Canon PowerShot G16 vs Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3: A Comprehensive Hands-On Comparison

When pitting two compact cameras from the early 2010s against each other - Canon’s 2013 PowerShot G16 and Fujifilm’s 2010 FinePix Real 3D W3 - we’re looking at very different philosophies under the hood. Though both fall into the “small sensor compact” category and share similarities in size and some handling aspects, their target audiences and capabilities are worlds apart. Over my 15+ years of testing cameras, I've learned that such comparisons highlight how rapidly camera tech evolves, and how diverse features serve very distinct photographic needs.

In this detailed comparison, I’ll walk you through every aspect I tested with these cameras - from handling and sensor tech to autofocus and specialized use cases. Whether you’re a street photography aficionado, macro lover, or casual shooter curious about 3D imaging, this article will help you understand which might be the best fit today, almost a decade after these models hit the shelf.

Handling and Ergonomics: Compact but Contrasting

At first glance, both cameras are compact and travel-friendly, but their body designs and handling experiences differ significantly due to their intended user bases.

Canon PowerShot G16

The G16 sports a fairly robust, chunky body for a compact - measuring 109 x 76 x 40 mm and weighing 356g. Its grip feels solid, and the textured surfaces allow confident one-handed use outdoors, even with gloves on. The physical controls include dedicated dials for aperture and shutter speed, a manual focus ring, and a conventional mode dial - features that cater to advanced enthusiasts who want precise control without fumbling through menus.

The rear sports a 3-inch 922k-dot fixed LCD that is bright and clear indoors but struggles under harsh daylight (more on the screen shortly). An optical tunnel viewfinder adds to experience, giving a traditional framing method with about 80% coverage. In low light or when trying to conserve battery, this option comes handy and shows Canon’s focus on classic photographic ergonomics.

Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3

By contrast, the Real 3D W3 is slightly larger on two dimensions (124 x 66 x 28 mm) but lighter at 230g. It’s a sleek, futuristic candy bar shape designed primarily for casual shooters intrigued by the novelty of real-time stereoscopic 3D photography and video. The controls are minimal, with no manual focus ring or physical exposure dials, reflecting its design towards point-and-shoot simplicity.

Its 3.5-inch 1150k-dot LCD is noticeably larger and higher resolution, optimized for viewing 3D images directly on-camera without glasses - one of the W3’s unique selling points. However, it lacks a viewfinder entirely, relying solely on this screen for composition.

Both cameras have decent button layouts but the Canon’s feel more purpose-driven, while the Fujifilm leans towards casual, novelty use with fewer tactile controls and simpler menus.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Battle of Sizes and Tech

Sensor specs often dictate the quality and versatility of any camera. Here, Canon’s G16 and Fujifilm’s W3 have very different sensor technologies, impacting everything from resolution to ISO performance.

Canon G16’s BSI-CMOS Sensor

At the heart of the G16 is a 1/1.7-inch 12 MP backside-illuminated CMOS sensor measuring 7.44 x 5.58 mm (approx. 41.5 mm² sensor area). This sensor size is among the largest available for small compacts of its era, yielding better dynamic range and noise control than smaller sensors.

Canon also paired it with their Digic 6 processor, which helps with faster image processing and improved noise reduction at higher ISOs. The G16 supports RAW capture, allowing enthusiasts to do extensive post-processing - a crucial feature for professionals or semi-pros. Canon’s maximum ISO reaches 12800, but realistically, usable ISO hovers around 1600–3200 before noise degradation becomes a problem.

The sensor includes an anti-alias filter, which reduces moiré but can slightly soften fine details, a typical tradeoff in many compact cameras.

Fujifilm W3’s Dual 1/2.3-inch CCD Sensors

The Real 3D W3 is unique as it employs two 1/2.3-inch CCD sensors (each 6.17 x 4.55 mm, ~28 mm² area) to capture stereoscopic images and video. Each sensor is 10 MP, delivering a maximum resolution of 3648 x 2736 pixels per eye image.

While CCD technology was standard earlier in the decade and can produce rich colors, it suffers in comparison to modern CMOS sensors regarding speed, dynamic range, and noise handling, especially in dim conditions. The smaller sensor size compared with Canon’s G16 means less light capture and more aggressive noise filtering, particularly noticeable above ISO 400.

Importantly, the W3 cannot shoot RAW, locking users into JPEG images straight from the camera, limiting editing flexibility.

Autofocus and Shooting Performance

The way these cameras autofocus and shoot in burst mode shapes their suitability for various photography genres. Over years of field testing, I’ve found autofocus system speed and accuracy to be deciding factors for wildlife and sports shooters.

Canon PowerShot G16 Autofocus System

The G16 houses a contrast-detection autofocus system with 9 points - including face detection - which, while not revolutionary by today’s mirrorless standards, is very capable for a compact. It supports AF single, continuous, and tracking modes, allowing smoother focus when subjects move.

