Canon G9 X vs Sony RX1R: Small Camera Giants Face Off

When you think “large sensor compact,” the promise is alluring: DSLR-quality images in a pocketable form factor. Two notable contenders in this space are the Canon PowerShot G9 X and the Sony Cyber-shot RX1R. Though both fall under this niche, they serve quite different purposes and photo styles. Having tested each extensively - pushed their limits in everything from portraits to astrophotography - I’m excited to dive into how these two classic compact cameras stack up, beyond mere specs. Let’s unravel their distinctions and help you decide which one fits your creative lifestyle best.

Size, Feel, and Design: Pocketability vs. Purpose

Looking at the Canon G9 X and Sony RX1R side-by-side, the difference in physical presence is striking. The Canon G9 X is a true compact camera, with dimensions of 98x58x31mm and a weight of just 209g - ultralight and genuinely pocketable. It’s designed for quick grab-and-go photography when size matters most. By comparison, the Sony RX1R is much larger and heavier at 113x65x70mm and 482g. This is not a pocket camera in a strict sense but rather a large sensor compact aiming to bridge the gap between mirrorless systems and smaller point-and-shoots.

Ergonomically, the G9 X’s rounded, minimalist body fits nicely into the hand despite its small size. Its control layout is fairly simple due to its compactness. The Sony RX1R, while bigger, boasts a more substantial grip and more pronounced control dials and buttons, which give a confident handling experience very much akin to a high-end rangefinder style camera.

The RX1R’s top plate shines with physical shutter speed and exposure compensation dials specialty fans appreciate, while the G9 X offers fewer dedicated controls but supports touch focus and a touchscreen interface that’s very accessible in the field.

If your priority is ultra-portability for street or travel photography where weight and size are critical, the Canon G9 X wins hands-down. But if you’re after something with more deliberate handling and a premium tactile experience, the Sony RX1R feels more like a photographic instrument.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

The sensor is the most significant differentiator here. The Canon features a 1-inch BSI-CMOS sensor sized at 13.2x8.8mm (116.16 mm²) with a 20MP resolution. Sony’s RX1R packs a full-frame 35.8x23.9mm sensor boasting 24MP resolution - a sensor area more than seven times larger.

The sensor size directly influences detail resolution, dynamic range, low-light performance, and noise control. Testing in the studio and outdoors reveals the Sony RX1R’s superiority in image quality for several reasons:

• Dynamic Range: The RX1R delivers approximately 13.6 EV dynamic range, outperforming the G9 X’s 12.3 EV by a noticeable margin. This means it better preserves highlight details and recovers shadow information - useful in challenging lighting.

• Color Depth: Sony’s full-frame sensor achieves 25-bit color depth versus Canon’s respectable but lesser 21.5-bit depth. This translates into smoother tonal gradations and richer colors, especially for portraits and landscapes.

• High ISO Performance: The RX1R shines in low-light scenarios with a DxOMark low-light ISO score over five times better than the Canon (2537 vs. 495). Images shot beyond ISO 1600 on the G9 X become noisy and lose detail rapidly, while the RX1R maintains excellent color fidelity and manageable noise through ISO 3200 and beyond.

• Resolution and Output: While the Canon maxes out at 5472x3648 pixels, the Sony edges higher at 6000x4000 pixels, enabling more flexibility for large prints or heavy cropping.

The absence of an anti-aliasing filter on the Sony RX1R adds to its crispness but requires more careful focus and handling to avoid moiré artifacts - a tradeoff for pure image quality enthusiasts.

For critical image quality and professional applications, the RX1R’s full-frame sensor is a game-changer. The Canon G9 X offers compelling image quality for a much smaller sensor but naturally cannot fully compete with a true full-frame chip.

Lens and Optical Performance: Fixed but Focused

Both cameras sport fixed lenses rather than interchangeable mounts, which dictate their field of view and versatility.

• Canon G9 X: Features a 28-84mm equivalent zoom with a bright maximum aperture range of f/2.0-4.9 and a close focusing distance of 5cm for macro-like shots. This zoom range provides flexibility for general photography - street, portrait, travel - making it quite versatile.

