Canon PowerShot SD960 IS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2: A Thorough Hands-On Comparison for Enthusiasts

When you're exploring the small-sensor compact camera market, you occasionally uncover some interesting contenders each with its own personality and quirks. Today, I’m delving deep into the Canon PowerShot SD960 IS, a 2009-era compact also known as the Digital IXUS 110 IS, and the slightly later but tech-forward Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 from 2014. At first glance, these cameras seem to occupy similar categories - they’re compact, pocketable, fixed-lens cameras with modest sensor sizes. But as anyone who’s tested both will tell you, their capabilities and intended user experiences differ quite widely.

Having conducted rigorous hands-on tests with both cameras over extended sessions, I’ll walk you through their strengths and drawbacks across major photography disciplines, breaking down real-world performance, technical details, and usability. Whether you’re after a vintage gem for casual portraits or a connected travel companion with powerful zoom, this comparison will help clarify which camera suits your needs best.

Let’s begin with how these cameras feel in the hand and stack up physically.

Size, Ergonomics, and Handling: Small but Distinctly Different

First impressions matter - and here the Canon SD960 IS feels notably smaller and more pocket-friendly. Measuring 98 x 54 x 22 mm and tipping the scales at 145 grams, it’s one of those subtly elegant compacts you barely notice in your jacket pocket. In contrast, the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 is significantly larger and heavier, at 133 x 71 x 19 mm and 283 grams. This beast is technically still compact but more of a mini superzoom, designed to deliver extended reach and richer features at the cost of bulk.

The Canon’s straightforward, minimalist controls are intuitive and satisfying to use - though they lack manual exposure dials or customizable buttons. The fixed lens, combined with simple point-and-shoot ergonomics, makes it an excellent grab-and-go camera for quick snaps.

Meanwhile, the Galaxy Camera 2 features a touchscreen interface complemented by physical buttons. You’ll find manual exposure settings like shutter and aperture priority, which are rare in compact cameras of this size category. Its larger body allows for a more comfortable grip during long shooting sessions, critical if you’re zooming in wildlife or sports scenarios.

If you prize extreme compactness and simplicity, the Canon takes the cake. But if you need more handling flexibility and don’t mind the extra heft, Samsung’s offering feels like a smart step up.

Top-Down View: Controls and Usability in Real-World Shooting

Taking a look from above reveals further differences in user interaction philosophy.

The Canon keeps things minimalist with a Crown jewel dial around the zoom rocker - no manual modes, no complex menus, just a clean interface for quick shooting. The top panel sports the traditional shutter button, zoom lever, and a simple on/off toggle. It’s very approachable but somewhat limiting if you want creative control.

Samsung, meanwhile, bets on a more hands-on approach: dedicated buttons for exposure compensation, manual exposure modes, and a zoom toggle optimized for its 21x optical zoom lens. The touchscreen fundamentally shifts how you navigate menus and frame shots - think smartphone-like interaction but tailored to photography.

If you’re revisiting foundational photography skills or seeking full automation on a slim device, Canon’s design is easy to master. But for users who want customization and tactile control while still benefiting from touchscreen convenience, Samsung’s layout wins.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Both cameras use 1/2.3" sensors - the de facto size for compact cameras of their era and class - but they differ in resolution and sensor technology.

The Canon SD960 IS employs a 12-megapixel CCD sensor, notable for its clean, natural colors, especially in daylight conditions. CCD sensors, although older technology compared to CMOS, are praised for color fidelity but tend to suffer under low light due to increased noise and limited ISO performance (max ISO 1600, but noisier beyond 400). The Canon includes an anti-aliasing filter to minimize moiré but at some cost to ultimate sharpness.

Samsung equips the Galaxy Camera 2 with a more modern 16-megapixel BSI-CMOS sensor. Backside illumination (BSI) technology significantly boosts light gathering, improving low-light performance and enabling higher maximum ISO sensitivity (up to 3200 native). Plus, slight improvements in dynamic range and noise handling make it a more versatile performer.

In practical shooting, the Canon’s images show pleasing skin tones and sharpness in good light but quickly lose detail and become grainy as light dims. The Samsung produces sharper, cleaner details at high ISOs and captures richer shadow detail - ideal for indoor, street, or night scenarios where lighting is less forgiving.

LCD Screen and User Interface: Viewing and Composing Your Shots

An essential part of usability is the rear screen, where you compose and review images.

The Canon has a modest 2.8-inch fixed LCD with 230k-dot resolution - not exactly sharp or vibrant by modern standards. It offers live view but no touchscreen. While fine for casual framing, the screen’s low resolution and brightness limitations make it difficult to verify focus or subtle exposure in bright outdoor conditions.

On the other hand, Samsung’s Galaxy Camera 2 sports an impressive 4.8-inch HD Super Clear Touch Display with 1037k dots. This screen is bright, sharp, and highly responsive, facilitating easy menu access and precise framing. It also provides pinch-to-zoom image review and touchscreen focus point selection, features you’d expect from a dedicated Android device, given the camera’s hybrid design.

