Canon T6 vs Sony A560
68 Imaging
61 Features
62 Overall
61
64 Imaging
53 Features
78 Overall
63
Canon T6 vs Sony A560 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF/EF-S Mount
- 485g - 129 x 101 x 78mm
- Launched March 2016
- Other Name is EOS Rebel 1300D
- Superseded the Canon 1200D
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 599g - 137 x 104 x 84mm
- Revealed August 2010
- Earlier Model is Sony A500
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon EOS T6 vs Sony Alpha DSLR-A560: A Thorough Entry-Level DSLR Showdown
Choosing the right camera at the entry-level DSLR category can set the tone for your photography journey. Today, we compare two noteworthy contenders: Canon’s EOS T6 (also known as Rebel 1300D) introduced in 2016, and Sony’s Alpha DSLR-A560 from 2010. Both cameras target enthusiasts stepping into DSLR ownership without breaking the bank, but they approach the market with distinct technologies and user experiences.
Having extensively tested both models over varied conditions and photographic genres, this in-depth comparison will break down their real-world performance, technical aspects, and suitability for different types of photographers. We’ll cover everything from sensor technology to ergonomics, autofocus capabilities to video features, illuminating all you need to know before you buy.
Physical Feel & Handling: Size Matters in Your Hands
When choosing a DSLR, ergonomics and physical handling can significantly impact how comfortable and intuitive your shooting experience is, especially during extended sessions.

The Canon T6 is a compact SLR measuring 129 x 101 x 78 mm and weighing a light 485 grams body-only. In contrast, the Sony A560 is slightly larger and heavier at 137 x 104 x 84 mm and 599 grams. This size difference is perceptible in hand; the Canon fits snugly, especially if you have smaller hands, lending to easier portability for travel or street use.
Holding both cameras, I found the Canon’s grip contours more tailored to entry-level users. The softer rounded edges and textured grip made it comfortable to hold without fatigue. The Sony, while solidly built, felt bulkier and less refined ergonomically.

Looking at control layouts, the Canon T6 sports a straightforward top dial with clear mode icons, including PASM modes (Program, Aperture, Shutter, Manual), ideal for those learning exposure control. The Sony’s top control offers similar mode select functionality but integrates a tilting rear LCD that adds compositional flexibility not present on the Canon.
Summary:
- Canon T6: Lighter, more compact, ergonomically friendly for beginners.
- Sony A560: Slightly bulkier but offers a tilting screen and robust feel.
Sensor & Image Quality: The Heart of the Camera
Sensor performance directly affects image quality - sharpness, dynamic range, noise - across all genres, from landscape to portrait.

Both cameras feature APS-C sized CMOS sensors, but with distinct specifications:
| Camera | Sensor Dimensions | Megapixels | Processor | ISO Range | DxOMark Overall Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canon T6 | 22.3 x 14.9 mm | 18 MP | DIGIC 4+ | 100–6400 (expandable to 12800) | 66 |
| Sony A560 | 23.5 x 15.6 mm | 14 MP | Bionz | 100–12800 (expandable to 25600) | 70 |
The Sony’s sensor is physically larger (366.6 mm² vs 332.27 mm²) with a 1.5x crop factor instead of Canon’s 1.6x, theoretically giving it a slight edge in light gathering and image quality, especially at high ISO settings.
In my hands-on testing, the Sony produced images with marginally better dynamic range and slightly cleaner shadows under low-light conditions. The Canon’s higher resolution sensor captures more detail, advantageous for cropping or large prints at moderate ISOs but with slightly reduced noise control compared to the Sony.
Color depth is excellent in both, with a slight edge to Sony (22.5-bit vs 22-bit). The Canon’s output skewed warmer, which may suit portrait photographers favoring skin tones, while Sony images exhibited neutral, accurate color reproduction.
In Portraits: Canon’s skin tone rendering felt more natural out of-camera, especially with JPEGs, making it beginner-friendly. The Sony required more post-processing adjustment but rewarded with richer tonal gradations.
In Landscapes: Sony delivered superior dynamic range, preserving more highlight and shadow detail in high contrast scenes.
Summary:
- Sony A560 offers better low-light performance and dynamic range.
- Canon T6 provides higher resolution beneficial for detailed large prints.
- Both sensors effectively support raw workflow for maximum creative control.
Autofocus Capability: Speed and Precision When It Counts
Autofocus systems are crucial across photography genres, from tracking fast-moving sports subjects to accurately locking onto delicate macro details.
| Feature | Canon T6 | Sony A560 |
|---|---|---|
| AF Points | 9 (all cross-type unknown) | 15 (3 cross-type) |
| AF System | Dual Pixel AF not supported | Phase detection AF |
| Face Detection | Yes | Yes |
| Animal Eye AF | No | No |
| AF Tracking | Yes | Limited (no continuous AF tracking) |
| AF Modes | Single, Continuous, Live View contrast AF | Single, Continuous AF |
Testing autofocus on moving subjects, the Sony’s 15-point system with 3 cross-type points proved more responsive and accurate, especially under good light. The higher number of focus points allows for better AF area selection, aiding compositions where the subject isn’t centered.
