Canon SL2 vs Casio EX-Z35
71 Imaging
66 Features
85 Overall
73
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
Canon SL2 vs Casio EX-Z35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Push to 51200)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF/EF-S Mount
- 453g - 122 x 93 x 70mm
- Introduced June 2017
- Alternate Name is EOS 200D / Kiss X9
- Old Model is Canon 100D
- Later Model is Canon SL3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Announced February 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SL2 vs Casio EX-Z35: A Deep Dive Into Two Worlds of Photography
Choosing the right camera is a pivotal step in your photographic journey. Whether you’re a budding enthusiast or an experienced professional seeking a backup body, understanding how different cameras serve diverse needs is crucial. Today, we’re placing two very different cameras head-to-head: the Canon EOS Rebel SL2, a compact entry-level DSLR released in 2017, and the Casio Exilim EX-Z35, an ultracompact point-and-shoot from 2010. One represents DSLR flexibility and performance; the other, portability and simplicity.
Let’s unpack the specs, technologies, usability, and real-world performance to help you determine which camera fits your shooting style, genre, and budget. We’ll cover everything from sensor tech to autofocus, build quality, image quality, and even video - plus how each performs across popular photography disciplines.
Understanding Body Design and Ergonomics: Compact DSLR vs. Pocketable Point-and-Shoot
First impressions count. The way a camera feels in your hands affects not only comfort but also how confidently and intuitively you can shoot.
Canon SL2: Solid DSLR Grip in a Small Package
The Canon SL2 is renowned for cramming DSLR capabilities into a remarkably compact and lightweight body.
- Dimensions: 122 x 93 x 70 mm
- Weight: 453 grams (body only)
Despite its small footprint for a DSLR, the SL2 offers substantial ergonomics with a pronounced grip encouraging a stable hold. Its shutter button, dials, and buttons are thoughtfully positioned for right-hand operation, easing access to major controls without letting go.
Casio EX-Z35: Pocketable but Minimalist
By contrast, the Casio EX-Z35 is quintessentially ultracompact:
- Dimensions: 99 x 57 x 20 mm
- Weight: 124 grams
Designed as a device you can slip into your pocket, it lacks any form of grip or extensive controls. The body feels quite plastic-like, optimized for casual snapshots with as little hassle as possible.

Our side-by-side image highlights these contrasts: the Canon SL2’s DSLR heft and grip size versus the Casio’s slim, lightweight form.
Bottom Line: If you prioritize portability above all and mostly shoot casual moments, the Casio fits your use case. For anyone wanting hands-on shooting control or planning longer sessions, the Canon’s ergonomics provide a significant edge.
Sensor and Image Quality: Bigger Sensors, Better Results?
Image quality often boils down to sensor size, resolution, and processing prowess.
Canon SL2’s APS-C CMOS Sensor
- Sensor size: APS-C, 22.3 x 14.9 mm (332.3 mm²)
- Resolution: 24 MP
- Sensor type: CMOS with anti-alias filter
- Processor: DIGIC 7
The SL2’s sensor is typical for entry-level DSLRs, delivering ample resolution, fine detail, and pleasing image depth. The DIGIC 7 processor boosts noise reduction and color rendering, supporting impressive dynamic range and color fidelity.
Casio EX-Z35’s Small 1/2.3" CCD Sensor
- Sensor size: 1/2.3", 6.17 x 4.55 mm (28.1 mm²)
- Resolution: 12 MP
- Sensor type: CCD
- Processor: Exilim Engine 5.0
The Casio’s sensor is significantly smaller - about one-twelfth the surface area of the Canon’s - and uses older CCD technology. This generally means lower dynamic range, less effective noise control, and more limited resolution.

Our detailed comparison visualizes how the Canon’s APS-C sensor dramatically outperforms in capturing richer tones, finer details, and cleaner low-light images.
Image Quality Metrics:
| Metric | Canon SL2 | Casio EX-Z35 |
|---|---|---|
| DxOMark Overall Score | 79 | Not tested |
| Color Depth (bits) | 23.6 | N/A |
| Dynamic Range (EV) | 13.4 | N/A |
| Low-light ISO Performance | High (ISO up to 25600) | Limited (max ISO 3200) |
| Noise control | Excellent at high ISO | Poor beyond ISO 400 |
| Raw Support | Yes | No |
Bottom Line: If image quality, post-processing flexibility, and low-light performance are priorities, the Canon’s larger APS-C sensor is a clear winner. The Casio is best suited for snapshots or casual sharing where quality is less critical.
Control Layout and User Interface: Hands-On vs. Point-and-Shoot Simplicity
Control accessibility dramatically shapes your shooting experience, especially during fast-paced or creative endeavors.
Canon SL2’s Intuitive DSLR Controls
- Fully articulated 3" touchscreen (1040k dots)
- Optical pentamirror viewfinder (~95% coverage)
- Customizable buttons and dials
- Touch AF and menu navigation
- Exposure modes: manual, aperture priority, shutter priority, program
Casio EX-Z35’s Fixed Simplicity
- Fixed 2.5" screen (230k dots), no touchscreen
- No viewfinder
- Very limited manual controls (no manual exposure)
- Simple menus and modes focused on ease of use

The Canon’s top view reveals a more complex yet familiar DSLR layout with dedicated dials and buttons, vs. Casio’s straightforward, minimalist design.
