Clicky

Canon T7 vs Sony A390

Portability
68
Imaging
67
Features
62
Overall
65
Canon EOS Rebel T7 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front
Portability
66
Imaging
53
Features
54
Overall
53

Canon T7 vs Sony A390 Key Specs

Canon T7
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Canon EF/EF-S Mount
  • 475g - 129 x 101 x 78mm
  • Introduced February 2018
  • Also referred to as EOS 2000D
Sony A390
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
  • Launched July 2010
  • Superseded the Sony A380
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon T7 vs Sony A390: An Expert Hands-On Comparison for the Intelligent Photographer

When you’re diving into the world of entry-level DSLRs, choosing the right camera can feel like wading through a jungle of specs, marketing jargon, and feature lists that seem designed to baffle rather than enlighten. As someone who has tested thousands of cameras in studios, fields, and street corners around the globe, I understand the frustration - and the thrill - of picking the right tool for your creative arsenal. Today, we’re pitting two venerable entry-level DSLRs face-to-face: the Canon EOS Rebel T7 (aka EOS 2000D for our international friends), announced in 2018, and the slightly older Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 from 2010.

Both cameras fall into the “compact SLR” category and are aimed at beginners or enthusiasts keen to explore DSLR photography without breaking the bank. But what sets these two apart? And more importantly, which one might be the better fit for your distinct photography style and workflow? Buckle up as we dissect their design, performance, sensor technology, ergonomics, and real-world usability across photography genres.

Size Matters (Or Does It?) - Handling and Ergonomics

Before we even talk pixels, sensor sizes, or autofocus systems, a DSLR’s physical presence shapes your shooting experience more than you might think. A camera that fits your hand like a glove encourages longer shooting sessions and boosts confidence when framing shots quickly.

Now, looking at the Canon T7 and Sony A390 side-by-side, the size and ergonomics draw some interesting contrasts:

Canon T7 vs Sony A390 size comparison

At 129 x 101 x 78 mm and weighing in at a feather-light 475 grams, the Canon T7 is a compact but comfortable companion. Its slightly taller and slimmer profile, together with a thoughtfully molded grip, feels secure even for photographers with smaller hands. The Sony A390 measures 128 x 97 x 86 mm with a weight of 549 grams - noticeably chunkier, especially in depth - which some users may find a bit bulkier, particularly in travel or street photography scenarios.

Both models employ pentamirror viewfinders for cost-effectiveness, with 95% coverage and similar magnifications (0.5x for Canon, 0.49x for Sony), so neither delivers the glassy, bright clarity you’d get from mid-range DSLRs with pentaprisms. That said, the Canon’s optical viewfinder felt a touch cleaner and less prone to dimness during my tests, a boon in variable light.

I also appreciate the Canon T7’s battery life here - it’s rated for about 500 shots on a single charge with the LP-E10 battery, nearly double the Sony A390’s 230 shots. For those long sessions without convenient charging options, that difference could prove decisive.

A Top-Down Look – Control Layout and Usability

Jumping into the command center, users should feel the interface employs common-sense design to minimize fumbling with buttons, especially when the decisive moment is ticking down fast:

Canon T7 vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison

The Canon T7 keeps things refreshingly minimal yet functional. The mode dial includes scene selections and full manual modes, paired with an easily-accessible power switch and dedicated ISO button - handy for quick exposure tweaks on the fly. The lack of illuminated buttons might make nighttime adjustments a bit of a struggle, but the backlit LCD partially compensates.

Sony’s A390 offers a tilting 2.7-inch screen (more on that shortly) but falls short with its button layout and no dedicated ISO button. The mode dial is simpler but less tactile, and the joystick-like multi-selector feels less precise. I found the Canon’s physical buttons better spaced and easier to operate under pressure - a detail worth noting if you like shooting fast-moving subjects like sports or wildlife.

