Canon EOS R vs Canon EOS R5: A Hands-On Expert Comparison for Serious Photographers

When Canon launched the EOS R back in 2018, it marked a bold step for the brand’s mirrorless ambitions - introducing the innovative RF mount, a brand-new body design, and enticing specs for professionals and advanced enthusiasts alike. Fast forward to 2020, and Canon upped the ante with the EOS R5, pushing boundaries in resolution, burst rate, and video capabilities.

As someone who has spent thousands of hours testing Canon gear in studios, outdoor shoots, wildlife hideouts, and concert halls, I wanted to put these two pro mirrorless cameras head-to-head. In this detailed comparison, I am diving deep into how the original EOS R holds up against Canon’s powerhouse R5 - looking beyond just specs and into real-world performance attributes that matter.

Whether you’re a portrait artist, landscape adventurer, sports shooter, or budding cinematographer, this guide will help you decide which Canon mirrorless body truly fits your needs and budget.

The Body and Handling: Size, Ergonomics, and User Interface

First impressions count, right? Both cameras share the classic SLR-style mirrorless shape Canon favors, but there are subtle yet meaningful differences.

Canon EOS R is compact and relatively light at 660g, making it a friendly companion for extended handheld shooting sessions and travel. Its grip is comfortable but a bit shallower compared to the R5. The camera measures roughly 136mm wide, 98mm tall, and 84mm deep.

In contrast, the Canon EOS R5 steps up the game with a more robust construction and a beefier grip, weighing 738g and measuring 138x98x88mm. The extra heft hints at better weather-sealing and durability - something I noticed firsthand during an early-season rainstorm shoot. Handling felt more confidence-inspiring.

Both cameras feature fully articulated 3.2-inch touchscreens with identical resolution (2100k dots) and intuitive multi-touch gestures. The top control panel of the R5 introduces additional custom buttons, while the EOS R remains simpler, favoring straightforward operation but at a slight cost to customization.

Notably, the R5’s electronic viewfinder has a higher resolution (5760k dots) than the EOS R’s 3690k dots, delivering a crisper, lag-free preview critical for tracking fast action or manual focusing.

User interface and menu navigation are familiar across the two models, but the R5’s processing power allows smoother transitions and quicker response times. This matters during rapid burst shooting or when reviewing large RAW files.

Verdict: If portability and lightweight design top your priority list, the original EOS R is still very manageable. But if you want pro-level handling, premium build, and more controls at your fingertips - the R5 locks in the win.

Sensor and Image Quality: Megapixels, Dynamic Range, and Low Light

Here’s where these two cameras really diverge – their sensors shape your final image quality and printing possibilities.

The EOS R packs a 30.3MP full-frame CMOS sensor with an optical low-pass (anti-alias) filter. It’s paired with Canon’s seasoned imaging pipeline, producing very pleasing JPGs straight out of camera and capable RAW files. The dynamic range clocks in at an impressive 13.5 stops (DxOMark), which holds well even at higher ISOs.

Now, the EOS R5 houses a newer 45MP full-frame sensor, also with an anti-aliasing filter (unlike many rivals going filterless for extra sharpness). The breakthrough here is the substantial resolution gain and improved high-ISO sensitivity (native up to 51200 ISO, boosted to 102400). Canon’s DIGIC X processor makes a measurable difference in noise reduction and detail retention.

Note: The R5 pushes max shutter speed up to 1/8000s in both mechanical and electronic shutter modes, whereas the R caps at 1/8000s mechanical only.

I’ve tested both in studio portraits and outdoor landscapes, and while the EOS R handles skin tones admirably with smooth gradations, the EOS R5’s extra pixels make it a fantastic choice for large prints or demanding landscape work where you can push fine detail and cropping flexibility.

Pros of EOS R sensor:

• Great for generalist shooters
• More gentle price point
• Reliable color reproduction and dynamic range

Pros of EOS R5 sensor:

• Higher resolution for detailed output
• Superior low-light and high-ISO performance
• Future-proof for large-format printing and cropping

Autofocus: Precision, Speed, and Subject Tracking

Autofocus performance can make or break your photography experience.

The EOS R introduced a 5655-point Dual Pixel CMOS AF system with excellent accuracy for general use. It supports eye detection AF for humans and offers face detection, multi-area, and touch tracking. However, it lacks dedicated animal eye detection - something wildlife and pet photographers will notice.

On the other hand, the EOS R5 incorporates a more advanced Dual Pixel CMOS AF II system, boasting 1053 selectable AF points and including Canon’s much-celebrated animal eye AF. This comes in handy when shooting wildlife or even your hyperactive pup. The increased AF points provide more granular control and coverage, beneficial for sports and action shooting.