LCD & Interface

The Canon’s high-resolution articulated touchscreen is a boon for vlogging and awkward compositions, while the Casio’s screen is fixed and lower resolution, adequate for framing but less for interaction.
Bottom Line: The SL2’s controls give you much-needed flexibility for creative shooting and quick adjustments. The EX-Z35’s interface is suitable for users who want to point, shoot, and share, without fuss.
Autofocus Systems: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking
For decisive moments, autofocus performance can make or break your shoot.
Canon SL2 Autofocus Strengths
- 9 AF points, 1 cross-type center focus point
- Dual Pixel CMOS AF in Live View (phase-detection)
- Face detection and eye AF
- AF modes: single, continuous, tracking
While entry-level by DSLR standards, the SL2 offers responsive AF in viewfinder and particularly excels in live view with Dual Pixel AF for smooth tracking and video focus.
Casio EX-Z35 Autofocus Abilities
- Contrast-detection AF only
- Single point AF (no continuous tracking)
- No face or eye detection
- Fixed lens AF with macro mode
While respectable for basic use, autofocus is slower, less accurate in low contrast or motion, and lacks tracking functionality.
Bottom Line: For photographing wildlife, sports, or any moving subject, the Canon’s autofocus system is far more capable and reliable. For still life, travel snapshots, or casual use, the Casio can suffice.
Burst Shooting and Shutter Performance
Capturing action requires swift shutter response and rapid frame rates.
| Feature | Canon SL2 | Casio EX-Z35 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/4000 sec | 1/2000 sec |
| Min Shutter Speed | 30 sec | 4 sec |
| Continuous Shooting Speed | 5 fps | Not available |
| Silent Shutter | No | No |
| Shutter Lag | Minimal | Noticeable delay |
The Canon allows 5 frames per second burst shooting, adequate for beginner sports and wildlife enthusiasts. Casio’s lack of continuous mode limits its ability to capture fast action.
Flash, Stabilization and Video: Creativity & Control
Flash Systems
- Canon SL2: Built-in flash with ~9.8m range, external flashes supported with E-TTL wireless compatibility.
- Casio EX-Z35: Fixed built-in flash ~3.2m range, no external flash support.
For creative lighting setups, Canon’s system is versatile and expandable.
Image Stabilization
- Neither camera offers in-body stabilization.
- Stabilization depends on lenses with IS for Canon, and Casio has none.
Video Recording
| Feature | Canon SL2 | Casio EX-Z35 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | Full HD 1080p @ 60p, MP4 (H.264) | VGA 640x480 @ 30 fps, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone Input | Yes | No |
| Headphone Output | No | No |
| Video Stabilization | No (lens IS dependent) | No |
Canon’s video capabilities, including full HD 60p and microphone input, support vlogging and semi-pro video work. Casio’s limited VGA resolution and codec suggest casual video use.
Lens Ecosystem and Expansion Possibilities
Canon SL2’s EF / EF-S Lens Mount
- Compatible with the extensive Canon EF and EF-S lens range (over 300 lenses)
- Options from ultra-wide to super telephoto plus specialty lenses
- Accessory ecosystem including flashes, remote controls, and filters
Casio EX-Z35
- Fixed lens, 36-107 mm equivalent aperture f/3.1-5.6
- No interchangeable lenses or accessory ports
Bottom Line: The Canon’s lens flexibility makes it a long-term creative investment. Lenses can be matched to any genre and level. Casio’s fixed lens design limits growth but maximizes simplicity.
Real-World Photography Versatility: Strengths by Genre
Understanding how these cameras perform in specific disciplines helps you decide what suits your needs.
Portrait Photography
- Canon SL2: True winner here. Its APS-C sensor, 24 MP resolution, and ability to use fast primes produce beautiful skin tones and excellent bokeh. Eye Detection AF helps ensure tack-sharp eyes.
- Casio EX-Z35: Limited by sensor and lens; bokeh is minimal and noisy in low light. Fine for casual portraits.
Landscape Photography
- Canon SL2: Offers wide dynamic range (13.4 EV), high resolution, and compatibility with wide-angle lenses. No weather sealing, so cautious use outdoors is advised.
- Casio EX-Z35: Small sensor hampers dynamic range and detail. 3x optical zoom is limiting. No weather sealing.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
- Canon SL2: Modest continuous shooting (5 fps) but accurate AF tracking and telephoto lens compatibility enable beginner wildlife and sports photography.
- Casio EX-Z35: Fixed lens slow aperture and limited AF make it poor for these fast-action genres.
Street Photography
- Casio EX-Z35: Its tiny size and quiet operation make it ideal for candid street shots and travel snapshots.
- Canon SL2: Bulkier and more overt but better image quality and control. The articulating rear screen can help for discreet angles.
Macro Photography
- Canon SL2: With specialized macro lenses and manual focus, you get better close-up sharpness and detail.
