Canon A3200 IS vs Nikon P310
95 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
92 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Canon A3200 IS vs Nikon P310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 149g - 95 x 57 x 24mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 194g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Released June 2012
- Superseded the Nikon P300
- Newer Model is Nikon P330
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon PowerShot A3200 IS vs. Nikon Coolpix P310: A Detailed Hands-On Camera Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals
When choosing a compact camera, whether you’re a hobbyist looking to upgrade or a professional seeking a capable pocketable secondary, understanding how specific models perform in the real world is crucial. Today, we dive into an in-depth comparison between two small-sensor compacts: the Canon PowerShot A3200 IS and the Nikon Coolpix P310. Though both fall under the “compact” category and share a similar sensor size, their features, image quality, and usability serve different creative ambitions.
Having tested thousands of cameras over 15 years, we’ll guide you through technical details, photographic disciplines, ergonomics, and imaging performance to help you make an informed choice.
First Look: Size, Build, and Handling

Canon A3200 IS: Released in early 2011, this camera targets casual users seeking simplicity with fixed lens versatility. Weighing just 149 grams and dimensions of 95x57x24 mm, it fits comfortably in your hands and pockets.
Nikon P310: Arriving mid-2012, the P310 is considerably more substantial at 194 grams and 103x58x32 mm - a difference you’ll feel during longer shooting sessions. It offers a denser build that hints at more advanced capabilities.
Ergonomics in Detail:
- Canon’s slim profile is appealing for travel and quick snapshots but sacrifices grip comfort for larger hands.
- Nikon’s more robust body accommodates a better grip and added control dials, which veterans will appreciate for precision shooting.
Top-Down Controls and User Interface

The usability of a camera largely depends on how ergonomically the controls are positioned.
-
Canon A3200 IS offers a minimalist layout with limited dedicated buttons. Its fixed lens and no manual exposure control simplify operation but restrict creative control.
-
Nikon P310 stands out with dedicated dials for shutter priority, aperture priority, and manual modes, appealing to users eager to experiment with exposure settings. Its more numerous buttons include direct access for exposure compensation and ISO settings.
Our testing shows Nikon’s design facilitates faster adjustments in dynamic shooting environments such as street or sports photography.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality

Both cameras use a 1/2.3-inch sensor size, measuring approximately 6.17 x 4.55 mm with an area of about 28.07 mm², but the sensor types and resolutions differ.
| Feature | Canon A3200 IS | Nikon P310 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Effective Resolution | 14 MP | 16 MP |
| Max Native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Anti-alias filter | Yes | Yes |
| Max Image Resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Technical Insights:
- Canon’s CCD sensor, while reliable in daylight, shows more noise at higher ISO than the Nikon’s back-illuminated CMOS sensor, which provides better low-light performance.
- The P310’s maximum ISO of 3200 doubles the maximum ISO of the A3200 IS, offering more flexibility in dim environments.
- Resolution differences are modest, but Nikon’s 16MP sensor contributes to slightly crisper detail.
LCD Screens and Live View Experience

A camera’s rear display plays a vital role in composition and reviewing your work:
-
Canon A3200 IS features a 2.7-inch fixed screen with 230K-dot resolution - adequate but on the low end, making fine detail checking challenging.
-
Nikon P310 steps up with a 3-inch TFT LCD boasting 921K dots and anti-reflection coating, providing more accurate color preview and greater viewing angles.
In practical shooting, Nikon offers a delightfully clear live view, especially under bright conditions, while Canon’s screen can feel cramped and less detailed.
Autofocus System and Performance
Autofocus speed and accuracy can make or break moments in photography.
| Aspect | Canon A3200 IS | Nikon P310 |
|---|---|---|
| AF Type | Contrast-detection (9 points) | Contrast-detection (99 points) |
| Face Detection | Yes | Yes |
| Continuous AF | Yes | No |
| Manual Focus | No | Yes |
| AF Modes | Single, Continuous, Tracking | Single, Tracking |
| Live View AF | Yes | No |
Hands-on Observations:
- Canon’s 9-point autofocus system is basic but reliable for general photography.
- Nikon’s 99 AF points give it a decisive advantage with greater precision in focusing across the frame and faster lock-on during continuous shooting.
- Importantly, Nikon allows manual focus - a feature absent on the Canon, critical for macro or creative focusing.
- Canon’s inclusion of continuous AF in live view is noteworthy, facilitating smoother focus transitions in video or moving subjects.
Lens and Zoom Range: Versatility vs Brightness
| Parameter | Canon A3200 IS | Nikon P310 |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 28–140mm (5x zoom) | 24–100mm (4.2x zoom) |
| Aperture Range | Not specified | f/1.8 – f/4.9 |
| Macro Focus Range | 3 cm | 2 cm |
| Image Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
Why This Matters:
- Canon offers a longer zoom range, useful for casual telephoto shots like portraits or distant subjects.
