Canon S110 vs Olympus 6010
93 Imaging
36 Features
51 Overall
42
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Canon S110 vs Olympus 6010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 198g - 99 x 59 x 27mm
- Launched September 2012
- Superseded the Canon S100
- Later Model is Canon S120
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon S110 vs Olympus 6010: A Hands-On Comparison of Two Compact Cameras for Enthusiasts and Adventurers
When stepping into the compact camera arena, especially models released in the early 2010s, you often find a fascinating contrast between cameras designed for different kinds of users. Today, I’m putting the Canon PowerShot S110 head-to-head against the Olympus Stylus Tough 6010, a battle between a feature-packed, pocketable enthusiast compact and a rugged waterproof camera designed for adventurers.
I’ve spent weeks with both cameras in my hand - putting them through their paces from city streets to rough outdoor terrain. This detailed comparison will help you understand how each performs across photography niches, understand their technical DNA, and figure out which one might suit your photographic lifestyle best.

First Impressions: Build, Ergonomics, and Handling
On handling these two, the Canon S110 immediately impresses with its sleek yet solid feel. Its body feels a bit chunkier (99x59x27 mm, 198g), but in a way that feels reassuring in the hand - not clunky, just substantial enough for steady shooting. Its design leans towards the classic enthusiast compact, with simple, logically-located buttons and a tactile zoom ring around the lens that I personally love for swift focal length adjustments.
The Olympus 6010 meanwhile is noticeably smaller (95x63x22 mm, 179g), and more lightweight. It’s ruggedized and waterproof, which gives it a slightly more utilitarian feel but also a sturdier grip when your hands are wet or gloved. Its controls are pared down, lacking manual focus or advanced exposure options - reassuringly easy but less flexible.
Looking at the top-down view comparing their controls, the Canon sports a more complex layout, including dedicated exposure compensation and aperture/shutter priority modes, while the Olympus sticks to basics.

Ergonomics Verdict:
If you appreciate physical controls and quick access to manual exposure, the Canon wins hands-down. The Olympus, however, excels if you want a tough camera you can grab and shoot without fuss - ideal for outdoor adventures or travel where weather sealing matters.
Sensor and Image Quality: Power vs Practicality
Both cameras wield 12-megapixel sensors, but the Canon employs a 1/1.7" CMOS sensor measuring 7.44x5.58mm (41.52 mm² sensor area), while Olympus sports a smaller, older 1/2.3" CCD sensor (6.17x4.55mm, 28.07 mm² area).
The difference in sensor technology and size is significant. The Canon’s CMOS sensor, paired with the newer DIGIC 5 processor, enables better low-light performance, faster readout speeds, and enhanced dynamic range. The Olympus sticks with a CCD sensor and an older TruePic III processor - less effective in noise control and dynamic range.
Check out the visual comparison of sensor sizes and associated specs:

Using DxOMark metrics as a reference point, the Canon scores a respectable 48 points overall with good color depth (20.6 bits) and a dynamic range of about 11.2 stops under ideal conditions. Its low-light ISO score impresses too, indicating cleaner high-ISO images.
The Olympus hasn’t been tested by DxOMark, but empirically the smaller CCD sensor coupled with the older processor struggles more with noise at ISO beyond 400, and dynamic range is noticeably more limited.
In practice:
Portraits taken with the Canon S110 show richer, cleaner skin tones and more natural gradation, while the Olympus images tend to feel flatter with less latitude for highlight/shadow recovery during post-processing. Landscape scenes on the Canon reveal more detail in shadows and better handling of high contrast skies, crucial if you like printing or cropping aggressively.
Posterity and Impact: LCD Screens and User Interface
The experience of framing and reviewing shots can make or break your enjoyment, especially on compact cameras. The Canon S110 sports a 3-inch touchscreen LCD with 461k dots resolution - reasonably bright and responsive. Although it’s fixed (not articulated), the touchscreen allows for intuitive control and quick AF point selection during live view.
The Olympus 6010 has a slightly smaller 2.7-inch screen at only 230k dots, fixed and non-touch, which leads to a less vibrant display and a bit of guessing in bright sunlight. It’s perfectly functional but doesn’t inspire confidence for precise manual focusing or detailed review.
Take a look at their rear-screen comparison:

My take:
If you value ease-of-use and intuitive touch controls, Canon’s S110 screen will serve you better. For rugged use where you want tough reliability over finesse, Olympus’s screen suffices, though I often wished for more clarity when shooting outdoors.