If you prize a rich user interface and bright, clear previewing, Samsung wins hands down. For photographers who prefer distraction-free simplicity, the Canon’s basic screen suffices but feels dated today.

Technical Autofocus Systems: Precision and Speed Under Pressure

When I tested these cameras in varied conditions, autofocus behavior immediately stood out as a major differentiator.

The Canon SD960 IS uses a contrast-detection AF with 9 focus points and face detection technology (no continuous or tracking AF). It’s reliable in decent light but tends to hunt slowly in low-light or on low contrast subjects. This camera is firmly optimized for static compositions or portraiture where you can take your time.

Samsung’s Galaxy Camera 2 is also contrast-detection based but features a hybrid autofocus setup enabled by a touch interface for selecting focus points. It gains center-weighted AF focus with face detection and allows manual focus, which is invaluable for tricky situations like macro or low-light. While it lacks tracking AF, the larger, touch-enabled interface lets you swiftly change focus points, speeding up operation.

In fast action scenarios - think sports or wildlife - the Canon’s single-shot AF at 1 fps and hunting behavior make it less than ideal, whereas Samsung’s 5 fps burst with faster AF offers a more practical solution. Neither camera competes with modern DSLRs or mirrorless systems here, but for their categories, Samsung delivers more agility.

Lens Options and Optical Zoom: Versatility in Framing

Fixed lenses are the norm for compact cameras, so optical zoom ranges heavily impact compositional flexibility.

The Canon offers a 28-112 mm (4x zoom), f/2.8-5.8 lens - good for wide-angle group shots and casual telephoto framing but modest compared to superzoom standards. The fast f/2.8 aperture at the wide end helps low-light shooting and shallow depth of field.

Samsung’s Galaxy Camera 2 boasts a superzoom stretching from 23-483 mm (21x zoom), f/2.8-5.9 elliptical lens. This is an amazing reach for a compact, letting you shoot distant wildlife, sports, or architectural details without carrying interchangeable lenses.

While the Canon’s lens preserves better optical quality across the zoom range on account of fewer elements and less extreme focal lengths, Samsung’s versatility is unmatched for travel and outdoor shooting.

Image Stabilization: Minimizing the Shake

Steady shots are critical, especially at longer focal lengths or in low light.

Both cameras employ optical image stabilization (OIS), a must-have for small sensor cameras with moderate apertures and zoom. Canon’s implementation performs well in moderate hand-shake situations, though it’s tuned for standard zoom ranges. Samsung’s OIS is more advanced and vital, given its zoom reach extends far beyond Canon’s.

In my field tests, Samsung’s OIS noticeably reduces blur at tele-end focal lengths - essential for handheld wildlife or sports photography. For casual snapshots or landscapes without wind or vibration, both do their job well.

Video Capabilities: Capturing Moving Moments

Neither camera is a dedicated camcorder, but video quality still matters.

The Canon SD960 IS records 720p HD video at 30 fps using Motion JPEG codec - a dated format that causes large files and limited editing flexibility. No external microphone input is available. Video autofocus is contrast-detection but single-shot only, leading to noticeable hunting in dynamic scenes.

Samsung steps up with 1080p Full HD video at 30 fps, offering MPEG-4 and H.264 compression for better file efficiency and editing compatibility. Impressively, it includes a microphone port for external mics, enhancing audio quality for vlogging or event recording.

If video is a priority beyond casual clips, Samsung clearly provides superior specs and real-world usability.

Connectivity, Wireless Features, and Storage

Connectivity can differentiate basic cameras from truly smart devices.

The Canon SD960 IS has no wireless connectivity - no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or GPS. Photos must be offloaded via USB or SD card reader. For users valuing a simple camera without fuss, this is fine, but it limits sharing and geotagging.

Samsung’s Galaxy Camera 2 is a gem in this department with built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, and GPS. As a hybrid Android device, you can instantly upload shots, geotag locations, and even install apps or cloud services - parameters generally unheard of on compact cameras at that time.

Storage-wise, Canon uses standard SD/SDHC/MMC cards, while Samsung depends on microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC cards, a nod to its smartphone-esque design.

Battery Life and Power Management

Power management can make or break usability on trips.

Exact Canon SD960 IS battery life data is scarce, but typical of compacts of its era, you can expect around 200-250 shots per charge using the NB-4L battery. It’s reasonably efficient given the modest screen size and limited connectivity.

Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 features a built-in battery pack rated for approximate 400 shots per charge. Power-hungry features like a large touchscreen, Wi-Fi, and Android OS reduce stamina, but 400 raw shots is decent for travel or casual shooting. The tradeoff is less flexibility for quickly swapping batteries onboard.

If you want no-hassle swapping and extended shooting without recharge, Canon’s removable battery is advantageous. For integrated smart features, Samsung’s battery life is acceptable, but keep a charger handy.

Durability and Environmental Sealing

Neither camera offers weather sealing, waterproofing, or shock resistance - which is understandable given their compact, consumer-oriented design. If those features are mandatory for your photography style, you’ll need to look into rugged cameras or mirrorless bodies with weather sealing.

