Canon S200 vs Olympus XZ-10
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Canon S200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon S200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Below is a extended overview of the Canon S200 vs Olympus XZ-10, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S200 (10MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is relatively comparable but the S200 (1/1.7") and XZ-10 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe S200 was launched 13 months later than the XZ-10 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the S200 scores vs the XZ-10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon S200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot S200 and Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The complete galleries are available at Canon S200 Gallery and Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Olympus XZ-10
| S200 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Canon S200
| XZ-10 | S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Crisper screen (+459k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon S200 and Olympus XZ-10
| S200 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Canon S200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Canon S200 offers outer measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-10 has specifications of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Canon S200 vs Olympus XZ-10 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the S200 and the XZ-10.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S200 and XZ-10 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements purely by going through specifications. The graphic here should give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the S200 and XZ-10.
Plainly, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The S200 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus XZ-10 will show greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The fresher S200 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon S200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon S200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2014-02-21 | 2013-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/1.8-2.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 181 grams (0.40 pounds) | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6LH | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $293 | $428 |