfully petite - almost pocket-friendly. It’s designed for portability above all, which echoes in its minimalistic button layout and lack of an electronic viewfinder. The build feels lightweight and plastic, but reassuringly solid enough for cautious everyday use. It’s a great grab-and-go option for travelers or vloggers alternating between stills and video.

The Canon M6, by comparison, tips the scales at 390 grams, with dimensions 112 x 68 x 45mm - noticeably chunkier due to a deeper grip and a more complex control interface. You immediately feel more confidence in its tactile heft. The grip is ergonomic, enabling longer handheld shoots without fatigue. This model includes an optional electronic viewfinder (sold separately), which many photographers find essential for composing in bright daylight or fast situations.

Looking at the top plate, the M6 sports a traditional mode dial, dedicated exposure compensation dial, and a hot shoe for external flashes - all features omitted or pared down on the M200. The M200 concentrates on touchscreen navigation and a streamlined rear layout, targeting those who prefer tapping through menus to fiddly buttons.

Bottom line on handling: If you prize compactness and selfie-friendly designs, the M200’s sleek profile wins. But for enthusiasts craving physical controls and a more substantial grip, the M6 feels like a proper photographic tool.

Sensor and Image Quality: Same Sensor, Different Processors

Both cameras utilize Canon’s 24MP APS-C CMOS sensor measuring 22.3 x 14.9 mm, delivering roughly 332 square millimeters of imaging area.

From a purely technical perspective, the sensors here are practically twins - identical pixel count, dimension, and Bayer filter array, complete with an antialiasing filter. This means you can expect similarly sharp images, good overall resolution, and color rendition characteristic of Canon’s color science.

The key difference is the image processor: the M200 features the newer DIGIC 8 chip, while the M6 runs on DIGIC 7. This upgrade in the M200 contributes to modest improvements in noise management and video encoding, illustrated by smoother high ISO performance when shooting in challenging light. Though not a seismic shift, the DIGIC 8 processor's enhanced noise reduction algorithms and faster processing pipeline can make a subtle difference, especially in video.

The M6’s slightly older DIGIC 7 still delivers a robust image quality baseline, benefiting from solid dynamic range (DXOMark rates it at a respectable 12.6 EV), and color depth. However, it tops out at 1080p video unlike the M200, which provides UHD 4K recording (albeit without crop) for more flexible video work.

If you prioritize ultimate image quality over specs on paper, these two share the same core sensor strengths. But for videographers or photographers who need 4K capture and quicker burst processing, the M200 edges forward in this technical battle.

Autofocus Systems: Speed vs. Coverage

Autofocus makes or breaks the experience when shooting anything beyond static subjects.

The Canon M200 offers an impressive 143 autofocus points using dual pixel hybrid AF - combining phase detection and contrast detection on sensor pixels. This wide spread of focus points allows for flexible composition and tracking of subjects across most of the frame.

The M6 settles for 49 hybrid AF points, fewer in number and area coverage, which may feel somewhat restrictive relative to the M200's system. Both cameras utilize face detection and touch tracking effectively. Neither offers the more modern animal eye AF found in Canon's newer models, which is worth noting for wildlife shooters.

Despite the disparity in focus points, the M6's autofocus system is considered snappier in continuous AF mode, benefiting from its slightly faster DIGIC 7 processor and optimized firmware. It can manage up to 9 frames per second continuous shooting, compared to the M200’s 6.1 fps, giving the M6 a clear advantage in tracking fast-moving subjects like sports or wildlife.

Here’s a quick summary:

• Canon M200: 143 focus points, excellent face detection, decent continuous AF, excellent for portraits, street photography, and casual wildlife.
• Canon M6: 49 focus points, faster continuous AF and frame rates, better for action, sports, and wildlife photography.

Long story short: If you often photograph moving subjects, the M6 offers more confident tracking and speed. For portrait or general photography where AF coverage is more important than raw speed, the M200’s broader AF spread is compelling.

User Interface & Screen: Touch and Tilt Showdown

Both cameras feature 3-inch 1040k-dot tilting touchscreens with similar resolution.

The M200’s screen tilts upward nearly 180 degrees, ideal for selfies and vlogging. It feels intuitive to navigate menus with the touchscreen, and the interface is simplified for beginners. However, the lack of any physical dials on the body means exposure controls primarily happen via on-screen adjustments - somewhat limiting for fast manual operation.

