Clicky

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Samsung ST65

Portability
95
Imaging
46
Features
39
Overall
43
Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS front
 
Samsung ST65 front
Portability
99
Imaging
37
Features
19
Overall
29

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs

Canon ELPH 360 HS
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-300mm (F3.6-7.0) lens
  • 147g - 100 x 58 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2016
Samsung ST65
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Samsung ST65 Overview

Its time to examine more in depth at the Canon ELPH 360 HS versus Samsung ST65, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Canon and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the ELPH 360 HS (20MP) and ST65 (14MP) but they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The ELPH 360 HS was manufactured 5 years after the ST65 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a brief view of how the ELPH 360 HS scores vs the ST65 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 360 HS over the Samsung ST65

 ELPH 360 HS ST65 
RevealedJanuary 2016January 2011Newer by 61 months
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen resolution461k460kSharper screen (+1k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Canon ELPH 360 HS

 ST65 ELPH 360 HS 

Common features in the Canon ELPH 360 HS and Samsung ST65

 ELPH 360 HS ST65 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurements
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon ELPH 360 HS provides outer measurements of 100mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST65 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Take a look at the Canon ELPH 360 HS versus Samsung ST65 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the ELPH 360 HS against the ST65.

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Samsung ST65 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ELPH 360 HS and ST65 is 95 and 99 respectively.

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Samsung ST65 top view buttons comparison

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is hard to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions merely by checking out a spec sheet. The picture underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the ELPH 360 HS and ST65.

As you can see, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Canon ELPH 360 HS to show more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The newer ELPH 360 HS will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Samsung ST65 sensor size comparison

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Samsung ST65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon ELPH 360 HS Portrait photography advice
Samsung ST65 Portrait photography advice
44
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
supports face detect autofocus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
28
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Canon ELPH 360 HS Street photography information
Samsung ST65 Street photography information
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
heavier than competitors in class (147 grams)
49
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
low max ISO (0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Canon ELPH 360 HS Sports photography highlights
Samsung ST65 Sports photography highlights
37
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
very slow continuous shooting (2.5 frames per second)
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
low battery life (180 per charge)
lacks phase detect autofocus
26
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
fixed focal length (()mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon ELPH 360 HS
Travel photography with Samsung ST65
64
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
long zoom (300mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
low battery life (180 per charge)
heavier than competitors in class (147g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.6)
71
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
great maximum aperture (f)
does not have Timelapse function
does not offer selfie friendly screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Canon ELPH 360 HS Landscape photography advice
Samsung ST65 Landscape photography advice
48
manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.6)
no manual control
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
low battery life (180 per charge)
does not have Time Lapse mode
37
great maximum aperture (f)
decent sized screen (3")
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
no RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Canon ELPH 360 HS Vlogging highlights
Samsung ST65 Vlogging highlights
33
pretty wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.6)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have mic socket
heavier than competitors in class (147 grams)
27
great maximum aperture (f)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Samsung ST65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon ELPH 360 HS and Samsung ST65
 Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HSSamsung ST65
General Information
Brand Canon Samsung
Model Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS Samsung ST65
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Launched 2016-01-05 2011-01-19
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor DIGIC 4+ -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 -
Lowest native ISO 80 -
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-300mm (12.0x) ()
Max aperture f/3.6-7.0 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 461 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 15 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 2.5fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.00 m (at Auto ISO) -
Flash options Auto, on, slow synchro, off -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 147 gr (0.32 lb) -
Dimensions 100 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 180 photographs -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-11LH -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card -
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $209 $130