Canon A490 vs Samsung TL220

Compact Camera Showdown: Canon PowerShot A490 vs. Samsung TL220 – Which One Deserves Your Pocket?

In the landscape of budget-friendly compact cameras, small sensors and fixed lenses dominate the category, but performance differences can be surprisingly nuanced. Today, I’m taking a deep dive into two contenders that typify this segment from the start of the last decade: the Canon PowerShot A490 and the Samsung TL220. Announced just months apart - Canon’s early 2010 entry meets Samsung’s late 2009 release - these cameras target the casual snapshooter but pack subtle variations that can influence your experience across different photography disciplines.

Having put both through their paces in studio tests and varied real-world shooting, I’ll share my hands-on insights regarding image quality, ergonomics, usability, and performance nuances. The goal here is straightforward: If you’re weighing these two compacts for your next casual shooter or travel companion, you’ll get a grounded, expert-driven perspective to help you decide. Let’s jump in.

First Impressions: Size, Feel, and Control Layouts

Starting with physical presence and handling, these two compacts reveal their design philosophies at a glance.

The Canon A490 feels slightly chunkier, measuring 94 x 62 x 31 mm and weighing 175 grams powered by two AA batteries. The Samsung TL220, marginally slimmer at 100 x 60 x 19 mm and lighter at 169 grams, opts for a proprietary rechargeable battery. The Canon’s reliance on AA cells offers ubiquitous charging convenience - a boon if you’re traveling off-grid - but at the expense of a slightly thicker grip.

Looking closer, the Canon’s thickness hinders pocketability somewhat, especially when compared to the TL220’s slender profile. That said, the Canon’s bulk translates into a more substantial grip area - crucial if you’re shooting handheld for extended periods or in active situations.

Navigating the controls, the Canon adopts a more minimalist approach. It lacks manual exposure controls but includes a few simple physical buttons and a small mode dial. In contrast, the Samsung TL220 surprises with a touchscreen interface, a rarity in this price-point and era, bringing some intuitive flexibility though with no dedicated physical dial for exposure modes. Neither camera supports manual exposure modes, so users are most reliant on intelligent auto and scene modes for their creative needs.

From an ergonomic standpoint, the Canon’s buttons are less “fiddly” - an observation I made after numerous test shots while holding the camera with gloves on a chilly morning - whereas the Samsung’s reliance on small touchscreen controls occasionally slows fast adjustments.

Sensor & Image Quality: A Detailed Dissection

Delving into the core imaging engine, both cameras utilize 1/2.3-inch CCD sensors - typical for compact cameras of their vintage - but key specifications point to noteworthy differences.

Canon’s A490 uses a 10-megapixel sensor (3648 x 2736 max resolution), while Samsung’s TL220 steps up to 12 megapixels (4000 x 3000). The increase isn’t just about resolution: The TL220 also offers a wider range of aspect ratios (4:3, 3:2, and 16:9), compared to Canon’s limited 4:3 and 16:9 options. However, more megapixels on a roughly equivalent sensor size often translate into smaller individual pixels, which can increase noise and reduce dynamic range - areas where the Canon sometimes shows an advantage.

Both cameras’ CCD sensors employ anti-aliasing filters to reduce moiré artifacts, but the Canon’s sensor size of 6.17 x 4.55 mm edges out Samsung’s 6.08 x 4.56 mm marginally. While irrelevant to casual users, the subtle sensor dimension delta is likely negligible with respect to final image quality.

From image processing, I found the Canon’s JPEG outputs delivered punchier colors and more accurate skin tones out of the box, albeit with moderate sharpening that could induce artifacts in high contrast edges. Samsung’s TL220 renders more natural color palettes with a tendency towards cooler hues - something to consider depending on your creative preference.

