Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FH25
77 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
94 Imaging
39 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FH25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced June 2007
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-410
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-400
- New Model is Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FS35
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FH25 Overview
Below is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus E-410 and Panasonic FH25, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-410 (10MP) and FH25 (16MP) and the E-410 (Four Thirds) and FH25 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-410 was launched 4 years earlier than the FH25 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FH25 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-410 matches up vs the FH25 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FH25 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-410 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-410 Gallery and Panasonic FH25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Panasonic FH25
E-410 | FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH25 over the Olympus E-410
FH25 | E-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2011 | June 2007 | More recent by 43 months | |
Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 215k | Sharper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Panasonic FH25
E-410 | FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FH25 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-410 comes with physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Panasonic FH25 has measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-410 and Panasonic FH25 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the E-410 vs the FH25.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-410 and FH25 is 77 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FH25 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements purely by looking at specs. The photograph underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-410 and FH25.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-410 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FH25 will give more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The older E-410 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FH25 Specifications
Olympus E-410 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-410 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-410 | Lumix DMC-FS35 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2007-06-14 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Screen LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720p (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 lb) | 159g (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 494 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | - | $180 |