Canon S90 vs Panasonic FX78
92 Imaging
33 Features
42 Overall
36
95 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Canon S90 vs Panasonic FX78 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 31mm
- Launched April 2010
- Updated by Canon S95
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FX77
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon PowerShot S90 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78: A Deep Dive for Photography Enthusiasts
As photographers who’ve handled thousands of cameras across decades, we know that choosing the right compact camera can be surprisingly complex. Even models released years ago can still offer solid performance, often trading off new features for classical strengths like ergonomics, image quality, or straightforward operation. In this comparison, we pit the venerable Canon PowerShot S90 against the nimble Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 (also known as the FX77) to help you find the perfect fit - be you a seasoned enthusiast or simply looking for a more capable pocket camera.
Both are small-sensor compacts boasting fixed lenses and aimed at users who want better quality than smartphones without carrying bulky gear. But their design philosophies, strengths, and technical trade-offs shape their real-world suitability.
Let’s unpack the key details to see how these two stack up for various photography demands.
A First Look: Size, Build, and Handling
The first impression matters when you pull a camera out to shoot. Handling comfort, control placement, and body size influence whether you’ll enjoy longer shoots and get better results through intuitive use.
Compact but Distinctive Profiles

The Canon S90 is slightly chunkier at 100 x 58 x 31 mm and weighs 195 grams with battery. Its matte black finish and minimalist, slightly rounded body shape feel sturdy and classic. Its heft provides a reassuring grip that doesn’t slip even in one-handed operation. The metal body adds a touch of professionalism.
Contrast this with the Panasonic FX78, which measures a more svelte 100 x 55 x 21 mm and weighs only 142 grams. It’s notably slimmer - almost wafer-thin compared to the S90 - and curvier with a glossy plastic finish prone to fingerprints. While lighter, it may feel a bit plasticky and less substantial for extended manual control.
Control Layout and Ergonomics

Ergonomics really set the Canon S90 apart. Physical dials for aperture, shutter speed, and an intuitive mode dial let you quickly fine-tune exposure - vital if you want creative control without diving deep into menus. The dedicated manual focus ring around the lens barrel is responsive and smooth, beloved by street and macro photographers alike.
The Panasonic FX78 lacks manual exposure modes entirely and depends on menus for adjustments, reflecting a more consumer-oriented approach. Buttons are minimalistic but sufficiently spaced for casual shooting. The touchscreen on the 3.5-inch rear display adds interactivity but feels less tactile and responsive in low light.
If you prize fast, accurate manual control and ergonomic confidence, the Canon S90 leads here. The FX78 favors casual, point-and-shoot simplicity.
Sensor & Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
The sensor determines image quality, dynamic range, and low-light ability. Here, the two cameras reflect their release dates and design priorities.
Sensor Specifications at a Glance
| Feature | Canon PowerShot S90 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) |
| Sensor Area | 41.52 mm² | 27.72 mm² |
| Resolution | 10 Megapixels (3648x2736) | 12 Megapixels (4000x3000) |
| Max ISO | 3200 (native) | 6400 (native) |
| RAW Support | Yes | No |
| Anti-alias Filter | Yes | Yes |

What This Means Practically
- The Canon S90’s larger 1/1.7-inch sensor provides more light-gathering capability and lower noise at higher ISOs. The 10MP resolution is sufficient for crisp prints up to A3 size.
- The Panasonic FX78 has a higher pixel count but on a smaller sensor. This typically means slightly more noise in low light due to smaller photodiodes.
- The S90’s RAW support vastly improves post-processing latitude, making it more versatile for shooters who want to fine-tune exposure, white balance, and recover shadows/highlights.
In testing, the Canon S90 proves superior in dynamic range, rendering skies and shadows with more detail and smoother gradients. Noise at ISO 800 and above is less intrusive, making it a better companion for dim indoor, event, and travel shooting.
The Panasonic’s sensor is respectable for daylight and moderate ISO, but noise climbs quickly beyond ISO 400. Its lack of RAW support limits creative editing.
Lens System: Versatility and Optical Quality
Lens specs paint a key picture of what’s possible from framing landscapes to capturing macro details.
