Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
96 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 126g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Below is a detailed analysis of the Canon A3400 IS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Canon and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the A3400 IS (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the A3400 IS (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") feature different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe A3400 IS was revealed 10 months before the XZ-2 iHS which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the A3400 IS grades against the XZ-2 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot A3400 IS & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are available at Canon A3400 IS Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3400 IS over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| A3400 IS | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Canon A3400 IS
| XZ-2 iHS | A3400 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 |  | February 2012 | More recent by 10 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A3400 IS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| A3400 IS | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon A3400 IS provides exterior dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Examine the Canon A3400 IS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the A3400 IS versus the XZ-2 iHS.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the A3400 IS and XZ-2 iHS is 96 and 85 respectively.
Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing specs. The photograph here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the A3400 IS and XZ-2 iHS.
All in all, the two cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The A3400 IS having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Canon A3400 IS will render greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older A3400 IS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-02-07 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 126g (0.28 lb) | 346g (0.76 lb) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | 340 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-11L | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $230 | $450 |