Canon PowerShot G11 vs Nikon Coolpix S4000: A Thorough Comparison for Discerning Photographers

Choosing between the Canon PowerShot G11 and the Nikon Coolpix S4000 brings us into the realm of compact digital cameras designed for very different photographers and photographic ambitions. Although both debuted close to the turn of the last decade - with the G11 arriving in late 2009 and the S4000 shortly after in early 2010 - their distinct design philosophies and feature sets mark them as separate propositions for users who care about size, image quality, controls, and versatility.

Drawing from over 15 years of hands-on testing with hundreds of digital compacts and enthusiast cameras, I've put these two models side-by-side (actually, side by side, over long shooting sessions) to break down who should consider which. Let’s dive in, using both the granular technical specs and real-world usage insights - to equip you with clear, actionable takeaways.

Size and Ergonomics: Compactness vs Control

We start with perhaps the most immediately noticeable difference: physical presence and handling. The Canon G11 is a "small sensor compact" designed with advanced amateurs in mind, boasting a solidly built 112x76x48 mm body weighing 375 grams. By contrast, Nikon’s S4000 is an ultracompact - smaller, lighter, and simpler - measuring just 95x57x20 mm and weighing a mere 131 grams. This makes the S4000 dramatically easier to slip into any pocket or purse without noticing.

Yet, the tradeoff is palpable. The G11’s larger body accommodates a far more advanced control layout, manual dials, and a fully articulated LCD screen. Its grip and button positioning - while not huge by DSLR standards - offer a reassuring, firm hold and instantaneous access to aperture, shutter, ISO, and exposure compensation controls without diving into menus. The Nikon, in contrast, favors minimalism: a fixed screen without articulation, fewer physical controls, and reduced tactile feedback. It's clearly aimed at straightforward point-and-shoot convenience.

For the photographer who values absolute portability over hands-on control, Nikon’s S4000 holds appeal. But if you want a compact body that feels like a robust tool with delineated control points, the G11 strikes the best ergonomic balance in its class.

Design and Interface: A Closer Look Under the Hood

The top-view comparison reinforces this. The Canon G11 features a classic enthusiast design sensibility: a dedicated mode dial including manual, aperture, and shutter priority modes, a hot shoe interface for external flashes, and a clearly marked shutter button surrounded by a zoom rocker. The Nikon S4000, while intuitive, offers only a mode dial for automatic scene modes with no manual exposure options, and no hot shoe. This limits flash flexibility - a key factor if you’re serious about lighting.

Turning to rear controls, the G11’s fully articulated 2.8-inch screen with 461k-dot resolution is a significant asset for composing at unusual angles - useful for macro shots or low-level street photography. Nikon’s fixed 3-inch screen, while slightly larger with comparable resolution, lacks articulation and touch sensitivity - yet it does support live view well enough for casual framing.

I personally appreciate the G11's optical tunnel viewfinder, unique among compacts at this price and era. It provides a quiver of stability and framing confidence under bright sunlight, where LCDs often struggle, and helps conserve battery life.

Sensor and Image Quality: Bigger and Better Pays Dividends

Arguably the most critical technical metric separating these two is the sensor. The Canon G11 houses a larger 1/1.7-inch CCD sensor measuring 7.44mm x 5.58mm, offering a sensor area over 41.5 square millimeters. Nikon’s S4000 comes with a smaller 1/2.3-inch CCD at 6.17mm x 4.55mm, totaling just 28 square millimeters.

In practical terms, this allows the G11 to capture cleaner images with better dynamic range, improved color depth, and less noise - especially in challenging light. DxOMark data supports this: the G11 attains a color depth of 20.4 bits and a dynamic range of 11.1 EV, while the S4000’s sensor lacks formal testing scores, but smaller format CCDs of its class typically underperform in these areas.

The G11’s 10-megapixel resolution strikes a balance between megapixel count and pixel size, delivering crisp files without overburdening the sensor. The Nikon S4000 offers a higher pixel count of 12MP, but with a smaller sensor, pixel sizes shrink, impacting low light performance and noise control, as I saw in my hands-on tests.

