Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS vs. ELPH 360 HS: The Ultimate Ultracompact Shootout

If you've been weighing the tiny-but-mighty Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS against its near sibling, the ELPH 360 HS, you’re in the right place. Having put both through their paces - pixel-peeping, frame-racing, and low-light fumbling - I’ll unpack what sets them apart in this ultracompact camera duel, and who might want to snap up each.

Shooting with point-and-shoot cameras - especially stylish pocket-ready models like these - can be a surprisingly rich experience. But as with any tech siblings, subtle spec and performance differences can nudge one ahead for specific photography styles or user preferences. Let’s dive in.

Pocket-Sized Titans: Ergonomics and Design First Impressions

When dealing with ultracompact cameras, size and handling take top billing. Both the ELPH 350 HS and 360 HS claim ultralight, pocketable credentials - and on paper, they deliver almost identically.

They measure precisely 100 x 58 x 23 mm, weighing a featherlight 147 grams each. These dimensions make them easy to stash in jacket pockets, purses, or even larger coat pockets without the bulk. Perfect companions for quick grabs and spontaneous shots.

But size isn’t everything. Holding them, the ELPH 360 HS feels marginally more refined in finish and grip texturing, despite sharing plastic bodies. It’s subtle but noticeable with extended use. The control layouts on the top and rear are nearly clones, but the 360 HS adds a manual focus ring (welcome for fine-tuning in macro or tricky lighting).

The top plate shows both have built-in flashes and modest zoom toggles, but the 360 HS’s manual focus wheel blends nicely without complicating the otherwise straightforward interface.

Summing up ergonomics: Both cameras excel in portability, but if you like a bit more tactile control, the 360 HS gives you that bonus with manual focus.

Sensor and Image Quality: Identical or Not?

Canon equips both models with a 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS sensor, boasting 20 megapixels at a 5184 x 3888 max resolution. The sensor area is about 28.07mm² for both, a fairly standard sizing for ultracompacts in this price range.

Here, the specs align almost perfectly. Both rely on the DIGIC 4+ image processor, ensuring comparable image crunching and noise reduction algorithms. But real-world testing reveals minute differences:

• High ISO performance: At their upper native ISO of 3200 (no expanded boost), images from both cameras show typical high compression noise and reduced detail. The 360 HS seems to edge ahead slightly due to minor tuning in firmware - images retain cleaner shadows and marginally better color integrity.

• Color reproduction and dynamic range: Both produce quite vibrant but faithful colors, though the 360 HS offers improved multi-area autofocus that better handles varied exposure conditions, subtly helping with final exposure consistency.

In ultracompacts, sensor size limits ultimate image quality, but the Canon ELPH 360 HS’s smarter autofocus and marginally better processing gives it a slight image output edge - enough to notice in shooting challenging scenes, but not a game-changer.

Viewing and Interface: Screen and Handling Usability

Moving to user interaction, both cameras sport a fixed 3-inch LCD screen with 461k dots resolution. The screens are non-touch, which may disappoint selfie or touchscreen aficionados, but keep in mind these models target simplicity.

The 360 HS supports manual focus, working exceptionally well via on-screen magnification - an underrated virtue for macro or portrait shots demanding razor-sharp focus. The 350 HS lacks this, relying solely on autofocus modes.

Menu systems, live view feedback, and navigation are nearly identical, rooted in Canon’s legacy usability for compact shooters - intuitive, if unflashy.

Autofocus and Real-World Shooting Performance: Who Focuses Faster?

Now for the heart of photographic responsiveness - the autofocus (AF) systems.

Both cameras employ contrast-detection AF with face detection, a necessity given their fixed lenses. However:

• The ELPH 350 HS offers 9 focus points and straightforward single and continuous AF modes - fine for casual photos, but limited for dynamic subjects.

• The ELPH 360 HS steps up with selective AF modes and the option for manual focus override, an impressive feat for such a compact point-and-shoot. Although they both lack phase detection (found in more advanced cameras), the 360 HS’s AF selects focus points more deftly in varied environments.

I tested continuous autofocus on moving subjects (kids chasing a dog around the park) and found both manageable but the 360 HS displayed less hunting and faster lock - especially in decent light.

Zoom Lenses and Macro Capabilities: Same Glass, Different Feel?

Both cameras share a 25–300mm (equivalent) 12x optical zoom fixed lens with an aperture of f/3.6-7.0. That’s generous reach for walking around town or capturing scenes from a distance.

Close focusing is rated to 1 cm macro distance on both, which in practice is superb for flower shots or product close-ups without adding lens attachments.

The 360 HS, thanks to a manual focus ring and finer AF adjustments, offers a better macro shooting experience - letting you dial in exact focus, which matters when you’re one millimeter off and risk an out-of-focus flower petal.

Burst Shots and Continuous Shooting: How Fast Can They Frame?

Burst shooting speeds are identical - 2.5 frames per second maximum continuous shooting for both. Not blazing fast by any means, especially compared with today’s mirrorless or DSLR champs, but fine for casual action.

Sports or wildlife photographers needing rapid-fire frame rates will likely find this limiting for capturing peak action moments. Still, for candid street photography or family snaps, these rates suffice.

Video Capabilities: Which Captures Motion Better?

Video recording across both is capped at Full HD 1080p at 30 frames per second, with lower resolutions available at 720p and 480p.

One notable difference lies in codecs: the 350 HS records using H.264, while the 360 HS adds MPEG-4 support alongside H.264. In practice, the 360 HS’s codec versatility offers better compatibility across devices and editing suites.

Both cameras lack microphone and headphone jacks, limiting sound control. Neither sports 4K video or advanced stabilization modes, relying instead on optical image stabilization in the lens.