The M6’s screen tilts in a more traditional fashion, roughly 180 degrees for selfies, but as noted earlier, it can be paired with an electronic viewfinder for more conventional eye-level composing. Importantly, its firmware offers more detailed manual control via dedicated physical dials alongside touchscreen input, which is a usability boon for professionals or serious hobbyists juggling aperture priority or full manual modes.

For photographers who value direct tactile dials, the M6 slightly outperforms the M200 despite similar screen specs.

Imaging Versatility: Portraits to Landscapes and Beyond

Let’s explore how these two Canon mirrorless cameras perform across key photography genres.

Portrait Photography

Portraits require accurate skin tones, eye detection AF, and pleasing bokeh in background blur.

• Canon M200: With its 143 AF points and advanced face and eye detection, the M200 can lock focus crisply on subjects’ eyes even in complex lighting. The DIGIC 8 processor’s improved image processing helps render skin tones naturally, preserving warmth without oversaturation. The lack of an electronic viewfinder isn’t too much of a hinderance in portraits, as you’re mostly working in live view. The M200 works well paired with the Canon EF-M 32mm f/1.4 STM lens or the EF-M 22mm f/2 pancake for creamy bokeh.

• Canon M6: While the autofocus coverage isn’t as broad, the M6 still offers solid face detection and image quality. The physical controls help with manual aperture adjustments on the fly, which veteran portraitists might prefer. Without native eye AF, manual focus checking can be done via the optional EVF magnification.

This one is a toss-up, but I lean towards the M200 for portraits if ease and AF coverage matter most, and the M6 for those who rely on physical control dials and an optional EVF.

Landscape Photography

Resolution and dynamic range are crucial here, alongside weather sealing and tripod friendliness.

Both cameras have the same 24MP APS-C sensor, delivering ample resolution for typical prints and cropping. Canon’s sensor performs well in preserving highlight details, but dynamic range isn’t as impressive as some Sony APS-C sensors.

Neither camera offers weather sealing or rugged build, so care is needed shooting in harsh conditions.

The M6’s more substantial body feels easier to steady on a tripod, but the M200’s smaller size is nothing if not convenient for on-location travel.

In landscape, differences are minimal - so lens choice and support gear matter more. Both cameras shoot in RAW for post-processing latitude.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

Speed and autofocus tracking come to the forefront.

The M6’s 9fps burst rate combined with faster autofocus makes a clear case for action shooters. It tracks moving subjects better despite fewer AF points. The M200’s slower 6.1 fps and broad but slightly less responsive AF points means it handles wildlife and sports reasonably but won’t keep pace with more advanced cameras.

Also, the M6 has a dedicated hot shoe for external flashes useful in wildlife hide setups, while the M200 does not.

Street Photography

Stealth, discretion, and quick responsiveness win here.

The M200’s petite size and light weight make it less conspicuous, perfect for candid shots. Its silent electronic shutter helps avoid drawing attention.

The M6 is bulkier but still compact relative to DSLRs. Both offer fully silent shutter modes though the M200’s newer firmware provides a slightly quieter experience.

Macro Photography

Neither body offers in-body stabilization, but both can pair with Canon’s EF-M macro lenses.

Focus stacking is unavailable and neither supports focus bracketing or post-focus features. Manual focus precision is aided on the M6 by the EVF and physical controls.

For handheld macro, the M6’s weight adds steadiness; the M200’s lighter frame helps in tight spots.

Night and Astro Photography

High ISO performance and long exposures matter.

Both cameras can shoot full manual with bulb mode up to 30 seconds max shutter speed.

The M200’s DIGIC 8 processing offers marginally cleaner images at high ISO 3200-6400, useful for low light or star photography.

Neither camera excels in astro-specific features or long exposure noise reduction beyond standard modes, so external intervalometers and post-processing remain essential.

Video Capabilities: 4K vs Full HD

Video is an increasingly important feature for hybrid shooters.

The Canon M200 supports UHD 4K (3840x2160) at 24 fps with a 120 Mbps bitrate - clear advantage here. However, it lacks full-time autofocus during video in 4K and has no microphone or headphone jacks, limiting sound control.

The M6 is stuck on 1080p 60 fps video but impresses with an input mic port for external audio, a useful feature missing on the M200. It also offers some exposure bracketing features aiding creative timelapses.