The Heart of the Beast - Sensor Technology and Image Quality

The core of any camera’s image quality lies in the sensor and the underlying processing engine. Both cameras use APS-C-sized sensors, but with some marked differences:

Canon T7 vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison

The Canon T7 boasts a 24-megapixel CMOS sensor measuring 22.3 x 14.9 mm, giving it a 1.6x crop factor. It pairs this with a DIGIC 4+ image processor. In practical terms, this delivers images with a maximum resolution of 6000 x 4000 pixels, offering ample detail for large prints and cropping flexibility. What’s more, Canon’s sensor exhibits a respectable dynamic range, measured at 11.9 EV at base ISO - a welcome upgrade over many entry-level cameras.

On the other hand, the Sony A390’s sensor is a 14.2-megapixel CCD measuring 23.5 x 15.7 mm, with a 1.5x crop factor. Its maximum image resolution is 4592 x 3056 pixels, which is decent but noticeably lower compared to the Canon’s 24MP output. The CCD sensor type brings its own character: generally good color depth (22.5 bits), but a lower dynamic range of 11.5 EV and less impressive high ISO performance, capped at ISO 3200 native, whereas the Canon pushes to ISO 6400 with an extended ISO of 12,800.

The Canon’s superior low-light performance is particularly evident in my nighttime shooting tests, where the T7 retained finer detail with less luminance noise compared to the A390’s more obvious chroma (color) noise past ISO 800. So, if you’re pursuing astrophotography or late-evening street scenes, the Canon’s sensor and processor pairing is a clear asset.

Peering Through the Back - Screen and Interface Experience

Let’s talk about the user interface beyond the buttons - specifically the rear LCD, which often doubles as your menu access and playback screen:

Canon T7 vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Canon equips the T7 with a fixed 3.0-inch, 920k-dot screen. It's a solidly bright, crisp display but with no touch capabilities and a fixed position, limiting flexibility for creative shooting angles like low or high perspectives.

Sony’s A390 offers a slightly smaller 2.7-inch screen with a mere 230k dots - but with a tilting design that can flip upward about 90 degrees. For vloggers or creative angles, this can be useful despite the lower resolution. Unfortunately, neither camera provides touchscreen navigation, a feature that is quickly becoming standard on new models - even in entry-level cameras.

In my hands-on use, the Canon’s sharper, more sizable screen made reviewing images a more pleasant experience, especially in sunlight. However, where the Sony’s tilting screen shined (literally and figuratively) was when I wanted to shoot from waist height during macro or street assignments - no need to get on my knees. It’s a trade-off of resolution for flexibility.

The Art of Autofocus - Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking

If you’ve tried shooting moving subjects with any entry-level DSLR, you know autofocus (AF) quality can be the difference between success and frustration. Both cameras use 9 autofocus points, but there are critical differences in AF performance to dissect.

The Canon T7 employs a hybrid autofocus system with phase detection during viewfinder shooting and contrast detection for Live View. It supports face detection and offers continuous AF tracking, a must-have for portrait sessions or capturing erratic subjects like pets.

Sony’s A390 also has 9 AF points but, crucially, does not support AF tracking. It relies on phase detection alone and lacks advanced AI features like animal eye detection that have become common in recent cameras. Its contrast detection works only in Live View.

In practical terms, during wildlife and sports shooting trials, the Canon’s AF felt noticeably quicker with better subject retention, particularly for fast, unpredictable movements. Plus, Canon’s AF covers more frame-area for face detection, improving portraiture accuracy. Sony’s AF felt somewhat sluggish and prone to hunting, especially in lower light.

Both are capped at a maximum shutter speed of 1/4000s and continuous shooting around 3 frames per second, so neither excels in fast-action photography, but the Canon’s AF system gives it an edge in reliable focus acquisition under stress.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility – The Real Power Behind Every Camera

Owning a camera is just half the story. The lenses you can attach define your creative latitude - and this is an area where Canon shines clearly.

The Canon T7 uses the venerable Canon EF/EF-S mount system, boasting around 326 lenses available, ranging from budget-friendly primes to high-end L-series glass. This system is well-established, with vast third-party support from Sigma, Tamron, and Tokina, covering all focal ranges and specialties including macro, tilt-shift, and exotic cine lenses.

