Canon A800 vs Panasonic ZS60
93 Imaging
33 Features
19 Overall
27


88 Imaging
43 Features
63 Overall
51
Canon A800 vs Panasonic ZS60 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 186g - 94 x 61 x 31mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 282g - 112 x 64 x 38mm
- Announced January 2016
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ80
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS50
- Replacement is Panasonic ZS70

Canon PowerShot A800 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60: A Practical Camera Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals
Selecting the right compact camera can be a surprisingly nuanced decision. Today I’m diving deep into two very different small sensor compacts that, despite similar sensor sizes, target dissimilar photographers and shooting scenarios. The Canon PowerShot A800 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 embody the evolution of compact cameras across a five-year span - from a 2011 entry-level point-and-shoot to a feature-rich 2016 superzoom with 4K video. Having tested thousands of digital cameras across genres and brands, I’m confident this head-to-head will clarify not only how these cameras stack up technically but also what type of photographer will benefit most from each.
Let’s unpack their core differences starting with physical design and ergonomics.
Unpacking Physical Feel and Handling: Size, Weight, and Layout
At first glance, the Canon A800 is a classic compact: light, pocketable, and minimal. Weighing just 186g and measuring 94x61x31mm, it fits effortlessly in a small purse or coat pocket. The Panasonic ZS60, though still compact, is noticeably chunkier at 282g and 112x64x38mm due to its extended zoom range and advanced features. This difference in size and heft influences handling and comfort, particularly during longer shoots or while traveling.
The Canon's slim profile feels nimble, ideal for grab-and-go street photography or casual use. The Panasonic’s more substantial grip and bigger body lend stability especially with longer lenses, though it’s less pocket-friendly.
Moving above to control layouts, the A800’s top panel is simplistic - just a shutter button, zoom rocker, and power switch. There’s little room for manual tweaks or quick access to key settings. Conversely, the ZS60 sports a thoughtfully arranged button cluster and mode dial on the top, enabling quicker adjustments on the fly - much appreciated during fast-paced shooting.
From my experience, this difference amounts to more than convenience - it dictates who will feel confident taking control. Beginners or casual users may prefer the simple, easy-to-use A800, while enthusiasts who like manual exposure and fast operation gain a clear edge with the ZS60.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: What 10MP vs 18MP Really Means
Both cameras employ 1/2.3" sized sensors measuring 6.17x4.55mm, but the type and resolution impact image outcome significantly.
The Canon A800 uses a 10MP CCD sensor paired with Canon’s DIGIC 3 processor - state of the art for its time. This setup yields decent color reproduction and clean images at low ISO but struggles beyond ISO 400, with digital noise becoming quickly apparent. The limitation of no RAW support also means the images lack flexibility for post-processing edits.
The Panasonic ZS60’s 18MP CMOS sensor combined with the advanced Venus Engine enables higher resolution and superior noise control. I found its photos detailed and sharp even up to ISO 800, and while noise becomes visible above ISO 1600, it remains manageable. Crucially, the ZS60 supports RAW format, giving professionals and enthusiasts enhanced control over dynamic range and color grading.
The difference is palpable in landscape and portrait shots where fine detail and color fidelity matter. The ZS60 also offers multiple aspect ratios (1:1, 3:2, 4:3, 16:9) for creative framing, while the A800 is limited to 4:3 and 16:9.
The Lens: Zoom Range and Aperture in Real-World Use
The optical lens is where these cameras diverge tremendously.
- Canon A800: 37-122mm equivalent (3.3x zoom), aperture f/3.0-5.8
- Panasonic ZS60: 24-720mm equivalent (30x zoom), aperture f/3.3-6.4
The Canon’s compact zoom is straightforward and practical for casual everyday shooting - from portraits to moderate telephoto needs. Its relatively bright aperture at wide angle affords reasonable low light capture, but at the teleend (f/5.8), lens speed diminishes significantly.
By contrast, the Panasonic boasts a phenomenal 30x reach, capable of walking up to far-flung subjects like wildlife or sports events without swapping lenses. The trade-off is the smaller max aperture and potential degradation in image quality at full telephoto. However, the optical image stabilization (absent in the Canon) compensates hand shake, allowing sharp shots even at extended focal lengths.
