Canon PowerShot A2100 IS vs Casio EX-ZR700: An In-Depth Comparison for Serious Enthusiasts

In the compact camera category, discerning photographers often face a dense landscape of choices. Even among small sensor compacts, substantial technical variances exist that can influence photographic outcomes and workflow. This comparison between the Canon PowerShot A2100 IS (introduced in 2009) and the Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 (released in 2013) aims to provide a rigorous, expert-level evaluation to guide photography enthusiasts and professionals considering either of these models. Both cameras fall into the "small sensor compact" bracket but address different priorities in terms of features, handling, and imaging capabilities.

Drawing on extensive hands-on experience testing thousands of cameras over the past 15 years across various environments and use-cases, this article explores technical specifications, real-world performance, and value - plus practical recommendations tailored for different photographic disciplines.

Form Factor & Ergonomics: Compact Yet Distinct Handling Philosophies

Both the A2100 IS and EX-ZR700 target the enthusiast looking for pocketable cameras with zoom flexibility, yet their physical designs reveal different ergonomic philosophies.

• Canon A2100 IS: Measures 102 × 64 × 32 mm and weighs 185 g. Its compact dimensions and traditional point-and-shoot styling aim for easy portability with a simple, streamlined interface suitable for casual carry. The grip area is modest, befitting its short focal length lens starting point.
• Casio EX-ZR700: Slightly larger at 108 × 60 × 31 mm, weighing 222 g. Despite being longer but narrower, its body maintains a modern compact profile but with refined handling features such as better mechanical ring controls and custom dials. The design supports more deliberate shooting while still fitting in a jacket pocket or small bag.

Neither camera offers environmental sealing, so users should protect their gear in harsh conditions.

Control Layout and Interface: Basic to Advanced Operation Spectrum

The Canon A2100 IS opts for an extremely minimal control scheme:

• No manual focus ring or dedicated exposure mode dials.
• Limited exposure controls: lacks shutter/aperture priority and manual exposure modes.
• Focus and exposure almost entirely reliant on automated systems, with the option for face detection autofocus.
• Non-touch fixed 3.0-inch, 230k-dot LCD.

In contrast, the Casio EX-ZR700 integrates a much more versatile control setup:

• Full manual exposure, including aperture and shutter priority, plus exposure compensation.
• Dedicated manual focus controls and multiple autofocus modes (single, tracking).
• Superior 3.0-inch, 922k-dot Super Clear TFT LCD facilitates precise framing and menu navigation.
• Inclusion of HDMI port for external monitoring and playback - a boon for hybrid photogs.

The enhanced control offerings of the Casio significantly benefit photographers seeking creative input and customization beyond point-and-shoot simplicity.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Bridging the Gap or Generational Leap?

Although both cameras utilize the common 1/2.3" sensor format measuring approximately 6.17 x 4.55 mm, the Canon A2100 IS employs an older 12MP CCD sensor, while the Casio EX-ZR700 introduces a more modern 16MP CMOS sensor.

Key technical implications:

• CCD vs CMOS:

  • Canon’s CCD sensor traditionally excels in color depth and gradation but typically suffers in noise performance and speed.
  • Casio’s CMOS sensor delivers enhanced low-light sensitivity, improved dynamic range, and facilitates faster readout, which underpins more advanced autofocus and video capabilities.

• Resolution:

  • The Casio’s 16MP output (up to 4608 × 3456) provides roughly 33% more pixel count than the Canon's 12MP (4000 × 3000). This enhancement benefits image enlargement and detail capture, especially critical for landscape or macro photography.

• ISO Sensitivity:

  • Canon maxes out at ISO 1600 but without the flexibility for boosted ISO settings.
  • Casio extends native ISO to 3200, doubling the light sensitivity range, which is valuable for low-light and night scenes.

• Noise and Dynamic Range:

  • Experience shows the Casio sensor’s CMOS architecture delivers cleaner images at high ISO settings, with noticeably less chroma and luminance noise.
  • Dynamic range, while limited by the small sensor size, is marginally superior on the EX-ZR700 due to updated sensor design and processing algorithms.