The lens aperture of f/1.8-f/2.8 over the zoom range aids focusing performance by letting in ample light, beneficial in low-light or macro situations. I found the G16’s AF lock reliable and relatively fast even under dim indoor lighting - a testament to the synergy between its sensor and processor.

Burst shooting clocks in at a high 12 fps, impressive for the class, making it valuable for capturing fleeting action like kids or pets playing. Buffer depth isn’t extensive but sufficient for short sequences.

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Autofocus

The W3’s autofocus is contrast-detection only, single autofocus mode. No continuous AF or tracking is available, making it less suitable for moving subjects or sports. Autofocus speed is moderate but can occasionally hunt in complex lighting.

While not aimed at high-speed shooting, the Fuji does not offer continuous shooting rates as an advertised specification, reflecting its focus on static or slow-moving subjects mostly for casual use.

Additionally, the lack of manual focus means control over focus precision is limited, which may frustrate macro or subject-specific photographers.

Lens and Zoom: Versatile or Specialized?

Lens specs often define the creative flexibility of these compacts.

Canon G16’s 5x Zoom (28-140mm F1.8-2.8)

The G16’s lens offers a classic 28-140mm equivalent focal length, excellent for wide-angle landscapes, street shooting, portraits, and modest telephoto shots. The fast aperture starting at f/1.8 at wide end gives beautiful background separation (bokeh) and excellent low-light capability - something I tested thoroughly in dim cafes and evening streets, where this lens outperformed many rivals.

For macro enthusiasts, the G16 can focus as close as 1cm, allowing detailed flower or insect shots, combined with optical image stabilization to steady handheld close-ups.

Fujifilm W3’s 3x Zoom (35-105mm F3.7-4.2)

The W3 zoom is narrower in range, from 35 to 105mm equivalent, with a slower aperture of f/3.7–4.2 limiting low-light versatility and shallow depth-of-field control. While this range works okay for portraits and casual snaps, the slower lens and smaller sensor restrict creative depth effects.

The macro focus minimum is 8cm, less tight than Canon’s, reducing pronounced close-up detail possibilities.

Notably, the W3’s lenses are doubled for 3D shooting, which introduces design compromises on aperture speed and sharpness per lens compared to single-lens vehicles like the G16.

Screens and Viewfinders: Visualizing Your Shots

The rear screen and viewfinder affect usability in different environments and shooting styles.

Canon: 3” 922k LCD + Optical Viewfinder

The 3-inch LCD on the Canon lacks touch and articulation but renders colors vividly with good contrast indoors. I noticed some difficulty under direct sunlight, similar to most TFT LCDs without brightness boosters. The included optical tunnel viewfinder is an often overlooked comparative advantage - though it doesn’t show exposure info, it helps with stability and framing, especially outdoors.

Fujifilm: 3.5” 1150k 3D LCD

The W3’s hallmark is its large 3.5" AMOLED-style LCD capable of showing 3D images without glasses - a genuine technical delight. The resolution is quite high, making it visually appealing for reviewing stereo images right on the spot.

However, its lack of a traditional viewfinder can make shooting in bright sunlight challenging. The absence of articulation and touch also limits framing flexibility.

In terms of shooting interface, neither camera supports touch or selfie-friendly screens, consistent with their era.

Video Recording Capabilities

For hybrid shooters wanting to capture moving images, video specs are critical.

Canon PowerShot G16

Canon’s G16 can record Full HD 1080p (1920x1080) at 60fps or 30fps using H.264/MPEG-4 compression, which was quite advanced for a compact in 2013. It delivers smooth motion, good color fidelity, and fairly natural autofocus transitions during recording.

The lack of a microphone or headphone jack limits audio control, but the built-in mono mic captures acceptable on-camera audio for casual use. Image stabilization helps with handheld video smoothness, though electronic IS is not present.

Fujifilm Real 3D W3

The W3 does 720p HD video at 24fps (stereo 3D video, no less), compressed as Motion JPEG. The frame rate is better suited for casual clips rather than professional use. Due to hardware limits, audio/video quality is basic, with no external mic inputs.

While the 3D video feature is a technical novelty that enthusiasts may enjoy, the limited resolution and compression make footage not ideal for anything beyond casual sharing.

Battery Life and Storage: Longevity and Flexibility

In real-world shooting, battery endurance and storage options often dictate how long and how hard you can shoot.

Canon G16

The G16 uses an NB-10L rechargeable battery delivering roughly 360 shots per charge per CIPA standards. In my testing with mixed use (photo and video), this sits around a full day for casual users, or half-day for enthusiasts who shoot continuously.

Storage slots support SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, widely available and compatible with large capacities. USB 2.0 and HDMI ports are present for data transfer and video output.

Fujifilm W3

The W3’s NP-50 battery specification states no clear official battery life rating; anecdotal tests suggest it is shorter, around 200-300 shots, partly due to powering dual sensors and the 3D display.

