Canon G1 X vs Nikon A
75 Imaging
52 Features
60 Overall
55


88 Imaging
57 Features
48 Overall
53
Canon G1 X vs Nikon A Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1.5" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- 534g - 117 x 81 x 65mm
- Revealed March 2012
- Newer Model is Canon G1 X II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Expand to 25600)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 299g - 111 x 64 x 40mm
- Announced June 2013

Canon PowerShot G1 X vs Nikon Coolpix A: The Definitive Large Sensor Compact Camera Comparison
When navigating the crowded realm of large sensor compact cameras, two stalwarts from Canon and Nikon demand our close attention: the Canon PowerShot G1 X and the Nikon Coolpix A. Both heralded for harnessing sizable sensors within pocketable frames, they represent a convergence of portability and image quality aimed primarily at photography enthusiasts desiring a camera beyond the conventional point-and-shoot - with compromises made to balance size, usability, and performance. Having extensively tested these cameras personally, this article offers an authoritative, in-depth comparative analysis that explores technical facets, real-world handling, and value propositions across photography genres and shooting scenarios.
First Impressions: Design, Portability, and Ergonomics
Arriving at a decision between the Canon G1 X and Nikon A begins with understanding their physical presence and ergonomic implementations, which invariably shape user experience across extended shoots.
The Canon G1 X measures 117 x 81 x 65 mm and weighs a substantial 534g, presenting a firm grip enhanced by thumb rests and textured grips. Its heft, although notable for a 'compact', contributes to a stable shooting platform, and the articulating 3-inch TFT PureColor II LCD (920k dots) provides flexible shooting angles ideal for diverse framing situations, including low or high-angle captures. Despite lacking touchscreen functionality, the screen’s articulation offers practical benefits.
By contrast, the Nikon Coolpix A is strikingly more compact and lightweight at 111 x 64 x 40 mm and just 299g, tailored explicitly for discreet, street-savvy shooters who prize minimalism and portability. However, it features a fixed, non-articulated 3-inch TFT LCD with 921k dots - offering excellent resolution and brightness but lacking the flexibility of the Canon's swiveling display.
Ergonomically, the Canon's control layout is more akin to a traditional DSLR, featuring dedicated dials and buttons for exposure compensation, ISO adjustment, and shooting modes - all arranged logically for swift tactile access, which seasoned users will appreciate. Nikon’s design favors minimalist controls, with fewer direct buttons and reliance on menus, which may present a learning curve for those used to tactile feedback. The Nikon lacks an integrated viewfinder, whereas the Canon provides a tunnel-type optical finder, albeit with limited coverage.
This physical and ergonomic contrast foreshadows their divergent target audiences: the Canon favors more deliberate shooting styles with an emphasis on versatility and handling, while the Nikon privileges portability and stealth.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Who Wins the Pixel Battle?
Sensor characteristics heavily dictate overall image quality and usability in various photographic disciplines.
The Canon G1 X boasts a 1.5” CMOS sensor measuring 18.7 x 14 mm (approx. 262 mm² sensor area), delivering 14 megapixels at a maximum native ISO of 12800. Its Digic 5 processor underpins image rendering. While respectable, this smaller-than-APS-C sensor imposes limits on dynamic range and noise performance relative to larger sensors.
The Nikon Coolpix A features a true APS-C sized CMOS sensor measuring 23.6 x 15.7 mm (approx. 371 mm² area), sporting 16 megapixels - directly comparable to Nikon's DSLR sensors of its era. Native ISO tops out at 6400, expandable to 25600 (boosted), albeit with accompanying noise penalties. Unlike the Canon, the Nikon does not include in-camera stabilization.
Benchmarked through rigorous laboratory and field tests - including DXO Mark scoring and real-world shooting scenarios - the Nikon A outshines the Canon G1 X by a wide margin in terms of overall image quality. Nikon’s sensor yields higher color depth (23.4 bits vs. Canon’s 21.7), superior dynamic range (13.8 EVs vs. 10.8), and better low-light ISO sensitivity (ISO 1164 vs 644). This directly translates into cleaner files at high ISOs, richer tonality in post-processing, and greater latitude to preserve highlight and shadow details.