ISO sensitivity caps also differ: the Canon maxes out at ISO 1600, while Samsung’s TL220 extends to ISO 3200. In practice, though, usable image quality above ISO 800 on either is limited, given the noise levels characteristic of 1/2.3" CCDs. Low-light shots show visible grain, with Samsung performing just slightly better at higher ISOs thanks to more aggressive noise reduction - but this comes at the cost of some detail softness.

LCD Screens & User Interface: Looking at the World Through Their Screens

An often overlooked yet pivotal shooting experience factor is the rear LCD display and interface.

The Canon A490 sports a modest 2.5-inch, fixed LCD with only 115k dots resolution - very low by today’s standards and even back then considered entry-level. The lack of touchscreen means all navigation is button-driven, which can slow access to quick settings.

The Samsung TL220, however, boasts a sharper 3-inch, 230k dots touchscreen. It’s quite responsive and simplifies menu scrolling and focus point selection. The touchscreen’s downside, however, is the absence of a physical joystick or D-pad, limiting tactile feedback. Additionally, in bright outdoor conditions, the TL220’s screen had a slight edge in visibility - perhaps due to Samsung’s screen coating - but both are prone to glare under direct sunlight.

Given neither camera offers a viewfinder, the LCD experience is paramount. If you’re shooting in bright daylight or prefer quick touch-based focusing and menu tweaks, the TL220’s screen stands out. Meanwhile, the Canon’s simpler screen and non-touch controls favor those who want straightforward, no-frills operation.

Autofocus and Burst Performance: Who’s Fast, Who’s Reliable?

Considering their basic sensor and processing foundations, neither camera is designed for speed, but autofocus usability is a key practical differentiator.

Both cameras use contrast-detection autofocus, with no hybrid phase-detection tech. The Canon has 5 focus points (though exact cross-type confirmation is unavailable), while the Samsung uses an unspecified number with touchscreen aided AF point selection.

In real use, the Canon A490 autofocus was noticeably sluggish and sometimes hunted, especially in low contrast or dim light. Furthermore, it supports only single-shot AF mode - which means the focus locks before shutter release, making moving subjects a challenge.

Samsung’s TL220 benefits from its touchscreen AF point selection, allowing precise targeting. It also offers single AF mode only but was marginally quicker to lock focus and more consistent, perhaps due to firmware optimizations.

Continuous autofocus and subject tracking are absent in both, which is expected at this price range and era.

Burst shooting rates are minimal: Canon offers 1 fps continuous shooting, while Samsung doesn’t specify but remains similarly limited. This renders both unsuitable for sports or wildlife specialists needing high-speed sequences.

Still Photography in Different Contexts: How Do They Stack Up Across Genres?

To better contextualize their practical benefits, let’s consider how these cameras perform in specific photography scenarios.

Portrait Photography

Portraiture demands skin tone fidelity, pleasing bokeh, and effective face or eye detection. Neither the A490 nor TL220 has face or eye detection autofocus, which limits ease of use here.

The Canon’s slightly wider maximum aperture at the wide end (f/3.0 vs. Samsung’s f/3.5) helps marginally with subject isolation, though the built-in lens's optical characteristics limit shallow depth of field effects. Images of people shot on the Canon render warm tones but can lack subtle details on skin due to JPEG sharpening.

The Samsung TL220, with its higher resolution sensor, captures more detail but its cooler color rendition can flatten complexions slightly unless post-processed. Bokeh is modest on both; neither achieves creamy background blur typical of larger sensor cameras.

Landscape Photography

Landscape shooters prize dynamic range, resolution, and weather resistance - the latter of which neither camera offers. Both entirely lack weather sealing.

Samsung’s higher 12MP sensor offers more megapixels, beneficial for large prints or crops. However, Canon’s lower noise levels at base ISO and slightly better dynamic range mean it retains more highlight and shadow details. Neither performs astonishingly here, but the Canon’s color interpretation and crispness gave landscapes a touch richer depth in my tests.

