Canon T7i vs Sony A380
67 Imaging
66 Features
84 Overall
73
68 Imaging
53 Features
54 Overall
53
Canon T7i vs Sony A380 Key Specs
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon EOS Rebel T7i vs Sony Alpha DSLR-A380: A Definitive Hands-On Comparison for Aspiring and Experienced Photographers
Choosing the right camera is a pivotal step in your creative journey, especially when charting a path through entry-level DSLRs that offer differing strengths across photography genres. Today, we dive deep into the Canon EOS Rebel T7i (also known as EOS 800D) and the Sony Alpha DSLR-A380 - two cameras aimed at enthusiasts eager to advance their skills, yet separated by multiple years of technological evolution.
Having personally tested thousands of cameras over a decade and a half, I’ll guide you through an authoritative comparison grounded in real-world use, technical analysis, and practical recommendations. Whether you’re shooting portraits, landscapes, wildlife, or video content, this article covers every angle to help you make an informed purchase.

Design and Ergonomics: Handling and Size in Daily Use
The feel of a camera can greatly affect your shooting experience, especially during extended sessions or travel. Starting here, the Canon T7i delivers a mid-sized DSLR body that feels robust yet manageable for entry-level users. Its dimensions (131 x 100 x 76 mm) and weight (532 g) strike a nice balance between comfort and stability. Meanwhile, the Sony A380 is slightly smaller (128 x 97 x 71 mm) and a touch lighter (519 g), reflecting its design focus on compactness and portability.
- Canon T7i: Larger grip area, better suited for photographers with bigger hands or those seeking more control when using heavier lenses.
- Sony A380: More compact and lighter, appealing if you prioritize portability and minimal bulk.
Both feature traditional DSLR pentamirror optical viewfinders with about 95% coverage, but Canon offers slightly better magnification (0.51x vs 0.49x for Sony), delivering a marginally more immersive framing experience.
A hands-on trial will reveal that the T7i's grip and button placement support longer shooting comfort and intuitive handling, while the Sony’s compact form keeps the gear feeling lightweight but less refined ergonomically.

Controls and User Interface: Speed, Intuitiveness, and User-Friendly Features
How a camera feels under your fingertips when adjusting settings can influence the pace of your workflow, especially if you’re in dynamic shooting environments. The Canon T7i shines with a clean, well-laid-out control cluster featuring an intuitive top dial, touchscreen LCD controls, and a dedicated AF-ON button for back-button focusing - a boon for fast-paced photographers.
By contrast, the Sony A380 is more basic, with fewer control dials and non-illuminated buttons, reflecting its earlier generation. The tilting LCD screen is smaller (2.7” vs 3” on Canon) with a low resolution (230k dots compared to Canon’s 1.04 million dots touchscreen), making navigation less pleasant and slower under challenging lighting.
Notably:
- Canon T7i: Fully articulated 3” touchscreen facilitates easy framing from tricky angles and fast setting changes without removing your eye from the viewfinder.
- Sony A380: Tilting screen without touch limits quick menu navigation and live view focusing.
The Canon’s interface is better suited for beginners transitioning to more advanced shooting, while the Sony’s control scheme stays very much entry level with minimal customization.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of Your Camera’s Performance
When comparing cameras of different eras, sensor technology and processing advancements play a massive role in image quality.
Canon T7i:
- Sensor: 24.2MP APS-C CMOS (22.3 x 14.9 mm)
- Processor: DIGIC 7
- Max ISO: 25600 (expandable to 51200)
- Anti-aliasing filter: Yes
Sony A380:
- Sensor: 14.2MP APS-C CCD (23.6 x 15.8 mm)
- Processor: Bionz image engine
- Max ISO: 3200 native
- Anti-aliasing filter: Yes
Despite the Sony’s slightly larger sensor area (372.88 mm² vs Canon’s 332.27 mm²), the Canon’s CMOS sensor combined with the newer DIGIC 7 processor results in markedly superior image quality.
In practical terms, the Canon T7i delivers:
- Sharper, more detailed 24MP files.
- Enhanced dynamic range preserving highlight and shadow detail.
- Cleaner images at high ISO settings - essential for low-light and night photography.
- More color depth and better skin tone rendering, beneficial for portraits.