For casual video, both deliver clean footage ideal for family videos and social posts. But with their fixed lenses and basic processors, they aren’t geared towards videographers craving advanced features.

Battery Life and Storage: Will They Last Through the Day?

A curious contrast emerges here: the ELPH 350 HS touts a rated battery life of 250 shots per charge, while the ELPH 360 HS falls short at 180 shots.

This is surprising given they share the same NB-11LH battery model. Testing reveals the manual focus and additional AF processing in the 360 HS pull more power, cutting endurance notably.

Both use a single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot, supporting affordable, ubiquitous storage.

For dedicated travelers or all-day shooters, carrying an extra battery is advisable, especially for the 360 HS.

Connectivity and Extras: Sharing Shots on the Fly

Wi-Fi with NFC is built-in for both, allowing quick image transfers to smartphones - convenient for instant sharing, something we professionals sometimes underestimate but casual shooters adore.

Neither has Bluetooth, GPS (the 350 HS offers optional GPS but likely requires an accessory), or touchscreen control, which limits ease of use a bit but keeps complexity low.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Ready for Harsh Conditions?

Both cameras have straightforward plastic bodies with no weather proofing - meaning neither is designed to brave rain, sand, or shock exposure. Fine for everyday city or indoor use but not suited for rugged outdoor adventures.

Pricing and Value: Competition in the Ultracompact Tier

As of mid-2024 pricing, the Canon ELPH 350 HS hovers around $219, while the 360 HS edges slightly lower at $209 - go figure.

Given the 360 HS is the newer model (2016 announcement vs. 2015 for 350 HS), this price inversion reflects market dynamics, availability, and consumer demand for added features like manual focus.

How Do They Perform Across Photography Genres?

Nothing rounds-out camera evaluations like a discipline-by-discipline breakdown based on practical use-cases.

Portraits: Both offer face detection AF and pleasing skin tone reproduction. The 360 HS’s selective AF and manual focus edge deliver finer control for exquisite eye focus and background separation. Neither produce the creamy bokeh of larger sensors but are respectable in their ultracompact class.

Landscape: 20 MP resolution and wide-angle starting focal length (25mm equiv.) help. Both handle dynamic range modestly; shadows and highlights compress noticeably. No weather sealing limits outdoor endurance, but straightforward usability is a plus.

Wildlife: Long 300mm reach is decent but autofocus lag and slow continuous shooting are flaws. Again, 360 HS’s optimized AF offers small benefits, but neither can truly replace dedicated superzoom or mirrorless options.

Sports: Slow burst rates and contrast-detection AF limit tracking fast, erratic movement. Better than smartphone snapping but disappoints for serious sports shooters.

Street: Both are great stealth companions due to size and quiet operation. Low-light autofocus is generally adequate, with the 360 HS slightly more reliable.

Macro: The minuscule 1cm focusing is a highlight for either, but the manual focus on the 360 HS elevates it to a practical tool for close-ups.

Night/Astro: High ISO performance is middling, befitting ultracompacts. Neither has bulb mode or advanced exposure controls for star trails or astrophotography enthusiasts.

Video: Good for casual HD footage, but limited codec support and no external mic input hold back prosumers.

Travel: Portability and built-in Wi-Fi make them superb travel companions. Battery life on the 350 HS adds merit for longer days.

Professional Work: Neither supports RAW shooting, which restricts advanced editing workflows. Both target casual users or pros wanting handy backups - not primary workhorses.

Putting It All Together: The Bottom Line

In the grand scheme:

• The Canon ELPH 350 HS wins on battery life and a very straightforward, low-frills approach. Perfect if you want simple point-and-shoot reliability without fuss. Great for quick snapshots, travel, and beginner shooters.

• The Canon ELPH 360 HS offers subtle but meaningful upgrades in autofocus sophistication, manual focus, and video codec options, appealing to a slightly more demanding user wanting creative control in a tiny package.

Neither camera revolutionizes the ultracompact category today, but each holds value as affordable, capable companions for specific photographers.

How I Tested and Verified These Insights

My experience with these canons involved:

• Controlled lab tests to measure autofocus speed and accuracy with standardized moving targets
• Side-by-side image comparison in studio setups for color, sharpness, and high ISO performance
• Outdoor field trials covering landscapes, macro subjects, and street scenes at various times of day
• Video capture tests on clips with motion and audio playback
• Battery longevity measured with repeated shooting cycles until shutdown
• Ergonomic assessment during long handheld shooting sessions

This blend of technical rigor and real-world use helped surface nuanced differences beyond raw specs.

Final Recommendations: Which Camera Should You Buy?

If you want a no-nonsense, pocket-friendly camera for everyday snapshots with longer battery life, go for the Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS. It shines in casual settings and travel where charging options may be limited.

If you crave a touch more control, especially manual focus and smarter autofocus, plus slightly better video codec flexibility, the Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS packs those extras in the same size.

For aspiring macro shooters, street photographers seeking agility, or casual videographers, the 360 HS justifies its small price difference with superior usability.

Sample Shots: View the Cameras in Action

Feast your eyes and judge for yourself:

Canon ELPH 350 HS front Canon ELPH 350 HS screen back Canon ELPH 360 HS front Canon ELPH 360 HS screen back

Discoveries at a Glance

Both Canon ELPH 350 HS and 360 HS have their merits, tied together by Canon’s hallmark reliability and impressive ultracompact design ethos. Choose your champion based on what fits your photographic priorities - or perhaps, keep both for different moments!

Happy shooting!

Disclaimer: No cameras were harmed nor unusually overworked during testing, though my patience with battery life was occasionally tested.

If you have specific shooting needs or want to discuss alternatives, drop a line - always happy to help navigate the camera jungle.

photography #CanonELPH #camerareviews