Olympus TG-310 vs Olympus VG-110
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Portability
97 Imaging
36 Features
20 Overall
29
97 Imaging
36 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus TG-310 vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2011
Olympus VG-110
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Released February 2011
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-310 vs Olympus VG-110 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus TG-310 and Olympus VG-110, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact and they are both designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the TG-310 (14MP) and the VG-110 (12MP) is very well matched and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe TG-310 was released within a month of the VG-110 so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the TG-310 scores versus the VG-110 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-310 vs Olympus VG-110 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-310 & Olympus VG-110. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-310 Gallery & Olympus VG-110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus VG-110
| TG-310 | VG-110 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus TG-310
| VG-110 | TG-310 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Olympus VG-110
| TG-310 | VG-110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | February 2011 | Similar age |
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical display sizing |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-310 vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera often, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-310 has outer dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus VG-110 has sizing of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-310 and Olympus VG-110 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-310 vs the VG-110.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-310 and VG-110 is 94 and 97 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing purely by checking a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-310 and VG-110.
Clearly, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-310 to give extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography information
Olympus VG-110 Portrait photography information
decent MP (14MP)
has face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
includes face detect focusing
manual focus not available
no manual mode
can't use external flash
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-310 Street photography details
Olympus VG-110 Street photography details
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
lighter than average (155g)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Olympus TG-310 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VG-110 as a Sports photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
has tracking autofocus
environment proof
slow frames per second (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery power (150 per charge)
does not have phase detect auto focus
includes tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (170 per charge)
has no phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-310 Travel photography features
Olympus VG-110 Travel photography features
lighter than average (155g)
environment proof
decent MP (14MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
bad battery power (150 per charge)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (27mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
not so great battery power (170 shots)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-310 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus VG-110 Landscape photography highlights
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
environment proof
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
bad battery power (150 per charge)
missing Time Lapse mode
reasonably wide (27mm)
manual focus not available
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
not so great battery power (170 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-310 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VG-110 as a Vlogging camera
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focus
lighter than average (155g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external mic socket
reasonably wide (27mm)
includes face detect focusing
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have microphone socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-310 vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Olympus VG-110 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus TG-310 | Olympus VG-110 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2011-01-06 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) | 105 gr (0.23 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 pictures | 170 pictures |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $150 |