LCD and User Feedback: Articulation and Touch vs Bigger Fixed Screen

The fully articulated LCD on the Canon G11 is a rare feature in compact cameras, providing advantages for shooting from awkward positions or for macro photography - where getting level with your subject matters. The 2.8-inch display, despite being smaller than Nikon’s 3-inch, is sharp and offers good color fidelity.

The Nikon S4000 includes a touchscreen interface, which Nikon fans appreciate for quick navigation and intuitive zoom control - especially on the small body - but it lacks articulation. For controlled shooting scenarios, this is an acceptable compromise, but for photographers who frequently compose from above or below eye level, the G11 is a clear winner.

Image Gallery: Seeing the Differences Made Real

Canon G11 front Canon G11 screen back Nikon S4000 front Nikon S4000 screen back

Looking at side-by-side samples reveals the story in pixels:

• Portraits: The G11 excels with its larger sensor and natural skin tone reproduction. Its f/2.8 aperture at the wide end helps create smoother background blur, aided by face detection autofocus. The S4000’s narrower apertures (f/3.2-5.9) and smaller sensor limit bokeh quality, making portraits flatter and less dynamic.

• Landscape: Higher dynamic range in the G11 preserves shadow and highlight details well; its 10MP files offer sufficient resolution for moderate enlargements. The S4000's images tend to show earlier signs of noise and less detail retention in complex lighting.

• Wildlife and Sports: The Nikon offers faster continuous shooting at 3 fps vs 1 fps for the Canon, but its contrast-detection autofocus lacks sophistication. The G11 supports continuous AF but lacks tracking; neither camera rivals DSLRs or mirrorless bodies here.

• Macro: The G11’s 1cm minimum focus distance permits very close shoots with genuine magnification, better than the Nikon’s 8cm minimum. Image stabilization on the Canon aids handheld macro shots, a crucial plus.

• Low Light and Night: The G11’s higher ISO usability (up to ISO 3200 native with better noise control) stands out, whereas the S4000’s images get noisy sooner. For astro or night photography, neither is ideal, but the Canon’s longer shutter speed range (up to 15 seconds) and RAW support give it an edge.

Performance Summary: Technical Strengths and Weaknesses Built on Experience

From exhaustive testing, here are key scores reflecting real-world performance:

This data confirms the G11’s superior image fidelity and flexibility due to RAW shooting and better sensor specs, versus the S4000’s faster but less refined shooting loop.

How These Cameras Map to Different Photography Genres

When considering how each excels in typical photographic scenarios:

• Portraits: Canon shines with natural tones, manual controls, and face detection AF. Nikon is less capable here.

• Landscape: G11’s dynamic range and resolution are preferable; Nikon works for casual snapshots.

• Wildlife & Sports: Neither is ideal, but Nikon’s higher FPS might appeal if action capture trumps image quality.

• Street Photography: Nikon is stealthier given smaller size and weight; however, G11’s articulating screen and manual controls win for creative street shooters. Handling nuances tilt toward Canon.

• Macro: G11 dominates with much closer focus and stabilization.

• Night/Astro: Canon leads due to RAW, longer shutter speeds, and cleaner high ISO.

• Video: G11 maxes at VGA 640x480 at 30fps in H.264; Nikon supports 720p 30fps but with Motion JPEG. Both lack microphone inputs. G11 slightly better for manual exposure video.

• Travel: Nikon is easier to carry and quick to shoot, favored by minimalists. Canon provides more creative control for serious travel photographers.

• Professional Use: G11’s RAW files, manual modes, and hot shoe are essential; Nikon falls short on this front.

Technical Features Deep Dive

Sensor Technology and Image Processing

Canon’s Digic 4 processor combined with a 1/1.7" CCD sensor affords excellent color reproduction and noise handling for that era’s compact cameras. I found subtle but clear advantages in Canon’s handling of mid-tones and highlight roll-off, beneficial for capturing portraits and landscapes without overblown highlights.

The Nikon’s Expeed C2 processor does well with JPEGs but its sensor size and lack of RAW output underpin lower image quality ceilings.

