Canon ELPH 135 vs Panasonic FS42
96 Imaging
40 Features
26 Overall
34
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Canon ELPH 135 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 127g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
- Launched February 2014
- Additionally referred to as IXUS 145
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Expand to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Revealed April 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon ELPH 135 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Canon ELPH 135 vs Panasonic FS42, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Canon and Panasonic. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the ELPH 135 (16MP) and FS42 (10MP) and the ELPH 135 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe ELPH 135 was introduced 4 years later than the FS42 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a concise summary of how the ELPH 135 scores against the FS42 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon ELPH 135 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon ELPH 135 Gallery and Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 135 over the Panasonic FS42
| ELPH 135 | FS42 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | April 2009 | More recent by 59 months |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Canon ELPH 135
| FS42 | ELPH 135 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon ELPH 135 and Panasonic FS42
| ELPH 135 | FS42 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Canon ELPH 135 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon ELPH 135 provides outside dimensions of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") and a weight of 127 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS42 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Look at the Canon ELPH 135 vs Panasonic FS42 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the ELPH 135 and the FS42.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ELPH 135 and FS42 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Canon ELPH 135 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualise the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading through technical specs. The photograph below should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the ELPH 135 and FS42.
As you can tell, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The ELPH 135 using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Canon ELPH 135 will give more detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The fresher ELPH 135 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon ELPH 135 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon ELPH 135 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Panasonic |
| Model | Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
| Also referred to as | IXUS 145 | - |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2014-02-12 | 2009-04-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1000 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | 1 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 6.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 127g (0.28 lb) | 132g (0.29 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-11L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $119 | $580 |
