Canon S200 vs Casio EX-ZR300
93 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Canon S200 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched May 2012
Photography Glossary Canon S200 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Overview
Here is a in depth analysis of the Canon S200 vs Casio EX-ZR300, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Canon and Casio. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the S200 (10MP) and EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the S200 (1/1.7") and EX-ZR300 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S200 was announced 22 months later than the EX-ZR300 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the S200 matches up vs the EX-ZR300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon S200 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot S200 & Casio Exilim EX-ZR300. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon S200 Gallery & Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| S200 | EX-ZR300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | May 2012 | Fresher by 22 months |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Canon S200
| EX-ZR300 | S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon S200 and Casio EX-ZR300
| S200 | EX-ZR300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 461k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Canon S200 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon S200 offers outer measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-ZR300 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Canon S200 vs Casio EX-ZR300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the S200 versus the EX-ZR300.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S200 and EX-ZR300 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing just by checking out technical specs. The graphic underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the S200 and EX-ZR300.
As you have seen, each of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The S200 with its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Casio EX-ZR300 will produce extra detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The younger S200 will have an advantage in sensor technology.
Canon S200 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon S200 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S200 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-02-21 | 2012-05-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 5 | Exilim Engine HS |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 15 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 181 gr (0.40 lbs) | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 photos | 500 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6LH | NP-130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $293 | $329 |