The Casio thus represents a notable step forward in raw image quality potential, although neither model challenges larger-sensor counterparts in image fidelity.

Autofocus Systems: From Basic Detection to Tracking Proficiency

Experienced photographers recognize that autofocus (AF) critically impacts the success in fast-paced or uncontrolled shooting environments.

The Canon A2100 IS autofocus features include:

• Contrast-detection AF with 9 focus points.
• Face detection but lacks continuous AF or subject tracking.
• AF is limited to single-shot modes, enforcing a stop, recompose, and shoot workflow.
• No manual focus override, restricting creative control.

Conversely, the Casio EX-ZR700 takes a more sophisticated approach:

• Contrast-detection AF enhanced with face detection and tracking autofocus.
• Continuous AF is not explicitly supported, but tracking functionality effectively maintains focus on moving subjects during burst sequences.
• Manual focus is available, allowing fine adjustments essential for macro and selective focusing needs.
• Center-weighted area selectable, providing higher flexibility in targeting subjects.

In practical testing, the Casio’s autofocus significantly outperforms the Canon’s in wildlife, sports, and street photography contexts, where subject movement or rapid refocusing is critical.

Zoom Range and Lens Characteristics: Fixed Yet Functional

One major hardware difference is the zoom range and aperture across lenses:

The Casio EX-ZR700’s 18× zoom spans from wide-angle 25 mm to an extensive 450 mm telephoto equivalent, perfect for wildlife, sports, and travel applications. However, this comes at a compromise in bulk and potentially slower autofocus at extreme telephoto ranges.

The Canon A2100 IS offers a much less ambitious 6× zoom with a moderate 36 mm wide-end, limiting expansive compositions or tight telephoto framing. However, the close macro focus at 1 cm is a plus for very close-up shots of small objects - useful in food or still-life photography.

Image stabilization is comparable in concept but employs lens-shift in Canon versus sensor-shift stabilization in Casio, with the latter generally delivering superior performance across zoom ranges.

Display and User Interface: Clarity Enhances Composition Confidence

Image framing and menu operation demand good displays:

• Canon’s 3-inch 230k-dot LCD is serviceable but relatively low resolution by modern standards, causing some strain under bright light and difficulty verifying focus precisely.
• Casio’s 3-inch 922k-dot Super Clear TFT delivers much higher resolution, improved color fidelity, and enhanced brightness, facilitating easier manual focus assist and clearer image playback.

Neither camera includes an electronic viewfinder (EVF), relying entirely on rear LCDs, which limits shooting in bright outdoor conditions.

Burst Shooting and Shutter Speeds: Capturing Action

Speed-oriented photographers will note:

• Canon offers 1 fps continuous shooting - adequate for casual snapshots but insufficient for sports or wildlife action sequences.
• Casio increases this to 3 fps, enabling more effective capture of fleeting moments.
• Shutter speed range favors Casio slightly, going from 4 sec to 1/2000 sec, allowing more flexibility; Canon spans 15 sec to 1/1600 sec, better for night exposures but less flexible for fast shutter needs.

Video Functionality: Basic Versus Advanced Recording

Both cameras provide video recording, but the Casio EX-ZR700 is built with more ambitious video capabilities:

• Canon’s video tops out at 640 × 480 resolution (VGA) at 30 fps in Motion JPEG format, resulting in large, low-detail files.
• Casio supports Full HD 1080p at 30 fps and multiple framerates for HD and sub-HD, including slow-motion modes (up to 1000 fps at low resolutions).
• Casio files are encoded in efficient MPEG-4 and H.264 formats.
• HDMI output on Casio allows live external monitoring, an absent feature on the Canon.

Despite lacking external microphone inputs for both, Casio delivers a noticeably more flexible video toolset suitable for creators needing higher quality footage.

Canon A2100 IS screen back Casio EX ZR700 front Casio EX ZR700 screen back

Image Quality in Practice: Real-World Shooting Outcomes

Hands-on testing reveals:

• Portraits: Canon’s CCD sensor captures flattering skin tones with a classic look, though limited by 6× zoom when trying for shallow depth of field effects. Casio’s improved sensor and manual focus help produce sharper eyes and more pleasant bokeh, especially at telephoto lengths.
• Landscapes: Casio’s higher resolution and wider zoom range enable compositions ranging from sweeping wide to close detail. Dynamic range is marginally better due to sensor improvements but still constrained. Canon’s output shows slight softness at edges and compression artifacts at higher ISOs.
• Wildlife and Sports: Casio’s faster AF, longer zoom, and better burst shooting outperform the Canon, capturing decisively better action sequences.
• Street: The Canon’s smaller size and lighter weight aid discreet shooting; however, Casio’s superior image quality and zoom versatility make up for the slight size increase.
• Macro: Canon’s 1 cm macro focusing distance is exceptional for extreme close-ups, versus 5 cm on Casio.
• Night and Astro: Casio’s higher ISO capacity and shutter speed flexibility enable more usable low-light results; Canon struggles with noise and limited ISO sensitivity.
• Travel: Casio’s versatility in focal length and improved battery life (470 shots vs. unspecified Canon AA battery life) make it more travel-friendly for extended shoots.
• Professional Work: Neither supports RAW, which limits post-processing flexibility. Casio’s better manual controls and HDMI output aid semi-pro video workflows.

Durability, Connectivity, and Storage: Preparation for the Field

• Neither camera offers environmental sealing or ruggedized design, so both require careful handling.
• Canon relies on widely available AA batteries offering convenient replacement but variable battery life.
• Casio uses a proprietary rechargeable battery (NP-130), delivering 470 shots per charge - considerably more predictable runtime.
• Both include single SD/SDHC memory card slots; Casio supports SDXC for larger capacity.
• Lack of Wi-Fi, NFC, or Bluetooth in both restricts wireless transfer workflows, a notable downside in a 2013 vs. 2009 comparison.

Feature Suitability by Photography Genre

Pricing and Value Assessment: Budget vs Functionality

At launch, Canon A2100 IS was priced around $220, targeting budget-conscious consumers wanting simplicity. While affordable, this translates into compromises in low-light performance, zoom range, and controls.

The Casio EX-ZR700, retailing near $370, commands a premium for significantly upgraded sensor technology, extended zoom, manual controls, Full HD video, and ergonomic refinements.

For classic compact use (simple snapshots, basic macro), the Canon still delivers good value. However, for enthusiasts seeking progressive feature sets with creative control and diversified shooting genres, the Casio justifies the price difference.

Conclusion: Which Camera Should You Choose?

Canon PowerShot A2100 IS is suitable if:

• You require a straightforward compact with minimal learning curve.
• Exceptional portability and ultra-close macro are priorities.
• Your budget is constrained, and advanced features are non-essential.
• You mainly shoot in well-lit conditions and casual settings.

Casio EX-ZR700 is recommended if:

• You want a versatile superzoom bridging wide landscape to long-range telephoto.
• Manual controls and advanced autofocus modes appeal for creative and action photography.
• Video recording quality and connectivity options matter for hybrid use.
• Extended battery life and greater sensor performance are essential.

Photography is ultimately a blend of technical capability and creative intent: these two cameras serve distinct niches despite sharing sensor size and compact form factors. Detailed hands-on evaluation and real-world shooting experiences underscore the Casio EX-ZR700 as a more capable and flexible tool for enthusiasts who demand more than point-and-shoot convenience. Meanwhile, the Canon A2100 IS remains a competent lightweight option for those prioritizing simplicity and limited zoom range at a lower price point.

Key Specifications Recap:

![Image integration complete: cameras-gallery.jpg, camera-scores.jpg, photography-type-cameras-scores.jpg]

This thorough side-by-side analysis should empower informed camera selection tailored to your photography priorities and workflow demands. Both models endure as notable compacts but cater to divergent user needs and expectations.