Canon’s 9-point AF is reliable but can lag behind Sony in terms of precision and speed when tracking unpredictable subjects like wildlife or sports. The Canon’s live view AF is contrast-based and generally slower than Sony’s phase detection system.
The Canon supports face detection and tracking which helps in portraiture, but the Sony’s system more precisely locks focus on faces and offers expanded AI Servo options.
Summary:
- Sony A560: More AF points and better speed for action and wildlife.
- Canon T6: Simpler AF suitable for portraits and general use.
- Neither supports animal eye tracking or the advanced hybrid AF systems of modern mirrorless cameras.
Build Quality & Weather Sealing: Durability You Can Trust?
Neither the Canon T6 nor Sony A560 offers professional-grade weather sealing or rugged construction. Both are entry-level DSLRs mainly designed for fair-weather shooting.
Field tests confirmed both cameras are well-built but require care in dusty or wet environments. The Canon’s lighter body feels a bit less robust, while the Sony’s additional weight conveys a sturdier frame.
Neither is waterproof nor freezeproof, so you’ll want protective accessories if shooting outdoors in harsh conditions.
Summary: Neither camera is weather sealed; consider protective gear for rough use.
Ergonomics & User Interface: Shooting Made Intuitive

The Canon T6 employs a fixed 3.0-inch LCD with 920k dots resolution - adequate for composing and reviewing images but lacks touch input or flexibility. It supports live view with face detection but is non-touchscreen and not self-facing.
The Sony A560 has a similar-sized 3.0-inch screen with 922k resolution but adds tilt capability, making it easier to shoot from low or high angles. This feature is invaluable for macro, street, and creative compositions.
Menu systems on both cameras are straightforward; Canon’s interface is beginner-friendly with helpful icons and guided menus. Sony’s menu is more traditional with less hand-holding but is logically organized.
Additionally, the Sony has a microphone input allowing for external audio capture in video mode, whereas the Canon lacks this feature.
Summary:
- Sony A560’s tilting screen and microphone input offer more flexibility.
- Canon T6’s fixed screen is simpler but sufficient for standard shooting.
Lens Ecosystem & Compatibility: Choose Your Glass Wisely
Lens selection is fundamental for any DSLR system, influencing creativity and image quality.
Canon T6 uses the ubiquitous Canon EF/EF-S mount with over 326 native lenses ranging from affordable kits to professional L-series primes and zooms. The vast third-party support from brands like Sigma and Tamron enhances choices further.
Sony A560 uses Sony/Minolta Alpha mount lenses with about 143 native options. This lineup is smaller but includes excellent primes and zooms for portraits, landscapes, and wildlife, although availability and variety are more limited compared to Canon.
If having access to a wide variety of lenses - especially modern, affordable, and specialty glass - is important, Canon's ecosystem provides the edge. Sony’s stable features solid optics but fewer options.
Summary:
- Canon T6 boasts a broader and more affordable lens ecosystem.
- Sony A560 compatible lenses cover core needs but with fewer choices.
Battery Life & Storage: Shooting Duration and Data Handling
Battery endurance can affect productivity on location.
| Feature | Canon T6 | Sony A560 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Life | Approx. 500 shots per charge (CIPA) | Approx. 1050 shots per charge (CIPA) |
| Battery Model | LP-E10 | NP-FM500H |
| Storage Media | Single SD/SDHC/SDXC slot | Dual slots: SD/SDHC/SDXC & Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Sony excels with double the battery longevity in my testing, a significant advantage for extended outdoor shoots or travel photography.
Sony’s dual storage slots provide redundancy and flexibility, important for professional workflows where instant backup is critical.
Canon’s single SD slot is typical for an entry-level DSLR but less flexible.
Summary:
- Sony A560 offers longer battery life and dual card slots.
- Canon T6 has shorter battery endurance and single card slot.
Video Capabilities: Beyond Still Photography
Video recording is increasingly relevant in DSLR selection.
| Specs | Canon T6 | Sony A560 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Resolution | Full HD 1080p at 30/24 fps | Full HD 1080p at 60p/30p |
| Video Formats | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic Input | No | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | No | Yes (In-body Sensor Stabilization) |
Sony’s advantage is clear: 60 fps full HD recording allows smoother motion capture, plus sensor-based stabilization helps handheld video be less shaky - a big plus for casual videographers.
Canon’s video output is limited to 30 fps and lacks any form of stabilization or audio input capabilities.
If video is part of your creative workflow, the Sony A560 offers substantial benefits.
Genre-Specific Performance: How These Cameras Stack Up Across Photography Styles
Drawing from extensive field tests, here’s a distilled analysis of how both cameras perform in key photography disciplines:
Portrait Photography: Canon’s warmer color rendering and skin tone accuracy make it appealing for portraits, especially for beginners wanting minimal post-editing. Sony’s better dynamic range enhances portraits with strong contrast lighting.
Landscape Photography: Sony’s sensor and dynamic range excel here, capturing richer details in highlights and shadows.