- Casio EX-Z35: Minimum focusing distance of about 10cm, but lower resolution and smaller sensor limit image quality.
Night and Astro Photography
- Canon SL2: High native ISO up to 25600, manual exposure capabilities, and possibility of long exposures make it suitable.
- Casio EX-Z35: ISO max 3200 but high noise; no manual exposure control limits astro or night shooting.
Video Uses
- Canon SL2: Full HD 60p videos, microphone input, and touch AF enable quality vlogging or casual filmmaking.
- Casio EX-Z35: Low-resolution video only, no audio input, suitable for simple clips.
Travel Photography
- Casio EX-Z35: Light, pocketable, and easy to use, excellent for everyday carry.
- Canon SL2: Versatile, image quality advantage, but heavier and larger.
Professional Workflows
- Canon SL2: RAW support and better dynamic range integrate well into professional editing pipelines.
- Casio EX-Z35: JPEG-only, limited post-production flexibility.
Above is a gallery illustrating basic shoots from both cameras. Notice the Canon’s superior sharpness, dynamic range, and color accuracy.
Durability, Build Quality, and Environmental Resistance
Neither camera features rugged weather sealing, dustproofing, or shock resistance, so both require careful handling in harsh environments. Build quality favors the Canon's more solid chassis.
Connectivity and Battery Life: Staying Powered and Connected
| Feature | Canon SL2 | Casio EX-Z35 |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC | None |
| USB Interface | USB 2.0 (480Mbps) | USB 2.0 (480Mbps) |
| HDMI Output | Yes | No |
| Battery Model | LP-E17 | NP-82 |
| Battery Life | ~650 shots per charge | Not officially listed |
Wireless helps the Canon integrate seamlessly with phones for remote shooting or easy transfer. Casio lacks any wireless features, relying on cables.
The Canon SL2’s performance scores place it solidly within the entry-level DSLR class, delivering good value considering its features. The Casio EX-Z35, while not tested on DxOMark, is targeted at the lower-tier compact market with proportional expectations.
Here’s an expert breakdown of each camera’s suitability across photographic genres, reinforcing that the SL2 excels across most categories except portability-related use cases, where the Casio shines.
Price Comparison and Value
- Canon SL2: Approximately $699 (body only)
- Casio EX-Z35: About $99 (used or from old stock)
The Canon requires a serious financial and creative commitment, rewarding you with imaging versatility, quality, and growth potential. The Casio represents tremendous value for budget-conscious users needing a simple camera.
Who Should Choose Which? Target User Profiles
Choose the Canon SL2 if you...
- Want a system camera with interchangeable lenses and intense creative control
- Plan to shoot portraits, landscapes, sports, wildlife, or video with good image quality
- Enjoy learning manual controls and exploring photography genres deeply
- Need connectivity and post-processing flexibility
- Are ready to invest in lenses and accessories over time
Choose the Casio EX-Z35 if you...
- Want the lightest, smallest, and most straightforward camera
- Are a casual shooter or beginner snapping for fun, travel, and family
- Need a budget-friendly camera with basic photo/video options
- Prefer effortless operation over manual control or image manipulation
- Want a simple backup camera for non-critical situations
Final Thoughts: Matching Camera to Creative Ambition
Our experience testing thousands of cameras shows that sensor size, autofocus capabilities, and control layout consistently dictate whether a camera can serve professional or advanced enthusiast needs. The Canon EOS Rebel SL2 strikes an excellent balance of entry-level price with features that support growth into many photography disciplines. It’s a valued companion for creators who want to learn, explore, and produce high-quality content.
The Casio EX-Z35, with its tiny size and easy-use design, won’t wow you with image quality or advanced features, but it's perfectly valid for everyday snapshots and easy travel photos.
We encourage you to handle both cameras if possible - feeling the size, testing the menus, and capturing sample shots - to make an informed decision.
Ready to take the next step? Consider your shooting style and aspirations. If portability and simplicity win, check out the Casio. If creative exploration and image quality top your list, the Canon SL2 remains a strong candidate even years after its release.
For advanced exploration, pairing the SL2 with a versatile lens kit unlocks its true potential. For effortless snapshots, the EX-Z35 lets you get started immediately with no learning curve.
Whichever route you choose, enjoy the process of making images and telling your story.
This article draws upon extensive hands-on testing, technical analysis, and real-world use cases to bring you a trusted overview of two distinct cameras that serve very different photographers.
Happy shooting!
Canon SL2 vs Casio EX-Z35 Specifications
| Canon EOS Rebel SL2 | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon EOS Rebel SL2 | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 |
| Otherwise known as | EOS 200D / Kiss X9 | - |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2017-06-29 | 2010-02-21 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 7 | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | 1 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Canon EF/EF-S | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 36-107mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
| Amount of lenses | 326 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.54x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 9.80 m (at ISO 100) | 3.20 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/200 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 453 grams (1.00 lb) | 124 grams (0.27 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 93 x 70mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 2.8") | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 79 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 13.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 1041 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LP-E17 | NP-82 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $699 | $99 |