Clicky

Canon S95 vs Nikon S5100

Portability
93
Imaging
34
Features
42
Overall
37
Canon PowerShot S95 front
 
Nikon Coolpix S5100 front
Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
21
Overall
28

Canon S95 vs Nikon S5100 Key Specs

Canon S95
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
  • Released November 2010
  • Previous Model is Canon S90
  • New Model is Canon S100
Nikon S5100
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F2.7-6.6) lens
  • 132g - 97 x 57 x 22mm
  • Released August 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Canon PowerShot S95 vs Nikon Coolpix S5100: A Detailed Compact Camera Comparison for Enthusiasts and Pros

Choosing the right compact camera can feel overwhelming, especially when options like the Canon PowerShot S95 and Nikon Coolpix S5100 surface. Both are small-sensor compacts announced around the same period in 2010, targeting enthusiasts who want better than smartphone shots without lugging bulky gear.

In this comprehensive comparison, I will draw on personal hands-on evaluations, technical analyses, and real-world use to help you understand the strengths and compromises of each model. Whether you’re an experienced photographer scouting for a lightweight travel camera or an enthusiast seeking versatile controls and quality output, this guide will provide clarity backed by experience.

First Impressions: Size, Design, and Handling

When choosing a compact camera, one of the first considerations is handling. How does it feel in your hand? Is it pocketable? Do the controls match your shooting style?

Physical Dimensions and Ergonomics

Feature Canon PowerShot S95 Nikon Coolpix S5100
Dimensions (mm) 100 x 58 x 30 97 x 57 x 22
Weight (grams) 195 132
Body Type Compact Compact
Grip/Design Rounded, modest grip Slim and sleek
Button Illumination No No

The Canon S95 is slightly larger and heavier. This extra volume contributes to a more secure grip and better control access. The Canon’s rounded body and robust build feel substantial, which photographers often appreciate during extended shoots. The S95’s control dials and buttons are well spaced and tactile given the size, providing confidence.

The Nikon S5100 feels more diminutive and lighter, favoring pocket portability and casual use. However, the tradeoff is having a less pronounced grip and more minimal button real estate. For street or travel photography where you want something unobtrusive, this slimmer profile is appealing.

Canon S95 vs Nikon S5100 size comparison

Control Layout and Interface

Both cameras lack electronic viewfinders, focusing on LCD-based live view shooting - fairly standard on compacts.

  • Canon S95 includes dedicated exposure compensation dial, PASM (Program, Aperture, Shutter, Manual) modes, and physical control rings around the lens for aperture and zoom. This appeals to those who want manual control and quick access.
  • Nikon S5100 is more point-and-shoot oriented, with mostly automatic modes and limited manual exposure capabilities.

Canon S95 vs Nikon S5100 top view buttons comparison

In short: if you value tactile, manual control and a more substantial grip, the S95 holds an advantage. The S5100 excels for users prioritizing pocketability and straightforward operation.

The Heart of the Image: Sensor and Image Quality Insights

Sensor size and technology highly influence image quality, dynamic range, and low-light capability.

Specification Canon PowerShot S95 Nikon Coolpix S5100
Sensor Type CCD CCD
Sensor Size 1/1.7" (7.44x5.58 mm) 1/2.3" (6.17x4.55 mm)
Sensor Area (mm²) 41.52 28.07
Megapixels 10 12
Max Native ISO 3200 1600
Raw Support Yes No
Anti-Aliasing Filter Yes Yes

The Canon S95 features a larger sensor (approximately 48% more surface area than Nikon’s), which equates to better light-gathering potential and generally improved image quality. The larger sensor size and higher max ISO rating (3200 vs 1600) offer superior low light performance and greater dynamic range.

Additionally, the Canon is one of the few compact cameras of its generation to support RAW shooting. This allows enthusiasts and professionals to extract maximum detail and make advanced edits in post-processing.

In contrast, the Nikon S5100 provides a higher megapixel count, but on a smaller sensor. That can lead to increased image noise and lower performance in dim conditions.

Canon S95 vs Nikon S5100 sensor size comparison

Technical Insight: The CCD sensors in both cameras were industry leaders around 2010, but CCDs generally suffer in high-ISO noise compared to modern CMOS variants. Nevertheless, Canon’s DIGIC 4 processor and larger sensor offer better noise control and tonal gradation.

LCD Screens and User Interface Experience

Since neither camera has a viewfinder, the rear LCD becomes critical.

Feature Canon PowerShot S95 Nikon Coolpix S5100
Screen Size 3" 2.7"
Resolution (k dots) 461 230
Touchscreen No No
Articulation Fixed Fixed

The Canon S95’s 3-inch high-res screen is a joy to use for composition and playback. The higher resolution means images appear sharper and details are easier to evaluate on the spot.

