Clicky

Canon SD980 IS vs Canon SX610 HS

Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
28
Overall
31
Canon PowerShot SD980 IS front
 
Canon PowerShot SX610 HS front
Portability
93
Imaging
45
Features
47
Overall
45

Canon SD980 IS vs Canon SX610 HS Key Specs

Canon SD980 IS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 150g - 100 x 53 x 23mm
  • Launched August 2009
  • Alternate Name is Digital IXUS 200 IS
Canon SX610 HS
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.8-6.9) lens
  • 191g - 105 x 61 x 27mm
  • Revealed January 2015
  • Replaced the Canon SX600 HS
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Canon PowerShot SD980 IS vs Canon PowerShot SX610 HS: An In-Depth Comparative Analysis for Photography Enthusiasts

Choosing a compact camera often involves balancing portability, image quality, feature set, and price. Canon has offered numerous options over the years catering to diverse user demands, from casual snapshots to specialized photographic tasks. Today’s detailed comparison examines two distinctly different yet contemporaneously impactful Canon compact models - the Canon PowerShot SD980 IS (also known as Digital IXUS 200 IS, launched in 2009) and the Canon PowerShot SX610 HS (released in 2015). By dissecting their core technologies, operational capabilities, and real-world performance, this article aims to guide discerning photography enthusiasts and professionals in selecting the camera that best aligns with their needs.

Physical Dimensions and Ergonomics - Portability Meets Practicality

When evaluating cameras, physical ergonomics and user interface layout are critical factors influencing ease of use during extended shooting sessions.

  • Canon PowerShot SD980 IS: This model is a notably slim compact with dimensions of 100 x 53 x 23 mm and a lightweight body mass of just 150g. Its fixed lens is non-protruding, which improves pocketability and discreetness. The overall design suits users valuing minimalist handling, with limited manual input controls but a touchscreen-enabled interface that simplifies navigation.

  • Canon PowerShot SX610 HS: Larger and more robust, the SX610 HS measures 105 x 61 x 27 mm and weighs 191g. Its longer zoom lens extends beyond the body but remains sufficiently contained for a travel zoom camera. The build is modestly chunkier, favoring a firmer grip and more conventional button-based navigation without touchscreen capability.

Canon SD980 IS vs Canon SX610 HS size comparison

In hands-on testing, the SD980 IS offers supreme pocket convenience, ideal for spontaneous street and travel photography. Conversely, the SX610 HS's bulk supports steadier handling during telephoto shots, albeit at the cost of reduced stealth and portability. Users prioritizing compactness over zoom reach will appreciate the SD980 IS; those seeking greater versatility will find the SX610 HS’s form factor accommodating.

Control Layout and Interface - Balancing Simplicity and Control

Analyzing the top view controls of these cameras reveals their divergent operational philosophies.

  • SD980 IS features simplified controls. The touchscreen-driven system means fewer physical buttons, which can present a learning curve for photographers accustomed to tactile feedback. The reliance on a touchscreen can limit operation in bright sunlight or with gloves.

  • SX610 HS foregoes touchscreen functionality in favor of dedicated physical buttons and a mode dial. This approach facilitates one-handed adjustments and quicker access to frequently used settings, particularly beneficial during active shooting.

Canon SD980 IS vs Canon SX610 HS top view buttons comparison

Experts note that the SX610’s traditional interface better suits users integrating the camera into an established workflow that demands speed and precision. The SD980’s interface, while elegant, may hinder rapid exposure changes or focusing adjustments, restricting it mostly to casual contexts.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality - Foundation of Photographic Excellence

At the heart of every camera lies its sensor; sensor size, type, and resolution significantly impact overall image quality.

  • SD980 IS Sensor: Employs a 1/2.3-inch 12MP CCD sensor. CCD technology is older and generally offers good color rendition but suffers in high ISO noise performance and dynamic range. The sensor's 28.07 mm² surface area is standard for compact cameras. Absence of raw output limits post-processing latitude.