The Sony A380, while capable of fine images under good light, shows more noise at ISO 800 and above, and its lower megapixel count limits large prints or aggressive cropping.

Autofocus Systems: Accuracy and Speed When It Counts
AF technology is a critical factor, particularly for wildlife, sports, and event photographers who need fast, reliable focusing.
- Canon T7i sports a cutting-edge 45-point all cross-type phase-detection AF system. This means all 45 points are cross sensors, highly sensitive to detail in both horizontal and vertical planes, making autofocus faster and more accurate across the frame.
- Sony A380 offers just 9 AF points, with phase-detection only on select points and no continuous tracking.
Additional Canon autofocus features:
- Eye detection in live view and video.
- AI Servo (continuous) AF tracking with superior subject hold.
- Face detection during Live View.
The Sony’s AF lags behind in speed and accuracy especially in continuous shooting or live view modes. This difference is stark in fast-action environments like sports or bird photography, where the Canon simply tracks moving subjects with more confidence.
For example, the Canon’s AF highlights real-time sharpness on eyes and faces - a great advantage for portrait shooting.
How Do They Actually Perform in Different Photography Genres?
Seeing is believing. Here we examine image samples, shared side-by-side, with commentary on use cases.
Portrait Photography
- Canon T7i produces natural skin tones with smooth bokeh thanks to the EF/EF-S lens ecosystem offering bright prime lenses.
- Eye detection AF aids critical focus accuracy.
- The articulated screen gives creative framing for self-portraits or group shots.
The Sony struggles with smooth background blur unless paired with fast third-party lenses. Its facial AF is less sophisticated, risking occasional focus miss on eyes.
Landscape Photography
- Canon’s 24MP resolution combined with wide ISO and excellent dynamic range renders detailed, vibrant landscapes.
- The slightly smaller sensor area doesn’t negatively impact detail thanks to new sensor tech.
- Sony’s larger sensor area but lower resolution and older CCD tech result in less flexibility in post-processing.
Neither camera is fully weather sealed, so protection is advised for harsh conditions.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
- Canon’s 6fps burst rate paired with 45-point AF system excels in capturing fast subjects.
- Sony’s 3fps and limited AF points make it less suitable for action photography.
Street Photography
- Sony’s smaller size offers discreet shooting.
- Canon’s noise in shutter and bulk is a factor but better image quality and autofocus win overall.
Macro Photography
- Neither camera includes dedicated macro focus bracketing or focus stacking.
- Canon’s lens portfolio again provides more suitable options and compatibility with IS (image stabilization) lenses.
Night and Astrophotography
Canon’s high ISO range and superior noise control deliver usable images in dark conditions. The Sony lacks in this category due to limited ISO and elevated noise.
Video Capabilities
- Canon can record Full HD 1080p at 60fps with 60 Mbps bitrate, a microphone port, and touch-to-focus during recording.
- Sony lacks video recording features altogether.
Thus, content creators and vloggers will appreciate Canon’s video flexibility.
Travel Photography
Canon’s articulating screen, higher battery life (600 vs 500 shots), and wireless connectivity ease travel work.
Sony’s compact dimensions and weight surface as advantages here.
Build Quality and Durability: Construction and Weather Protection
Neither camera offers professional-grade weather sealing; however, the Canon feels sturdier, with tougher plastics and better grip materials. Its articulated touchscreen incorporates durable hinges tested to handle frequent operation.
Sony’s body, while lighter, has a more plasticky feel and a less robust LCD hinge.
For users who shoot outdoors often, protective cases or rain covers are strongly recommended, especially for Sony users who lack Canon’s generally better sealing and build robustness.
Lens and Accessory Ecosystem: What Fits and Feeds Your Creativity?
One of the greatest advantages of the Canon T7i is its compatibility with the extensive Canon EF and EF-S lens lineup comprising over 300 native lenses covering every genre, from ultra-wide to super-telephoto, specialized macro, and tilt-shift optics. This availability empowers photographers to tailor gear exactly to style and budget.
The Sony A380 uses the Sony / Minolta A mount, which in 2024 is a more limited ecosystem with fewer current lenses in production, focusing mostly on legacy optics. New mirrorless Sony lenses do not work natively with the A mount, constraining natural evolution.
Adapters exist but may hinder autofocus speed. For full creative flexibility long-term, Canon clearly wins here.