Specs Summary
| Parameter | Canon S90 | Panasonic FX78 |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length Range | 28-105 mm (35mm equivalent) | 24-120 mm (35mm equivalent) |
| Zoom Factor | 3.8× | 5× |
| Maximum Aperture | f/2.0 - f/4.9 | f/2.5 - f/5.9 |
| Minimum Focus Distance | 5 cm (macro mode) | 5 cm (macro mode) |
| Image Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
The Panasonic FX78's slightly broader zoom range offers more framing flexibility, especially at telephoto lengths where it reaches 120mm vs. Canon’s 105mm.
However, the Canon S90 features a slightly faster wide-aperture of f/2.0 vs Panasonic’s f/2.5, allowing more light in for better subject isolation and bokeh, particularly in the wide-to-normal zoom range. Portrait photographers will appreciate the smoother background separation and sharper subject rendering.
Both cameras can focus down to 5cm, great for macro enthusiasts, but the Canon's manual focus ring makes precise focusing easier in close-ups.
User Interface, Displays & Viewfinder
Shooting experience is shaped strongly by rear screen quality and interaction.

- The Canon S90 has a crisp 3-inch screen with 461k-dot resolution. Colors appear natural and viewing angles are good but not outstanding. No touchscreen functionality.
- The Panasonic FX78 sports a larger 3.5-inch screen but with only 230k dots, resulting in a softer, less detailed image. The touchscreen system introduces some ease for selecting subjects but can feel sluggish.
Neither camera includes an electronic viewfinder, which means relying fully on the rear LCD when composing shots.
Autofocus & Performance: Speed and Accuracy
Autofocus (AF) behavior can make or break decisive shots, especially in dynamic photography.
| Feature | Canon S90 | Panasonic FX78 |
|---|---|---|
| AF System Type | Contrast-detection | Contrast-detection |
| Focus Points | 9 | 11 |
| AF Modes | Single AF | Single/Continuous/Tracking |
| Face Detection | No | No |
| Continuous Shooting | 1 fps | 4 fps |
While the Panasonic FX78 has a faster burst shooting at 4fps (compared to S90's 1fps), its burst depth is limited and buffer clears slowly. This makes it better suited to casual shooting sequences rather than professional sports.
The Canon S90's autofocus is slower but more deliberate, favoring image quality over speed. Its 9-point system lacks tracking, which limits ability to follow moving subjects. The Panasonic, oddly for its category, features AF tracking and continuous AF which help with moving subjects but both struggle in low light due to inherent contrast-based AF limitations.
Image Stabilization & Low Light Performance
Important for handheld shooting and dim environments, optical image stabilization helps reduce blur.
- Both cameras utilize optical stabilization effectively, though the Canon’s is slightly more refined owing to fewer digital corrections.
- The Canon S90 truly shines under low light, usable up to ISO 800 with good detail retention. ISO 1600 and 3200 are noisy but still salvageable thanks to the sensor’s performance.
- The FX78 can shoot up to ISO 6400 but noise levels at ISO 800 and above degrade image quality quickly.
Video Capabilities: A Substantial Difference
If you plan to record video, the Panasonic FX78 significantly outpaces Canon S90.
| Feature | Canon S90 | Panasonic FX78 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | 640 x 480 (VGA) 30fps | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) 60fps |
| Video Codec | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| External Mic Input | No | No |
| Image Stabilization | Optical (for video) | Optical |
The Panasonic FX78's Full HD 1080p videos at 60 fps provide smooth and sharp footage perfect for casual home movies and sharing online. The Canon S90’s VGA video resolution feels outdated and limits creative video applications.
Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity
| Feature | Canon S90 | Panasonic FX78 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Model | NB-6L | Rechargeable Battery Pack |
| Battery Life | ~260 shots (CIPA rating typical) | ~200 shots |
| Storage Media | SD/SDHC/MMC | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Internal |
| Connectivity | USB 2.0, HDMI | USB 2.0, HDMI |
| Wireless | None | None |
Battery life is modest on both - typical for compact cameras of their generation. Neither has Wi-Fi or Bluetooth connectivity options.
Sample Images & Real-World Performance
To truly grasp how these cameras perform in practice, we've put them head-to-head across a variety of scenarios.
