Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a542/5a54204eab4a88c3bca57f82f94873880adeaa4d" alt="Olympus SP-600 UZ front Olympus SP-600 UZ front"
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
- Renewed by Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Replaced the Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Later Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Overview
Here is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-500 and Olympus SP-600 UZ, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and SP-600 UZ (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and SP-600 UZ (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-500 was launched 5 years before the SP-600 UZ and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SP-600 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-500 matches up vs the SP-600 UZ with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-500 and Olympus SP-600 UZ. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
E-500 | SP-600 UZ |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Olympus E-500
SP-600 UZ | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2010 | ![]() | October 2005 | Fresher by 52 months |
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus SP-600 UZ
E-500 | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-500 features outside measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-600 UZ has measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-500 and Olympus SP-600 UZ in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-500 compared to the SP-600 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14800/14800f1047d5b50d036a70d65f91f085561ce716" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and SP-600 UZ is 70 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d917/2d917efa71ce30536c8ffc65e878017fa627dbd5" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reading a spec sheet. The photograph below will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and SP-600 UZ.
As you can see, both cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-500 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus SP-600 UZ will offer you more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62105/621055d79953a1fa04b9bbad9f68b7e7bc579bfc" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc91c/fc91c0d7bc4b6be48e954754de6d12b8954d6a63" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Olympus SP-600 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Olympus SP-600 UZ |
Other name | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-420mm (15.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 215k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/2 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479 gr (1.06 lb) | 455 gr (1.00 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $600 | $189 |