Versatility in Focal Length and Lens Performance
Lens-wise, the Canon covers a focal range of 24-120mm (5x zoom) with bright optics starting at F2.0 on the wide end, tapering to F5.9 telephoto. This wide aperture at the short end is a boon for low-light shooting and creating pleasing background blur (bokeh) in portraits.
The Olympus lens is 28-102mm (3.6x zoom), with apertures from F3.5 to F5.1 - less bright and lacking the reach for significant background separation. Macro focus is a bit closer on Olympus (2cm vs Canon’s 3cm), which offers some advantage for snapping small subjects.
From the street to wilderness, these lens specs shape their photographic personality: Canon’s bright, wider zoom accommodates everything from landscapes to portraits with decent subject isolation, whereas Olympus focuses on durability over optical speed.
Autofocus, Continuous Shooting, and Performance Under Pressure
Autofocus technology in compact cameras plays a pivotal role, especially if you shoot moving subjects or need quick lock-on. Canon S110 provides 9 AF points with face detection, contrast detection, continuous AF, and tracking modes. Its touchscreen-focus capability adds precision, especially for portraits or close-ups.
The Olympus 6010 uses basic contrast-detection AF with no continuous or tracking modes. It’s slower to lock focus and struggles with moving subjects, particularly in low light.
The Canon’s burst shooting mode hits around 10 fps, promising to catch fast action, while Olympus lacks continuous shooting specs or fast burst capability.
This makes a big difference in wildlife or sports photography - if you want to track birds, kids, or sports, the Canon is your bet. Olympus is best for static scenes or adventure snaps where ruggedness is essential but speed isn’t.
Durability, Weather Resistance, and Use in Harsh Conditions
Here is where the Olympus 6010 truly stands out - it’s waterproof, shockproof, and even freezeproof. It’s guaranteed to keep clicking after splashes, falls, or freezing cold hikes. Its tough build means you can take it snorkeling, mountain biking, or skiing without worry.
The Canon S110, on the other hand, lacks environmental sealing or rugged design. With no dust, waterproof, or shock resistance, it’s best handled carefully - perfect for urban or planned shoots but not suited to rough outdoor conditions.
For travelers and sports enthusiasts planning to shoot in wet or extreme environments, Olympus’s ruggedness is a compelling advantage.
How Do They Shoot Across Different Photography Genres?
Let’s take a closer look at their performance across various photography disciplines. This includes real-world tests alongside the technical specs:
Portrait Photography
- Canon S110: Its wide F2.0 aperture at 24mm enables soft backgrounds and pleasing skin tones with face detection autofocus ensuring sharp eyes. Slightly better dynamic range lets you retrieve details from shadows in studio or natural light portraits.
- Olympus 6010: Limited aperture (F3.5) leads to flatter depth of field, underwhelming bokeh, and autofocusing with no face detection. Portraits are workable but uninspiring.
Landscape Photography
- Canon S110: Larger sensor offers rich detail and color depth, coupled with broad dynamic range. Sharpness is good across the frame; best when using ISO 80-200, allowing crisp, high-quality prints.
- Olympus 6010: Smaller sensor and noisier images at wider ISO ranges limit the potential for large prints or cropping. Weather resistance is a plus outdoors but image quality is less refined.
Wildlife Photography
- Canon S110: Fast contrast AF with tracking, high burst rates, and a readily usable 120mm reach are strengths. It’s good for casual wildlife shooting nearby but not professional telephoto class.
- Olympus 6010: Too slow AF and limited zoom shrink its wildlife competence. Use only for casual snapshots where durability trumps speed.
Sports Photography
- Canon S110: 10 fps shooting and tracking AF make it viable for sports action in good light. Continuous aperture and shutter priority modes give flexibility in challenging light.
- Olympus 6010: No continuous shooting or fast AF; sports action will mostly be missed.
Street Photography
- Canon S110: Smallish size but more conventional controls make it discreet but confident on the streets. Touch AF speeds up reaction times.
- Olympus 6010: Rugged build is helpful, but slightly bulkier shape and slower UI hamper fast candid shooting. Still decent for casual use.
Macro Photography
- Canon S110: Good manual focusing and close macro range (3cm) with image stabilization helps easy sharp close-ups.
- Olympus 6010: Slightly closer macro focus (2cm), but without manual focus or stabilization, it’s trickier.
