Comparing the Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42: An Expert's Take on Two Ultracompact Cameras

In the ultra-compact camera arena, designs and specs can often feel like a blur, especially when you’re comparing older models that still hold value for entry-level shooters or casual photographers. Today, I’m breaking down two such contenders - the Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 (aka IXUS 145) introduced in 2014, and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 from 2009 - to help you understand their practical differences, real-world performance, and buying value in the context of their release eras and intended users.

Both cameras slot into the ultracompact category, designed for maximum portability without complicating things unnecessarily - but the devil is in the details. Based on my years of testing thousands of cameras, I’ll guide you through an in-depth comparison that covers every major photographic discipline (yes, including night and macro!) and key technical aspects. Along the way, I’ll share some behind-the-scenes insights from hands-on use to help you decide which one matches your shooting style and budget best.

Let’s dive in.

Size, Handling, and Build: Pocketable Ease vs. Ergonomic Nuances

Looking at the Canon ELPH 135 and Panasonic FS42 side by side, they both deliver the classic “slim and light” ultracompact form factor, sealed in plastic bodies with minimal weather sealing (so keep that rain cover handy).

• Canon ELPH 135: Slightly more compact at 95x54x22 mm and weighing a featherlight 127 grams, it is perfect for slipping into a jacket pocket or the smallest bag. The thin profile and rounded edges contribute to effortless one-handed use. Its grip area, while limited by size, feels balanced due to careful button placement.
• Panasonic FS42: Marginally larger (98x55x22 mm) and a bit heavier at 132 grams, it’s still highly pocketable, though you’ll notice a bit more heft if you hold both in hand. The body feels slightly boxier but surprisingly solid. However, my experience suggests the FS42’s thinner sides can make grip less natural over longer shoots, especially with larger hands.

Both cameras miss out on physical viewfinders - a sign of the times for this class - but rely solely on their LCDs for framing.

Looking upward, the Canon’s controls are straightforward with well-spaced buttons, while the FS42 opts for a more minimalistic top and rear button layout. We’ll explore that in more detail momentarily.

Controls and Interface: When Less Is More - or Not?

A camera’s usability often boils down to how intuitive the controls are - a topic I’ve always prioritized during hands-on reviews.

• Canon ELPH 135: The Canon boasts a crisp, user-friendly top layout with a dedicated zoom toggle surrounding the shutter button, plus physical buttons for mode and playback on the back. Although it lacks manual exposure controls (no shutter or aperture priority), the menu system is straightforward - ideal for beginners or casual snaps.

• Panasonic FS42: This camera leans into simplicity with fewer physical buttons, relying more heavily on the on-screen menu for adjustments. The zoom lever and shutter sit side-by-side on top with minimal tactile feedback. For photographers used to more direct access, this could slow down operation a bit.

Neither support touchscreens, so menu navigation always involves button-press poking - a bit slow but manageable.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Now to the meat of it all - the sensor technology. This directly affects image quality, dynamic range, and low-light performance.

• Canon ELPH 135 Sensor: A 1/2.3" CCD sensor capturing 16 megapixels (4608 x 3456 max resolution), this sensor size of 28.07 mm² is industry-standard for budget ultracompacts. While the CCD tech is somewhat dated compared to CMOS, Canon pairs it with the Digic 4+ processor, which offers decent image clarity, good color accuracy, and noise reduction up to ISO 1600. CCDs typically excel in color depth but struggle more with higher ISO noise.

• Panasonic FS42 Sensor: This camera uses a slightly smaller 1/2.5" CCD sensor with 10 megapixels output (3648 x 2736), measuring 24.74 mm². While 10MP might sound low by modern standards, fewer pixels on a smaller sensor can sometimes mean cleaner images at low ISOs, but the FS42 maxes out at ISO 1000 natively - with expanded ISO up to 6400 (boosted) but with clarity trade-offs. Its older Motion JPEG video format also hints at dated processing.

In practical terms, the ELPH’s higher resolution gives extra cropping flexibility and more detail, while the FS42 might offer slightly smoother low ISO results but less overall detail. Neither camera will impress for challenging dynamic range scenes, but the Canon edges ahead thanks to newer processor algorithms that I saw reflected in less highlight clipping during early tests.

LCD Screens and Viewing Experience: Your Window to the Shot

With no viewfinders in sight, screen quality becomes crucial for composing images or videos.

• Canon ELPH 135 LCD: A 2.7-inch fixed TFT LCD screen with 230K pixel resolution. It strikes a good balance for daylight viewing, with decent color fidelity and brightness control. The lack of touch functionality is a downside but typical at this price point.

• Panasonic FS42 LCD: Slightly smaller at 2.5 inches but with the same 230K pixel count. Its brightness is a bit lower, which made outdoor framing more challenging during sunny day testing. Both cameras suffer in direct sunlight, requiring shading for clear visibility.

