Panasonic GH3 vs Pentax RZ18
66 Imaging
51 Features
80 Overall
62


92 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Panasonic GH3 vs Pentax RZ18 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 550g - 133 x 93 x 82mm
- Revealed September 2012
- Earlier Model is Panasonic GH2
- Replacement is Panasonic GH4
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011

Panasonic GH3 vs. Pentax RZ18: An Expert Comparison for Your Next Photography Investment
Choosing the right camera means matching your creative vision with the best technical tools. Whether you’re an enthusiast stepping up your game or a professional seeking specific performance, understanding how cameras deliver across diverse shooting scenarios is critical. Today, we dive deep into a detailed comparison of two distinct cameras that cater to very different needs: the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3 and the Pentax Optio RZ18.
This side-by-side analysis is grounded in extensive hands-on testing and covers all essential photography disciplines, real-world performance, and value considerations. Our goal? To help you find the camera that truly fits your creative workflow and budget.
Setting the Stage: A Tale of Two Cameras
At first glance, these two cameras could hardly be more different. The Panasonic GH3, launched in 2012, is an advanced mirrorless camera aimed at enthusiasts and professionals. It boasts robust controls, a Micro Four Thirds sensor, and a notable video pedigree.
By contrast, the Pentax RZ18 (2011) is a compact superzoom, designed for casual shooters seeking zoom versatility in a pocket-friendly package.
Before we break down their capabilities, let’s see how these cameras compare physically.
From this size comparison, you’ll notice the GH3’s classic SLR-style form factor and larger dimensions intended for extensive handling. The RZ18 fits comfortably in your hand and pocket, emphasizing portability over manual control.
Design and Handling: Control vs. Convenience
Panasonic GH3 – Ergonomic Precision
- SLR-style mirrorless body measuring 133 x 93 x 82 mm, weighing approx. 550g
- Numerous dedicated buttons and dials, enabling quick manual adjustments
- Fully articulated 3.0-inch OLED touchscreen with static touch control (614k dots)
- High-resolution electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 1.744k dots, covering 100% frame
- Weather sealing adds durability for challenging environments
- No illumination on buttons but tactile precision designed for professional use
Pentax RZ18 – Compact Simplicity
- Very compact shape: 97 x 61 x 33 mm, weighing just 178g
- Minimal physical controls; no external viewfinder
- Fixed 3.0-inch TFT LCD, lower resolution at 460k dots, no touchscreen
- Emphasis on automatic shooting modes with limited manual override
- Also features some environmental sealing but lacks ruggedness of GH3
The GH3’s top control layout reflects a thoughtful design for photographers needing fast access. In contrast, the RZ18’s minimal interface favors casual users or travelers wanting hassle-free operation.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality
The heart of any camera lies in its sensor. Panasonic equipped the GH3 with a Four Thirds CMOS sensor (17.3 x 13 mm) with 16 megapixels, while the Pentax RZ18 uses a much smaller 1/2.3” CCD sensor (6.08 x 4.56 mm) also at 16 megapixels.
Here’s what this means for your shooting:
Feature | Panasonic GH3 | Pentax RZ18 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Size | Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) | 1/2.3" CCD (6.08 x 4.56 mm) |
Sensor Area | 224.9 mm² | 27.72 mm² |
Resolution | 16 MP (4608 x 3456) | 16 MP (4608 x 3456) |
Native ISO Range | 200-12,800 | 80-6,400 |
Sensor Technology | CMOS (better for noise control) | CCD (good colors but more noise) |
Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
What This Means in Practice
- The GH3’s larger sensor enables better light gathering, delivering superior dynamic range and low-light performance. Its DxOmark scores reflect this with an overall score of 71, excellent color depth (22.7 bits), and dynamic range (12.4 EV).
- The RZ18’s tiny sensor, combined with a CCD design, struggles with noise at higher ISOs. It doesn’t have DxOmark data available, but in testing produces noticeably poorer image quality especially once you zoom or shoot in low light.