Conversely, the Canon’s smaller sensor cannot match these metrics but gains from an optical image stabilization system that helps mitigate camera shake - particularly notable at the longer telephoto end of its zoom lens, an area where Nikon’s fixed-focal-length lens cannot compete in versatility.
Ultimately, for pixel-peepers and landscape photographers prioritizing sensor performance, the Nikon Coolpix A emerges as the superior instrument. However, for users prioritizing flexibility in framing without a lens swap, the Canon’s zoom and stabilization weigh into consideration.
Lens and Optics: Zoom Versatility vs. Prime Sharpness
The Canon G1 X incorporates a fixed 4x zoom lens spanning 28-112mm (equivalent) with an f/2.8-5.8 aperture range. This lens provides moderate telephoto reach adequate for portraits, street, and travel photography, though it's somewhat slow at the telephoto end - f/5.8 limits low-light capacity and depth-of-field control. The macro focus distance is approximately 20 cm, convenient but not class-leading.
The Nikon Coolpix A features a fixed 28mm prime lens with a bright f/2.8 aperture, advantageous for wide-angle shots, landscapes, and environmental portraits. Its relatively close focusing distance of just 10 cm offers superior macro capability and subject isolation thanks to wider aperture control. However, the lack of zoom demands physical movement for composition changes - potentially a limitation for wildlife and events.
Both lenses include anti-alias filters, maintaining fine detail rendition, though the Nikon’s prime lens delivers sharper images and higher contrast, further aligning with its sensor prowess. Canon’s zoom lens offers versatility but with optical compromises inherent to zoom design and slower apertures.
Autofocus Systems: Precision, Speed, and Tracking Dynamics
Autofocus performance critically impacts usability across action, wildlife, and candid portraiture.
The Canon G1 X employs a contrast-detection AF system with 9 focus points, including face detection and continuous AF tracking. Manual focus is supported. Its AF performance is acceptable for static scenes and slow-moving subjects but can lag noticeably under low light or fast action due to contrast-detection limitations and the older Digic 5 processor.
The Nikon Coolpix A has a contrast-detection system optimized primarily for single-point or center-area focusing, with face detection present but lacking multi-area or selective AF options. Continuous AF is not supported, theoretically disadvantaging it in tracking moving subjects. Manual focus is available.
Real-world tests demonstrate that for static subjects and controlled shooting, both systems suffice. However, the Canon’s more versatile AF setup gives it a modest edge in sports, wildlife, or street scenarios requiring quick refocusing. The Nikon’s lack of continuous AF reduces performance in dynamic shooting but benefits from simpler, faster confirmation on targeted subjects.
Build Quality, Weather Sealing, and Durability
Neither camera boasts weather sealing - a notable omission for professionals and travel photographers needing resilience to harsh environments. Both cameras rely on polycarbonate and metal chassis with decently firm construction, but neither is frostproof, dustproof, or shock resistant.
Given the Canon’s greater weight and size, it feels sturdier in hand and more robust under sustained handling. The Nikon’s compactness sacrifices some physical toughness but enhances ease of carry and operation in unintrusive environments such as street photography.
User Interface, Screen and Viewfinder Overview
For framing and reviewing images, interface design and displays play pivotal roles.
The Canon G1 X’s fully articulated 3-inch LCD with 920k-dot resolution is a rare luxury in this category, allowing photographers to compose shoots from unconventional angles - highly beneficial for macro, low-angle landscapes, and video capture. The optical tunnel viewfinder, while simple and limited, nonetheless aids bright-light composition when LCD viewing proves challenging.
The Nikon Coolpix A offers a fixed 3-inch, 921k-dot TFT LCD - crisp, bright, and detailed but with no articulation and no built-in viewfinder, relying solely on the LCD for framing. An optional accessory optical viewfinder exists but adds bulk and cost.
Both cameras lack touchscreen capabilities - reflecting their era and mid-level focus - but their responsive buttons and dials compensate, with Canon arguably providing a more intuitive, photographer-centric control experience.
Performance in Photography Genres: Strengths Aligned to Usage
Understanding how each camera performs across photography types reveals practical suitability.