Connectivity and Storage Options
Canon T7i:
- Wireless features: Built-in Wi-Fi, NFC, Bluetooth for instant image sharing and remote control.
- Supports SD/SDHC/SDXC cards (single slot) with UHS-I standard for faster write speeds.
- HDMI output and USB 2.0 port.
Sony A380:
- No wireless connectivity.
- Storage includes SD, SDHC, and Memory Stick Pro Duo cards.
- HDMI and USB 2.0 ports.
Canon’s wireless presence aligns with modern workflows, especially social media content creators and remote shooting setups.
Battery Life and Portability
Canon T7i claims approximately 600 shots per charge, thanks to efficient DIGIC 7 processing and newer battery technology. Sony’s older NP-FH50 battery delivers roughly 500 shots.
Longer battery life in the Canon reduces need for carrying multiple spares, enhancing user convenience during travel or events.
Price-to-Performance Ratio: What’s the Real Value?
Current pricing (as of mid-2024):
| Camera | Approximate Price (USD) | Key Appeal |
|---|---|---|
| Canon T7i | $750 | Modern features, image quality, AF system |
| Sony A380 | $900 (used/legacy market) | Build compactness, alternative lens mount |
Despite a slightly higher used price tag, the Sony A380 lacks many modern conveniences. The Canon T7i offers newer tech, superior performance across the board, and a broader future-proof lens ecosystem - making it an overall better investment for most buyers.
Who Should Choose Which Camera? Expert Recommendations by Use Case
If you are...
- A beginner or enthusiast looking for an easy-to-use, future-proof DSLR: The Canon T7i with its robust autofocus, touchscreen interface, articulated screen, and excellent image quality is your best choice.
- A portrait photographer focused on skin tones, bokeh, and eye detection AF: Canon T7i dominates this category.
- A landscape or nature enthusiast wanting high resolution and dynamic range: Canon’s 24MP CMOS sensor gives more flexibility.
- A wildlife or sports shooter needing fast burst and tracking: Canon’s 6fps and 45-point AF system outperform Sony.
- A videographer or vlogger: Canon is the only one here offering Full HD video, audio inputs, and stabilization support.
- Someone on a tighter budget or preferring a very compact DSLR: Sony A380’s lower price and smaller body are considerations but at a cost to modern features.
- A traveler prioritizing portability: Sony’s smaller size and weight help, but the Canon still offers a compact, versatile package.
- Interested in connecting and sharing images wirelessly: Canon’s built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and NFC options are essential.
In Summary: A Mature Choice for Today’s Photography and Creativity
Comparing the Canon EOS Rebel T7i and Sony Alpha DSLR-A380 illuminates how important recent sensor and processing advancements are in shaping real-world photography experiences.
The Canon T7i’s modern autofocus system, superior image quality, rich lens ecosystem, and user-friendly interface present a compelling value for both beginners and intermediate photographers aiming for rapid growth.
The Sony A380, while offering a light, compact DSLR experience, falls short in speed, resolution, video capability, and connectivity. Its older CCD sensor technology and limited lens options restrict its appeal to hobbyists exploring photography fundamentals without concern for future expandability.
Ready to advance your photography? We encourage you to try both cameras in hand if possible, but in nearly every evaluation metric, the Canon T7i stands out as the more versatile and capable camera in today’s entry-level DSLR market.
Find the right lenses and accessories that match your creative goals to unlock the full potential of your new DSLR. Whether shooting portraits, landscapes, or video, progressing with a camera like the T7i can elevate your skill and satisfaction.
Happy shooting!
Canon T7i vs Sony A380 Specifications
| Canon EOS Rebel T7i | Sony Alpha DSLR-A380 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Sony |
| Model type | Canon EOS Rebel T7i | Sony Alpha DSLR-A380 |
| Also called as | EOS 800D / Kiss X9i | - |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2017-02-15 | 2009-08-24 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 7 | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 45 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Canon EF/EF-S | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Total lenses | 326 | 143 |
| Crop factor | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.51x | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 6.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/200 secs | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 532g (1.17 pounds) | 519g (1.14 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 131 x 100 x 76mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") | 128 x 97 x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 67 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.8 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 614 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 600 photographs | 500 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible) | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $749 | $899 |