Neither screen offers articulating movement, so flexibility in tricky angles is limited. For casual photography, however, both are perfectly adequate.

Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed and Accuracy in Everyday Use

Autofocus systems can make or break your experience, especially when trying to capture fleeting moments outdoors or in action.

• Canon ELPH 135: Employs 9 contrast-detection AF points plus face detection. While contrast AF isn’t the fastest autofocus method, the face detection capability helps keep portraits sharp and focused on the eyes when used in bright conditions. Continuous AF is supported but at a slow pace; during burst mode (1fps), autofocus locks between shots.

• Panasonic FS42: Uses a singular contrast detection AF point with basic focusing accuracy. No face detection, continuous AF, or tracking features here. Burst mode offers 2fps, slightly faster but without AF adjustments mid-burst, which can result in missed focus when subjects move.

In practice, this means the Canon is better suited for portraits or stationary subjects, while the Panasonic might struggle more with tracking moving objects or subjects off-center.

Lens Optics: Versatility vs. Brightness

The fixed lenses on both cameras define their focal range and aperture, crucial for framing and low-light capture.

• Canon ELPH 135 Lens: 28-224 mm equivalent (8x optical zoom), aperture range F3.2 (wide) to F6.9 (tele). The wider zoom range offers much more versatility, covering wide-angle landscapes to decent telephoto portraits or casual wildlife shots. However, note that aperture narrows significantly when zoomed in, which restricts low-light and bokeh capability at long focal lengths.

• Panasonic FS42 Lens: 33-132 mm equivalent (4x zoom), aperture range F2.8 (wide) to F5.9 (tele). The brighter wide end aperture allows better low-light shots and more background separation for shallow depth of field in well-lit conditions. However, the shorter zoom range limits flexibility for tight framing or distant subjects.

Both lenses include macro modes, with Canon offering focus as close as 1 cm for extreme close-ups, while Panasonic’s macro starts at 5 cm - less magnification but still suitable for casual detail shots.

Flash and Low Light Performance: Strengths and Limitations

Good flash behavior and low-light image quality are important for indoor or night shooting.

• Canon ELPH 135: Built-in flash with a range of 3m max. The flash modes include auto, on, off, and slow sync - quite versatile for creative lighting and avoiding harsh shadows. Digital image stabilization (though not optomechanical) helps reduce minor hand shake at slow shutter speeds.

• Panasonic FS42: Has a longer flash range (6.3m) with modes auto, on, off, red-eye, and slow sync, providing better illumination for larger scenes or groups. However, there’s no image stabilization, meaning handheld shots under low light may exhibit blur unless you have a steady grip or tripod.

Regarding noise, the Canon holds ISO better due to Digic 4+ processing, but both cameras begin to degrade past ISO 800, with pronounced graininess and softening noticeable in shadows and uniform areas.

Video Capabilities: Simple Clips, No Frills

If video capture is an occasional need, you’ll want to know what each camera offers.

• Canon ELPH 135: Records HD video at 1280x720 at 25fps in H.264 format, which balances decent quality with manageable file sizes. There's no external microphone input, so audio is limited to in-camera mic quality.

• Panasonic FS42: Caps video at 640x480 (standard definition) at 30fps using Motion JPEG, a much older format that produces bloated files without good compression, and lower overall image clarity.

Neither offers advanced video features like 4K, stabilization while recording, or manual control. The Canon’s tighter resolution and newer codec make it preferable for casual video snippets.

Battery Life and Storage: How Long and Where?

• Canon ELPH 135: Uses the NB-11L Battery Pack, delivering approximately 230 shots per charge according to manufacturer specs. For casual day trips or backups, this is adequate, but you'll want a spare for extended outings.

• Panasonic FS42: Battery info is less clear, but practical testing suggests similar or slightly lower endurance. It uses rechargeable proprietary batteries, and supports SD, SDHC cards, plus internal storage (though the latter is small and not practical for many photos).

Both have a single memory card slot and USB 2.0 connectivity for data transfer, standard for compact cameras of their generation.

Which Camera Excels in Which Photographic Situations?

Let’s analyze how each performs across common photographic domains, based on my testing experience and sample images comparisons.

Canon ELPH 135 front Canon ELPH 135 screen back Panasonic FS42 front Panasonic FS42 screen back

Portrait Photography

• Canon ELPH 135: The face and eye detection AF helps ensure sharp portraits. The 8x zoom lets you frame tighter headshots without getting uncomfortably close. The limitation is the narrow aperture at telephoto, limiting creamy bokeh. Skin tones are rendered pleasantly, benefiting from Canon’s color science.

• Panasonic FS42: No face detection, so precise focusing relies on your aim. The brighter lens at wide (F2.8) can deliver marginally better subject-background separation for arm-distance selfies or group shots. However, the shorter zoom hampers framing variety.

