Canon S110 vs Nikon S3500
93 Imaging
36 Features
51 Overall
42
95 Imaging
44 Features
25 Overall
36
Canon S110 vs Nikon S3500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 198g - 99 x 59 x 27mm
- Announced September 2012
- Old Model is Canon S100
- Later Model is Canon S120
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-182mm (F3.4-6.4) lens
- 129g - 97 x 58 x 21mm
- Released February 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon PowerShot S110 vs Nikon Coolpix S3500: Practical Compact Camera Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
When scouting for a compact camera that can slip easily into pockets yet deliver decent image quality, enthusiasts and casual shooters often weigh the balance between portability, features, and value. Today, I bring you a detailed, hands-on comparison of two entry-level compact cameras premiered around 2012–2013, the Canon PowerShot S110 and the Nikon Coolpix S3500. Although both belong to the “small sensor compact” category - meaning they sport sensors smaller than mirrorless or DSLRs - they carve out distinct propositions across design, tech, and usability that demand closer scrutiny.
In my 15+ years testing camera bodies from bargain bins to prosumer giants, I’ve evaluated countless compacts under real-world shooting situations. Drawing on that experience, this comparison will break down these models from multiple angles: sensor tech, ergonomics, autofocus, image quality, and suitability across photography genres. I'll also comment on how each fares for budding content creators on tight budgets or enthusiasts seeking a reliable second shooter.
Let’s begin with the basics - the physicality and handling of both models.
Size, Handling, and Build Quality - Compactness vs Control

For folks craving an ultra-portable camera, both the Canon S110 and Nikon S3500 pack into lightweight, pocket-friendly chassis, but there are nuance-filled trade-offs.
- The Canon S110 measures roughly 99 x 59 x 27 mm and weighs 198 grams with battery and card. It sports a more substantial heft relative to its compact footprint, thanks to a metal chassis that feels solid and more premium in hand.
- The Nikon S3500, on the other hand, is even smaller - 97 x 58 x 21 mm and featherweight at 129 grams, leaning into a plastic build that is decidedly more budget-focused.
The S110’s slightly chunkier body offers better grip ergonomics, especially useful for prolonged shooting sessions or those who dislike fiddling with clubs for thumbs on flat, slippery bodies. The Nikon feels like a lightweight travel companion, ideal for someone prioritizing minimal bulk but with the downside of less tactile assurance.
What you don’t get from either: weather sealing or ruggedness - neither model is designed to endure adverse conditions, so for landscape or travel adventurers planning rough shoots, consider this a buy-and-beware scenario.
On top, controls diverge further:

- Canon’s S110 lays out a manual control dial and dedicated exposure compensation button, plus physical access to aperture and shutter priority modes, encouraging manual explorations.
- Nikon’s S3500 simplifies with minimal buttons and no manual exposure modes - you’re stuck with full auto or scene presets, which suits beginners or casual shooters but frustrates those who want creative freedom.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Beast
[Sensor size and pixel count often determine core image quality and usability range, so let’s examine this crucial aspect.]

- Canon S110 boasts a 1/1.7-inch 12MP CMOS sensor covering approx 41.5 mm², notably larger than its Nikon counterpart. Larger sensors usually mean better light-gathering, lower noise, and improved dynamic range.
- Nikon S3500 sports a 1/2.3-inch 20MP CCD sensor measuring about 28.5 mm². While more pixels sound good on paper, the sensor’s smaller size means smaller pixel pitch - often leading to more noise and less dynamic range, especially in dimmer lighting.
From my tests shooting under low light and high contrast (typical tricky situations for compacts), the Canon’s CMOS sensor paired with the DIGIC 5 processor offers superior noise control, cleaner shadows, and crisper highlights. Its color depth and dynamic range are measurably better - Canon scores 20.6 bits color depth and 11.2 EV dynamic range (per DxOMark testing), while Nikon’s sensor architecture typically yields flattened colors and tighter dynamic windows.
However, the Nikon’s higher pixel count can deliver finer detail in good light when shooting JPGs at base ISO, but it comes at the expense of noise creeping up quickly as ISO rises beyond 400.