Continuous autofocus during burst shooting is smooth in both models, but the R5’s higher frame rate (up to 12fps mechanical vs 8fps mechanical for the R) and improved tracking algorithms allow you to capture more critical moments with better accuracy.

My real-world testing notes:

• Portraits benefit enormously from the R5’s eye AF extension to animals.
• In wildlife scenarios, the R5 kept critters sharp and focused amid movement and foliage.
• For street and casual photography, the EOS R AF system works fine, but it’s a bit slower locking focus in dimmer light or challenging contrast situations.

Recommended for AF critical shooters: EOS R5

Burst Rate and Buffering for Action and Sports Shooting

If you’re chasing sports or wildlife, frame rate is key.

• Canon EOS R shoots up to 8 frames per second with autofocus locked between shots.
• Canon EOS R5 increases this to 12 frames per second mechanically, going even faster (up to 20fps) with an electronic shutter.

The R5 also sports dual memory card slots (CFexpress + UHS-II SD), which aids in faster image dumping and avoids buffering delays during high-speed bursts. By contrast, the EOS R has a single SD slot, which can slow workflow during hefty shoots.

In my field tests tracking basketball, soccer, and bird flights, the R5 never missed a beat, maintaining responsiveness where the EOS R occasionally lagged behind during longer bursts, especially when shooting RAW.

Video Capabilities: 4K, 8K, and Beyond

Canon built the R5 as a hybrid powerhouse with videographers in mind.

The EOS R offers solid UHD 4K video at 30p with H.264 codec, geared towards enthusiasts wanting basic 4K capabilities. Its video bitrate caps at 480 Mbps, which is respectable but not groundbreaking.

The EOS R5 shines with its 8K RAW video capture at up to 30p, 4K up to 120fps (ideal for slo-mo), and support for H.265 alongside H.264. It also adds 5-axis in-body image stabilization (IBIS) to smooth handheld footage, something missing from the EOS R.

If you’re a video content creator or hybrid shooter, the R5’s capabilities deliver professional-grade video quality and flexibility unmatched by the original R. Plus, handy features like headphone sockets and compatibility with external mics round out the package.

Downside: Even the R5 suffers from overheating during extended 8K recording, so pro videographers should plan accordingly or use external recording solutions.

Build Quality and Weather Sealing

Both cameras feature robust build quality with environmental seals protecting against dust and moisture, but neither is fully waterproof or shockproof.

The EOS R5’s body feels slightly more rugged and resistant, consistent with Canon’s progression in professional-grade bodies. I’ve shot both in dusty desert conditions and damp forest trails, and every time, the R5 inspired added confidence that no dirt or rain would halt my workflow.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility

Both cameras mount Canon’s RF lenses. As of now, Canon offers 17 native RF lenses covering a comprehensive focal range from ultra-wide to super-telephoto, including macro and tilt-shift options.

If you have EF lenses, the Canon Mount Adapter II allows full compatibility with both models, retaining autofocus and image stabilization features.

Given the investment in RF glass, both bodies give you access to Canon’s rapidly expanding, world-class lenses. The choice between bodies should weigh more heavily on your sensor and feature needs than lens compatibility.

Battery Life and Storage: What Keeps You Shooting Longer?

Battery life is often a dealbreaker, especially for travel or day-long shoots.

• The Canon EOS R offers about 370 shots per charge using the LP-E6N battery.
• The Canon EOS R5 is rated slightly lower at 320 shots despite using the newer LP-E6NH battery.

Real-world usage aligns with these figures when shooting briskly, especially with the electronic viewfinder active. Heavy video recording on the R5 further drains battery rapidly.

The R5’s dual card slots (one CFexpress and one SD UHS-II) provide flexibility and speed but also add complexity and cost when stocking media. The EOS R’s single UHS-II SD slot means packing appropriately sized cards to avoid delays.

Connectivity: Wireless Features and Ports

Wireless connectivity is built-in for both cameras, including Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, facilitating remote control and transferring images to smart devices or computers.

Both feature HDMI out, microphone, and headphone ports, although the EOS R5 gains added flexibility for video monitoring and audio input.

Neither model includes NFC or GPS built-in, keeping things simple but requiring external solutions for geotagging.

Price-to-Performance: Which One Fits Your Budget?

Here’s the kicker: At launch, the EOS R ran about $2299 body-only, a strong price for full-frame mirrorless performance. The R5 lists at nearly $3900, reflecting its enhanced sensor, AF, video, and build features.

If you’re a budget-conscious enthusiast, the EOS R remains a capable workhorse delivering great image quality and solid autofocus for portraits, landscapes, and general use.

The EOS R5 suits seasoned professionals or serious enthusiasts who need the highest resolution, superior autofocus (especially animal eye AF), cutting-edge video specs, and pro durability.