Real-World Test Samples: Image Quality at a Glance

Seeing is believing, so I put together a gallery of sample images from both cameras under diverse lighting and subject conditions.

Canon SD960 IS screen back Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 screen back

From portraits, landscape vistas, to street moments, here’s what stood out:

• Canon SD960 IS delivers warm, natural skin tones with pleasant color rendering in daylight but loses sharpness noticeably in indoor or dim scenes.

• Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 shows more vibrant detail, better dynamic range, and less noise at higher ISOs, particularly in shadow areas.

• At telephoto zoom, Samsung clearly resolves distant subjects better, thanks to its 21x zoom and steadier image stabilization.

Assessing the Cameras Across Photography Genres

To help you pinpoint which device matches your interests, here’s a breakdown by photography style and use case.

Portrait Photography

Canon’s skin tone reproduction is flattering and true-to-life. Its face detection and 9-point AF are adequate for posed portraits, though its lack of manual focus and shallow depth-of-field control limits creativity. Samsung yields sharper portraits with its higher-res sensor and touch AF but sometimes over-processes skin details.

Landscape Photography

Both capture respectable detail thanks to 1/2.3" sensors, but Samsung’s better dynamic range and wider ISO help in varied lighting. Canon’s slightly wider angle (28 mm) is a bit more flexible, but Samsung’s 23 mm wide end is close. Neither offers weather sealing - carry caution outdoors.

Wildlife Photography

Samsung’s 21x zoom is a massive asset here. Combined with faster burst rates (5 fps) and better autofocus, it’s the clear choice. Canon simply cannot match reach or responsiveness.

Sports Photography

Both cameras struggle to keep up with fast action, but Samsung’s faster continuous shooting and manual exposure modes offer better chances at capturing moving subjects.

Street Photography

Canon’s small size and discreet shutter system are advantageous for candid street shots. Samsung is a bit bulkier but offers superior image quality and connectivity for on-the-fly sharing.

Macro Photography

Canon’s 2 cm macro focusing makes it more versatile for close-ups, whereas Samsung’s 10 cm minimum focusing distance limits true macro capability.

Night and Astrophotography

Samsung’s improved high-ISO performance and longer shutter speeds (max 1/2000 down to 16 seconds) support long exposure creativity better. Canon caps at ISO 1600 with limited noise control.

Video Recording

Samsung provides better video specs and audio options with Full HD and microphone input, whereas Canon is limited to 720p with no audio ports.

Travel Photography

Samsung’s versatility, zoom, connectivity, and GPS make it a smart travel tool, though bulkier to carry. Canon’s compact size is easy to slip in pockets but somewhat less capable beyond casual photos.

Professional Work

Neither camera suits professional demands requiring RAW support, fast workflows, or robust build quality. They remain enthusiast-level compacts for casual shooting.

Overall Performance Scores and Value Assessment

Synthesizing all test results, here is a comparative rating:

• Image Quality: Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 takes the lead

• Speed and Autofocus: Samsung wins comfortably

• Handling and Ergonomics: Canon favored for compactness; Samsung for control

• Features and Connectivity: Samsung well ahead

• Battery Life: Samsung slightly better, but integrated vs removable pros & cons

• Value vs Price: Given its newer tech and feature set, Samsung’s higher price reflects the performance jump, while Canon remains a budget-friendly option.

Final Word: Who Should Choose Which?

So, which camera should you buy? Here’s my take, based on extensive testing and practical use:

Choose the Canon PowerShot SD960 IS if:

• You want a pocketable, elegant compact for casual shooting or travel.

• You prioritize simplicity and easy operation without distractions.

• You don’t need video beyond basic clips or advanced autofocus.

• Battery swapping and smaller size matter most to you.

• Your budget is tight or you enjoy hunting vintage used cameras.

Choose the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 if:

• You want a versatile zoom range for wildlife, sports, or travel photography.

• Connectivity and sharing features are critical to your workflow.

• You desire better video, manual controls, and a bright touchscreen.

• You often shoot scenes in low light or need outdoor GPS tagging.

• You appreciate a hybrid camera-smartphone experience.

In Conclusion: Two Compacts, Two Visions

Though both fall under the "small sensor compact" umbrella, the Canon SD960 IS and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 serve different photographer profiles. Canon embodies the straightforward, no-frills point-and-shoot tradition. Samsung blends a camera with smart, connected features ahead of its time, catering to a more tech-savvy enthusiast.

Hey, dear Canon - there’s room for a modern SD960 successor that combines your compact elegance with more sophisticated controls and connectivity, don't you think?

Whichever model catches your eye, I hope this detailed comparison arms you with the insights to make an informed choice - because the best camera remains the one that fits your vision and style.

Happy shooting!

If you want to dive deeper, check out my full video review walkthroughs comparing these two cameras, which reveal sample handling and image results in real-time. Photography is as much about the feel and responsiveness as specs, and seeing these cameras in action can cement your decision.

For now, happy snapping and stay curious!

end