The Nikon S5100’s smaller, lower resolution screen feels less refined, which can make manual focusing and reviewing images less precise.

Canon S95 vs Nikon S5100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Lens Capabilities: Zoom Range and Aperture

The fixed zoom lens in point-and-shoot cameras defines a big part of versatility.

Lens Feature Canon PowerShot S95 Nikon Coolpix S5100
Focal Length (35mm equiv.) 28-105 mm (3.8x zoom) 28-140 mm (5x zoom)
Max Aperture f/2.0 – f/4.9 f/2.7 – f/6.6
Macro Focus Range 5 cm 2 cm

The Nikon S5100 offers a longer zoom reach (28-140mm) compared to the Canon’s 28-105mm, which could benefit casual telephoto shots. However, its slower maximum aperture, particularly at the telephoto end, means less light reaches the sensor.

The Canon S95’s bright f/2.0 wide end is excellent for low-light photography and achieving shallower depth of field (more background separation) - especially useful in portraits and creative close-ups.

Macro-wise, Nikon’s 2 cm minimum focusing distance is slightly better than Canon’s 5 cm, aiding extreme close-up shooting.

Autofocus Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Flexibility

Autofocus (AF) is a critical factor, especially for moving subjects or fast shooting scenarios.

Both cameras have:

  • Contrast-detect AF systems (common in compacts)
  • No phase-detect pixels
  • Face detection: Not supported on either

Canon S95 AF:

  • 9 focus points (number of cross-type points unknown)
  • Single AF, no continuous AF
  • Manual focus via lens ring
  • Live view AF contrast detection

Nikon S5100 AF:

  • AF points unknown, likely fewer
  • Single AF only
  • No manual focus option

Contrast detection AF can be slower and hunt in low light or for fast subjects. I found the Canon’s implementation notably quicker and more reliable, thanks in part to the DIGIC 4 processor optimization. The manual focus ring on Canon’s lens allows precision control, especially useful in macro or low contrast scenes.

The Nikon’s AF is decent for static subjects in good light but struggles beyond that, with no manual override.

Real-World Shooting Disciplines: Where Each Camera Shines

Let’s break down how these cameras perform across key photography genres based on hands-on experience and testing:

Portrait Photography

You want natural skin tones, pleasing bokeh, and focusing accuracy on faces and eyes.

  • Canon S95: The bright f/2 aperture at wide angle allows background blur even on a compact. Images show smooth skin tone rendition, helped by Canon’s trusted color science. Manual focus lets you finesse sharpness on eyes.
  • Nikon S5100: Being slower at f/2.7 and with less manual control, portraits appear flatter and less distinct in subject-background separation. More prone to in-camera sharpening artifacts.

Winner: Canon S95 for creative portrait control.

Landscape Photography

Look for resolution, dynamic range, and weather sealing.

  • Canon S95: 10MP is adequate for casual to enthusiast landscapes. The larger sensor and higher dynamic range capture more tonal gradations in skies and shadows. No weather sealing though.
  • Nikon S5100: 12MP gives more pixels but dynamic range and noise performance are limited by sensor and processor. Also no sealing.

Neither camera is sealed, so take care on wet hikes. Landscape photographers will prefer Canon’s sensor and RAW support for post-processing latitude.

Wildlife Photography

Key factors: autofocus speed, telephoto range, and burst rates.

  • Canon S95: More limited zoom at 105mm equivalent but better focusing responsiveness. Burst shooting limited to 1 fps, so not ideal for action.
  • Nikon S5100: Longer 140mm reach helps composition but AF slows and burst not specified.

Neither suited for serious wildlife photography but Nikon’s zoom may provide modest framing advantage for casual wildlife portraits.

Sports Photography

Look for AF tracking, frame rates, and low light.

Neither camera offers continuous AF tracking or very fast burst rates (Canon max 1 fps, Nikon not stated). Max ISOs differ (Canon 3200, Nikon 1600), but noise at high ISO on small sensors is limiting.

Not recommended for fast action work, but Canon’s manual controls at least allow some exposure precision.

Street Photography

Discretion, portability, and quick responsiveness matter most.

  • Canon S95: Slightly bulkier but still discreet, robust controls suit photographers who want to shoot quickly and precisely.
  • Nikon S5100: Very slim and light - ideal if you prioritize unobtrusiveness. Image quality is serviceable for casual street shots.

Macro Photography

Subjects like flowers and insects need close focusing and sharpness.

  • Nikon’s 2 cm macro focusing distance offers tight framing.
  • Canon’s manual focus ring is beneficial for precise focus stacking/work.

Night / Astrophotography

High ISO noise performance and exposure flexibility matter.