Recommendation: Choose Canon ELPH 135 if portraits and ease of focusing matter most.

Landscape Photography

• Canon ELPH 135: The wider angle (28mm) is better suited for sweeping vistas, and 16MP resolution captures more detail for landscape prints or crops. The CCD sensor has limited dynamic range, so shooting in harsh contrasts may require manual exposure tweaks or HDR post-processing.

• Panasonic FS42: Starts at a narrower 33mm, reducing wide-angle capture, and lower 10MP resolution means less fine detail for large prints. The absence of custom white balance and limited manual control restrict creative freedom outdoors.

Recommendation: Canon ELPH 135 wins for landscapes due to its focal range and higher megapixel count.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

Neither camera is purpose-built for moving subjects, but let’s see which handles these demanding situations better.

• Canon ELPH 135: Face detection AF accuracy and 1 fps burst make fast action capture a challenge. The lens' 224mm reach helps with distant subjects, but slow autofocus and shutter lag limit keeper rate.

• Panasonic FS42: Faster burst mode (2 fps) but no continuous AF or tracking means shots can easily miss focus on moving targets. Zoom is too short for distant wildlife.

Recommendation: Neither excels, but if forced, Canon ELPH 135’s longer zoom compensates somewhat.

Street Photography

• Canon ELPH 135: Small and quiet, though the lens zoom noise may be noticeable. The camera’s quick wake-up and face detection assist in snapping candids. The weight and size make it easy to carry discreetly.

• Panasonic FS42: Slightly bulkier and with more limited zoom, but silent operation is comparable. The combo of size and limited control can frustrate shy or quick-gesture photographers.

Recommendation: Both adequate, but the Canon ELPH 135 edges out for street due to handling and focusing support.

Macro Photography

• Canon ELPH 135: True macro focusing as close as 1 cm allows for dramatic detail shots, great for flowers or textures. Image stabilization aids handheld sharpness.

• Panasonic FS42: Macro focus starts at 5 cm, less close but still usable for casual close-ups.

Recommendation: Canon ELPH 135 for vivid macro images.

Night and Astro Photography

Both cameras’ small sensors and limited ISO ranges restrict serious night photography, but if you want to experiment:

• Canon ELPH 135: Max ISO 1600 and digital stabilization help but noise becomes pronounced. The slowest shutter is 1/15s, so you’ll need a tripod for longer exposure.

• Panasonic FS42: Max ISO 1000 native, ISO 6400 boosted (high noise) but with a 1/60s slowest shutter - a significant limitation, meaning low light scenes will be underexposed without flash.

Recommendation: Canon ELPH 135 marginally better for low light with tripod use.

Video Use

The Canon’s HD video and H.264 compression offer a clear advantage for casual videography. The FS42’s VGA clips will look dated and less detailed.

Travel and Everyday Use

For grab-and-go travel, the Canon’s longer zoom gives framing versatility while maintaining ultra portability and decent battery life. The Panasonic is simple and might appeal to budget buyers wanting the essentials but ends up feeling less “future-proof.”

Professional and Workflow Considerations

Neither supports RAW capture, so post-processing latitude is limited. Both output JPEGs only, with standard color spaces. For professional work, these cameras serve as emergency backups or casual documenting tools rather than primary gear.

To summarize overall strength: the Canon ELPH 135 ranks higher due to sensor resolution, zoom range, autofocus system, and video capabilities.

The Final Word: Who Should Buy Which?

Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 - Best For:

• Beginners or casual photographers who want pocket-friendly versatility
• Travelers needing long zoom reach without bulk
• Portrait and macro shooters wanting face detection and decent image detail
• Those who want simple HD video capabilities on the side

Panasonic Lumix FS42 - Best For:

• Ultra-budget buyers focused purely on snapshot convenience
• Casual users who prefer brighter lens and slightly faster burst mode over resolution or zoom
• Those who may already have older Lumix lenses or accessories (though none here given fixed lens)

My Personal Take

Having shot extensively with both cameras in varied environments, I tend to favor the Canon ELPH 135 for its more balanced feature set and solid image quality. The extended zoom and face detection autofocus translate into a smoother user experience, especially for novices or travelers who want an all-in-one but simple device.

The Panasonic FS42 is a reasonable choice if your budget is severely constrained or your needs don’t extend beyond casual day shots - though the jump in image quality and flexibility with the Canon is significant enough to justify the slight price increase in my opinion.

Dear Canon, a touchscreen and a modest ISO boost would turn the ELPH series into a real pocket powerhouse. Please hear the call!

Feel free to share your thoughts or questions - I’m happy to discuss how these cameras perform in specific scenarios or offer advice tailored to your shooting style.

Happy shooting!

end