Canon S95 vs Nikon S5100
93 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
95 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Canon S95 vs Nikon S5100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
- Released November 2010
- Previous Model is Canon S90
- New Model is Canon S100
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.7-6.6) lens
- 132g - 97 x 57 x 22mm
- Released August 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon PowerShot S95 vs Nikon Coolpix S5100: A Detailed Compact Camera Comparison for Enthusiasts and Pros
Choosing the right compact camera can feel overwhelming, especially when options like the Canon PowerShot S95 and Nikon Coolpix S5100 surface. Both are small-sensor compacts announced around the same period in 2010, targeting enthusiasts who want better than smartphone shots without lugging bulky gear.
In this comprehensive comparison, I will draw on personal hands-on evaluations, technical analyses, and real-world use to help you understand the strengths and compromises of each model. Whether you’re an experienced photographer scouting for a lightweight travel camera or an enthusiast seeking versatile controls and quality output, this guide will provide clarity backed by experience.
First Impressions: Size, Design, and Handling
When choosing a compact camera, one of the first considerations is handling. How does it feel in your hand? Is it pocketable? Do the controls match your shooting style?
Physical Dimensions and Ergonomics
| Feature | Canon PowerShot S95 | Nikon Coolpix S5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions (mm) | 100 x 58 x 30 | 97 x 57 x 22 |
| Weight (grams) | 195 | 132 |
| Body Type | Compact | Compact |
| Grip/Design | Rounded, modest grip | Slim and sleek |
| Button Illumination | No | No |
The Canon S95 is slightly larger and heavier. This extra volume contributes to a more secure grip and better control access. The Canon’s rounded body and robust build feel substantial, which photographers often appreciate during extended shoots. The S95’s control dials and buttons are well spaced and tactile given the size, providing confidence.
The Nikon S5100 feels more diminutive and lighter, favoring pocket portability and casual use. However, the tradeoff is having a less pronounced grip and more minimal button real estate. For street or travel photography where you want something unobtrusive, this slimmer profile is appealing.

Control Layout and Interface
Both cameras lack electronic viewfinders, focusing on LCD-based live view shooting - fairly standard on compacts.
- Canon S95 includes dedicated exposure compensation dial, PASM (Program, Aperture, Shutter, Manual) modes, and physical control rings around the lens for aperture and zoom. This appeals to those who want manual control and quick access.
- Nikon S5100 is more point-and-shoot oriented, with mostly automatic modes and limited manual exposure capabilities.

In short: if you value tactile, manual control and a more substantial grip, the S95 holds an advantage. The S5100 excels for users prioritizing pocketability and straightforward operation.
The Heart of the Image: Sensor and Image Quality Insights
Sensor size and technology highly influence image quality, dynamic range, and low-light capability.
| Specification | Canon PowerShot S95 | Nikon Coolpix S5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.7" (7.44x5.58 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.17x4.55 mm) |
| Sensor Area (mm²) | 41.52 | 28.07 |
| Megapixels | 10 | 12 |
| Max Native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Raw Support | Yes | No |
| Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
The Canon S95 features a larger sensor (approximately 48% more surface area than Nikon’s), which equates to better light-gathering potential and generally improved image quality. The larger sensor size and higher max ISO rating (3200 vs 1600) offer superior low light performance and greater dynamic range.
Additionally, the Canon is one of the few compact cameras of its generation to support RAW shooting. This allows enthusiasts and professionals to extract maximum detail and make advanced edits in post-processing.
In contrast, the Nikon S5100 provides a higher megapixel count, but on a smaller sensor. That can lead to increased image noise and lower performance in dim conditions.

Technical Insight: The CCD sensors in both cameras were industry leaders around 2010, but CCDs generally suffer in high-ISO noise compared to modern CMOS variants. Nevertheless, Canon’s DIGIC 4 processor and larger sensor offer better noise control and tonal gradation.
LCD Screens and User Interface Experience
Since neither camera has a viewfinder, the rear LCD becomes critical.
| Feature | Canon PowerShot S95 | Nikon Coolpix S5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution (k dots) | 461 | 230 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Articulation | Fixed | Fixed |
The Canon S95’s 3-inch high-res screen is a joy to use for composition and playback. The higher resolution means images appear sharper and details are easier to evaluate on the spot.
The Nikon S5100’s smaller, lower resolution screen feels less refined, which can make manual focusing and reviewing images less precise.

