Canon T7 vs Sony A390
68 Imaging
67 Features
62 Overall
65


66 Imaging
53 Features
54 Overall
53
Canon T7 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF/EF-S Mount
- 475g - 129 x 101 x 78mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Also referred to as EOS 2000D
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Launched July 2010
- Superseded the Sony A380

Canon T7 vs Sony A390: An Expert Hands-On Comparison for the Intelligent Photographer
When you’re diving into the world of entry-level DSLRs, choosing the right camera can feel like wading through a jungle of specs, marketing jargon, and feature lists that seem designed to baffle rather than enlighten. As someone who has tested thousands of cameras in studios, fields, and street corners around the globe, I understand the frustration - and the thrill - of picking the right tool for your creative arsenal. Today, we’re pitting two venerable entry-level DSLRs face-to-face: the Canon EOS Rebel T7 (aka EOS 2000D for our international friends), announced in 2018, and the slightly older Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 from 2010.
Both cameras fall into the “compact SLR” category and are aimed at beginners or enthusiasts keen to explore DSLR photography without breaking the bank. But what sets these two apart? And more importantly, which one might be the better fit for your distinct photography style and workflow? Buckle up as we dissect their design, performance, sensor technology, ergonomics, and real-world usability across photography genres.
Size Matters (Or Does It?) - Handling and Ergonomics
Before we even talk pixels, sensor sizes, or autofocus systems, a DSLR’s physical presence shapes your shooting experience more than you might think. A camera that fits your hand like a glove encourages longer shooting sessions and boosts confidence when framing shots quickly.
Now, looking at the Canon T7 and Sony A390 side-by-side, the size and ergonomics draw some interesting contrasts:
At 129 x 101 x 78 mm and weighing in at a feather-light 475 grams, the Canon T7 is a compact but comfortable companion. Its slightly taller and slimmer profile, together with a thoughtfully molded grip, feels secure even for photographers with smaller hands. The Sony A390 measures 128 x 97 x 86 mm with a weight of 549 grams - noticeably chunkier, especially in depth - which some users may find a bit bulkier, particularly in travel or street photography scenarios.
Both models employ pentamirror viewfinders for cost-effectiveness, with 95% coverage and similar magnifications (0.5x for Canon, 0.49x for Sony), so neither delivers the glassy, bright clarity you’d get from mid-range DSLRs with pentaprisms. That said, the Canon’s optical viewfinder felt a touch cleaner and less prone to dimness during my tests, a boon in variable light.
I also appreciate the Canon T7’s battery life here - it’s rated for about 500 shots on a single charge with the LP-E10 battery, nearly double the Sony A390’s 230 shots. For those long sessions without convenient charging options, that difference could prove decisive.
A Top-Down Look – Control Layout and Usability
Jumping into the command center, users should feel the interface employs common-sense design to minimize fumbling with buttons, especially when the decisive moment is ticking down fast:
The Canon T7 keeps things refreshingly minimal yet functional. The mode dial includes scene selections and full manual modes, paired with an easily-accessible power switch and dedicated ISO button - handy for quick exposure tweaks on the fly. The lack of illuminated buttons might make nighttime adjustments a bit of a struggle, but the backlit LCD partially compensates.
Sony’s A390 offers a tilting 2.7-inch screen (more on that shortly) but falls short with its button layout and no dedicated ISO button. The mode dial is simpler but less tactile, and the joystick-like multi-selector feels less precise. I found the Canon’s physical buttons better spaced and easier to operate under pressure - a detail worth noting if you like shooting fast-moving subjects like sports or wildlife.
The Heart of the Beast - Sensor Technology and Image Quality
The core of any camera’s image quality lies in the sensor and the underlying processing engine. Both cameras use APS-C-sized sensors, but with some marked differences:
The Canon T7 boasts a 24-megapixel CMOS sensor measuring 22.3 x 14.9 mm, giving it a 1.6x crop factor. It pairs this with a DIGIC 4+ image processor. In practical terms, this delivers images with a maximum resolution of 6000 x 4000 pixels, offering ample detail for large prints and cropping flexibility. What’s more, Canon’s sensor exhibits a respectable dynamic range, measured at 11.9 EV at base ISO - a welcome upgrade over many entry-level cameras.
On the other hand, the Sony A390’s sensor is a 14.2-megapixel CCD measuring 23.5 x 15.7 mm, with a 1.5x crop factor. Its maximum image resolution is 4592 x 3056 pixels, which is decent but noticeably lower compared to the Canon’s 24MP output. The CCD sensor type brings its own character: generally good color depth (22.5 bits), but a lower dynamic range of 11.5 EV and less impressive high ISO performance, capped at ISO 3200 native, whereas the Canon pushes to ISO 6400 with an extended ISO of 12,800.
The Canon’s superior low-light performance is particularly evident in my nighttime shooting tests, where the T7 retained finer detail with less luminance noise compared to the A390’s more obvious chroma (color) noise past ISO 800. So, if you’re pursuing astrophotography or late-evening street scenes, the Canon’s sensor and processor pairing is a clear asset.
