Clicky

Canon S95 vs Kodak C135

Portability
93
Imaging
34
Features
42
Overall
37
Canon PowerShot S95 front
 
Kodak EasyShare C135 front
Portability
92
Imaging
37
Features
17
Overall
29

Canon S95 vs Kodak C135 Key Specs

Canon S95
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
  • Launched November 2010
  • Previous Model is Canon S90
  • New Model is Canon S100
Kodak C135
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1250
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35mm (F3.0) lens
  • 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
  • Released January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon S95 vs Kodak C135 Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Canon S95 versus Kodak C135, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Kodak. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the S95 (10MP) and C135 (14MP) and the S95 (1/1.7") and C135 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The S95 was launched 13 months earlier than the C135 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go through a full comparison, below is a short summary of how the S95 matches up versus the C135 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the Kodak C135

 S95 C135 
Manual focus More precise focusing
Screen sizing3"2.4"Bigger screen (+0.6")
Screen resolution461k112kSharper screen (+349k dot)

Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Canon S95

 C135 S95 
ReleasedJanuary 2012November 2010Fresher by 13 months

Common features in the Canon S95 and Kodak C135

 S95 C135 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Canon S95 vs Kodak C135 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to carry your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon S95 provides external measurements of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") along with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Kodak C135 has dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).

Contrast the Canon S95 versus Kodak C135 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the S95 vs the C135.

Canon S95 vs Kodak C135 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the S95 and C135 is 93 and 92 respectively.

Canon S95 vs Kodak C135 top view buttons comparison

Canon S95 vs Kodak C135 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by researching specifications. The graphic below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the S95 and C135.

To sum up, each of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The S95 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Kodak C135 will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older S95 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Canon S95 vs Kodak C135 sensor size comparison

Canon S95 vs Kodak C135 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon S95 vs Kodak C135 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon S95 Portrait photography info
Kodak C135 Portrait photography info
40
has manual focus
flash sync is higher than normal (1/500s)
saves RAW files
no external flash support
low resolution (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
33
MP count good (14MP)
has face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Canon S95 Street photography information
Kodak C135 Street photography information
65
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
53
environment proof
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
maximum ISO low (1,250)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Canon S95 Sports photography details
Kodak C135 Sports photography details
27
built in image stabilization (Optical)
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames per second)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect AF
31
MP count good (14 megapixels)
environment proof
focal length is fixed (35mm)
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Canon S95 Travel photography highlights
Kodak C135 Travel photography highlights
64
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
lack of Timelapse mode
low resolution (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
64
environment proof
MP count good (14MP)
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse mode
does not have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon S95
Landscape photography with Kodak C135
52
has manual focus
relatively wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen is a good size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low resolution (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
lack of Timelapse mode
31
MP count good (14 megapixels)
environment proof
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
tiny screen (2.4")
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (1,250)
has no RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Canon S95 as a Vlogging camera
Kodak C135 as a Vlogging camera
32
relatively wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone jack
25
has face detect autofocus
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not have a selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of microphone socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon S95 vs Kodak C135 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon S95 and Kodak C135
 Canon PowerShot S95Kodak EasyShare C135
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Kodak
Model Canon PowerShot S95 Kodak EasyShare C135
Class Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Launched 2010-11-23 2012-01-10
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Digic 4 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 3200 1250
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-105mm (3.8x) 35mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/3.0
Macro focus distance 5cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 2.4"
Display resolution 461k dots 112k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 15 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/1600 secs 1/1400 secs
Continuous shutter rate 1.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 6.50 m 2.40 m (@ ISO 360)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/500 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 195g (0.43 lbs) 175g (0.39 lbs)
Dimensions 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 47 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 153 not tested
Other
Battery model NB-6L 2 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots - One
Retail cost $495 $0