Storage includes SD/SDHC plus 15 MB of internal storage - a minor bonus for short-term emergency shots. However, the W3 lacks wireless connectivity, limiting convenient remote transfer or app tethering.

Building for the Elements and Durability

Neither camera is weather sealed, waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, crushproof, or freezeproof. Given their compact nature and release periods, this is not unexpected. They are mainstream consumer compacts, not rugged outdoor tools.

The Canon does feel a bit more substantial in grip and overall build, while the Fujifilm’s lighter, more plastic-feeling body aligns with its casual use case.

Color Science and Image Rendering

Canon’s PowerShot G16 continues a lineage of producing generally warm, pleasing skin tones and vivid greens - traits desirable for portrait and landscape shooters alike. Its BSI CMOS sensor helps with accurate detail and contrast, giving files that require minimal correction even in JPEG.

Fujifilm’s Real 3D W3 showcases the color science heritage of the brand but given the older CCD sensors and JPEG-only output, colors can sometimes appear slightly less accurate or a bit “washed out,” especially in challenging lighting.

Sample Images and Real-World Output

Here we see sample images from both cameras across different lighting conditions and scenes.

Canon G16 front Canon G16 screen back Fujifilm Real 3D W3 front Fujifilm Real 3D W3 screen back

In daylight, the G16 resolves finer details and richer dynamic range, while the W3 excels in 3D depth perception but at the cost of lower clarity and higher noise in shadows. Indoors, the G16’s faster lens and larger sensor lead to noticeably cleaner images.

Strengths and Weaknesses at a Glance

How Do They Score? Objective Performance Ratings

Let me quantify their performance across major criteria based on extensive tests:

The Canon G16 leads comfortably in image quality, controls, and shooting speed. The Fuji W3 scores points for its innovative 3D imaging but falls behind in nearly all other categories.

Genre-Specific Performance: Who Suits Which Photography Style?

Let’s breakdown their fit for distinct photography genres:

• Portrait: Canon’s skin tone rendering, aperture control, and face detect AF shine here. Fuji's slower lens hampers background blur control.
• Landscape: Canon wins with superior dynamic range and resolution, though neither has weather sealing.
• Wildlife & Sports: Canon’s 12fps burst and continuous AF provide solid support, Fuji lacks speed and tracking.
• Street: Fuji’s compact size helps, but Canon's viewfinder and fast lens give it an edge in versatility.
• Macro: Canon excels with 1cm focus and stabilization.
• Night/Astro: Canon’s higher ISO usability is vital here. Fuji struggles in weak light.
• Video: Canon supports 1080p60 with stabilization; Fuji limited to 720p24.
• Travel: Canon's slightly heavier body adds presence, but both are portable.
• Professional Use: Canon’s RAW and manual features allow integration; Fuji aimed at casual consumers.

Connectivity & Extras

While both cameras feature USB 2.0 and HDMI outputs, the G16 adds built-in Wi-Fi, facilitating quick image sharing and remote control from smartphones - a convenience increasingly expected even from compacts. The W3 lacks any wireless capabilities, which is a significant limitation in today’s connected world.

Neither supports Bluetooth or NFC. GPS support is optional on the Canon and absent on the Fuji.

Final Assessment & Recommendations

Who Should Consider the Canon PowerShot G16?

If you are a serious enthusiast or entry-level professional who needs a high-quality compact offering manual controls, RAW shooting, excellent image quality, and versatile zoom with a fast lens, the Canon G16 remains a surprisingly capable performer. For portrait, landscape, street, travel, or casual wildlife work, the G16’s feature set and handling make it a reliable pocket companion. The inclusion of Wi-Fi and solid video specs add modern usability that lengthens its lifespan.

Who is the Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 For?

The Fuji W3 is a niche camera suited for those fascinated by 3D photography and casual photography without a heavy gear commitment. Its standout feature - the glasses-free 3D LCD and stereoscopic imaging - offer fun and novelty. However, sacrifices in lens speed, low-light performance, and manual control make it less useful for serious photographic work. If you want to explore 3D without investing in newer VR or stereo cameras, the W3 is your camera.

Closing Thoughts: Context Is Key

While both cameras share compact sizes and come from respected brands, their design intentions couldn’t be more different. The Canon PowerShot G16 embodies the classic enthusiast compact formula with manual control, image fidelity, and balanced feature sets. The Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 takes a unique path focusing on 3D consumer fun, sacrificing conventional photographic rigor.

My testing reinforced that sensor quality, lens speed, and control interfaces remain king in photographic versatility. But 3D imaging is an intriguing creative angle, one that the W3 offered at a time few cameras did.

If forced to choose one, I’d recommend the G16 for anyone serious about image quality and traditional photography versatility, and the W3 only for a specialized 3D hobbyist wanting a standalone compact with that rare capability.

Here’s to informed choices - may your next camera suit your vision as well as the camera suits your hands.

End of article.