Canon A480 vs Fujifilm XQ1
94 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
![Canon PowerShot A480 front Canon PowerShot A480 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-PowerShot-A480/Canon-A480-front.jpg)
![Fujifilm XQ1 front Fujifilm XQ1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-XQ1/Fujifilm-XQ1-front.jpg)
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
Canon A480 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 140g - 92 x 62 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched November 2013
- New Model is Fujifilm XQ2
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Canon A480 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Canon A480 and Fujifilm XQ1, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Canon and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the A480 (10MP) and the Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) is fairly close but the A480 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") offer totally different sensor sizing.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The A480 was released 5 years earlier than the Fujifilm XQ1 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short view of how the A480 grades versus the Fujifilm XQ1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Canon A480 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A480 and Fujifilm XQ1. The complete galleries are provided at Canon A480 Gallery and Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A480 over the Fujifilm XQ1
A480 | Fujifilm XQ1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Canon A480
Fujifilm XQ1 | A480 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 59 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 115k | Sharper display (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A480 and Fujifilm XQ1
A480 | Fujifilm XQ1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Canon A480 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon A480 has got outside dimensions of 92mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm XQ1 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Compare the Canon A480 and Fujifilm XQ1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the A480 vs the Fujifilm XQ1.
![Canon A480 vs Fujifilm XQ1 size comparison Canon A480 vs Fujifilm XQ1 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A480-vs-Fujifilm-XQ1-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the A480 and Fujifilm XQ1 is 94 and 92 respectively.
![Canon A480 vs Fujifilm XQ1 top view buttons comparison Canon A480 vs Fujifilm XQ1 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A480-vs-Fujifilm-XQ1-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon A480 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes only by viewing technical specs. The pic below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the A480 and Fujifilm XQ1.
As you can tell, each of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The A480 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Fujifilm XQ1 will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged A480 will be behind in sensor tech.
![Canon A480 vs Fujifilm XQ1 sensor size comparison Canon A480 vs Fujifilm XQ1 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A480-vs-Fujifilm-XQ1-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon A480 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon A480 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon A480 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A480-vs-Fujifilm-XQ1-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Canon A480 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Specifications
Canon PowerShot A480 | Fujifilm XQ1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model type | Canon PowerShot A480 | Fujifilm XQ1 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2009-01-15 | 2013-11-26 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS X-TRANS II |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 2/3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.8 x 6.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 58.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 5 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 115k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, on, off, slow syncho |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/500s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 140 grams (0.31 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 62 x 31mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 2 x AA | NP-48 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $210 | $500 |