Neither camera provides in-body image stabilization, so lens IS or gimbals are needed for smooth handheld video.

For video creators prioritizing 4K recording in a small package, the M200 leads. But for well-audio-integrated Full HD workflow, the M6 is preferable.

Build Quality and Durability: What You Can Expect

Neither camera offers weather sealing or toughened construction, so both require protection in adverse environments.

The M6’s heavier, more robust-feeling chassis and deeper grip lend a perception of sturdiness. In daily use, it's less prone to accidental slipping.

The M200’s compactness comes at the cost of feeling more plasticky, though it remains solid enough for casual use.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: Shared, but With Considerations

Both the M200 and M6 use Canon’s EF-M mount, compatible with the same 23 native lenses ranging from ultra-wide to telephoto primes and zooms.

Adapters allow use of Canon’s extensive EF and EF-S DSLR lenses with some compromises in autofocus speed.

Here’s a common limitation: None of the cameras features in-body image stabilization (IBIS), so optical IS lenses or gimbals are essential for stabilization.

I recommend investing in prime lenses like the EF-M 22mm f/2 and EF-M 32mm f/1.4 for portraits and everyday use, or the EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 STM lens for wildlife and sports.

Power, Storage, and Connectivity

Both use single battery slots with Canon’s LP-E12 battery pack for the M200 (model lacking for M6 but generally similar). Battery life is middling - around 300 shots per charge - requiring spare batteries for extended shooting.

Storage is via SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, UHS-I compatible, typical for this class.

Connectivity includes built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth on both, enabling remote control and file transfer via Canon’s Camera Connect app. The M6 adds NFC for quicker pairing.

Both have USB 2.0 ports and micro-HDMI outputs for tethering or external monitors.

Putting It All Together: Performance Scores and Genre Analysis

Canon M200 front Canon M200 screen back Canon M6 front Canon M6 screen back

The M6 receives slightly higher overall performance ratings due to faster burst speeds, physical controls, and better autofocus responsiveness - features favoring action and professional workflows.

The M200 scores favorably in user-friendliness, image quality enhancements via DIGIC 8, and versatility in video thanks to 4K capture.

Who Should Pick Which Camera?

Canon EOS M200 is Best For:

• Beginners and casual photographers who want an affordable, compact camera with great autofocus coverage.
• Travel and street photographers craving portability and discreet shooting.
• Content creators and vloggers benefiting from 4K video and flip-up touchscreen.
• Portrait and landscape shooters who prefer touchscreen control and simplified operation over physical dials.
• Budget-conscious buyers seeking strong value.

Canon EOS M6 suits:

• Enthusiasts wanting a more “camera-like” experience with physical dials and optional EVF.
• Sports and wildlife photographers who prioritize burst speed and AF tracking.
• Video shooters needing external microphone input for better audio quality at 1080p.
• Those ready to trade size and portability for nuanced control and faster responsiveness.

Final Thoughts: A Matter of Priorities and Personal Taste

Between the Canon EOS M200 and M6, neither is a clear-cut winner - rather, they offer different strengths tailored to different users.

My personal preference leans to the M6 when shooting dynamic subjects, thanks to its responsive handling and faster continuous shooting, despite the trade-off of heavier weight and no 4K.

But if I’m traveling light or making quick portraits/video, I reach for the M200’s compactness, superior AF coverage, and UHD video option.

Both cameras demonstrate Canon’s skill in delivering APS-C mirrorless solutions catering to varied needs - and you really can’t go wrong picking either model if their feature sets align with your style.

If you’d like, check out my detailed hands-on video reviews linked above for further visual comparisons and live shooting tests.

Happy shooting - the best camera is always the one you have with you!

Related Gear Recommendations (EF-M Lenses to Match)

• EF-M 22mm f/2 STM - great everyday, street, and macro-ish shots
• EF-M 32mm f/1.4 STM - top choice for portraits with lovely bokeh
• EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 STM - solid telephoto reach for wildlife
• Canon Speedlite 270EX II - compact flash option (M6 only)

This comparison has been tailored to deliver an honest, thorough perspective rooted in hands-on experience and technical expertise. For photographers diving into Canon’s mirrorless world, understanding these nuances proves invaluable in choosing a camera that truly supports your creative vision.