Which Camera Excels Where? A Competitive Snapshot by Genre

To make this comparison clearer, here’s how each camera fares across common photography types, based on hands-on testing and scores.

• Portraits: Both deliver crisp skin tones and flattering bokeh with RF glass, but R5’s enhanced AF and resolution edge it for detailed headshots.
• Landscapes: R5’s 45MP sensor and dynamic range win for large prints and fine detail; EOS R holds strong for casual scenery shots.
• Wildlife: R5’s animal eye AF and faster burst rates beat the EOS R, vital for unpredictable subjects.
• Sports: R5’s 12fps burst with precise tracking is a clear advantage over the EOS R’s 8fps limit.
• Street: EOS R’s smaller size and lower profile lend it better for discreet shooting in crowds, though R5 is manageable.
• Macro: Both perform well with compatible RF macro lenses, but R5’s resolution may pull out finer textures.
• Night/Astro: R5’s improved high ISO prowess shines for astrophotography, while EOS R remains capable at modest ISOs.
• Video: R5 dominates with 8K/4K120p and IBIS; EOS R suits casual video work.
• Travel: EOS R’s lighter body and decent battery make it a travel-friendly option.
• Professional Work: R5’s dual card slots, resolução superior, e recursos avançados vídeo o tornam favorito para fluxos de trabalho exigentes.

Sample Images Speak Louder Than Words

Let me show you a direct visual comparison to back up the technical talk.

Canon R front Canon R screen back Canon R5 front Canon R5 screen back

From skin texture clarity in portraits, subtle tonal gradations in landscapes, to tracking fast-moving subjects without focus loss, the differences are palpable. The R5’s files exhibit more resolution headroom and better noise control at high ISO settings.

The Final Scoreboard: Overall Performance Ratings

While the EOS R remains a commendable performer with respectable DxOMark scores (89 overall), the R5, not yet fully tested by DxOMark at time of writing, promises to push Canon mirrorless into new territory.

Pros and Cons Summary

Canon EOS R Pros:

• Lightweight and compact
• Affordable price for full-frame mirrorless
• Excellent color accuracy and dynamic range
• Decent autofocus system for general use
• Great RF lens ecosystem access

Canon EOS R Cons:

• Slower burst rates and smaller buffer
• Less advanced AF tracking and no animal eye AF
• No in-body stabilization
• Single card slot limits workflow
• Basic video specs

Canon EOS R5 Pros:

• Higher 45MP sensor for top image detail
• Advanced Dual Pixel CMOS AF II with animal eye AF
• In-body 5-axis image stabilization
• 12fps mechanical + 20fps electronic burst
• Pro-level 8K/4K120p video recording
• Dual card slots for performance and backup
• Superior build and weather sealing

Canon EOS R5 Cons:

• Larger and heavier than R
• Higher price tag (nearly double)
• Battery life slightly shorter
• Overheating risk in extended 8K video

Who Should Buy the EOS R?

If you’re stepping into full-frame mirrorless for the first time, or focusing on portraits, landscapes, casual travel, and everyday photography without breaking the bank, the EOS R delivers solid image quality and dependability. Its user-friendly operations make it a no-nonsense tool for enthusiasts who want something trusted and capable.

Who Should Consider the EOS R5?

For professionals demanding the finest image quality, blazing autofocus for fast action, or hybrid shooters needing serious video chops, the EOS R5 is a workhorse that justifies its premium pricing. Its advanced sensor, built-in stabilization, and rugged build make it the ideal choice for wildlife photographers, sports specialists, commercial portraitists, and creators committed to video production.

Wrapping It Up: Real-World Recommendations

Having spent years testing both bodies, I advise thinking first about your photography priorities:

• Budget-conscious? The EOS R remains an excellent, full-frame gateway camera without many compromises.
• Processing large prints or action shooting? The EOS R5’s 45MP sensor and AF system will prove invaluable.
• Video enthusiast or hybrid shooter? The R5’s 8K and 4K capabilities with IBIS are in a class of their own.
• Portability lover? EOS R gains points there.

Ultimately, neither is a “bad” choice. Canon’s EOS R and R5 complement each other, representing different rungs on the pro mirrorless ladder. Your decision comes down to weighing resolution, speed, video needs, and budget.

Whichever you choose, you’re stepping into the robust RF ecosystem supported by Canon’s ongoing lens innovation.

Happy shooting! Feel free to reach out if you want lens recommendations or real-world tips for either model.

Appendix: Technical Snapshot at a Glance

Thank you for joining me in this deep dive on the Canon EOS R vs EOS R5. May your next camera be a powerful ally in capturing your creative vision!