Clicky

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL3

Portability
88
Imaging
69
Features
80
Overall
73
Canon EOS M200 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL3 front
Portability
88
Imaging
48
Features
52
Overall
49

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL3 Key Specs

Canon M200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Canon EF-M Mount
  • 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
  • Revealed September 2019
  • Previous Model is Canon M100
Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
  • Introduced September 2011
  • Superseded the Olympus E-PL2
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL3 Overview

Lets look a bit more in depth at the Canon M200 and Olympus E-PL3, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and E-PL3 (12MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and E-PL3 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The M200 was announced 8 years after the E-PL3 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the M200 matches up versus the E-PL3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Olympus E-PL3

 M200 E-PL3 
IntroducedSeptember 2019September 2011More modern by 98 months
Screen resolution1040k460kCrisper screen (+580k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Canon M200

 E-PL3 M200 

Common features in the Canon M200 and Olympus E-PL3

 M200 E-PL3 
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen sizing

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL3 Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon M200 features external dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL3 has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs).

Compare the Canon M200 and Olympus E-PL3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the M200 and the E-PL3.

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL3 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M200 and E-PL3 is 88 and 88 respectively.

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL3 top view buttons comparison

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL3 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes merely by researching specs. The picture underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M200 and E-PL3.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M200 using its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Canon M200 will provide you with extra detail with its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more recent M200 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL3 sensor size comparison

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon M200 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-PL3 as a Portrait photography camera
74
has manual focus
megapixel count good (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
offers face detection focusing
exports RAW files
no external flash support
60
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon M200
Street photography with Olympus E-PL3
82
has a tilting screen
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
offers touch focus
very good ISO range (25,600)
no image stabilization
84
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Canon M200 Sports photography highlights
Olympus E-PL3 Sports photography highlights
74
megapixel count good (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
offers tracking autofocus
sensor has phase detect AF
no image stabilization
45
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
max fps very slow (6.0 fps)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
bad battery life (300 shots)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon M200
Travel photography with Olympus E-PL3
89
has bluetooth
offers touch focus
megapixel count good (24MP)
flash built-in
selfie friendly display
44
missing Timelapse recording
bad battery life (300 shots)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Canon M200 Landscape photography details
Olympus E-PL3 Landscape photography details
80
has manual focus
switch lenses (Canon EF-M mount)
screen size is good (3")
megapixel count good (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
very good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
no image stabilization
61
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
low resolution sensor (12MP)
bad battery life (300 shots)
missing Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M200 Vlogging info
Olympus E-PL3 Vlogging info
75
selfie friendly display
touchscreen capability
offers face detection focusing
video res high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
no image stabilization
doesn't have external mic port
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
missing microphone port
Photography Glossary

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon M200 and Olympus E-PL3
 Canon EOS M200Olympus PEN E-PL3
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Olympus
Model Canon EOS M200 Olympus PEN E-PL3
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2019-09-25 2011-09-20
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip DIGIC 8 Truepic VI
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 22.3 x 14.9mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 332.3mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 6000 x 4000 4032 x 3024
Highest native ISO 25600 12800
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 143 35
Lens
Lens mount Canon EF-M Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 23 107
Focal length multiplier 1.6 2.1
Screen
Screen type Tilting Tilting
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,040 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech - HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 6.1fps 6.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 AVCHD, Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 299 grams (0.66 lbs) 313 grams (0.69 lbs)
Physical dimensions 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 52
DXO Color Depth score not tested 20.9
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.3
DXO Low light score not tested 499
Other
Battery life 315 photographs 300 photographs
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LP-E12 BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $549 $399