Olympus E-620 vs Sony H90
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
91 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
Olympus E-620 vs Sony H90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 222g - 105 x 60 x 34mm
- Revealed February 2012
Olympus E-620 vs Sony H90 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-620 and Sony H90, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and H90 (16MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and H90 (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-620 was announced 3 years prior to the H90 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony H90 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-620 grades against the H90 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony H90 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-620 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Sony H90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony H90
E-620 | H90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony H90 over the Olympus E-620
H90 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | July 2009 | More recent by 32 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony H90
E-620 | H90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Sony H90 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-620 has outer dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Sony H90 has proportions of 105mm x 60mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-620 and Sony H90 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-620 and the H90.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and H90 is 71 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony H90 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements simply by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph here may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-620 and H90.
Clearly, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-620 using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Sony H90 will provide you with greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older E-620 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony H90 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Sony H90 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-07-06 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 461k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD | ClearPhoto TFT LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 3.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500 gr (1.10 lbs) | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 105 x 60 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | 290 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $799 | $230 |