The S110’s ability to shoot RAW files (Canon’s CR2 format) is a major advantage for post-processing flexibility - the Nikon stays JPG-only, limiting the ability to rescue shadows, modify white balance, and extract highlight detail later.
Viewing, Touchscreen, and User Interface

Looking through a viewfinder isn’t possible on either, but their rear screens know different leagues:
- The Canon S110 includes a bright, moderately high-res 3-inch touchscreen (461k dots). The touchscreen interface is responsive, and menus are navigable with ease - useful for quick focus selections or setting adjustments on the fly. Touch and drag AF points represent a refreshing experience on a compact.
- Nikon’s S3500, by contrast, offers a 2.7-inch TFT-LCD with a resolution of about 230k dots, noticeably dimmer and lacking touchscreen capability. The interface feels dated, menu navigation is clunkier, and controlling focus or settings is all button-based.
If you’re accustomed to smooth touchscreen control, the Canon clearly offers a modern user experience despite the older release date.
Autofocus Performance: Speed and Precision
Let’s talk about what impacts your subject sharpness directly - autofocus.
- The Canon S110 utilizes a contrast-detect AF system with 9 focus points, face detection, and continuous AF during video. It also supports touch-to-focus, a definite benefit for street or portrait shooting.
- The Nikon S3500 lacks manual focus and any advanced AF features, relying on a single-point AF system typical of budget cameras of that era, no face detection included.
In my side-by-side shooting of moving subjects (children running, pets darting), the Canon S110’s AF locked faster and tracked moving subjects better, with fewer front/back focusing issues. Nikon’s AF exhibited occasional hunting delays and missed focus under low contrast.
For wildlife, sports, or event photography, where quick and accurate AF is non-negotiable, the Canon’s system, while not perfect, outclasses the Nikon S3500.
Burst Shooting and Shutter Speed Nuances
Want to freeze motion or capture a fleeting smile? Burst shooting and shutter speed ranges matter.
- Canon S110 offers a max burst rate of 10 fps, enabling you to capture action sequences with relative ease.
- Nikon S3500 does not specify continuous shooting rates and lags behind here.
In practice, I managed to capture rapid-fire images of kids at play with the Canon’s burst mode effectively, while the Nikon felt slow to keep up.
Shutter speed range on both tops out around 1/2000 sec, sufficient for daylight hand-held shots, but Canon offers a longer minimum shutter time of 15 seconds, opening some options for long-exposure and night photography (more on this later).
Lens Versatility and Optical Zoom
Fixed lenses limit flexibility but vary in focal range and aperture:
- Canon S110 features a 24-120mm (35mm equivalent) zoom with a fast aperture of f/2.0-5.9, advantageous for low-light shooting and subject isolation with shallow depth of field.
- Nikon S3500 includes a longer 26-182mm (35mm equiv.) zoom at f/3.4-6.4, good reach for distant subjects but with narrower max aperture, which restricts low-light performance and bokeh.
The Canon's wider aperture at the short end means softer backgrounds for portraits, and the modest 5x zoom covers typical travel and street scenarios nicely. Nikon aims for extended telephoto, but at considerable cost to brightness and image stabilization effectiveness.
For macro enthusiasts, the Canon boasts a near 3 cm minimum focusing distance - handy for close-ups and detail shots - Nikon’s data is unspecified, likely less versatile here.
Image Stabilization and Flash
Both offer optical image stabilization to counteract hand shake, but the Canon S110’s stands out for smoother video and sharper handheld shots at slow shutter speeds.
- Built-in flashes exist, with Canon’s effective range around 7 meters, flash modes include Red-eye reduction and Slow sync.
- Nikon’s flash info is minimal, with no bracketing or advanced modes.
Neither supports external flash, limiting off-camera lighting options for ambitious flashes setups.
Video Capabilities - Moving Pictures in Compact Form
Content creators may wonder how these cameras handle video:
- The Canon S110 records Full HD 1080p at 24 fps with H.264 compression - respectable for a compact of its time. It also provides manual exposure control during video, enhancing creativity.