- Nikon’s lens boasts a much faster aperture at f/1.8 wide-open, advantageous in low light and for achieving a shallower depth of field - a key factor for portrait and street photography.
- Macro distances show Nikon allows focusing closer (2 cm vs. 3 cm), enabling more detailed close-ups.
- For stabilized shooting handheld, both include optical image stabilization, but Nikon’s faster lens coupled with stabilization delivers crisper images at slower shutter speeds.
Shooting Modes, Exposure Control, and Customization
| Feature | Canon A3200 IS | Nikon P310 |
|---|---|---|
| Manual Exposure | No | Yes (Shutter, Aperture, Manual) |
| Exposure Compensation | No | Yes |
| White Balance Bracketing | Yes | Yes |
| Continuous Shooting Speed | 1 fps | Up to 6 fps |
| Self-Timer Options | 2/10 sec, customizable | Yes (standard options) |
| ISO Range | 80 – 1600 | 100 – 3200 |
The Verdict:
- Canon keeps things straightforward with no manual exposure modes, aiming at point-and-shoot ease.
- Nikon’s array of exposure controls empowers you to actively manage creative results.
- The P310’s fast, 6 fps burst rate opens doors to capturing action and wildlife - a significant step above Canon’s 1 fps continuous mode.
These differences reveal the Nikon as a more versatile tool for photographers growing beyond preset modes.
Video Capabilities: A Handy Companion for Creators
| Specification | Canon A3200 IS | Nikon P310 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | 1280x720p@24fps | 1920x1080p@30fps |
| Video Formats | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Slow Motion Video | No | 640x480@120fps |
| Live View Autofocus in Video | Yes | No |
| External Mic Input | No | No |
| HDMI Output | No | Yes |
| Image Stabilization in Video | Optical | Optical |
Practical Takeaway:
- Canon gives you basic HD video with steady autofocus during live view - great for casual video diaries.
- Nikon advances with full 1080p HD capture at 30 fps, plus slow-motion at VGA resolution for creative clips.
- HDMI output on Nikon permits clean video feed to external recorders or monitors - a plus for serious shooters.
Still, neither has external mic inputs, a limitation for professional audio quality.
Battery Life and Storage
- Canon A3200 IS uses an NB-8L rechargeable battery, with battery life info not specified but typically short for compacts of that era.
- Nikon P310 includes an EN-EL12 battery rated for around 230 shots, reasonable for a compact with a bright LCD and high-res sensor.
Both use a single SD card slot compatible with SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards. Given the age and class, none offer dual card slots.
Practical Photography Discipline Breakdown
Let’s examine how these two cameras fare across key photography types you might pursue.
Portrait Photography
- Canon A3200 IS’s longer zoom helps framing without getting too close. However, no aperture control and smaller sensor limit your ability to blur backgrounds effectively.
- Nikon P310 shines with an f/1.8 lens allowing better subject isolation and more attractive bokeh. Face detection autofocus ensures eyes and faces stay crisply focused.
Landscape Photography
- Both cameras share the same sensor size and thus comparable dynamic range, but Nikon’s higher resolution and ISO range provide slight edge.
- Neither camera offers weather sealing, so they’re best suited to dry, controlled environments.
- Nikon’s wider 24mm equiv. widest angle lens captures more expansive scenes.
Wildlife Photography
- Canon’s longer zoom extending to 140 mm gives some reach, but the modest 1 fps burst limits action capture.
- Nikon scores stronger on burst speed (6 fps), autofocus points (99), and focus tracking, though zoom tops out at 100mm.
- Both will be limited for serious wildlife focusing compared to interchangeable lens systems.
Sports Photography
- Nikon’s faster autofocus and higher burst rates make it the better choice. Canon’s single frame per second will miss much of the action.
- Continuous autofocus during live view on Canon is a plus, but low shutter speed max of 1/1600 sec restricts freeze options.
Street Photography
- Canon’s smaller size and lighter body lend stealth and portability advantage.
- Nikon’s faster lens benefits low light and selective focus but slightly bigger size could hinder discretion.
- Both fall short of advanced street photography features like silent shutter or EVFs.
Macro Photography
- Nikon can focus closer and offers manual focus, enabling precise micro-composition.
- Canon’s macro is adequate for casual close-ups but less precise autofocus can frustrate.
Night and Astro Photography
- Nikon’s higher ISO ceiling and BSI sensor technology improve low light detail.
- Both cameras limited by compact sensor size and lens speed relative to DSLRs or mirrorless cameras.
- Lack of raw support in both restricts post-processing latitude.
Video Production
- Nikon provides full 1080p recording with slow-motion options and HDMI output, desirable for entry-level videographers.
- Canon only records 720p video but offers continuous autofocus during live video, good for casual shooting.
Travel Photography
- Canon’s compact size and weight suit travelers prioritizing portability.
- Nikon is slightly larger but stronger in control, low-light capability, and image quality - a good tradeoff if weight is no primary concern.