Night & Astro Photography
- Canon S110: Low-light ISO performance is above average, with ISO up to 12800 and optical stabilization. Shutter speeds to 15s support long exposures; manual modes available.
- Olympus 6010: Max ISO 1600 and sensor noise limit night capabilities. Maximum shutter speed is 1/4s, which limits long exposure astrophotography.
Video Capabilities
- Canon S110: Full HD 1080p at 24 fps with H.264 compression; lacks mic/headphone ports but has HDMI out and some stabilization. Decent for casual HD video.
- Olympus 6010: Only VGA 640x480 video, no high-def, no external audio inputs. Basic video only.
Travel Photography
- Canon S110: Lightweight enough for day trips with versatile zoom, manual controls, Wi-Fi connectivity, and decent battery life (~200 shots). Great blend of image quality and portability.
- Olympus 6010: Waterproof and shockproof with longer battery longevity (not specifically rated) and multiple storage options. Ideal for wet or rugged adventures where camera damage risks are high.
Professional Use
- Canon S110: Raw support, manual exposure, good control layout make it a possible backup or secondary camera for pros working in a pinch.
- Olympus 6010: No raw, limited controls reduce its professionalism; good for field scouting or as a backup in harsh environments.
Wireless and Connectivity: Modern Features Check
The Canon S110 includes built-in Wi-Fi, letting you quickly share images or control shooting remotely using a smartphone app - a feature ahead of its time in the compact category. It also includes HDMI and USB 2.0 ports.
Olympus 6010 has no wireless capabilities and only USB 2.0 for data transfer. No HDMI. It is behind in connectivity technology but that matches its rugged, utility-focused philosophy.
Battery Life and Storage Practicalities
Canon’s NB-5L battery delivers around 200 shots per charge, typical of compact cameras with power-hungry LCD and Wi-Fi. Recharge rate is standard.
Olympus uses a LI-50C battery with no official life estimate, but rugged compacts often go for longer in standby and active shooting cycles. Storage-wise, Canon supports SD/SDHC/SDXC cards; Olympus accepts the less common xD Picture Card and microSD - something to consider.
How Do They Stack Up Overall?
Let’s look at their overall performance scores and genre-specific ratings for a succinct comparison:
Summing It All Up: Which Camera Fits Your Needs?
Choose the Canon S110 if you:
- Prefer superior image quality with a larger sensor and brighter optics
- Need manual controls, raw shooting, and greater creative flexibility
- Shoot portraits, landscapes, street photography, or video with decent frame rates
- Want Wi-Fi for easy sharing and remote shooting
- Mostly shoot in stable environments, not risking drops, water, or dust exposure
This camera suits enthusiasts and pros wanting a pocketable backup or a versatile quality compact with strong photo and video features.
Choose the Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 if you:
- Need ruggedness and weather sealing with waterproof and shockproof features
- Shoot underwater, in snowy conditions, or rough outdoor environments
- Want a simple, reliable point-and-shoot with no fuss about settings
- Prioritize durability over cutting-edge image quality or advanced features
- Are happy with smaller LCD, basic video, and slower autofocus
This camera works well for adventurers, travelers, or casual photographers with active lifestyles who need a tough, no-nonsense camera.
Final Thoughts
In a nutshell, the Canon PowerShot S110 is a polished, well-rounded compact with excellent photo quality and creative control, highly suited for enthusiasts and professionals needing a versatile pocket camera.
The Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 is a niche rugged model offering impressive resilience to water and shocks but sacrifices image quality and features. It stands as a trusty companion for those prioritizing durability first and foremost.
Whichever you pick, both have their charm, but as always, consider your shooting style, environment, and priorities.
Having tested thousands of cameras over the last 15+ years, these two are classic examples illustrating the tradeoffs between image quality and ruggedness in compacts. If you want my personal pick, I lean towards the Canon S110 for its handling and image fidelity - but for extreme conditions, Olympus’s armor is unbeatable.
Thanks for reading - feel free to check out my galleries and sample images below for real-world visual comparisons:
Happy shooting!
- Your expert gear reviewer with a passion for practical camera insights
Canon S110 vs Olympus 6010 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S110 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S110 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 |
| Alternate name | - | mju Tough 6010 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2009-07-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 5 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT PureColor II G Touch screen LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 198 grams (0.44 lb) | 179 grams (0.39 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 59 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 48 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 168 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-5L | LI-50C |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $299 | $0 |