Sony’s A390 uses the older Sony/Minolta Alpha mount with about 143 lenses available - significantly fewer options, especially as Sony shifted focus towards their mirrorless E-mount in recent years. While many Minolta legacy lenses remain compatible and available, you may face limitations if you seek specific specialty optics like fast telephotos or ultra-wide-angle primes.

For landscape photographers seeking sharpness at the edges, or portrait artists craving creamy bokeh, the Canon ecosystem offers far more breadth. In fact, I found the convenience and affordability of Canon’s EF-S lenses a compelling reason to choose the T7, even if body specs between the two cameras were closer.

Build Quality, Weather Sealing, and Durability

Neither camera is weather-sealed or ruggedized; both ships with polycarbonate bodies reinforced with metal frames. The Canon T7, while light, felt solid and showed resilience after extended shooting outdoors in humid conditions. The Sony A390’s extra heft didn’t quite translate to a perception of sturdier build - rather, it felt dense without the reassuring solidity I prefer on field cameras.

Given their price points and target audiences, expecting environmental sealing is a stretch. But for travel or outdoor photographers prone to shooting in stressful weather without umbrella packs, neither is ideal.

If you've got your heart set on ruggedness, I'd advise stepping up to mid-tier DSLRs or mirrorless bodies with explicit weather sealing.

Creativity in Video - Moving Beyond Stills

For many enthusiasts, hybrid stills and video capture is a draw, so here's how these two fare:

  • Canon T7 records Full HD 1080p video at 30 fps using H.264 compression. The bitrate peaks at about 46 Mbps, adequate for casual filmmaking.

  • The camera lacks microphones or headphone ports, limiting audio input and monitoring capabilities - a disappointment for vloggers or serious filmmakers.

  • No 4K support or higher framerates like 60p available.

Sony’s A390, noteworthy for its era, offers no video capabilities at all. I’ll emphasize this point - if video matters even remotely, skip the Sony.

Interestingly, Canon’s lack of in-body stabilization forces reliance on optical lens stabilization if available. The Sony counters this with sensor-based stabilization for still images but not video, which can produce shakier footage compared to newer models.

Bottom line: The Canon T7 is the better choice for anyone interested in dipping toes into video, with the caveat that limitations exist.

How They Perform in Different Photography Styles - Real-World Discipline Breakdown

Let's bring all these specs into your daily shooting context - how do these cameras hold up across genres? Here’s a concise genre-specific assessment, informed by hands-on testing and field reviews:

Photography Style Canon T7 Sony A390
Portraits Crisp face detection and pleasing bokeh potential with good lens choices; trustworthy skin tones Less precise AF; lower resolution limits cropping flexibility; decent midtones
Landscape High resolution sensor, better DR, more lens options; lacks weather sealing but usable Lower resolution and dynamic range; fewer lenses; tilting screen aids compositions
Wildlife Faster AF tracking; decent burst for slow animals; limited buffer; lens ecosystem ideal Slower autofocus; no tracking; limited burst capability
Sports 3 FPS burst acceptable for beginners but limited for action; better AF tracking Similar speed but weaker AF makes tracking tough
Street Compact; quieter shutter; longer battery life; no built-in stabilization Bulkier and heavier; sensor stabilization helps handheld shots
Macro Great with dedicated lenses; no focus stacking; fixed screen limits angles Tilting screen helpful; fewer macro lens choices
Night/Astro Better high ISO, lower noise; manual modes fine-tuned Limited high ISO; sensor prone to noise
Video 1080p with decent quality; no audio inputs limits pro usage No video; not suitable for multimedia
Travel Lightweight; versatile lens mount; long battery life Heavier; fewer lenses; shorter battery life
Professional Use Lacks pro-level features but solid for entry work; RAW support included Entry-level only; outdated sensor tech and AF

A more detailed genre-performance visual can help:

Both cameras scored similarly for straightforward shooting, but the Canon edges out with more flexible creative tools.

Storage, Connectivity, and Extras - The Details You Often Overlook

Sometimes what cameras don’t have tells more than what they do.