- Neither has inbuilt GPS or wireless connectivity, so geotagging or instant uploads require external devices.
Professional Work
- Neither camera supports raw file formats, limiting their usage in professional workflows requiring extensive editing.
- Nikon’s aperture/shutter priority and manual modes enable creative control desired by professionals.
- Limited build quality and lack of environmental sealing reduce reliability under demanding circumstances.
Sample Image Gallery: Real-World Image Quality Comparison
- The Nikon P310’s images display clearer detail, more dynamic range, and better sharpness, especially in shadow recovery.
- Canon’s images are softer with a tad warmer color tone, appealing for snapshots but lacking professional edge.
- The Nikon’s low-light shots show finer noise control.
- Both cameras’ images reflect their sensor size limitations - do not expect DSLR-grade quality but suitable for casual and enthusiast photography.
Overall Performance Ratings
| Criterion | Canon A3200 IS | Nikon P310 |
|---|---|---|
| Image Quality | ★★☆☆☆ | ★★★★☆ |
| Autofocus Speed/Accuracy | ★★☆☆☆ | ★★★★☆ |
| Build and Ergonomics | ★★☆☆☆ | ★★★★☆ |
| Exposure Control | ☆☆☆☆☆ | ★★★★☆ |
| Burst Speed | ☆☆☆☆☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
| Video Quality | ★☆☆☆☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
| Portability | ★★★★☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
| Value for Money | ★★★☆☆ | ★★☆☆☆ |
Performance in Different Photography Genres
| Genre | Canon A3200 IS | Nikon P310 |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | ★★☆☆☆ | ★★★★☆ |
| Landscape | ★★☆☆☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
| Wildlife | ★☆☆☆☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
| Sports | ☆☆☆☆☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
| Street | ★★★☆☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
| Macro | ★★☆☆☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
| Night / Astro | ★☆☆☆☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
| Video | ★☆☆☆☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
| Travel | ★★★★☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
| Professional Use | ☆☆☆☆☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
Who Should Choose the Canon A3200 IS?
- You want a simple-to-use pocket camera with a longer zoom lens for everyday snapshots.
- You are a beginner or casual photographer who prefers point-and-shoot convenience without fiddling with settings.
- Lightweight and compact design is your top priority for travel or quick shoots.
- Budget-conscious buyers looking for an entry-level compact with reliable optical stabilization and face detection.
The Canon A3200 IS excels as a no-fuss camera for capturing memories with minimal learning curve, though image quality and manual control are modest.
Who Will Benefit from the Nikon Coolpix P310?
- You’re an enthusiast eager to expand creative control via manual modes, aperture priority, and shutter priority.
- You require better low-light performance and a faster lens for portraits and street photography.
- Action shooting or wildlife is part of your repertoire, benefiting from higher burst rates and sophisticated AF.
- Desire HD video recording in full 1080p with richer codec and HDMI output for more polished video projects.
- You value a better LCD display and more robust handling for intensive use.
The Nikon P310 is a more advanced compact that delivers higher image quality and feature-rich experience for those ready to move beyond basic presets.
Final Thoughts: Making the Right Choice for Your Photography Journey
Both cameras represent small sensor compacts designed for different segments of photography enthusiasts.
- Canon A3200 IS is excellent for those stepping into digital photography or needing a lightweight travel companion prioritizing simplicity.
- Nikon P310 caters to the enthusiast who demands more technical control, improved image and video quality, and is willing to carry a slightly larger camera.
Neither camera competes with today’s mirrorless systems or DSLRs but remain relevant as affordable, portable alternatives.
Our Recommendation: Try Before You Buy
Because handling and intuitive controls significantly affect your photography joy, we strongly recommend you try both cameras hands-on if possible. Pay attention to:
- How their sizes and weights feel during extended shooting.
- The responsiveness and comfort of their controls.
- Live view image preview clarity.
- Focus lock and burst shooting behavior.
Useful Accessories for These Models
- Spare batteries (NB-8L for Canon, EN-EL12 for Nikon) if you plan all-day shooting.
- High-speed SD cards to maximize burst shooting potential on the Nikon.
- A compact tripod for macro and low-light handheld stability.
- Protective cases tailored to each camera’s shape.
Begin Your Exploration: Both the Canon A3200 IS and Nikon Coolpix P310 offer stepping stones into digital photography. Understanding their strengths and limits helps you find the one that best fits your creative path. Check them out in person and pair them with lenses or accessories that enhance your style.
Thank you for reading our detailed, hands-on comparison. Your photography journey deserves thoughtful gear choices - may your next camera inspire your best images yet!
Canon A3200 IS vs Nikon P310 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A3200 IS | Nikon Coolpix P310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Nikon |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A3200 IS | Nikon Coolpix P310 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2012-06-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 99 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-100mm (4.2x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/1.8-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Smart | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 149 grams (0.33 lb) | 194 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 230 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-8L | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $230 | $700 |