Clicky

Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-S200

Portability
96
Imaging
40
Features
26
Overall
34
Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 front
 
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32

Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-S200 Key Specs

Canon ELPH 135
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
  • 127g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
  • Launched February 2014
  • Also referred to as IXUS 145
Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Revealed August 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-S200 Overview

Below is a in-depth assessment of the Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-S200, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Canon and Casio. The resolution of the ELPH 135 (16MP) and the EX-S200 (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The ELPH 135 was released 3 years later than the EX-S200 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the ELPH 135 scores vs the EX-S200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 135 over the Casio EX-S200

 ELPH 135 EX-S200 
RevealedFebruary 2014August 2010More recent by 43 months

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Canon ELPH 135

 EX-S200 ELPH 135 
Manually focus Very exact focusing

Common features in the Canon ELPH 135 and Casio EX-S200

 ELPH 135 EX-S200 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size2.7"2.7"Same screen measurements
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-S200 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Canon ELPH 135 enjoys physical dimensions of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") along with a weight of 127 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Casio EX-S200 has sizing of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).

Examine the Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-S200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the ELPH 135 against the EX-S200.

Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-S200 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 135 and EX-S200 is 96 and 96 respectively.

Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-S200 top view buttons comparison

Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-S200 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reviewing specifications. The photograph underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the ELPH 135 and EX-S200.

Plainly, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Canon ELPH 135 to deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The newer ELPH 135 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-S200 sensor size comparison

Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-S200 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-S200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon ELPH 135 Portrait photography factors
Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography factors
35
decent MP (16MP)
comes with face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
35
you can focus manually
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Canon ELPH 135 as a Street photography camera
Casio EX-S200 as a Street photography camera
58
has image stabilization (Digital)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
57
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Canon ELPH 135 Sports photography details
Casio EX-S200 Sports photography details
41
has image stabilization (Digital)
decent MP (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon ELPH 135
Travel photography with Casio EX-S200
66
decent MP (16MP)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
65
good megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (27mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
doesn't have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Canon ELPH 135 Landscape photography features
Casio EX-S200 Landscape photography features
39
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
decent MP (16MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
42
you can focus manually
relatively wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
small screen (2.7")
no manual mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
does not have Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Canon ELPH 135 Vlogging advice
Casio EX-S200 Vlogging advice
31
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
comes with face detection focusing
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone jack
29
relatively wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external mic port
Photography Glossary

Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-S200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon ELPH 135 and Casio EX-S200
 Canon PowerShot ELPH 135Casio Exilim EX-S200
General Information
Brand Name Canon Casio
Model Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 Casio Exilim EX-S200
Also referred to as IXUS 145 -
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Launched 2014-02-12 2010-08-03
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip Digic 4+ Exilim Engine 5.0
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 100 50
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points 1 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-224mm (8.0x) 27-108mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.2-6.9 f/3.2-5.9
Macro focus range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, on, off, slow sync Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 127 grams (0.28 lbs) 132 grams (0.29 lbs)
Physical dimensions 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 230 images -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-11L NP-120
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Retail cost $119 $0