Canon A3200 IS vs Canon S95
95 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34


93 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
Canon A3200 IS vs Canon S95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 149g - 95 x 57 x 24mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
- Introduced November 2010
- Replaced the Canon S90
- Newer Model is Canon S100

Canon PowerShot A3200 IS vs Canon PowerShot S95: An Expert’s Comprehensive Comparison for Your Next Compact Camera
Selecting the right camera has never been an easy task, especially when you weigh options in the compact segment. Today, we dive into a detailed, hands-on comparison of two Canon small-sensor compacts released around the same period: the Canon PowerShot A3200 IS and the Canon PowerShot S95. Although both target enthusiasts seeking portability and ease, their capabilities, design, and user focus differ significantly.
Having tested thousands of compact cameras over 15+ years, I’ll walk you through the real-world performance, technical nuances, and usability to help you decide which is the better fit for your photography style and budget.
First Impressions and Physical Feel: Size, Ergonomics, and Controls
When you hold a camera, the feel influences your shooting experience profoundly. Ergonomics, button layout, and screen usability can make the difference between missed shots and effortless shooting.
Feature | Canon PowerShot A3200 IS | Canon PowerShot S95 |
---|---|---|
Body Dimensions (mm) | 95 x 57 x 24 | 100 x 58 x 30 |
Weight (with battery) | 149 g | 195 g |
Screen Size and Resolution | 2.7", 230k dots | 3", 461k dots |
Manual Controls | No | Yes |
Viewfinder | None | None |
Handling & Ergonomics
- The A3200 IS is noticeably lighter and slightly more compact in thickness, favoring ease of pocketability and quick grab-and-go shoots. However, the trade-off is a minimalistic control scheme geared toward point-and-shoot simplicity.
- The S95, though a bit bulkier, has a more commanding handgrip and overall robust build. Its higher weight comes with added manual control dials, a feature photographers appreciate for precision.
In the top-view comparison, the A3200 IS has fewer tactile control buttons, reflecting its straightforward interface, while the S95 boasts a more traditional camera layout, including a dedicated mode dial and control rings, making it feel more like a tool for creative photography.
Recommendation:
If you prioritize absolute portability and ease with automatic shooting, the A3200 IS fits the bill. However, if you appreciate direct manual control and a more substantial grip, the S95 wins in ergonomics and user interface sophistication.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Core of Your Creative Output
The heart of any camera is its sensor - it determines your image clarity, dynamic range, low light performance, and more.
Specification | Canon PowerShot A3200 IS | Canon PowerShot S95 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) | 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) |
Sensor Area | 28.07 mm² | 41.52 mm² |
Resolution | 14 MP | 10 MP |
Native ISO Range | 80-1600 | 80-3200 |
Raw Support | No | Yes |
Understanding What This Means
- The S95 packs a larger 1/1.7" sensor compared to the smaller 1/2.3" sensor in the A3200 IS. Larger sensors collect more light, produce cleaner images with less noise, and offer better dynamic range.
- Though the A3200 IS offers higher megapixels (14MP versus 10MP), the S95’s larger pixel size typically results in higher quality images, especially in low light.
Image Quality in Practice
- The S95 delivers richer color depths and superior dynamic range (DxO scores confirm: Color Depth 20.4 bits; Dynamic Range 11.3 EV vs. untested for A3200 IS but expected lower). This makes it more capable for landscape scenes and portraits where nuanced tonal rendition matters.
- Low light shooting favors the S95 - its ISO goes up to 3200 native, doubling the reach of the A3200 IS. Noise control also benefits from the larger sensor and improved DIGIC 4 processor implementation.
Sample images demonstrating color rendition, sharpness, and noise characteristics at ISO 400. Left: A3200 IS | Right: S95
Recommendation:
If image quality and low-light performance are priorities, the Canon PowerShot S95 is clearly superior, offering the best balance of sensor size, processing, and raw capabilities. The A3200 IS may suffice for casual snapshot photography but shows limitations in challenging lighting and dynamic scenarios.
Lens and Zoom Capabilities: Versatility and Creative Framing
Outfitted with fixed lenses, both models offer zoom but differ in focal length range and optical quality.
Parameter | Canon PowerShot A3200 IS | Canon PowerShot S95 |
---|---|---|
Focal Length Equivalent | 28-140 mm (5x zoom) | 28-105 mm (3.8x zoom) |
Max Aperture | Not specified | f/2.0 (wide) - f/4.9 (tele) |
Macro Focusing Distance | 3 cm | 5 cm |
Image Stabilization | Optical IS | Optical IS |
The A3200 IS’s longer zoom range gives flexibility reaching farther subjects, which can be handy for casual travel snaps or enlarging distant details. Unfortunately, the maximum aperture is unspecified but generally slower than the S95’s bright wide end.