The Canon’s lens focal range equates roughly to 37-122mm in 35mm terms (about 3.3x optical zoom), whereas Samsung TL220’s 27-124mm range (4.6x zoom) covers a more versatile wide-angle to short telephoto jump, potentially more useful for sweeping vistas.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

Both cameras falter for action photography: slow autofocus, no continuous AF, limited burst rates, and small sensors hinder low light and fast-moving subject capture. Neither camera sports image stabilization except Samsung’s optical IS, which can aid handheld shooting at telephoto but struggles to compensate for subject motion blur.

If wildlife or sports are your priority, these cameras are better reserved as casual backups rather than primary tools.

Street and Travel Photography

For street shooting, camera size, discretion, and quick response are paramount.

The Samsung TL220’s slimmer profile (though slightly wider) and touchscreen controls allow swift framing and focusing, though the touchscreen sometimes slows rapid shooting sequences compared to physical buttons. The Canon’s bulk and button layout demand more deliberate operation but offer more tactile feedback.

Battery-wise, Canon’s use of AA batteries is advantageous on extended trips or when traveling in regions without easy access to proprietary battery chargers. The Samsung relies on a dedicated rechargeable battery with limited spare options, which can be a drawback.

Both cameras lack Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, GPS, or other wireless connectivity, so transfer and sharing require cable or card readers.

Macro Photography

Neither model is designed as a dedicated macro performer, but maximum focusing distances indicate differences.

The A490 allows focusing as close as 1 cm - impressively close for a compact, enabling detailed close-ups of small objects or flowers. Samsung’s TL220 offers minimum focus distance of 5 cm, which restricts extreme close-ups but still suffices for casual macro shooting.

Neither has focus stacking or bracketing features.

Night and Astrophotography

CCD sensors with limited ISO ranges and weak noise control limit both cameras’ utility in night or astro photography.

Samsung’s max ISO 3200 may sound promising, but noise degrades detail severely beyond ISO 800. Canon’s max ISO 1600 fares similarly, though with slightly less noise noticeable at base ISOs.

Neither camera offers exposure bracketing or long exposure times beyond 15 seconds for Canon and 8 seconds for Samsung. Both come with built-in flash, unsuitable for night landscapes.

So if you aim to capture star fields or cityscapes after dark, these compacts are less ideal; a DSLR, mirrorless, or advanced bridge camera would serve better.

Video Capabilities: Small Sensor Limitations

Video functions are arguably secondary in this class but merit review.

Canon PowerShot A490 records VGA (640 x 480) video at 30 fps using Motion JPEG compression. The Samsung TL220 is more ambitious, offering HD 720p (1280 x 720) at 30 and 15 fps, as well as VGA and QVGA modes.

The TL220’s larger, sharper rear screen and touchscreen controls aid framing video shots. Neither camera supports external microphones or headphone monitoring, limiting audio quality and control.

No optical or electronic video stabilization is present on Canon; Samsung’s optical image stabilization can help smooth handheld footage slightly.

While neither camera is suitable for professional video, Samsung’s HD mode gives it a clear edge for casual videographers needing better resolution and screen usability.

Durability, Battery, and Storage Considerations

Neither camera offers weather sealing or ruggedized design features such as dustproof or shockproof construction - expected at this price point.

Battery options differ markedly: Canon uses two AA batteries, while Samsung depends on proprietary SLB-07A lithium-ion rechargeable cells. Both have pros and cons. Canon’s AA batteries are universal and easily replaced on location, though heavier and less consistent in voltage delivery. Samsung’s lithium-ion offers lighter weight and longer life but needs specialized chargers and spares.

Storage also differs: Canon supports standard full-sized SD/SDHC and MMC cards, while Samsung uses microSD and microSDHC cards with internal storage (an unusual inclusion for its class).

Lens Ecosystem and Expandability

Both cameras feature fixed, non-interchangeable lenses - a hallmark of compact cameras and limitation by design. With no option to swap lenses, users are constrained to the built-in zoom and aperture ranges.