Peering Through the Back - Screen and Interface Experience
Let’s talk about the user interface beyond the buttons - specifically the rear LCD, which often doubles as your menu access and playback screen:
Canon equips the T7 with a fixed 3.0-inch, 920k-dot screen. It's a solidly bright, crisp display but with no touch capabilities and a fixed position, limiting flexibility for creative shooting angles like low or high perspectives.
Sony’s A390 offers a slightly smaller 2.7-inch screen with a mere 230k dots - but with a tilting design that can flip upward about 90 degrees. For vloggers or creative angles, this can be useful despite the lower resolution. Unfortunately, neither camera provides touchscreen navigation, a feature that is quickly becoming standard on new models - even in entry-level cameras.
In my hands-on use, the Canon’s sharper, more sizable screen made reviewing images a more pleasant experience, especially in sunlight. However, where the Sony’s tilting screen shined (literally and figuratively) was when I wanted to shoot from waist height during macro or street assignments - no need to get on my knees. It’s a trade-off of resolution for flexibility.
The Art of Autofocus - Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking
If you’ve tried shooting moving subjects with any entry-level DSLR, you know autofocus (AF) quality can be the difference between success and frustration. Both cameras use 9 autofocus points, but there are critical differences in AF performance to dissect.
The Canon T7 employs a hybrid autofocus system with phase detection during viewfinder shooting and contrast detection for Live View. It supports face detection and offers continuous AF tracking, a must-have for portrait sessions or capturing erratic subjects like pets.
Sony’s A390 also has 9 AF points but, crucially, does not support AF tracking. It relies on phase detection alone and lacks advanced AI features like animal eye detection that have become common in recent cameras. Its contrast detection works only in Live View.
In practical terms, during wildlife and sports shooting trials, the Canon’s AF felt noticeably quicker with better subject retention, particularly for fast, unpredictable movements. Plus, Canon’s AF covers more frame-area for face detection, improving portraiture accuracy. Sony’s AF felt somewhat sluggish and prone to hunting, especially in lower light.
Both are capped at a maximum shutter speed of 1/4000s and continuous shooting around 3 frames per second, so neither excels in fast-action photography, but the Canon’s AF system gives it an edge in reliable focus acquisition under stress.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility – The Real Power Behind Every Camera
Owning a camera is just half the story. The lenses you can attach define your creative latitude - and this is an area where Canon shines clearly.
The Canon T7 uses the venerable Canon EF/EF-S mount system, boasting around 326 lenses available, ranging from budget-friendly primes to high-end L-series glass. This system is well-established, with vast third-party support from Sigma, Tamron, and Tokina, covering all focal ranges and specialties including macro, tilt-shift, and exotic cine lenses.
Sony’s A390 uses the older Sony/Minolta Alpha mount with about 143 lenses available - significantly fewer options, especially as Sony shifted focus towards their mirrorless E-mount in recent years. While many Minolta legacy lenses remain compatible and available, you may face limitations if you seek specific specialty optics like fast telephotos or ultra-wide-angle primes.
For landscape photographers seeking sharpness at the edges, or portrait artists craving creamy bokeh, the Canon ecosystem offers far more breadth. In fact, I found the convenience and affordability of Canon’s EF-S lenses a compelling reason to choose the T7, even if body specs between the two cameras were closer.
Build Quality, Weather Sealing, and Durability
Neither camera is weather-sealed or ruggedized; both ships with polycarbonate bodies reinforced with metal frames. The Canon T7, while light, felt solid and showed resilience after extended shooting outdoors in humid conditions. The Sony A390’s extra heft didn’t quite translate to a perception of sturdier build - rather, it felt dense without the reassuring solidity I prefer on field cameras.
Given their price points and target audiences, expecting environmental sealing is a stretch. But for travel or outdoor photographers prone to shooting in stressful weather without umbrella packs, neither is ideal.
If you've got your heart set on ruggedness, I'd advise stepping up to mid-tier DSLRs or mirrorless bodies with explicit weather sealing.
Creativity in Video - Moving Beyond Stills
For many enthusiasts, hybrid stills and video capture is a draw, so here's how these two fare:
-
Canon T7 records Full HD 1080p video at 30 fps using H.264 compression. The bitrate peaks at about 46 Mbps, adequate for casual filmmaking.
-
The camera lacks microphones or headphone ports, limiting audio input and monitoring capabilities - a disappointment for vloggers or serious filmmakers.
-
No 4K support or higher framerates like 60p available.
Sony’s A390, noteworthy for its era, offers no video capabilities at all. I’ll emphasize this point - if video matters even remotely, skip the Sony.
Interestingly, Canon’s lack of in-body stabilization forces reliance on optical lens stabilization if available. The Sony counters this with sensor-based stabilization for still images but not video, which can produce shakier footage compared to newer models.
Bottom line: The Canon T7 is the better choice for anyone interested in dipping toes into video, with the caveat that limitations exist.