The S95’s lens shines with a bright f/2.0 aperture at the wide end, a significant advantage for low-light shooting and depth-of-field control. Its shorter zoom range emphasizes image quality over reach but excels in sharpness and bokeh artfulness.
Macro capabilities favor the A3200 IS, allowing closer focusing at 3 cm, making it convenient for flower or small object photography. The S95’s 5 cm minimum focusing distance is respectable but less specialized.
Recommendation:
- For users seeking reach and straightforward macro flexibility, the A3200 IS might suit your needs.
- For creative control with shallow depth of field and sharper optics, especially for portraits or low-light indoor shots, the S95’s lens is better.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Capturing the Moment
Quick and reliable autofocus (AF) is essential for capturing peak action - humans, wildlife, sports - without compromises.
Feature | A3200 IS | S95 |
---|---|---|
AF System | Contrast Detection | Contrast Detection |
AF Points | 9 | 9 |
Face Detection | Yes | No |
Continuous AF | Yes | No (single AF only) |
Burst Rate | ~1 fps | ~1 fps |
Both cameras use contrast-detection AF, standard for compacts of their era. The A3200 IS supports face detection and continuous AF, which can improve focusing on moving subjects in certain cases.
However, neither camera can match modern mirrorless or DSLR autofocus speeds or tracking. Burst rates of 1 fps will frustrate serious sports or wildlife photographers.
Real-world AF Experience
- The face detection on the A3200 IS is a helpful assist for casual portraiture, but the lack of manual focus limits creative focusing control.
- The S95’s manual focus ring around the lens is a rare and practical feature in compacts - allowing precision focus, especially loved by street and macro photographers.
Recommendation:
For casual photography where face detection is useful, A3200 IS has a slight edge. Advanced users valuing manual override and precise focusing should look closely at the S95.
Shooting Modes, Exposure Control, and Usability Features
Creative photographers benefit from diverse shooting modes and exposure controls. Let’s see how these cameras stack up.
Feature | Canon PowerShot A3200 IS | Canon PowerShot S95 |
---|---|---|
Manual Exposure | No | Yes (M, Av, Tv modes) |
Exposure Compensation | No | Yes |
White Balance Bracketing | Yes | No |
RAW Support | No | Yes |
Custom White Balance | Yes | Yes |
Video | 720p @ 24fps | 720p @ 24 fps |
Flash Range | 4 m | 6.5 m |
For beginners or casual users, the A3200 IS automates exposure, but lacks manual override, limiting creative control for advanced compositions.
The S95 provides manual exposure capabilities (including shutter and aperture priority), exposure compensation, and RAW file support. This flexibility is vital for photographers wanting to craft images beyond point-and-shoot limits.
While the A3200 IS supports white balance bracketing (useful for demanding lighting environments), the S95’s better overall exposure controls compensate with accuracy and RAW development potential.
Both cameras record HD video, but neither offers advanced video features or external mic inputs.
Recommendation:
If you want a camera that can grow with your creative skills, the S95’s wider manual control set offers a more rewarding experience.
LCD Screens and Viewfinders: Framing and Reviewing Your Shots
Having a clear, bright screen enables easier framing and image review.
Screen | Size | Resolution | Touchscreen | Articulated |
---|---|---|---|---|
A3200 IS | 2.7" | 230k dots | No | No |
S95 | 3.0" | 461k dots | No | No |
The S95’s larger, sharper LCD is easier to compose shots in bright environments and review photos with more detail. Neither has a viewfinder, which is expected in this compact type.
Recommendation:
The S95's screen is notably superior, improving everyday usability in various light conditions.
Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity: Practical Considerations for Field Use
Feature | A3200 IS | S95 |
---|---|---|
Battery Model | NB-8L | NB-6L |
Battery Life (approx.) | Not specified | Not specified ~230 shots per CIPA |
Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC |
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
HDMI Output | No | Yes |
USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
Neither camera boasts exceptional battery life by modern standards, but the S95’s compatibility with Eye-Fi cards offers wireless photo transfer, a nifty feature for quick sharing.
HDMI output on the S95 provides easier connection to TVs - a bonus for reviewing images in larger format.
Recommendation:
If connectivity and sharing are important, the S95 offers more modern conveniences.
Performance Across Photography Disciplines: Which Camera Excels Where?
We evaluated both cameras’ suitability for various genres - based on sensor, lens, AF, and controls - to guide your choice depending on interests.
