Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Olympus 5010
95 Imaging
45 Features
39 Overall
42
96 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Olympus 5010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.6-7.0) lens
- 147g - 100 x 58 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Other Name is IXUS 275 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 126g - 95 x 56 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Also referred to as mju 5010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Olympus 5010 Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Canon ELPH 350 HS and Olympus 5010, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the ELPH 350 HS (20MP) and 5010 (14MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe ELPH 350 HS was released 5 years after the 5010 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the ELPH 350 HS matches up vs the 5010 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Olympus 5010 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS & Olympus Stylus 5010. The complete galleries are available at Canon ELPH 350 HS Gallery & Olympus 5010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 350 HS over the Olympus 5010
| ELPH 350 HS | 5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2015 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 62 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 5010 over the Canon ELPH 350 HS
| 5010 | ELPH 350 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon ELPH 350 HS and Olympus 5010
| ELPH 350 HS | 5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Olympus 5010 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon ELPH 350 HS offers physical measurements of 100mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Olympus 5010 has measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs).
Analyze the Canon ELPH 350 HS and Olympus 5010 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the ELPH 350 HS vs the 5010.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 350 HS and 5010 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Olympus 5010 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the ELPH 350 HS and 5010.
As you can see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Canon ELPH 350 HS to result in more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer ELPH 350 HS should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Olympus 5010 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Olympus 5010 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS | Olympus Stylus 5010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS | Olympus Stylus 5010 |
| Otherwise known as | IXUS 275 HS | mju 5010 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2015-02-06 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 4+ | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-300mm (12.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.6-7.0 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.5 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash on, slow synchro, flash off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 147 grams (0.32 lb) | 126 grams (0.28 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-11LH | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $219 | $150 |