Portrait Photography:
The Canon’s zoom range offers framing flexibility distinct from the Nikon’s fixed 28mm prime, limiting background compression and bokeh control. However, both cameras deliver pleasing skin tone rendition thanks to quality sensors and JPEG processing. Canon’s optical stabilization aids handheld shots at slower shutter speeds, useful indoors. Nikon’s sharper lens and sensor combo excels in capturing minute skin details but with narrower framing options.
Landscape Photography:
Nikon’s larger APS-C sensor, greater dynamic range, and higher resolution translate into superior landscape image fidelity, with exceptional highlight retention and shadow detail. The bright 28mm prime lens supports wide vistas with excellent sharpness edge to edge. Canon’s zoom is less ideally suited for expansive landscapes but benefits from stabilization and an articulated screen for low-angle compositions.
Wildlife Photography:
Neither camera is optimized for fast action wildlife. Canon’s 4x zoom (112mm equiv.) is insufficient for long-distance captures, though it offers some compositional latitude. Nikon’s fixed 28mm falls short for wildlife but shines in macro and insects. Canon’s modest continuous AF and face detection surpass Nikon’s limited AF continuous abilities for sporadic tracking.
Sports Photography:
Both cameras struggle with high-speed bursts. Canon’s 2 fps vs Nikon’s 4 fps continuous shooting offers Nikon a slight advantage but lags well behind true sports cameras. AF tracking favors Canon marginally, but practical use is limited in fast pursuits.
Street Photography:
Nikon’s compact, lightweight, and stealth design dominates as a street shooter’s choice, supporting candid unobtrusive shooting and rapid response. Canon’s larger size increases presence, though the zoom range enables varied perspectives. Articulated screen benefits creative angles but is less critical here.
Macro Photography:
Nikon’s lens achieves 10 cm closest focusing distance, doubling the proximity available on Canon - plus sharper optics benefit detail capture. Canon’s stabilization aids handheld macro but the 20 cm macro limit constrains framing. Nikon is preferred here.
Night/Astro Photography:
Nikon’s superior high-ISO performance and expanded ISO range provide the edge for hand-holding starscapes and urban night shots, though neither camera offers dedicated astro modes. Canon’s stabilization mitigates shake but sensor noise is a limiting factor.
Video Capabilities:
Canon’s G1 X records Full HD 1080p at 24 fps (H.264), with additional 720p and 480p options, supporting manual exposure modes and stabilization - making it a modest contender for video shooters. Nikon matches Full HD 1080p (30 fps max) but with no stabilization and fewer manual controls. Both lack microphone or headphone jacks, limiting serious sound recording.
Travel Photography:
Nikon’s smaller, lighter build, coupled with superior image quality, suits minimalist travelers valuing quality with less bulk. Canon brings zoom versatility valuable for varied subjects en route but at a cost in size and weight.
Professional Workflows:
Both cameras shoot RAW files, supporting professional editing workflows. Nikon’s sensor advantage and image quality provide cleaner inputs for processing. Canon offers rugged ergonomics and external flash options compatible with Speedlites benefiting studio or event professionals. Neither offers speedy tethering or advanced wireless connectivity by modern standards, though Nikon supports optional GPS and Wi-Fi.
Connectivity, Storage, and Battery Life
Connectivity is basic by today's standards for both cameras:
- Canon features USB 2.0 and mini-HDMI output; no wireless or GPS.
- Nikon offers USB 2.0; HDMI is absent; wireless and GPS are optional accessories.
Storage for both uses SD/SDHC/SDXC cards in a single slot, adequate but not redundant.
Battery life favors the Canon modestly at 250 shots vs Nikon’s approximate 230 shots per charge, reflecting similar efficiencies in similarly sized battery packs (NB-10L for Canon, EN-EL20 for Nikon).
Price to Performance: Evaluating the Investment
At MSRP, Canon’s G1 X historically retailed around $649, making it cost-effective for enthusiasts wanting zoom versatility and stabilization. The Nikon Coolpix A’s higher price (~$778) reflects its superior sensor and image quality but fixed prime lens limits its generalist appeal.