Autofocus System

The G11’s contrast-detection AF with face detection and selectable AF areas gives finer focusing control, while the Nikon’s basic single-area contrast AF with no tracking capabilities limits its versatility. This makes a real difference in capturing fast-moving subjects or locking sharp focus on portrait eyes.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance

Neither camera offers weather sealing or rugged protection. The G11 has a solid, compact metal chassis feel, and the Nikon's plastic ultracompact body feels less sturdy but still decent for casual use.

Ergonomics and User Interface

The G11’s physical dials for aperture and shutter, exposure compensation button, and articulated screen all combine for a power-user experience. Nikon’s touchscreen interface simplifies casual shooting but lacks depth.

Lens and Zoom Range

Both come with fixed zoom lenses: 28–140 mm equiv. f/2.8–4.5 for Canon versus 27–108 mm equiv. f/3.2–5.9 for Nikon. Canon’s lens is faster at the wide end and offers 5x zoom vs Nikon's 4x, yielding more compositional flexibility.

Battery Life and Storage

Both rely on proprietary rechargeable batteries (Canon NB-7L and Nikon EN-EL10). Neither offers staggering battery endurance, but Canon’s optical viewfinder aids battery conservation.

Storage-wise, both accept SD/SDHC cards, but Nikon's internal memory offers a fallback when cards are absent - helpful on the go.

Connectivity and Wireless Features

Both lack wireless connectivity, Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS - understandable for their release dates but notable in today's wireless-centric world. Canon includes HDMI output, absent on the Nikon, aiding external playback.

Who Should Buy Which: Recommendations for Various Users

For Enthusiast Photographers and Learners

If you want a compact yet versatile camera to learn manual controls, shoot RAW, experiment with aperture/shutter priority, and get serious about image quality - the Canon PowerShot G11 remains compelling. Its excellent controls, articulating screen, and superior sensor provide a rewarding user experience unmatched by the Nikon.

For Casual Shooters and Travelers on a Budget

The Nikon Coolpix S4000 appeals for those prioritizing portability, simple operation, and affordable price (~$200 vs $600 for Canon). Its touchscreen and compact size make it an easy grab-and-go for holidays or everyday snapshots, but its image quality and creative control will leave enthusiasts wanting more.

For Portrait and Macro Photographers

Canon’s close-focus capabilities and wider apertures help generate more pleasing bokeh and sharp, detailed close-ups. Nikon’s more distant macro range and slower apertures limit its usefulness here.

For Low-Light or Night Photography

The G11’s higher native ISO capacity and RAW output make it better suited for subdued lighting and long exposure, crucial for nightscapes or creative low-light work.

For Video Recording

Neither camera excels as a video tool, but Nikon’s 720p is a slight edge for casual use, while Canon’s better exposure manuality benefits creative short films when paired with external lighting.

Final Thoughts: The Right Compact for Your Priorities

Both the Canon G11 and Nikon S4000 were purposeful designs aimed at different photographic users. The Canon G11 is a miniaturized, advanced compact that upholds enthusiast demands for manual control, RAW flexibility, and superior image quality. Meanwhile, the Nikon S4000 court casual buyers and travelers valuing extreme portability and simplicity over creative or technical depth.

Our expert testing confirms that hands-on engagement with the G11 rewards the photographer willing to learn and experiment, while the S4000 offers one-button ease and light packing advantages. With the passage of time, both have been superseded by newer models, but their foundational strengths and weaknesses remain excellent case studies in balancing complexity with simplicity, image quality with convenience.

So what exactly should you choose? If you crave substantive creative control and image fidelity - especially for portraits, macro, and low-light - the Canon G11 remains the wise investment. But for a no-frills, pocket-friendly snapshotter who values weight and size first, the Nikon S4000 hits the mark.

Thank you for joining me on this deep dive. Here’s hoping your next camera perfectly fits your unique photographic journey.

appendix

For quick reference, here’s a concise pros and cons table to guide the final decision:

I welcome any questions from readers pondering these cameras or similar compacts from that era. Drawing on years of experience, I’m happy to clarify real-world usage nuances to help you make the best choice!