- Nikon S3500 maxes out at 720p video at 30 fps, with no manual controls or microphone input, reflecting the budget-tier focus.
Canon’s video is more versatile, especially for vloggers or casual filmmakers wanting a pocket camera that can double for decent video.
Connectivity and Storage
Wireless features are increasingly critical:
- Canon S110 sports built-in Wi-Fi (no Bluetooth or NFC, though), allowing image transfer and remote shutter control via Canon’s app - a feature ahead of its time in 2012.
- Nikon offers no built-in Wi-Fi but features Eye-Fi card compatibility for wireless transfer upon inserting an Eye-Fi card.
Both share USB 2.0 ports; only Canon supports HDMI output.
Storage is SD/SDHC/SDXC for both, with single card slots.
Battery Life and Practical Shooting Duration
On paper, the Canon S110 rates about 200 shots per charge using its NB-5L battery, which is modest but typical for compacts with power-hungry processors and Wi-Fi.
Nikon doesn’t specify battery life or model details, but due to its small size and less processing demand, expect similar or possibly better stamina.
For long day shooting or travel, carrying spares or a power bank (for Canon with optional USB charging, though not official) is advisable.
Real-World Photography Scenarios: Which Camera Suits What?
Let me guide you through how each camera performs across common photography styles.
Portrait Photography
The Canon wins easily here. Its larger sensor, wider aperture f/2.0 lens at wide end, and face detection AF yields flattering skin tones, well-blurred backgrounds, and faster, more reliable eye detection. Nikon’s small sensor and slower lens struggle to isolate subjects, and without face detection, critical focusing on eyes is hit-or-miss.
Landscape Photography
Canon’s superior dynamic range allows capturing richer detail in shadows and prevents highlight blowouts, crucial for dramatic skies and high-contrast scenes. The S110’s sharper lenses and RAW support enhance editing options.
The Nikon S3500’s longer zoom adds compositional flexibility to isolate distant landmarks but will show less tonal subtlety, particularly under challenging lighting.
Neither offers weather resistance, so neither is an outdoor adventurer’s dream.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Canon’s faster burst and better AF tracking help freeze fast-moving wildlife and athletes, though both cameras’ small sensors limit detail and cropping potential compared to larger-sensor models.
Nikon may reach further with zoom but suffers from slower AF, lower frame rates, and noisier images at higher ISO.
Street Photography
For candid shooting, compactness and discreetness matter.
Nikon’s lighter weight and smaller profile may be less obtrusive for some. However, Canon’s manual controls, touchscreen AF, and quick responsiveness give you more creative options. Low-light street scenes favor the brighter Canon lens and cleaner sensor output.
Macro Photography
Canon handles macro better with a minimum focusing distance of about 3 cm, allowing detailed close-ups with good background separation.
Nikon doesn’t advertise macro capability, likely less effective in this area.
Night and Astro Photography
Thanks to the Canon’s 15-sec shutter speed, ISO range to 12,800, and superior noise reduction, it’s the better choice for low-light and astrophotography enthusiasts dabbling with star trails or dimly lit scenes.
Nikon’s shorter exposure limits this, and noisier results hamper usability.
Video Content Creation
Canon’s full HD video, manual control, and image stabilization make it a practical pick for casual video creators or travelers who want a hybrid still/video compact.
Nikon’s HD video quality and lack of controls make it strictly baseline.
Travel Photography
Both are travel-friendly, but Canon’s versatility in lens speed, Wi-Fi connectivity, and better ergonomics favor travelers emphasizing image quality and convenience. Nikon’s lower price and lighter weight suit ultra-basic carry, but you sacrifice creative options.
Professional Work
Neither camera targets pro-grade work; however, Canon’s RAW support, manual exposure modes, and superior sensor translate into a more reliable secondary camera for professionals needing a pocketable backup.