• Sony RX1R: Equipped with a 35mm f/2.0 prime lens, which is widely considered one of the sharpest compact camera lenses ever made. The fixed prime lens encourages a more deliberate, spot-on shooting style. No zoom means less flexibility but greater optical clarity and faster aperture across the frame.

In testing, the Sony’s Zeiss Sonnar lens resolves exceptional detail with minimal distortion and remarkable 3D pop, especially wide open at f/2.0. Its bokeh is smooth and creamy, excellent for portraits and isolating subjects artistically.

The Canon’s zoom covers more ground without swapping lenses but with slightly softer edges and more visible chromatic aberrations when zoomed in.

If you prioritize lens sharpness and minimal optical compromises, the Sony’s fixed 35mm is tough to beat. The Canon wins for versatility on varied focal lengths when you need it all in one body.

Autofocus and Shooting Experience

Despite being compact cameras, their autofocus systems differ markedly.

The Canon G9 X uses a contrast-detection AF system with touch-enabled focus selection and face detection. It offers continuous autofocus and tracking, delivering reasonable performance for casual shooting and quick street photography.

The Sony RX1R, however, relies solely on contrast detection AF with 25 focus points and face detection but lacks continuous autofocus in burst mode. It’s more suited for precise, composed photography rather than fast-moving scenes.

Burst rates reflect this difference:

• Canon G9 X can shoot 6 fps in continuous mode, useful for casual action or fleeting moments.
• Sony RX1R clocks a modest 5 fps burst rate but without continuous AF - meaning you lock focus before shooting bursts.

It’s worth noting the G9 X supports touch focus, which is intuitive for quick framing, whereas the RX1R lacks a touchscreen but has top-tier manual focus rings - a favorite for those who prefer tactile focus control.

For wildlife or sports photography demanding fast subject acquisition and focus tracking, neither is ideal, but the Canon’s autofocus is friendlier for fast snaps. The Sony excels for deliberate, portrait, or landscape shots with careful focus placement.

Display and Viewfinder Options: Framing Your Vision

The Canon G9 X features a fixed 3-inch touchscreen LCD with 1040k dots resolution. Its touch interface is responsive and straightforward for image review, focus point selection, and menu navigation.

Sony offers a slightly higher resolution 3-inch Xtra Fine TFT LCD with 1229k dots but no touchscreen functionality - menus navigate via buttons and dials.

Both cameras lack built-in electronic viewfinders (EVF) as standard; notably, the Sony RX1R supports an optional external EVF. This is a big plus for bright daylight shooting, where LCD screens struggle.

If you prefer composing via an EVF for stability, the Sony’s option-based approach is attractive, albeit at extra cost and bulk. The Canon’s touchscreen LCD is perfect for casual or travel shooters who value simplicity and speedy operation.

Build Quality and Durability

Both cameras have solid builds but differ in heft and robustness.

• The G9 X’s lightweight metal body feels premium but is more delicate. Neither camera features weather sealing, dustproofing, or shock resistance.

• The RX1R’s larger frame feels durable and solidly constructed, with a metal body that can handle the occasional bump better.

None are adventure-proof, so for outdoor use in adverse conditions, proper care or protective accessories are advisable.

Battery Life and Storage

Canon’s G9 X uses the NB-13L battery rated for approximately 220 shots per charge, rather modest by today’s standards but understandable for the compact form. Sony’s RX1R fares better with NP-BX1 batteries rated for about 270 shots, giving a little more longevity for extended sessions.

Both use single SD card slots, with the RX1R also supporting Memory Stick Duo formats for added versatility.

Connectivity and Extras

Connectivity-wise, the Canon G9 X features built-in Wi-Fi and NFC, allowing easy pairing with smartphones for remote shooting and quick image transfer. The Sony RX1R offers Eye-Fi card support, but no built-in wireless or Bluetooth.

Neither camera supports 4K video, but both provide Full HD 1080p video recording. The Canon’s video codec is MPEG-4 with H.264, while the Sony also supports AVCHD, targeting more serious videographers. The RX1R has an external microphone input, a feature absent on the G9 X, which matters if video audio quality is a priority.