Canon’s A490 lens covers 37-122mm equivalent focal length with an f/3.0-5.8 aperture. Samsung’s TL220 offers a slightly wider 27-124mm range at f/3.5-5.9. The TL220’s wider angle end better suits landscapes and interiors; the Canon is marginally faster on the wide end, benefiting low-light wide shots.

Neither camera supports external flash or accessories, limiting creative control beyond on-board flash modes.

Connectivity and Workflow Integration

Neither camera offers modern wireless features like Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or NFC. USB 2.0 (480 Mbps) is standard for both, enabling wired file transfers.

Neither supports RAW capture, restricting advanced post-processing flexibility. Images are locked into JPEG format with limited in-camera adjustments. Professional photographers will find these models insufficient for workflow integration requiring high bit-depth files.

Pricing, Value, and Who Should Choose What?

Pricing at the time of launch is roughly on par: Canon A490 at $99 and Samsung TL220 at $89.95. This close margin further compels buyers to consider nuanced real-world merits.

Canon A490 front Canon A490 screen back Samsung TL220 front Samsung TL220 screen back

Viewing sample images from both, an observer will notice that:

• Canon’s JPEGs deliver slightly warmer tones and marginally better low-ISO sharpness.
• Samsung’s photos benefit from higher resolution and HD video capability.
• Samsung’s touchscreen makes operation feel modern and intuitive.
• Canon’s use of AA batteries and chunkier grip favors those valuing versatility and reliability in battery sourcing.

Performance scoring through standardized tests (focusing speed, image quality, usability) shows the Samsung TL220 edging out the Canon A490, but only modestly. Both score below average compared to modern standards, unsurprisingly.

Genre-specific rankings reinforce prior observations:

Final Verdict: Matching Your Needs to These Compacts

Both cameras reflect their budget, compact status with inherent limitations yet deliver respectable usability for casual users.

Choose the Canon PowerShot A490 if:

• You need off-the-grid battery flexibility using common AA cells.
• Your shooting style is simple and slow-paced, without demand for touchscreen controls.
• Macro photography and close focusing interest you.
• You prefer slightly warmer skin tones and colors straight from the camera.
• You prioritize a sturdier, more substantial grip for steady handling.

Choose the Samsung TL220 if:

• You want the best image resolution and video at HD 720p.
• You value a larger, clearer touchscreen for easy focusing and menu navigation.
• A wider-angle lens start (27mm equivalent) is important, e.g., for landscapes and interiors.
• You prefer a slimmer, sleeker camera for better pocketability.
• You appreciate a more refined image processing engine balancing noise and detail.

Neither is designed to be a workhorse for professional or enthusiast photography but can serve admirably as a lightweight travel companion or an easy-to-carry everyday snapshot machine. For budget buyers considering strictly between these models, the TL220 slightly edges out the A490 in imaging and usability, but Canon’s reliability and battery system make it a good alternative.

Concluding Thoughts: Compact Cameras in a Modern World

Given the rapid progress of camera technology, these models are now aged relics of a bygone era when compact cameras had to fight harder for relevance against emerging smartphone options and affordable mirrorless systems. For true hobbyists or professionals, these cameras won’t satisfy demands on speed, dynamic range, or creative control.

However, they do offer an approachable platform for beginners or sporadic users wanting straightforward point-and-shoot capabilities - with the Canon’s macro strengths and AA battery system being a particular highlight.

Before picking either, consider your shooting style and priorities. If possible, handle each model and inspect sample images closely to gauge personal preferences.

I hope this detailed comparison proves illuminating and equips you to choose wisely between the Canon PowerShot A490 and Samsung TL220. These cameras may no longer lead the pack, but their enduring simplicity and ease of use still hold value for specific needs.

If you have questions on usage scenarios or want recommendations on modern equivalents, feel free to reach out. I’m here to help you capture your best moments - no matter what gear you carry.

Happy shooting!