Summarizing Technical Strengths and Weaknesses
| Feature | Canon PowerShot S110 | Nikon Coolpix S3500 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | 1/1.7" CMOS, 12MP, RAW support | 1/2.3" CCD, 20MP, no RAW |
| Lens | 24-120mm f/2.0-5.9 | 26-182mm f/3.4-6.4 |
| Display | 3" 461k-dot touchscreen TFT | 2.7" 230k-dot non-touch TFT |
| Autofocus | Contrast-detect, 9 points, face detection | Basic single-point AF, no face detect |
| Burst | 10 fps | Not specified |
| Video | 1080p 24fps, manual exposure control | 720p 30fps |
| Stabilization | Optical IS | Optical IS |
| Connectivity | Built-in Wi-Fi, HDMI | Eye-Fi card compatibility only |
| Manual Controls | Aperture, shutter priority, full manual | None |
| Battery Life | ≈ 200 shots | Unknown |
| Weight | 198g | 129g |
| Price (at launch) | ~$299 | ~$85 |
Sample Image Quality Comparison
Viewing side by side, Canon’s images show richer colors, less noise, and better highlight retention. Nikon’s shots appear softer with less tonal range, especially in shadow-heavy or low-light conditions.
Overall Performance Scoring
Canon scores well on image quality, autofocus, and features, while Nikon ranks lower, reflecting its more entry-level position.
Genre-Specific Performance Breakdown
This chart reinforces our discussion: Canon leads in demanding genres like portrait, landscape, night, and macro, whereas Nikon’s strengths lie in ultra-budget travel snapshots and simple casual use.
Final Verdict: Which Compact Does Your Pocket Deserve?
After hands-on use and exhaustive testing, here’s my straightforward take:
-
Choose the Canon PowerShot S110 if you value image quality, control over exposure, flexibility in manual focusing, and want a compact that can double as a light travel or backup camera. It’s ideal for enthusiasts and casual pros who want to explore photography beyond point-and-shoot presets. The ability to shoot RAW and manual exposure modes opens a playground missing from its Nikon rival.
-
Opt for the Nikon Coolpix S3500 if you are an absolute beginner or a cheapskate (and I say that with kindness) who desires a super-simple, ultra-light compact for quick family snaps and vacations with minimal fuss. Its longer zoom lens helps reach for those distant candid moments, but you pay a price in reduced image quality and creative flexibility.
In the budget compact class, compromises are inevitable. However, the Canon S110's richer feature set, better sensor, and more capable lens justify its higher price, offering a tangible image quality uplift and usability benefit. The Nikon is, well, “the bare necessities,” suitable for casual shooters uninterested in manual control or post-processing.
Bonus Tips for Buying and Using These Cameras Today
- Both cameras support SD cards up to SDXC, but investing in a Class 10 card will improve write speeds, especially for burst shooting in Canon.
- Given their age, battery replacements or third-party options may be needed if you hunt for these models used.
- Canon’s Wi-Fi system is compatible with older mobile OS versions only, so app support might be limited.
- Neither offers 4K video - so if video quality is paramount, modern compacts or mirrorless cameras are better bets.
Parting Shot
For photographers who want a genuine pocket-friendly shooter with respectable image quality, the Canon S110 remains a better compromise of tech vs cost, while the Nikon S3500 plays safe as an affordable, lightweight snapshot machine. Neither will replace your DSLR or mirrorless for critical pro work or high-end creative projects, but depending on your priorities, these two models deliver solid short-term utility.
If you want a camera that respects your effort and skill even on a budget, Canon’s S110 deserves a spot in your gear lineup. And if you just want a cheap compact to carry around without worry, Nikon’s S3500 is the minimalist choice.
Whichever camera you pick, happy snapping!
This detailed analysis reflects extensive field tests under varied shooting conditions, including controlled lab testing for sensor and AF performance. As always, individual experience with your chosen camera will deepen insights and preferences.
Canon S110 vs Nikon S3500 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S110 | Nikon Coolpix S3500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Nikon |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S110 | Nikon Coolpix S3500 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-09-17 | 2013-02-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 26-182mm (7.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.4-6.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT PureColor II G Touch screen LCD | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 198 grams (0.44 lbs) | 129 grams (0.28 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 59 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 97 x 58 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 48 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 168 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-5L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $299 | $85 |