- Portraits: The S90 nails natural skin tones and background blur, thanks to its faster aperture and larger sensor. The FX78 produces sharper but flatter portraits with less creamy bokeh.
- Landscapes: Both resolve good detail; the S90 handles dynamic range better, preserving skies and shadows well.
- Macro: Close-ups are more precisely focused with the S90's manual focus ring.
- Low Light: The S90 produces cleaner results up to ISO 800; FX78 images are noticeably grainier.
- Video: FX78’s full HD and smooth motion drastically outperform the S90’s VGA clips.
Performance and Reliability Ratings
For a visual summary, take a look at their overall performance scores and genre-specific strengths.
The S90 scores highly on portrait, low light, and control ergonomics. The FX78 excels at travel compacts and video quality but lags behind on image quality metrics.
Who Should Choose Which? Recommendations by Use Case
If You’re a...
- Portrait Photographer: Choose the Canon S90 for better bokeh, natural tones, and manual focus precision.
- Landscape Shooter: Canon S90’s dynamic range and sensor size offer more latitude.
- Street Photographer: The S90 offers tactile controls and image quality; the FX78’s smaller size favors extreme portability.
- Wildlife/Sports Amateur: Neither is ideal – both lack fast autofocus and reach. FX78’s 4fps offers an edge.
- Macro Enthusiast: The S90’s manual focus and f/2.0 aperture provide more creative control.
- Video Creator: Panasonic FX78 is your choice with Full HD 60fps and better codec support.
- Travel Casual Shooter: FX78 wins with smaller size, lighter weight, and versatile zoom.
- Budget-Conscious Buyer: The FX78 comes at a lower price point (approx. $210 vs. $600 for S90), making it attractive for entry-level users.
Final Thoughts: Practical Insights for Your Next Pocket Camera
Having examined these two cameras in depth, we find the Canon PowerShot S90 delivers superior image quality, manual controls, and low-light capability, embodying the best of bridge-style compact cameras from its era. Its ability to shoot RAW and fine-tune exposure settings appeals to enthusiasts and advanced users who prioritize creative control within a compact body.
On the other hand, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 brings modern video capabilities, lightweight design, and easy-to-use touchscreen features at a more accessible price point. It suits casual photographers and video bloggers who want more zoom reach and convenient features but can live without manual exposure and RAW files.
Both cameras remind us of a golden era in compact camera design: small sensors but meaningful choices in control and image quality.
We encourage you to try these cameras (if possible) to witness firsthand the tactile feel and image results. Consider what photographic genres excite you most and what features will complement your creative journey.
Explore Further
- Check out compatible lenses and accessories - especially for the Canon S90’s manual control enthusiasts.
- Test video recording modes on the FX78, experimenting with stabilization and varied frame rates.
- Experiment with RAW shooting on the S90 to harness its full post-processing potential.
Now that you have a comprehensive understanding, you’re better equipped to find the compact camera that fits your style and goals perfectly.
Happy shooting!
Appendix: Quick Specs at a Glance
| Feature | Canon PowerShot S90 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Size | 1/1.7" CCD | 1/2.3" CCD |
| Maximum Resolution | 10 MP (3648×2736) | 12 MP (4000×3000) |
| ISO Range | 80 - 3200 | 100 - 6400 |
| Lens | 28-105 mm f/2.0-4.9 | 24-120 mm f/2.5-5.9 |
| Manual Controls | Aperture, Shutter, Focus Ring | None |
| RAW Support | Yes | No |
| Video Resolution | 640×480 @ 30 fps | 1920×1080 @ 60 fps |
| Continuous Shooting | 1 fps | 4 fps |
| Display | 3" LCD, 461k dots | 3.5" Touch LCD, 230k dots |
| Weight | 195 g | 142 g |
| Price (approx.) | $600 | $210 |
Thank you for reading our detailed comparison. Stay creative and informed as you choose your next photography companion!
End of Article.
Canon S90 vs Panasonic FX78 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S90 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Panasonic |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S90 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 |
| Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX77 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-04-08 | 2011-01-25 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4 | Venus Engine FHD |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.50 m | 5.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/500s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 195g (0.43 lbs) | 142g (0.31 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 46 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.2 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.0 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 185 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, MMC, MMCplus, HC MMCplus card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $599 | $210 |