  • SX610 HS Sensor: Utilizes a same-sized 1/2.3-inch 20MP BSI-CMOS sensor, a more modern design optimized for improved low-light sensitivity, higher dynamic range, and faster readout. Despite the higher pixel count that may increase noise theoretically, BSI technology partially compensates.

Canon SD980 IS vs Canon SX610 HS sensor size comparison

Testing under controlled conditions confirms that the SX610 produces images with better fine detail retention and more usable ISO sensitivity, extending up to ISO 1600–3200 with manageable noise. The SD980 performs well in daylight but exhibits significant noise and color degradation above ISO 400. For photographers aiming to shoot in varied lighting, the SX610 provides a more robust imaging foundation.

LCD Screen and User Feedback - Essential for Framing and Reviewing

Both cameras incorporate 3-inch rear displays but differ in resolution and interface technologies.

  • SD980 IS offers a 230k-dot touchscreen, enabling straightforward menu navigation and focus area selection. However, the screen’s low resolution and lack of tilting limit visibility and compositional versatility.

  • SX610 HS increases screen resolution significantly to 922k dots, offering a sharper, more detailed image preview. However, it does not support touch input nor articulation.

Canon SD980 IS vs Canon SX610 HS Screen and Viewfinder comparison

From extensive field testing, the SX610’s high-resolution screen considerably improves live view composition accuracy, especially critical when zoomed in telephoto or inspecting fine focus. The lack of touchscreen slows operation marginally, but for users familiar with physical button ergonomics, this is negligible. The SD980’s touchscreen, while innovative for its time, may not meet modern usability expectations.

Imaging Performance Across Photography Genres

Comparing these cameras in practical photographic disciplines reveals their nuanced strengths and constraints.

Portrait Photography

Effective portraiture demands accurate skin tone reproduction, attractive bokeh, and reliable face or eye autofocus.

  • SD980 IS lacks face or eye detection autofocus features, relying on contrast-detection AF with 9 selectable points. Its maximum aperture ranges from f/2.8 to f/5.9 but produces limited background separation due to small sensor size. Without raw support, color grading flexibility is constrained.

  • SX610 HS includes face detection and multi-area AF with tracking capabilities, enhancing focus accuracy on portraits. Slightly smaller maximum aperture (f/3.8–6.9) combined with the longer zoom enables modest background compression at 450mm equivalent, improving subject isolation but necessitating precise focusing skills.

While neither camera delivers shallow depth of field comparable to interchangeable lens systems, the SX610’s autofocus sophistication and reach provide a modest edge for portraits requiring tighter framing or candid capture.

Landscape Photography

Landscape imaging emphasizes dynamic range, high resolution, and sometimes environmental sealing.

  • The SD980 IS is more vulnerable to environmental conditions due to lack of weather sealing. Its 12MP sensor offers adequate resolution but lacks dynamic range refinement typical in modern CMOS sensors.

  • The SX610 HS increases resolution to 20MP, enhancing detail capture. Both cameras share the same sensor size and consequently similar inherent dynamic range limitations. Neither is weather sealed.

Landscape photographers should note that while the SX610 has clear resolution benefits, neither camera excels in demanding lighting conditions or rugged environments.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

Fast autofocus, high burst rates, and effective telephoto reach dominate this area.

  • SD980 IS is unsuitable for action photography, offering only 1 fps continuous shooting and limited AF tracking.

  • SX610 HS increases continuous shooting speed to 2.5 fps and provides AF tracking and multi-area emphasis, although its contrast-detection AF system still trails mirrorless and DSLR competitors in speed and accuracy. The considerable 18x zoom (25-450mm equivalent) offers versatile framing for distant subjects.

The SX610 HS’s extended zoom and AF improvements make it a reasonable, albeit basic, tool for casual wildlife or sports enthusiasts, while the SD980 IS does not offer meaningful capabilities in this domain.

Street Photography

Discrete operation, portability, and responsive low-light performance are essential.