- The GH3’s lack of optical low-pass filter reduction aids in sharper images, ideal for detail-rich photography such as landscapes or portraits.
- For everyday snapshots and zoom versatility, the RZ18’s sensor is adequate but limited when compared head-to-head.
Viewing and Composing: Electronic Viewfinder vs. LCD
Both being mirrorless and compact models respectively, their differing approaches to composition stand out.
- GH3’s EVF packs a 1.744k dot OLED panel with 100% coverage and 0.67x magnification, providing critical real-time exposure previews - vital for precision shooting.
- RZ18 has no viewfinder, relying solely on its LCD which is smaller, fixed, and with a modest resolution of 460k dots. Reflection can hamper usability under bright sunlight.
This difference will heavily influence your shooting style. The GH3 lets you comfortably shoot with your eye to the camera - reducing shake and distractions. The RZ18’s LCD-only approach suits casual shooting or travel snaps but is less adaptable under varying light conditions.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance
Panasonic GH3 Autofocus System
- Uses contrast-detection autofocus with 23 focus points, multi-area AF, face detection, and selective AF options.
- Includes continuous autofocus and tracking that performs well in both photo and video modes.
- Touchscreen AF controls add speed and versatility.
- Burst speed tops at an incredible 20 fps (JPEG at reduced resolution), well-suited for fast action photography.
Pentax RZ18 Autofocus System
- Offers contrast-detection AF but limited to 9 points.
- No continuous autofocus or advanced tracking capability.
- Single shot AF with face detection missing.
- Continuous shooting capped at 1 fps, poor for action situations.
For wildlife, sports, or street photography demanding speed and reliability, GH3 clearly dominates. The RZ18’s autofocus is primarily aimed at casual subjects and static scenes.
Lens Ecosystem and Flexibility
One key advantage of the GH3 is its Micro Four Thirds mount, compatible with an extensive and continuously expanding lens lineup.
- Over 100 lenses available ranging from ultra-fast primes to extensive telephoto zooms.
- This opens up possibilities for specialized applications: portraiture with creamy bokeh, macro photography, astrophotography, and more.
- Panasonic's growing investment in video lens systems complements the GH3’s 4K-ready successors.
In contrast:
- The Pentax RZ18 features a fixed 25-450mm F3.5-5.9 zoom lens, a versatile range (equivalent to ~18x zoom with 5.9x crop multiplier).
- Suitable for travel or general family photography but no lens interchangeability, limiting creative options.
Specialty Photography Disciplines: How They Measure Up
Portraiture
- Panasonic GH3 excels with accurate skin tone rendition, eye detection AF, and excellent bokeh from fast Micro Four Thirds lenses.
- Pentax RZ18 struggles here because of smaller sensor and slower lens apertures that reduce depth-of-field control.
Landscape Photography
- GH3’s sensor size and dynamic range capture broad tones and detail gradients effectively.
- Weather sealing offers peace of mind outdoors.
- RZ18 has limited dynamic range and less resolution tactically usable at base ISO.
Wildlife and Sports
- GH3’s fast continuous shooting and AF tracking are ideal.
- RZ18's one frame per second continuous mode is unsuitable for action.
Street Photography
- RZ18’s small size and zoom make it discreet and convenient.
- GH3 is larger but offers customization and manual control to perfect exposure in unpredictable conditions.
Macro
- GH3's lens compatibility allows macro-specific lenses and focus stacking; Pentax RZ18’s 4cm macro mode is basic.
Night and Astro
- GH3’s high ISO and manual controls outperform vastly.
- RZ18’s small sensor and max ISO 6400 are less capable.
Video Capabilities
- GH3 offers Full HD 1080p at 60fps with AVCHD and MPEG4 formats; external mic and headphone ports allow pro audio.
- RZ18 maxes out at 720p with Motion JPEG format, no audio inputs.