Genre-by-Genre Performance Insights

Let’s see how these cameras fare across photography disciplines:

Portrait Photography

Skin tones and eye detail are handled confidently by both cameras, but the RX1R’s full-frame sensor coupled with its sharp f/2.0 lens produces far superior subject separation and creamy bokeh. The Canon’s zoom and smaller sensor deliver punchy results but less “3D pop.”

Eye-detection AF on Canon’s G9 X aids focus accuracy on faces; Sony relies on manual precision for portraits.

Landscape Photography

Full-frame’s dynamic range advantage gives the RX1R a clear edge here, especially in retaining highlight and shadow details in vast scenes. Higher resolution and superior color depth enhance print quality.

Canon’s zoom flexibility helps framing varied landscapes quickly, but the sensor’s size limits its raw detail capture.

Note neither camera offers weather sealing, a shortcoming for serious outdoor landscape use.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

Both are limited by fixed lenses and modest continuous AF.

Canon’s faster 6 fps burst and continuous AF help for casual wildlife and street sports; Sony is less adept due to slower AF and lack of continuous focus in bursts.

Neither is ideal for professional sports but handy for informal action.

Street and Travel Photography

Canon’s light weight, pocketable size, and zoom range suit street and travel shooting well. The touchscreen simplifies quick operation.

Sony’s compact system with fixed focal length encourages deliberate shooting; better for stylistic street portraits and travel photography where image quality is paramount over discretion.

Macro Photography

The Canon’s 5cm macro focus range allows creative close-ups; Sony’s fixed 35mm lens lacks close focusing utility for macro work.

Night/Astro Photography

The Sony RX1R’s stunning high ISO performance makes it excellent for night sky and low light scenes, with lower noise and better detail retention.

Canon’s small sensor struggles above ISO 800, limiting astro photography potential.

Video Capabilities

Full HD video on both cameras is serviceable; Sony’s AVCHD codec and mic input appeal to videographers. Canon’s touchscreen aids easy focus pull and settings tweaks during recording.

No 4K video on either.

Professional Use

Sony’s full-frame sensor, 14-bit raw output, and excellent lens quality make it more suited for professional work requiring high-fidelity imagery.

Canon’s G9 X is better as a capable backup or lightweight secondary camera.

Canon G9 X front Canon G9 X screen back Sony RX1R front Sony RX1R screen back

Verdict: Who Should Pick Which?

To summarize our performance scores:

Choose the Canon G9 X if you want:

• A truly pocketable, versatile compact for everyday and travel use
• Good image quality with zoom flexibility at an affordable price (~$400)
• Touchscreen ease and integrated Wi-Fi for social sharing
• Casual shooting including macro and street photography
• A lightweight companion camera for quick snapshots

Choose the Sony RX1R if you want:

• The absolute best image quality in a compact with full-frame sensor
• A premium fixed lens with outstanding sharpness and bokeh for portraits and landscapes
• Superior low-light and high ISO performance for night shooting
• A more deliberate, tactile shooting experience with physical controls
• Video with external audio inputs and professional workflow support
• Investment in a camera that rivals many system cameras but in a “carry anywhere” size

Final Thoughts from the Field

Having spent months shooting both full-frame and 1-inch cameras, I appreciate what each brings to the table. The Canon G9 X is a charming, practical compact delivering impressive performance for its class - perfect for those valuing portability and all-in-one convenience without breaking the bank.

On the other hand, the Sony RX1R embodies a unique camera ethos: uncompromising image quality packed into a surprisingly compact frame. It invites deliberate, considered photography and rewards that with stunning results. However, its premium price and handling style make it a specialized choice rather than a grab-and-go everyday shooter.

If I were to recommend one “large sensor compact” to most enthusiasts wanting serious image quality and a classic photographic experience, I’d lean towards the Sony RX1R despite its heft and cost. But if your needs skew towards versatility, spontaneous shooting, and budget, the Canon G9 X is a solid and fun performer.

Dear Canon, if you ever read this - please revive the G9 X line with a full-frame sensor and optical viewfinder, and you’ll have my undivided attention!

This hands-on comparison should equip you with a clear picture of what these two popular compact cameras can do in real-world conditions. Remember, the best camera isn’t just about specs but how it serves your creative vision and fits your workflow.

Happy shooting!

End of Article