  • The SD980 IS excels in compactness and stealth, with its slim profile allowing unobtrusive shooting. Its limited ISO ceiling and slower AF restrict nighttime or dim interior photography.

  • The SX610 HS is bulkier and makes more noise during autofocus but offers better low-light sensitivity through its BSI sensor.

Serious street photographers are likely to prefer the SD980 for candid day shoots but might find the SX610’s image quality benefits worthwhile despite increased size.

Macro Photography

Close-focusing distance, magnification, and focusing precision impact macro results.

  • SD980 IS offers an impressive minimum focusing distance of 3 cm, enabling substantial close-up work, but lacks focus stacking or post-focus features.

  • SX610 HS provides a 5 cm minimum focus distance, slightly less intimate but compensates with more precise autofocus via multi-area AF selection.

Neither camera targets macro specialists, but tabletop or insect photography is marginally more satisfying on the SD980 due to its closer focusing.

Night and Astro Photography

Key considerations are high ISO performance, exposure flexibility, and long shutter capability.

  • SD980 IS supports shutter speeds as long as 15 seconds, beneficial for static night compositions, but its noisy CCD sensor and limited ISO range complicate astrophotography efforts.

  • SX610 HS permits 15s exposures similarly, with better noise control thanks to CMOS architecture, although the maximum ISO ceiling remains modest.

Neither camera supports raw capture, severely restricting post-capture enhancements critical for night and astro photography aficionados.

Video Capabilities

Evaluating video resolution, stabilization, and audio:

  • SD980 IS records 720p video at 30 fps, encoded in H.264. Lacking external microphone input and advanced stabilization.

  • SX610 HS advances to 1080p Full HD at 30 fps with optical image stabilization. Microphone input is absent, limiting audio control.

Practically, the SX610 HS presents a more usable video solution with higher resolution and improved image clarity, though both cameras serve amateur videographers minimally.

Travel Photography

Versatility, battery endurance, and weight are paramount.

  • The SD980 IS is superbly pocketable but limited in zoom (5x) and lacks wireless connectivity.

  • The SX610 HS boasts an 18x zoom lens, built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for image sharing, and respectable battery life (~270 shots per charge), though it is larger and marginally heavier.

Travelers valuing small size and simplicity may favor the SD980, while those wishing to cover a broader range of subjects and share images on-the-go will benefit from the SX610’s more comprehensive feature set.

Professional Applications and Workflow Integration

Considerations here include file format flexibility, reliability, and connectivity.

  • Neither camera supports raw format, a serious limitation for professional workflows that depend on maximum image data. Both rely on JPEG output.

  • Connectivity in the SX610 HS adds Wi-Fi and NFC, enabling faster image transfer to mobile devices, an advantage for on-location professionals seeking quick previews.

  • Both use proprietary NB-6L/LH batteries, with the SX610 HS showing improved stamina.

Neither camera targets professional markets but the SX610 HS offers modest benefits for semi-professional use regarding remote shooting workflows.

Autofocus System Deep Dive

Both models employ contrast-detection autofocus but differ in implementation:

Feature SD980 IS SX610 HS
AF Points 9 points 9 points
AF Modes Single AF only Single, Continuous, Tracking
Face Detection Absent Present
Touch AF No No
AF Performance Slow, prone to hunting Faster, better tracking though limited in fast action

Testing reveals the SX610 HS significantly reduces AF hunting time and increases hit rate under dynamic shooting conditions. This is critical in wildlife, sports, and street photography.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance

Neither camera features weather sealing or rugged construction found in higher-tier apparatus. Both require careful handling in harsh outdoor environments.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility

Both cameras house fixed zoom lenses:

  • SD980 IS: 24-120 mm equivalent, f/2.8-5.9 aperture - favors wide-angle, suitable for landscapes and travel.

  • SX610 HS: 25-450 mm equivalent, f/3.8-6.9 aperture - extensive telephoto reach, accommodating wildlife and distant subjects.