  • Canon S95: Higher ISO up to 3200 plus manual exposure modes make the difference in capturing stars or cityscapes at night.
  • Nikon S5100: Limited ISO 1600 max and no manual exposure limits creative control.

Video Capabilities

  • Both cameras record HD video at 1280x720, Canon at 24 fps (H.264) and Nikon at 30 fps (Motion JPEG).
  • Neither supports microphone input, headphone output, or 4K.
  • Optical image stabilization in both helps keep handheld video smooth.

Video on both is basic - fine for snapshots and casual social media but not advanced projects.

Travel Photography

The ideal travel camera balances size, versatility, battery life, and durability.

  • Canon S95: Bulkier but more control and better image quality; battery life moderate.
  • Nikon S5100: Lightweight, smaller and possibly better battery life with EN-EL10 battery; simpler operation.

Check your needs - if you want a reliable “grab and go,” Nikon fits; if image quality and manual control matter, Canon is better.

Professional Work and Workflow Integration

While neither camera is intended as a pro body, Canon’s RAW support and manual modes integrate better with professional workflows, enabling more latitude in editing software like Lightroom or Capture One.

Nikon’s JPEG-only output limits post-processing flexibility.

Connecting Your Camera to the World: Connectivity Features

  • Canon S95 supports Eye-Fi wireless connectivity enabling Wi-Fi image transfer with compatible cards.
  • Nikon S5100 offers no wireless features.
  • Both have USB 2.0 ports; Canon also includes HDMI out.
  • Neither supports Bluetooth, NFC, GPS, or external microphone inputs.

Wireless connectivity in the S95 adds convenience for digital workflow integration.

Battery and Storage

  • Canon uses NB-6L battery; Nikon uses EN-EL10.
  • Both compatible with SD/SDHC/SDXC cards (Nikon also has internal memory).
  • Real-world battery life depends on usage but expect around 200-300 shots per charge on each.

Putting It All Together: Performance Scores & Samples

Here’s a succinct visual summary from lab tests and field trials:

Summary and Recommendations

Criterion Canon PowerShot S95 Nikon Coolpix S5100
Image Quality Superior sensor, RAW support Adequate but noisier
Manual Controls Full PASM, manual focus ring Mostly auto, no manual focus
Lens Bright aperture, shorter zoom Longer zoom, slower aperture
Size and Weight Slightly bulkier, heavier Smaller and lighter
Autofocus Faster, reliable Slower, less flexible
Video HD 720p 24 fps H.264 HD 720p 30 fps Motion JPEG
Wireless Connectivity Eye-Fi compatible None
Price (at launch) ~$495 ~$200

Who Should Choose the Canon S95?

  • Serious enthusiasts wanting better image quality and creative control
  • Those who want RAW files for editing flexibility
  • Photographers interested in manual modes and precise focusing
  • Portrait, night, landscape shooters who value sensor performance

Who Should Choose the Nikon S5100?

  • Casual users seeking a slim, easy-to-use point-and-shoot
  • Travelers valuing compactness and longer zoom reach
  • Budget-conscious buyers wanting respectable image quality

Final Thoughts: Explore, Experiment, and Capture Your Vision

Both cameras offer unique strengths characteristic of early 2010s compacts. The Canon PowerShot S95 stands out as a more serious photographic tool, offering manual control, RAW capture, and superior sensor technology - qualities that reward you with greater creativity and image excellence when you take the time to learn its features.

The Nikon Coolpix S5100 focuses on simplicity, portability, and zoom versatility, appealing for everyday snapshots and those new to photography who want to point, shoot, and share with minimal fuss.

If possible, check out both cameras in person to see which feels right in your hands. Consider your priorities - do you want creative control and best image quality, or a slim, no-fuss companion for travel and casual shooting?

Either way, both will let you explore visual storytelling in ways smartphones of their day struggled to match. And who knows? Mastering either could be your stepping stone to even more ambitious photography adventures.

Ready to start your quest for stunning images? Look beyond specs - get hands-on, practice, and find the right accessories to elevate your craft. Your perfect compact companion is out there. Happy shooting!

Canon S95 vs Nikon S5100 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon S95 and Nikon S5100
 Canon PowerShot S95Nikon Coolpix S5100
General Information
Brand Name Canon Nikon
Model Canon PowerShot S95 Nikon Coolpix S5100
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2010-11-23 2010-08-17
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Digic 4 Expeed C2
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-105mm (3.8x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/2.7-6.6
Macro focus distance 5cm 2cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 2.7"
Display resolution 461k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/1600 secs 1/1500 secs
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 6.50 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/500 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 195 gr (0.43 lbs) 132 gr (0.29 lbs)
Physical dimensions 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") 97 x 57 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 47 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 153 not tested
Other
Battery model NB-6L EN-EL10
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots - One
Retail cost $495 $200