In my hands-on testing, the ZS60’s lens versatility meant I could capture everything from broad landscapes to distant wildlife seamlessly - valuable for travel and documentary work.
Autofocus, Metering, and Exposure Controls: Precision vs. Simplicity
Autofocus performance has a direct impact on capturing decisive moments.
The Canon A800 employs a nine-point contrast-detection AF system with face detection capability. This system is modest by modern standards; focus acquisition is sometimes sluggish and subject to hunting under low light or challenging contrast. There is continuous AF, but no phase detection or advanced tracking modes.
The Panasonic ZS60 improves on this with 49 contrast-detection AF points, multiple focusing modes including selective point AF, touch AF, and face detection for human subjects. Its continuous AF and tracking are notably faster and more accurate, crucial for action, wildlife, or street photography.
Exposure control also contrasts sharply: the Canon provides fully automatic operation without manual exposure modes, shutter or aperture priority. On the other hand, the ZS60 offers full manual control, shutter priority, aperture priority, exposure compensation, and white balance bracketing. This flexibility is indispensable once you wish to move beyond point-and-shoot results.
Screen and Viewfinder Experience: How You Compose Makes All the Difference
Composition aids hugely affect shooting comfort, especially in bright sunlight or tricky angles.
The Canon A800 features a modest 2.5-inch fixed TFT LCD with just 115k dots of resolution. This screen is dim and low res, limiting fine detail preview and challenging usability in outdoor scenarios.
The Panasonic ZS60 counters with a larger 3-inch fixed LCD comprising 1040k dots and touchscreen functionality that enables swift focusing and menu navigation. Additionally, it includes an electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 1166k dots and 100% coverage - a considerable boon for stability and visibility under strong sunlight or when holding the camera at eye level.
When shooting outdoors, I repeatedly appreciated the ZS60’s EVF over the Canon’s reliance on the rear LCD alone. For street or nature photographers often in bright or unpredictable lighting, this can decide whether you nail a shot or miss it.
Video Capabilities: Unraveling the Gap Between HD and 4K
Video remains a prominent consideration even for still-focused users.
The Canon A800 records at a maximum of 640x480 at 30fps using Motion JPEG, which is painfully low resolution by today’s standards and lacks audio input. This limits usability mostly to casual, low-expectation clips.
In contrast, the Panasonic ZS60 delivers 4K UHD (3840x2160) video at 30p, full HD at 60p, and multiple bitrates and formats including MPEG-4 and AVCHD. It also offers 4K Photo mode - snapping high-res stills from video frames - super handy for fast action or wildlife photography.
While neither camera supports an external microphone port, the ZS60’s higher fidelity audio and sharper resolution alongside optical stabilization translate into impressive handheld video results for vlogging or travel documentation.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations for Long Days
Battery endurance is often overlooked but critical on extended shoots.
The Canon A800 relies on two AA batteries rated for approximately 300 shots - a convenient feature internationally since AAs are common and easy to find. However, AA alkaline batteries tend to drain quickly during continuous use. Rechargeable NiMH options are advisable.
The Panasonic ZS60 uses a proprietary rechargeable battery delivering around 320 shots per charge. Although similar in shot count, this controlled power system provides more consistent performance and energy management.
Both cameras utilize a single SD card slot compatible with SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards providing ample storage options.
Robustness and Weather Sealing: Which Camera Stands Up to the Elements?
Neither the Canon A800 nor Panasonic ZS60 offers weather sealing or ruggedized design elements such as splash or dust resistance. For casual urban or travel photography in fair weather, this is usually sufficient. But for landscape and outdoor adventure photographers, an additional protective case or shelter is recommended.
Real-World Shooting Tests: Portraits, Landscapes, Wildlife, and Street Photography
I took both cameras out in varied conditions to test their strengths and limitations side-by-side in practical shoots:
-
Portraits: The Canon’s lower resolution and simpler focusing worked fine for casual snapshots but struggled locking onto eyes quickly in dim lighting. Panasonic’s face detection and live touch AF made portraits crisper and more consistently sharp. The ZS60 also rendered skin tones more naturally with better color depth.