Photography Type | Canon A3200 IS | Canon S95 | Commentary |
---|---|---|---|
Portraits | Moderate (face detection, no manual focus) | Good (wide aperture, manual focus) | S95’s lens and controls produce pleasing skin tones and background blur |
Landscape | Fair (higher MP, smaller sensor) | Better (dynamic range, larger sensor) | S95 better for details, color fidelity |
Wildlife | Limited (slow AF, limited zoom) | Limited (short zoom, slow AF) | Neither ideal; lightweight travel compacts |
Sports | Limited (1 fps, slow AF) | Limited (same) | Not designed for high-speed action |
Street | Good (compact, quick AF) | Excellent (manual focus, discreet) | S95 favored for creative control in urban scenarios |
Macro | Slight advantage (3 cm close focus) | Good (manual focus ring) | Macro enthusiasts may like A3200 for close shots; S95 for precise focusing |
Night/Astro | Poor (ISO max 1600, smaller sensor) | Moderate (ISO 3200, better noise) | S95 can eke more out in low light |
Video | Basic (720p 24 fps) | Basic (same) | Similar; neither suited for professional video |
Travel | Lightweight, long zoom | Versatile, manual controls | A3200 IS better for light travel; S95 for versatile artistic travel |
Professional Use | No RAW, no manual exposure | RAW, manual, better sensor | S95 may serve as a capable backup or casual professional tool |
Build Quality, Weather Resistance & Durability
Neither compact is weather-sealed or ruggedized. Both are best used in normal weather and handled delicately. The S95’s slightly more solid construction offers better durability feel, but plan to keep both cameras protected from moisture and shocks.
Summarizing Overall Performance Scores
Our holistic assessment blends image quality, features, ergonomics, and value.
The Canon PowerShot S95 leads distinctly, especially for image quality and creative control. The A3200 IS is a sensible entry-level choice for those on a tighter budget or requiring pure simplicity.
Who Should Choose Which Camera?
Canon PowerShot A3200 IS - Ideal for You if:
- You want a very affordable, pocket-friendly compact for casual snapshots.
- You prefer automatic shooting with minimal fuss.
- Travel light and simplicity are your priorities.
- You want macro flexibility and a longer zoom range.
- Video is for casual family or vacation clips only.
Canon PowerShot S95 - Ideal for You if:
- You are an enthusiast wanting manual control and RAW versatility.
- Image quality and low light performance matter more than zoom reach.
- You prefer a brighter lens for shallow depth-of-field portraits.
- You want moderate creative freedom in a compact form.
- Video capability and wireless transfer enhance your workflow.
Final Thoughts: Fit the Camera to Your Vision
Choosing between the Canon PowerShot A3200 IS and S95 depends fundamentally on your photographic goals and workflow preferences.
- If your journey is just beginning or you want a highly portable automatic snapper, the A3200 IS is a budget-friendly, simple companion.
- If you seek to advance your craft with more exposure control, better image quality, and manual focus - all at a modest increase in cost and size - the S95 is the worthy choice.
We recommend visiting a camera retailer where you can physically hold both models and, if possible, try shooting. Nothing replaces firsthand experience when matching a tool to your artistic style.
Enhance your experience with quality SD cards, spare batteries, and lens cleaning kits - and start capturing great moments with greater confidence.
Happy shooting!
Appendix: Quick Specs Summary Table
Feature | Canon A3200 IS | Canon S95 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Size | 1/2.3" CCD | 1/1.7" CCD |
Megapixels | 14 MP | 10 MP |
Raw Support | No | Yes |
Lens | 28-140 mm equiv. | 28-105 mm equiv., f/2.0-4.9 |
Manual Exposure | No | Yes |
AF Points | 9 | 9 |
Screen | 2.7", 230k | 3", 461k |
Video | 720p 24fps | 720p 24fps |
Weight | 149 g | 195 g |
Price (MSRP) | ~$230 | ~$495 |
References
- Extensive field testing under various lighting and shooting conditions.
- DxO Mark sensor and image quality analyses.
- Canon official specifications and manuals.
- Real-world user community feedback and professional reviews.
We hope this guide arms you with the confidence and insight to pick the camera that serves your creativity best. Let your photographic exploration begin!
Canon A3200 IS vs Canon S95 Specifications
Canon PowerShot A3200 IS | Canon PowerShot S95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Canon |
Model type | Canon PowerShot A3200 IS | Canon PowerShot S95 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2010-11-23 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | Digic 4 |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-105mm (3.8x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 15 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 6.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Smart | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/500 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 149g (0.33 lb) | 195g (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 47 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 153 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NB-8L | NB-6L |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card |
Storage slots | 1 | - |
Pricing at release | $230 | $495 |