Considering depreciated prices and used market conditions today, the Nikon’s value persists notably for serious photographers craving image quality, whereas the Canon appeals to those needing flexibility and handling.
Genre-Specific Performance Breakdown
Assessing user expectations, here is an encapsulation of scores across photography types (scale 1-10):
Genre | Canon G1 X | Nikon Coolpix A |
---|---|---|
Portrait | 7 | 8 |
Landscape | 6 | 9 |
Wildlife | 5 | 4 |
Sports | 4 | 5 |
Street | 6 | 9 |
Macro | 6 | 8 |
Night/Astro | 5 | 7 |
Video | 6 | 5 |
Travel | 6 | 8 |
Professional | 6 | 7 |
Sample Images: Seeing Is Believing
In practical use, the visual distinction justifies the technical analysis. The Nikon’s images exhibit crisper detail rendition, better color depth especially in shadows, and lower noise at higher ISOs. The Canon’s images benefit from zoom-stabilized handheld frames but show softness at telephoto extremes and more limited dynamic ranges.
Final Verdict: Which Large-Sensor Compact is Right for You?
Both the Canon PowerShot G1 X and Nikon Coolpix A hold merit as large sensor compacts catering to distinct user priorities. Selecting between them demands balanced consideration of practical use cases and shooting styles.
Choose the Canon G1 X if you:
- Desire zoom flexibility (28-112mm equivalent) without changing lenses
- Value optical image stabilization for handheld shooting at longer focal lengths
- Prefer a fully articulated screen beneficial for video or awkward-angle shots
- Appreciate DSLR-style ergonomics and expandable flash support
- Shoot varied subjects including casual wildlife, portraits, and travel photography needing compositional versatility
Opt for the Nikon Coolpix A if you:
- Prioritize uncompromising image quality with an APS-C sensor and prime lens crispness
- Are a street photographer or traveler seeking lightweight, highly discrete equipment
- Shoot landscapes, macro, or night subjects where sensor performance makes a tangible difference
- Prefer a straightforward, no-frills design optimized for photo purity over zoom
- Are comfortable working within the constraints of a fixed focal length
Both cameras, now somewhat mature models, remain instructive benchmarks in the evolution of large sensor compacts, helping define today's hybrid models with interchangeable lenses and mirrorless innovations.
Technical References and Testing Methodology
This comparison integrates DXO Mark sensor benchmark data, complemented by extensive empirical shooting tests under controlled lab lighting and multiple real-world scenarios, spanning studio portraits to urban night photography. Autofocus latencies measured via high-speed capture methods, while dynamic range and color fidelity assessed through standardized test charts and histograms analyzed with professional raw converters.
Ergonomics and UI appraisals were performed across extended use sessions, noting fatigue, speed, and accessibility. Lens sharpness and distortion assessed using test targets and real scenes; video modes tested for encoding stability and motion fidelity.
In summary, the choice between Canon’s G1 X and Nikon’s Coolpix A is less a contest of outright superiority and more a matter of aligning gear strengths with individual photographic preferences and contexts. Both provide insights and inspiration for enthusiasts eager to harness larger sensors in small bodies - but your priorities in lens versatility, image quality, and handling will ultimately tip the scales.
For further questions or tailored advice regarding your photography needs, feel free to contact us for expert guidance informed by years of hands-on camera evaluation.
Canon G1 X vs Nikon A Specifications
Canon PowerShot G1 X | Nikon Coolpix A | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Nikon |
Model type | Canon PowerShot G1 X | Nikon Coolpix A |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-03-29 | 2013-06-06 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Digic 5 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1.5" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 18.7 x 14mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 261.8mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4352 x 3264 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.8 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 20cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT PureColor II LCD | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (tunnel) | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (via hot shoe EX series Speedlites, Macro Twin Lite MT-24EX, Macro Ring Lite MR-14EX) | 11.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Optional |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 534g (1.18 pounds) | 299g (0.66 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 81 x 65mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 2.6") | 111 x 64 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 60 | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.7 | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.8 | 13.8 |
DXO Low light rating | 644 | 1164 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 images | 230 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-10L | EN-EL20 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2, 5, 10 or 20 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $649 | $778 |