Wildlife Photography: Sony’s faster continuous shooting rate (5fps vs 3fps Canon) and superior autofocus benefit action and wildlife shots with quick subject movement.
Sports Photography: Sony leads again with better autofocus responsiveness and frame rate, capturing fast-paced action more reliably.
Street Photography: Canon’s smaller size and lighter body favor discreet shooting. The Sony’s tilting screen offers compositional creativity but adds bulk.
Macro Photography: Sony’s tilting screen and better battery life will enhance macro shoots; both cameras’ focusing precision is adequate but limited by lacking focus stacking or bracketing features.
Night/Astronomy Photography: Sony’s lower noise at high ISO gives cleaner night images.
Video Use: Sony clearly dominates with higher frame rates, stabilization, and mic input.
Travel Photography: Canon’s compact size and simpler interface make it travel-friendly, but Sony’s battery life and versatile file storage make it a dependable travel companion.
Professional Use: Both cameras lack professional-grade weather sealing and advanced features but Sony’s dual card slots and robust autofocus lend it more reliability.
Pricing & Value: Which Offers the Best Bang for Your Buck?
Both cameras target budget-conscious photographers.
- Canon EOS T6: Approx. $549 (body only)
- Sony A560: Approx. $650 (used market pricing, as discontinued)
While the Sony A560 is older and priced slightly higher in secondary markets, it provides more features like superior AF, longer battery life, tilting screen, and better video capabilities.
Canon T6 shines as a simple, reliable, and easy-to-use DSLR for absolute beginners who prioritize portability and ease of operation over advanced features.
Overall Performance Scores: How They Measure Up
DxOMark rates the Sony A560 sensor at 70 points versus Canon T6’s 66, reflecting the tangible but modest technical edge Sony holds. This echoes my subjective real-world findings.
Sample Image Gallery: Real-World Output Comparison
Side-by-side photo shoots demonstrate:
- Canon’s higher resolution delivers more detail in daylight portraits.
- Sony captures better shadow detail and dynamic range in landscapes.
- Noise handling favors Sony under dim conditions.
- Both cameras create pleasant bokeh, though Canon’s lens options may make aperture control easier for dreamy backgrounds.
Final Thoughts & Recommendations
Canon EOS T6 is your pick if:
- You’re a novice looking for an easy-to-use, lightweight DSLR that produces vibrant, pleasing images right out-of-camera.
- Portability and handling comfort are priorities.
- You want access to Canon’s vast and affordable lens ecosystem.
- You shoot mostly still photography with occasional Full HD video at 30fps.
- Budget constraints are tight.
Sony Alpha DSLR-A560 suits you if:
- You prefer better sensor performance with higher dynamic range and cleaner high ISO images.
- You need faster continuous shooting and more advanced autofocus for action, wildlife, or sports.
- Video is important, with 1080p at 60fps and built-in stabilization highly valued.
- You want longer battery life and dual card slots for professional backup workflows.
- Tilting LCD is beneficial for your shooting style.
How We Tested
My hands-on tests included studio setups with controlled lighting, outdoor scenes capturing diverse subjects from wildlife to street candid moments, and real-time AF speed trials. Both cameras were paired with standard kit lenses and select primes for fair comparison. Images were assessed for noise, dynamic range, color accuracy, and detail at low and high ISOs. Video footage was analyzed for sharpness, stabilization, and audio capture. Battery longevity was tested under continuous use per CIPA standards.
In Summary: Choosing the Right Entry-Level DSLR
The Canon EOS T6 and Sony A560 both remain viable DSLRs for enthusiasts stepping into photography, despite their age and limitations. Canon emphasizes user-friendliness and lens choice, excellent for those starting out or valuing classic DSLR simplicity. Sony pushes better sensor tech and feature set toward demanding users who benefit from faster focusing, longer battery life, and higher quality video.
Your choice will ultimately hinge on what features you prioritize and your shooting style. Be sure you’re buying the best camera for you - whether that’s ease and versatility with Canon, or technical superiority and expanded options with Sony.
Ready to take the next step? Consider also pairing your camera choice with good quality lenses and accessories which equally impact image quality and shooting enjoyment.
Happy shooting!
For more in-depth camera reviews and photography guidance, trust my 15+ years of expert testing and analysis here. Your photography journey deserves nothing less than informed, hands-on expertise.
Canon T6 vs Sony A560 Specifications
| Canon EOS T6 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A560 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Sony |
| Model type | Canon EOS T6 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A560 |
| Also called | EOS Rebel 1300D | - |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2016-03-10 | 2010-08-24 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4+ | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 15 |
| Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Canon EF/EF-S | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Amount of lenses | 326 | 143 |
| Crop factor | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 920k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.5x | 0.53x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 9.20 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/200s | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 485g (1.07 lb) | 599g (1.32 lb) |
| Dimensions | 129 x 101 x 78mm (5.1" x 4.0" x 3.1") | 137 x 104 x 84mm (5.4" x 4.1" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 66 | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.0 | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | 781 | 817 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | 1050 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LP-E10 | NP-FM500H |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | Dual |
| Price at launch | $549 | $650 |