Battery Life and Storage
Feature | Panasonic GH3 | Pentax RZ18 |
---|---|---|
Battery Type | Rechargeable Battery Pack | D-LI92 (proprietary) |
Battery Life | Approx. 540 shots per charge | Not specified (likely lower) |
Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (1 slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal storage |
GH3’s battery life is solid for extended shooting sessions, while the RZ18 is better suited for casual snapshots due to smaller battery capacity.
Connectivity, Durability, and Additional Features
- GH3 includes built-in Wi-Fi for instant sharing and remote control, HDMI output, and USB 2.0 port.
- RZ18 supports Eye-Fi cards for wireless transfer but lacks HDMI and audio interfaces.
Both cameras have some environmental sealing; however, neither is fully weatherproof or shockproof.
Practical Image Comparison: Sample Gallery
Let’s review real-world image output from both cameras across various scenes to illustrate differences in sharpness, color accuracy, and dynamic range.
You’ll notice the GH3 images have richer tones, better noise control in shadows, and more pleasing bokeh transitions. RZ18 snaps are punchy in daylight but degrade quickly in low light and zoomed shots.
Overall Performance Ratings
Bringing all technical and real-world factors together:
Panasonic GH3: High marks for sensor performance, autofocus, handling, video capabilities, and versatility.
Pentax RZ18: Decent ratings for portability and zoom range; limited in sensor quality and advanced features.
Performance by Photography Genre
Breaking down genre-specific suitability helps clarify which camera matches your primary interests:
- Portrait, Landscape, Wildlife, Sports, Macro, Video - Panasonic GH3 leads clearly.
- Travel and Street photography are areas where Pentax RZ18’s compactness may appeal despite image quality limits.
Who Should Choose the Panasonic GH3?
If you:
- Demand professional-quality images and video with nuanced manual control
- Need a wide selection of lenses for varying photography styles
- Shoot portraits, landscapes, wildlife, or events regularly
- Want a robust build with weather sealing for outdoor use
- Value fast autofocus, high burst rates, and advanced video features
The Panasonic GH3 remains a strong contender today, especially for budget-conscious pros or enthusiasts eager to tap into the Micro Four Thirds ecosystem.
Who Should Consider the Pentax RZ18?
If you:
- Primarily want an ultra-compact camera with extensive zoom for travel or casual shooting
- Prefer automatic modes over manual controls to simplify photography
- Are not concerned with video quality or fast autofocus
- Have a limited budget around $200
- Value ease of use and pocket portability above image quality
The Pentax RZ18 is an accessible choice for beginners or those upgrading from a smartphone without stepping into advanced camera territory.
Final Thoughts: Matching Your Creative Journey
Our detailed comparison highlights the Panasonic GH3’s clear superiority in sensor technology, controls, autofocus, and video capabilities, undeniably suited for photographers who want creative control and solid performance across photography genres.
Conversely, the Pentax RZ18 fills a niche for casual users looking for convenience and a powerful zoom in a pocketable design.
Whichever path you choose, testing the cameras in-person is invaluable. Visit stores, rent if possible, and see how each feels in your hands. Pair your choice with the right lenses and accessories to unlock your creative potential.
Happy shooting, and don’t hesitate to explore further - the camera is the start, your vision transforms the world.
This comparison was carefully compiled through hands-on evaluation and technical analysis, reflecting over 15 years of camera experience to ensure you get trusted, actionable insights.
Panasonic GH3 vs Pentax RZ18 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3 | Pentax Optio RZ18 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Panasonic | Pentax |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3 | Pentax Optio RZ18 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-09-17 | 2011-09-12 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Venus Engine VII FHD | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 23 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 4cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 614 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | OLED Monitor with static touch control | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,744 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.67x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 20.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 2.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 24 fps) 1280 x 720 (60, 50, 30, 25fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25fps | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 550g (1.21 pounds) | 178g (0.39 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 133 x 93 x 82mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 3.2") | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 71 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 812 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 540 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $799 | $210 |