Lens Capabilities: Zoom Range and Aperture
The fixed zoom lens in point-and-shoot cameras defines a big part of versatility.
| Lens Feature | Canon PowerShot S95 | Nikon Coolpix S5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length (35mm equiv.) | 28-105 mm (3.8x zoom) | 28-140 mm (5x zoom) |
| Max Aperture | f/2.0 – f/4.9 | f/2.7 – f/6.6 |
| Macro Focus Range | 5 cm | 2 cm |
The Nikon S5100 offers a longer zoom reach (28-140mm) compared to the Canon’s 28-105mm, which could benefit casual telephoto shots. However, its slower maximum aperture, particularly at the telephoto end, means less light reaches the sensor.
The Canon S95’s bright f/2.0 wide end is excellent for low-light photography and achieving shallower depth of field (more background separation) - especially useful in portraits and creative close-ups.
Macro-wise, Nikon’s 2 cm minimum focusing distance is slightly better than Canon’s 5 cm, aiding extreme close-up shooting.
Autofocus Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Flexibility
Autofocus (AF) is a critical factor, especially for moving subjects or fast shooting scenarios.
Both cameras have:
- Contrast-detect AF systems (common in compacts)
- No phase-detect pixels
- Face detection: Not supported on either
Canon S95 AF:
- 9 focus points (number of cross-type points unknown)
- Single AF, no continuous AF
- Manual focus via lens ring
- Live view AF contrast detection
Nikon S5100 AF:
- AF points unknown, likely fewer
- Single AF only
- No manual focus option
Contrast detection AF can be slower and hunt in low light or for fast subjects. I found the Canon’s implementation notably quicker and more reliable, thanks in part to the DIGIC 4 processor optimization. The manual focus ring on Canon’s lens allows precision control, especially useful in macro or low contrast scenes.
The Nikon’s AF is decent for static subjects in good light but struggles beyond that, with no manual override.
Real-World Shooting Disciplines: Where Each Camera Shines
Let’s break down how these cameras perform across key photography genres based on hands-on experience and testing:
Portrait Photography
You want natural skin tones, pleasing bokeh, and focusing accuracy on faces and eyes.
- Canon S95: The bright f/2 aperture at wide angle allows background blur even on a compact. Images show smooth skin tone rendition, helped by Canon’s trusted color science. Manual focus lets you finesse sharpness on eyes.
- Nikon S5100: Being slower at f/2.7 and with less manual control, portraits appear flatter and less distinct in subject-background separation. More prone to in-camera sharpening artifacts.
Winner: Canon S95 for creative portrait control.
Landscape Photography
Look for resolution, dynamic range, and weather sealing.
- Canon S95: 10MP is adequate for casual to enthusiast landscapes. The larger sensor and higher dynamic range capture more tonal gradations in skies and shadows. No weather sealing though.
- Nikon S5100: 12MP gives more pixels but dynamic range and noise performance are limited by sensor and processor. Also no sealing.
Neither camera is sealed, so take care on wet hikes. Landscape photographers will prefer Canon’s sensor and RAW support for post-processing latitude.
Wildlife Photography
Key factors: autofocus speed, telephoto range, and burst rates.
- Canon S95: More limited zoom at 105mm equivalent but better focusing responsiveness. Burst shooting limited to 1 fps, so not ideal for action.
- Nikon S5100: Longer 140mm reach helps composition but AF slows and burst not specified.
Neither suited for serious wildlife photography but Nikon’s zoom may provide modest framing advantage for casual wildlife portraits.
Sports Photography
Look for AF tracking, frame rates, and low light.
Neither camera offers continuous AF tracking or very fast burst rates (Canon max 1 fps, Nikon not stated). Max ISOs differ (Canon 3200, Nikon 1600), but noise at high ISO on small sensors is limiting.
Not recommended for fast action work, but Canon’s manual controls at least allow some exposure precision.
Street Photography
Discretion, portability, and quick responsiveness matter most.
- Canon S95: Slightly bulkier but still discreet, robust controls suit photographers who want to shoot quickly and precisely.
- Nikon S5100: Very slim and light - ideal if you prioritize unobtrusiveness. Image quality is serviceable for casual street shots.
Macro Photography
Subjects like flowers and insects need close focusing and sharpness.
- Nikon’s 2 cm macro focusing distance offers tight framing.
- Canon’s manual focus ring is beneficial for precise focus stacking/work.
Night / Astrophotography
High ISO noise performance and exposure flexibility matter.
- Canon S95: Higher ISO up to 3200 plus manual exposure modes make the difference in capturing stars or cityscapes at night.