-
Landscapes: The ZS60’s greater resolution allowed for impressive 4K crops, while its dynamic range and noise handling captured more shadow detail. The Canon’s images were softer and prone to highlight clipping due to limited sensor capability.
-
Wildlife/Sports: Panasonic’s 10fps continuous shooting and fast AF helped secure better action sequences. The Canon’s slow single fps meant missing more critical moments.
-
Street Photography: Here, the Canon’s simplicity and less intimidating profile offered discreet shooting; however, the ZS60’s EVF allowed more stable framing in bright sunlight and optional manual controls gave creative freedom.
Scoring Their Performance Across the Board
Bringing all technical and practical factors together, the following scorecard summarizes overall and genre-specific performance based on real-world testing, sensor metrics, and feature sets:
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: What Are You Locked Into?
Both the Canon A800 and Panasonic ZS60 have fixed lenses, meaning no lens swaps or upgrades. The Canon’s more modest 3.3x zoom lens focuses it squarely on casual users or beginners, while Panasonic’s 30x zoom lens uniquely satisfies all-in-one needs - travelers, wildlife photographers, vloggers - who want versatility without gear hassle.
If lens flexibility is a priority, these compacts won’t fit, so you’d need to explore interchangeable lens systems.
Connectivity and Extras: Wireless, GPS, Flash, and More
The Canon A800 lacks any wireless features or GPS. File transfers require USB connection to a computer.
The Panasonic ZS60, despite its age, includes built-in Wi-Fi for quick image transfer and remote shutter control - handy for sharing or shooting from a distance. It also supports adjustable flash modes with a stronger flash output range.
Neither camera supports NFC, Bluetooth, or headphone/mic ports, limiting advanced multimedia workflows.
Price and Value: Budget Balancing Act
The Canon PowerShot A800 retails around $90 - an attainable entry point for casual photographers wanting simple, dependable point-and-shoot capabilities without breaking the bank.
The Panasonic ZS60, priced closer to $250 (used or discounted), delivers substantial value through its comprehensive feature set, improved image quality, video prowess, and manual controls, appealing to enthusiasts seeking a true all-purpose pocket camera.
Wrapping Up: Who Should Choose Which?
After extensive hands-on tests and comparisons, here’s my distilled guidance:
-
Opt for the Canon PowerShot A800 if:
You want a straightforward, affordable compact for snapshots, family events, or simple street shooting. The ease of use and AA battery backup are pluses if you value practicality over advanced controls. Be ready to accept basic image quality and no RAW workflow. -
Choose the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 if:
You need a versatile “pocket superzoom” with extensive focal range, solid image quality, 4K video, and full manual control. This camera suits avid travelers, wildlife hunters, casual videographers, and enthusiasts wanting one camera for multiple roles without lugging extra glass.
Final Thoughts From My Photographer’s Perspective
Working with the Canon A800 was like revisiting a bygone era of simple, friendly photography - great for low-pressure snapshots and memory-keeping. The Panasonic ZS60 reminded me how compact cameras have matured, blending portability with sophisticated tech that delivers creative freedom and quality.
Neither camera is a professional tool in today’s terms, but understanding their capabilities helps photographers set realistic expectations. Ultimately, the ZS60’s technical advances and practical feature set make it the better investment for anyone serious about photography beyond the basics.
I recommend seeing these cameras through the prism of your shooting style and aspirations rather than just pixel counts or specs, as real-world performance and usability define satisfaction in the field.
Thank you for reading my detailed comparison. Should you have specific shooting scenarios or questions about these cameras or others, feel free to reach out - sharing photography knowledge continues to be my passion.
Safe shooting!
Canon A800 vs Panasonic ZS60 Specifications
Canon PowerShot A800 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Panasonic |
Model | Canon PowerShot A800 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ80 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2016-01-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | DIGIC 3 | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 115k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 5.60 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 186g (0.41 pounds) | 282g (0.62 pounds) |
Dimensions | 94 x 61 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 112 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 37 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 109 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 320 pictures |
Style of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 3 shots / 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $90 | $248 |