Clicky

Canon S100 vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
93
Imaging
37
Features
48
Overall
41
Canon PowerShot S100 front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Canon S100 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Canon S100
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
  • 198g - 99 x 60 x 28mm
  • Revealed December 2011
  • Superseded the Canon S95
  • Replacement is Canon S110
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Announced January 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon S100 vs Samsung WB35F Overview

Its time to examine more closely at the Canon S100 versus Samsung WB35F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Canon and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the S100 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the S100 (1/1.7") and WB35F (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The S100 was launched 24 months earlier than the WB35F which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the S100 scores against the WB35F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon S100 over the Samsung WB35F

 S100 WB35F 
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution461k230kClearer screen (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Canon S100

 WB35F S100 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014December 2011Newer by 24 months

Common features in the Canon S100 and Samsung WB35F

 S100 WB35F 
Manual focus More precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Neither offers Touch screen

Canon S100 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Canon S100 offers outer dimensions of 99mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Check the Canon S100 versus Samsung WB35F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the S100 and the WB35F.

Canon S100 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S100 and WB35F is 93 and 93 respectively.

Canon S100 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Canon S100 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions simply by checking specifications. The pic here will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S100 and WB35F.

To sum up, each of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The S100 due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Samsung WB35F will give you greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged S100 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Canon S100 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Canon S100 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Canon S100 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon S100
Portrait photography with Samsung WB35F
45
focusing manually
above average flash sync speed (1/2,000s)
includes face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
37
you can focus manually
decent MP (16MP)
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Canon S100 Street photography advice
Samsung WB35F Street photography advice
65
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/1.7")
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (194 grams)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Canon S100 Sports photography features
Samsung WB35F Sports photography features
32
image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
terrible battery pack (200 CIPA)
does not have phase detect autofocus
40
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Canon S100 Travel photography features
Samsung WB35F Travel photography features
61
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
no Timelapse mode
terrible battery pack (200 shots)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
does not have a selfie friendly display
70
lighter than average (194 grams)
decent MP (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
very long reach (288mm)
missing Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.1)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Canon S100 Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB35F Landscape photography factors
51
focusing manually
decently wide (24mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
terrible battery pack (200 shots)
no Timelapse mode
43
you can focus manually
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Canon S100
Vlogging with Samsung WB35F
36
decently wide (24mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not have a selfie friendly display
no external microphone socket
31
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (194g)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon S100 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon S100 and Samsung WB35F
 Canon PowerShot S100Samsung WB35F
General Information
Brand Name Canon Samsung
Model type Canon PowerShot S100 Samsung WB35F
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2011-12-22 2014-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Digic 5 -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 9 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-120mm (5.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.0-5.9 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focusing range 3cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 461k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 15 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 2.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 7.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/2000 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (120, 30 fps), 320 x 240 (240, 30 fps) 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 198g (0.44 pounds) 194g (0.43 pounds)
Dimensions 99 x 60 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 50 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 20.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.6 not tested
DXO Low light rating 153 not tested
Other
Battery life 200 photographs -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NB-5L BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) -
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $429 $130