- Nikon S5100: Limited ISO 1600 max and no manual exposure limits creative control.
Video Capabilities
- Both cameras record HD video at 1280x720, Canon at 24 fps (H.264) and Nikon at 30 fps (Motion JPEG).
- Neither supports microphone input, headphone output, or 4K.
- Optical image stabilization in both helps keep handheld video smooth.
Video on both is basic - fine for snapshots and casual social media but not advanced projects.
Travel Photography
The ideal travel camera balances size, versatility, battery life, and durability.
- Canon S95: Bulkier but more control and better image quality; battery life moderate.
- Nikon S5100: Lightweight, smaller and possibly better battery life with EN-EL10 battery; simpler operation.
Check your needs - if you want a reliable “grab and go,” Nikon fits; if image quality and manual control matter, Canon is better.
Professional Work and Workflow Integration
While neither camera is intended as a pro body, Canon’s RAW support and manual modes integrate better with professional workflows, enabling more latitude in editing software like Lightroom or Capture One.
Nikon’s JPEG-only output limits post-processing flexibility.
Connecting Your Camera to the World: Connectivity Features
- Canon S95 supports Eye-Fi wireless connectivity enabling Wi-Fi image transfer with compatible cards.
- Nikon S5100 offers no wireless features.
- Both have USB 2.0 ports; Canon also includes HDMI out.
- Neither supports Bluetooth, NFC, GPS, or external microphone inputs.
Wireless connectivity in the S95 adds convenience for digital workflow integration.
Battery and Storage
- Canon uses NB-6L battery; Nikon uses EN-EL10.
- Both compatible with SD/SDHC/SDXC cards (Nikon also has internal memory).
- Real-world battery life depends on usage but expect around 200-300 shots per charge on each.
Putting It All Together: Performance Scores & Samples
Here’s a succinct visual summary from lab tests and field trials:
Summary and Recommendations
| Criterion | Canon PowerShot S95 | Nikon Coolpix S5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Image Quality | Superior sensor, RAW support | Adequate but noisier |
| Manual Controls | Full PASM, manual focus ring | Mostly auto, no manual focus |
| Lens | Bright aperture, shorter zoom | Longer zoom, slower aperture |
| Size and Weight | Slightly bulkier, heavier | Smaller and lighter |
| Autofocus | Faster, reliable | Slower, less flexible |
| Video | HD 720p 24 fps H.264 | HD 720p 30 fps Motion JPEG |
| Wireless Connectivity | Eye-Fi compatible | None |
| Price (at launch) | ~$495 | ~$200 |
Who Should Choose the Canon S95?
- Serious enthusiasts wanting better image quality and creative control
- Those who want RAW files for editing flexibility
- Photographers interested in manual modes and precise focusing
- Portrait, night, landscape shooters who value sensor performance
Who Should Choose the Nikon S5100?
- Casual users seeking a slim, easy-to-use point-and-shoot
- Travelers valuing compactness and longer zoom reach
- Budget-conscious buyers wanting respectable image quality
Final Thoughts: Explore, Experiment, and Capture Your Vision
Both cameras offer unique strengths characteristic of early 2010s compacts. The Canon PowerShot S95 stands out as a more serious photographic tool, offering manual control, RAW capture, and superior sensor technology - qualities that reward you with greater creativity and image excellence when you take the time to learn its features.
The Nikon Coolpix S5100 focuses on simplicity, portability, and zoom versatility, appealing for everyday snapshots and those new to photography who want to point, shoot, and share with minimal fuss.
If possible, check out both cameras in person to see which feels right in your hands. Consider your priorities - do you want creative control and best image quality, or a slim, no-fuss companion for travel and casual shooting?
Either way, both will let you explore visual storytelling in ways smartphones of their day struggled to match. And who knows? Mastering either could be your stepping stone to even more ambitious photography adventures.
Ready to start your quest for stunning images? Look beyond specs - get hands-on, practice, and find the right accessories to elevate your craft. Your perfect compact companion is out there. Happy shooting!
Canon S95 vs Nikon S5100 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S95 | Nikon Coolpix S5100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Nikon |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S95 | Nikon Coolpix S5100 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-11-23 | 2010-08-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 4 | Expeed C2 |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.7-6.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/500 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 195 gr (0.43 lbs) | 132 gr (0.29 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 97 x 57 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 47 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 153 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-6L | EN-EL10 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | - | One |
| Retail cost | $495 | $200 |