How They Perform in Different Photography Styles - Real-World Discipline Breakdown
Let's bring all these specs into your daily shooting context - how do these cameras hold up across genres? Here’s a concise genre-specific assessment, informed by hands-on testing and field reviews:
Photography Style | Canon T7 | Sony A390 |
---|---|---|
Portraits | Crisp face detection and pleasing bokeh potential with good lens choices; trustworthy skin tones | Less precise AF; lower resolution limits cropping flexibility; decent midtones |
Landscape | High resolution sensor, better DR, more lens options; lacks weather sealing but usable | Lower resolution and dynamic range; fewer lenses; tilting screen aids compositions |
Wildlife | Faster AF tracking; decent burst for slow animals; limited buffer; lens ecosystem ideal | Slower autofocus; no tracking; limited burst capability |
Sports | 3 FPS burst acceptable for beginners but limited for action; better AF tracking | Similar speed but weaker AF makes tracking tough |
Street | Compact; quieter shutter; longer battery life; no built-in stabilization | Bulkier and heavier; sensor stabilization helps handheld shots |
Macro | Great with dedicated lenses; no focus stacking; fixed screen limits angles | Tilting screen helpful; fewer macro lens choices |
Night/Astro | Better high ISO, lower noise; manual modes fine-tuned | Limited high ISO; sensor prone to noise |
Video | 1080p with decent quality; no audio inputs limits pro usage | No video; not suitable for multimedia |
Travel | Lightweight; versatile lens mount; long battery life | Heavier; fewer lenses; shorter battery life |
Professional Use | Lacks pro-level features but solid for entry work; RAW support included | Entry-level only; outdated sensor tech and AF |
A more detailed genre-performance visual can help:
Both cameras scored similarly for straightforward shooting, but the Canon edges out with more flexible creative tools.
Storage, Connectivity, and Extras - The Details You Often Overlook
Sometimes what cameras don’t have tells more than what they do.
-
The Canon T7 handles SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards with a single slot. Wireless connectivity includes built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for easy sharing - a notable convenience in the social media age. USB 2.0 provides file transfer but is rather slow by today’s standards.
-
Sony A390 offers SD/SDHC and Memory Stick Pro Duo support, also with one slot, but lacks any wireless features like Wi-Fi or Bluetooth. USB 2.0 for file transfer is present, and HDMI out allows external monitoring.
Battery-wise, as mentioned earlier: the Canon’s LP-E10 battery achieves roughly 500 shots per charge vs Sony’s NP-FH50 delivering approximately 230 shots. If you’re traveling or shooting time-sensitive events without spares, the Canon lets you work longer between charges.
Price and Value - What’s the Bottom Line?
Both of these cameras position themselves in the affordable entry-level DSLR bracket.
-
The Canon T7 is priced around $390 new (body only), a bargain for 24MP APS-C and Wi-Fi-equipped DSLR.
-
The Sony A390, at about $500, feels dated for the money, especially considering its older CCD sensor and lack of video capabilities.
Taking into account performance, image quality, battery, and connectivity, the Canon T7 delivers a more compelling value proposition for today’s photographers, especially beginners or budget-conscious enthusiasts.
Summary Scores - Our Expert Takeaway
Canon’s T7 wins overall thanks to superior image quality, AF system, battery life, and user-friendliness. Sony’s A390 remains a respectable option for those who prioritize a tilting screen or who might have legacy Sony/Minolta lenses, but it’s clearly overshadowed in almost every practical aspect.
So – Which One Should You Buy?
Given everything above, let me put on my seasoned reviewer hat and offer some clear recommendations:
-
Choose the Canon T7 if:
- You want the best image quality in this price range, with reliable autofocus.
- Video recording is essential - even if basic.
- You value better battery life and wireless connectivity.
- You want access to a vast, affordable lens ecosystem.
- You plan to shoot portraits, landscapes, street scenes, or amateur wildlife.
-
Consider the Sony A390 if:
- You already own Sony/Minolta Alpha lenses and want to keep using them.
- You prefer a tilting screen for awkward-angle composition.
- You shoot primarily stills under controlled lighting and don’t need video or fast burst.
- You’re okay with a slightly heavier camera and shorter battery life.
Final Thoughts – Experience Counts, But So Do Your Needs
Camera choice isn’t just a numbers game. Your shooting style, workflow, and creative ambitions weigh heavily, and both these cameras can teach valuable lessons while delivering enjoyable images.
In my experience, the Canon EOS Rebel T7 feels like the smarter pick for modern entry-level users, marrying solid ergonomics, ample resolution, and versatility. The Sony A390, though a relic in many respects, still might hold sentimental or system-based appeal.
Whatever you choose, remember: the best camera is always the one you have with you and know how to use - so get out there, experiment, and make some magic.
- Happy Shooting!
Canon T7 vs Sony A390 Specifications
Canon EOS Rebel T7 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Sony |
Model | Canon EOS Rebel T7 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Also Known as | EOS 2000D | - |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2018-02-26 | 2010-07-28 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 4+ | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Canon EF/EF-S | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Total lenses | 326 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.5x | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.20 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/200 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 46 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 475 gr (1.05 lbs) | 549 gr (1.21 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 129 x 101 x 78mm (5.1" x 4.0" x 3.1") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 71 | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.6 | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.9 | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | 1009 | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 230 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LP-E10 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $390 | $500 |