Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony TX1
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Released August 2011
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-3
- Newer Model is Sony NEX-F3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced August 2009
Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony TX1 Overview
Below is a extensive overview of the Sony NEX-C3 and Sony TX1, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact and both are built by Sony. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the NEX-C3 (16MP) and TX1 (10MP) and the NEX-C3 (APS-C) and TX1 (1/2.4") come with different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe NEX-C3 was revealed 2 years later than the TX1 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the NEX-C3 grades versus the TX1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony TX1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sony Alpha NEX-C3 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The full galleries are available at Sony NEX-C3 Gallery and Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Sony TX1
NEX-C3 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2011 | August 2009 | More recent by 25 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Sony NEX-C3
TX1 | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Sony NEX-C3 and Sony TX1
NEX-C3 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Sony NEX-C3 has external measurements of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Sony TX1 has proportions of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check out the Sony NEX-C3 and Sony TX1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the NEX-C3 compared to the TX1.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the NEX-C3 and TX1 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements purely by looking at technical specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the NEX-C3 and TX1.
As you have seen, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The NEX-C3 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sony NEX-C3 will give you extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The fresher NEX-C3 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony TX1 Specifications
Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sony | Sony |
Model type | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2011-08-22 | 2009-08-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Bionz | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 23.4 x 15.6mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor area | 365.0mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4912 x 3264 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Sony E | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing range | - | 8cm |
Number of lenses | 121 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT Xtra Fine LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 2 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225 gr (0.50 lb) | 142 gr (0.31 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1083 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NPFW50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $343 | $350 |