Both offer optical image stabilization to counteract handshake. The SX610 HS’s 18x zoom greatly surpasses the SD980 IS’s 5x, reinforcing their distinct use cases.

Battery Life and Storage

  • SD980 IS uses NB-6L batteries with undocumented battery life, likely shorter runtime due to older technology.

  • SX610 HS employs NB-6LH batteries rated for approximately 270 shots per full charge, typical for compact superzoom cameras.

Both utilize a single SD/SDHC-compatible slot accepting MMC formats (SDXC only on SX610 HS). Practically, the SX610 HS supports higher capacity cards and more modern memory standards.

Connectivity and Wireless Features

  • SD980 IS lacks any wireless connectivity options, constraining image sharing and remote control.

  • SX610 HS integrates Wi-Fi and NFC for wireless transfers and pairing with smart devices, aligning with contemporary user expectations.

This feature is increasingly essential for travelers and social photographers prioritizing immediate upload capabilities.

Comprehensive Performance Ratings

An expert scoring chart summarizes overall evaluation across key metrics for quick reference:

Genre-Specific Performance Evaluation

A detailed breakdown highlights strengths and weaknesses per photographic category:

Sample Imagery and Real-World Comparison

Examining JPEG samples produced by both cameras in identical lighting confirms anticipated disparities:

  • The SD980 IS offers pleasant daylight color rendition and contrast but shows rapid degradation in shadow detail and low light.

  • The SX610 HS delivers finer detail, improved noise control, and better exposure latitude.

Final Considerations and Recommendations

Canon PowerShot SD980 IS

  • Ideal for users demanding ultra-compact design and intuitive touchscreen operation.
  • Suited for casual users, street photographers desiring discrete devices, and those prioritizing portability.
  • Limitations: Modest zoom range, dated sensor technology, lack of raw support, limited AF capabilities, and absence of wireless features.

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

  • Better for enthusiasts requiring superzoom versatility with modern sensor advantages.
  • Balanced choice for travel photographers, entry-level wildlife/street shooters, and those wanting improved video capabilities and wireless image sharing.
  • Drawbacks: Larger size, slower aperture at telephoto, no raw shooting, and basic AF compared to more advanced cameras.

Conclusion

The Canon PowerShot SD980 IS and SX610 HS represent differing camera philosophies within the compact segment - the former emphasizing slim form factor and simplicity, the latter favoring enhanced zoom versatility and modern sensor improvements.

From firsthand testing and technical analysis, the SX610 HS offers superior all-around image quality, autofocus functionality, and feature breadth, at the cost of increased size and complexity. The SD980 IS can still fulfill the niche for users prioritizing absolute portability and straightforward operation.

Photographers should align their choice with specific use cases and practical needs: the SD980 IS excels in casual travel or street scenarios requiring invisibility, whereas the SX610 HS is a practical superzoom for broader photographic subjects including wildlife, landscapes, and casual sports.

By grounding the assessment in detailed specifications, rigorous field testing, and balanced evaluation, this analysis assists photography enthusiasts and professionals in making informed decisions aligned with their artistic intentions and technical requirements.

Canon SD980 IS vs Canon SX610 HS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SD980 IS and Canon SX610 HS
 Canon PowerShot SD980 ISCanon PowerShot SX610 HS
General Information
Make Canon Canon
Model Canon PowerShot SD980 IS Canon PowerShot SX610 HS
Also Known as Digital IXUS 200 IS -
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-08-19 2015-01-06
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Digic 4 DIGIC 4+
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-120mm (5.0x) 25-450mm (18.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8-5.9 f/3.8-6.9
Macro focus range 3cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 922 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15s 15s
Highest shutter speed 1/3000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames per sec 2.5 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 6.50 m 3.50 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, on, slow synchro, off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 150 gr (0.33 lbs) 191 gr (0.42 lbs)
Dimensions 100 x 53 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.1" x 0.9") 105 x 61 x 27mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 270 images
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model NB-6L NB-6LH
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD, SDHC, MMC, MMCplus, HC MMCplus SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost - $214