Clicky

Canon A2300 vs Samsung TL500

Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
25
Overall
33
Canon PowerShot A2300 front
 
Samsung TL500 front
Portability
88
Imaging
34
Features
54
Overall
42

Canon A2300 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs

Canon A2300
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
  • 125g - 95 x 54 x 20mm
  • Released February 2012
Samsung TL500
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
  • 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
  • Revealed July 2010
  • Additionally Known as EX1
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon A2300 vs Samsung TL500 Overview

In this article, we are analyzing the Canon A2300 versus Samsung TL500, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Canon and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the A2300 (16MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the A2300 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") use different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The A2300 was brought out 20 months later than the TL500 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a short summation of how the A2300 matches up vs the TL500 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

				

Reasons to pick Canon A2300 over the Samsung TL500

 A2300 TL500 
RevealedFebruary 2012July 2010Fresher by 20 months

Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Canon A2300

 TL500 A2300 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution614k230kCrisper display (+384k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Common features in the Canon A2300 and Samsung TL500

 A2300 TL500 
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Canon A2300 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry your camera, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon A2300 has got external dimensions of 95mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL500 has measurements of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).

Look at the Canon A2300 versus Samsung TL500 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the A2300 against the TL500.

Canon A2300 vs Samsung TL500 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A2300 and TL500 is 96 and 88 respectively.

Canon A2300 vs Samsung TL500 top view buttons comparison

Canon A2300 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the A2300 and TL500.

Clearly, both cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The A2300 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Canon A2300 will produce more detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The fresher A2300 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Canon A2300 vs Samsung TL500 sensor size comparison

Canon A2300 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A2300 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon A2300 Portrait photography factors
Samsung TL500 Portrait photography factors
34
megapixel count decent (16MP)
includes face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
40
you can focus manually
saves RAW formats
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Canon A2300 as a Street photography camera
Samsung TL500 as a Street photography camera
56
lighter than competitors (125 grams)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
66
screen articulates
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
sensor is small (1/1.7")
heavier than average in class (386 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon A2300
Sports photography with Samsung TL500
32
megapixel count decent (16MP)
includes tracking focus
max frames per second low (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (210 shots)
does not have phase detect AF
29
built in image stabilization (Optical)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
does not have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Canon A2300 Travel photography highlights
Samsung TL500 Travel photography highlights
66
lighter than competitors (125g)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
terrible battery power (210 CIPA)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
64
built-in flash
screen is selfie friendly
pretty wide (24mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than average in class (386 grams)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Canon A2300 Landscape photography features
Samsung TL500 Landscape photography features
33
really wide (28mm)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
terrible battery power (210 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse mode
52
you can focus manually
pretty wide (24mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
missing Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A2300 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung TL500 as a Vlogging camera
30
really wide (28mm)
includes face detect focusing
lighter than competitors (125 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone support
64
pretty wide (24mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
screen is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external mic socket
heavier than average in class (386g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon A2300 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A2300 and Samsung TL500
 Canon PowerShot A2300Samsung TL500
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Samsung
Model type Canon PowerShot A2300 Samsung TL500
Otherwise known as - EX1
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2012-02-07 2010-07-09
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8-6.9 f/1.8-2.4
Macro focusing range 3cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dots 614k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1500s
Continuous shooting rate 1.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 5.20 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format H.264 H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 125 grams (0.28 lbs) 386 grams (0.85 lbs)
Dimensions 95 x 54 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 40
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 19.2
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.1
DXO Low light rating not tested 129
Other
Battery life 210 images -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID NB-11L SLB-07A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, internal
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $139 $527