Canon S200 vs Sigma Quattro
93 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Canon S200 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016
Canon S200 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Canon S200 versus Sigma Quattro, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Canon and Sigma. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the S200 (10MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the S200 (1/1.7") and Quattro (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe S200 was manufactured 24 months before the Quattro making them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Canon S200 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the S200 grades vs the Quattro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon S200 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot S200 and Sigma sd Quattro. The entire galleries are provided at Canon S200 Gallery and Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Sigma Quattro
S200 | Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Canon S200
Quattro | S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2016 | February 2014 | Newer by 24 months | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 461k | Sharper display (+1159k dot) |
Common features in the Canon S200 and Sigma Quattro
S200 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Canon S200 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon S200 offers physical measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro has measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon S200 versus Sigma Quattro in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the S200 against the Quattro.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S200 and Quattro is 93 and 63 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to envision the gap in sensor dimensions only by checking out specifications. The pic below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the S200 and Quattro.
To sum up, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The S200 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Sigma Quattro will produce more detail due to its extra 19 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged S200 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Canon S200 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon S200 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Canon PowerShot S200 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Sigma |
Model type | Canon PowerShot S200 | Sigma sd Quattro |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2014-02-21 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 5 | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 29MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5424 x 3616 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | 3.8fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 181 grams (0.40 pounds) | 625 grams (1.38 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-6LH | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $293 | $738 |