Canon S200 vs Casio EX-FH25
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
Canon S200 vs Casio EX-FH25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Released July 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon S200 vs Casio EX-FH25 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Canon S200 vs Casio EX-FH25, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and Casio. The resolution of the S200 (10MP) and the EX-FH25 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the S200 (1/1.7") and EX-FH25 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S200 was released 3 years after the EX-FH25 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Canon S200 being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple overview of how the S200 grades against the EX-FH25 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon S200 vs Casio EX-FH25 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot S200 and Casio Exilim EX-FH25. The complete galleries are provided at Canon S200 Gallery and Casio EX-FH25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Casio EX-FH25
| S200 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 45 months |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Canon S200
| EX-FH25 | S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon S200 and Casio EX-FH25
| S200 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Canon S200 vs Casio EX-FH25 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon S200 provides exterior dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-FH25 has measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs).
Analyze the Canon S200 vs Casio EX-FH25 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the S200 compared to the EX-FH25.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S200 and EX-FH25 is 93 and 69 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Casio EX-FH25 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading through technical specs. The image underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the S200 and EX-FH25.
As you have seen, both the cameras provide the same megapixels but not the same sensor sizes. The S200 contains the larger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower depth of field simpler. The more modern S200 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon S200 vs Casio EX-FH25 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon S200 vs Casio EX-FH25 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S200 | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2014-02-21 | 2010-07-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 40.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 181 gr (0.40 pounds) | 524 gr (1.16 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6LH | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $293 | $450 |