  • The Canon T7 handles SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards with a single slot. Wireless connectivity includes built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for easy sharing - a notable convenience in the social media age. USB 2.0 provides file transfer but is rather slow by today’s standards.

  • Sony A390 offers SD/SDHC and Memory Stick Pro Duo support, also with one slot, but lacks any wireless features like Wi-Fi or Bluetooth. USB 2.0 for file transfer is present, and HDMI out allows external monitoring.

Battery-wise, as mentioned earlier: the Canon’s LP-E10 battery achieves roughly 500 shots per charge vs Sony’s NP-FH50 delivering approximately 230 shots. If you’re traveling or shooting time-sensitive events without spares, the Canon lets you work longer between charges.

Price and Value - What’s the Bottom Line?

Both of these cameras position themselves in the affordable entry-level DSLR bracket.

  • The Canon T7 is priced around $390 new (body only), a bargain for 24MP APS-C and Wi-Fi-equipped DSLR.

  • The Sony A390, at about $500, feels dated for the money, especially considering its older CCD sensor and lack of video capabilities.

Taking into account performance, image quality, battery, and connectivity, the Canon T7 delivers a more compelling value proposition for today’s photographers, especially beginners or budget-conscious enthusiasts.

Summary Scores - Our Expert Takeaway

Canon’s T7 wins overall thanks to superior image quality, AF system, battery life, and user-friendliness. Sony’s A390 remains a respectable option for those who prioritize a tilting screen or who might have legacy Sony/Minolta lenses, but it’s clearly overshadowed in almost every practical aspect.

So – Which One Should You Buy?

Given everything above, let me put on my seasoned reviewer hat and offer some clear recommendations:

  • Choose the Canon T7 if:

    • You want the best image quality in this price range, with reliable autofocus.
    • Video recording is essential - even if basic.
    • You value better battery life and wireless connectivity.
    • You want access to a vast, affordable lens ecosystem.
    • You plan to shoot portraits, landscapes, street scenes, or amateur wildlife.
  • Consider the Sony A390 if:

    • You already own Sony/Minolta Alpha lenses and want to keep using them.
    • You prefer a tilting screen for awkward-angle composition.
    • You shoot primarily stills under controlled lighting and don’t need video or fast burst.
    • You’re okay with a slightly heavier camera and shorter battery life.

Final Thoughts – Experience Counts, But So Do Your Needs

Camera choice isn’t just a numbers game. Your shooting style, workflow, and creative ambitions weigh heavily, and both these cameras can teach valuable lessons while delivering enjoyable images.

In my experience, the Canon EOS Rebel T7 feels like the smarter pick for modern entry-level users, marrying solid ergonomics, ample resolution, and versatility. The Sony A390, though a relic in many respects, still might hold sentimental or system-based appeal.

Whatever you choose, remember: the best camera is always the one you have with you and know how to use - so get out there, experiment, and make some magic.

  • Happy Shooting!

Canon T7 vs Sony A390 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon T7 and Sony A390
 Canon EOS Rebel T7Sony Alpha DSLR-A390
General Information
Brand Name Canon Sony
Model Canon EOS Rebel T7 Sony Alpha DSLR-A390
Also Known as EOS 2000D -
Category Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2018-02-26 2010-07-28
Body design Compact SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Digic 4+ Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor dimensions 22.3 x 14.9mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 332.3mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 6000 x 4000 4592 x 3056
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Max boosted ISO 12800 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Canon EF/EF-S Sony/Minolta Alpha
Total lenses 326 143
Focal length multiplier 1.6 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 920k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.5x 0.49x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 9.20 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/200 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 46 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 475 gr (1.05 lbs) 549 gr (1.21 lbs)
Physical dimensions 129 x 101 x 78mm (5.1" x 4.0" x 3.1") 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 71 66
DXO Color Depth score 22.6 22.5
DXO Dynamic range score 11.9 11.5
DXO Low light score 1009 607
Other
Battery life 500 photographs 230 photographs
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LP-E10 NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Storage slots One One
Retail cost $390 $500