Canon SX1 IS vs Nikon P950
64 Imaging
33 Features
53 Overall
41


52 Imaging
43 Features
70 Overall
53
Canon SX1 IS vs Nikon P950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 615g - 128 x 88 x 88mm
- Released March 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 1005g - 140 x 110 x 150mm
- Launched January 2020

Canon SX1 IS vs Nikon Coolpix P950: A Definitive Bridge Camera Showdown
When the realm of small sensor superzoom bridge cameras beckons, two models stand out for their distinct appeal and capabilities: the Canon PowerShot SX1 IS, a 2009 pioneer, and the Nikon Coolpix P950, a 2020 powerhouse. Whether you're stepping into the world of superzoom photography or seeking an ultra-flexible companion for your creative journey, this in-depth comparison will help you understand how these cameras stack up across all major photography disciplines and technical features. Based on rigorous hands-on testing and technical evaluation, we guide you in choosing the right tool tailored to your needs.
Getting a Feel for the Cameras: Design, Size, and Handling
Before diving into pixels and processing, let's examine how these cameras feel in your hands - a critical factor when you’re out capturing fleeting moments or photographing for hours.
Feature | Canon SX1 IS | Nikon P950 |
---|---|---|
Body Type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Dimensions (mm) | 128 x 88 x 88 | 140 x 110 x 150 |
Weight (g) | 615 | 1005 |
Screen Size (in) | 2.8 (Fully Articulated) | 3.2 (Fully Articulated) |
Viewfinder | Electronic, unspecified res | Electronic, 2359 pixels, ~90% coverage |
The Canon SX1 IS boasts a compact, lighter frame weighing just over 600g, making it more comfortable for extended handheld shooting and travel. The Nikon P950 is visibly larger and heavier, partly due to its enormous 83.3x zoom lens. You’ll notice this bulk especially during extended shoots or when trying to blend into street photography environments. However, the Nikon’s larger grip and more substantial build help with stability, compensating for its weight when you’re pushing its telephoto range.
The fully articulating LCD screens are a boon for videographers and tricky angles, with the Nikon’s 3.2-inch screen delivering a much higher resolution (921k dots vs. Canon’s 230k), resulting in a clearer and more detailed preview experience. The Nikon further distinguishes itself with a high-res electronic viewfinder that covers about 90% of the frame, perfect for composing under bright conditions, while Canon's EVF lacks specific resolution details but feels less refined in use.
Ergonomically, the Canon features a more traditional control layout that beginners may find intuitive, while Nikon has packed more buttons to accommodate advanced control during fast action shooting.
If portability and ergonomics are priorities, the SX1 IS has a slight edge, but for intense telephoto use and robust handling, the P950’s heft pays dividends.
Sensor and Image Quality: Resolving the Real Differences
Both cameras employ a small 1/2.3" CMOS sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm, suitable for packing powerful zooms but limited in raw high ISO performance and dynamic range compared to larger sensor systems.
Specification | Canon SX1 IS | Nikon P950 |
---|---|---|
Sensor | 1/2.3" CMOS | 1/2.3" CMOS |
Resolution | 10 MP (3648 x 2736) | 16 MP (4608 x 3456) |
Max ISO Native | 1600 | 6400 |
Raw Format | Yes | Yes |
Aspect Ratios | 4:3, 3:2, 16:9 | 4:3 |
Anti-alias Filter | Yes | Yes |
The Nikon P950 steps ahead in resolution and high ISO capability, boasting 16 megapixels and a maximum native ISO of 6400 (versus 10 MP and ISO 1600 on the Canon). The increased resolution allows for more cropping flexibility and finer detail rendition, particularly noticeable in landscape and wildlife shots where sharpness counts. The Canon’s lower maximum ISO limits its low-light usability and night photography potential.
In direct comparison of resolution charts and field tests, the P950 produces cleaner images at high ISO with less noise, thanks in part to more advanced sensor readout and image processing algorithms. The Canon’s images contain more noise above ISO 400, making it a better fit for daylight shooting or well-lit conditions.
That said, the Canon’s sensor still produces vibrant colors and pleasant tonality at base ISO. Its native 10 MP resolution is adequate for small to medium prints and online sharing.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Capturing the Moment
A camera’s autofocus (AF) system and shooting speed define its ability to capture fast-moving subjects effectively. Here they diverge notably.
Feature | Canon SX1 IS | Nikon P950 |
---|---|---|
Autofocus Points | 9 (contrast detection, face detection) | Unknown number; AF single, continuous, tracking, face detection |
AF System | Contrast-detection only | Contrast-detection only, but advanced algorithms |
Continuous Shooting | 4 fps | 7 fps |
Burst Speed Type | No electronic shutter mode | No electronic shutter mode |
AF Modes | Single AF only | Single, continuous, tracking, selective |
The Canon SX1 IS autofocus system is limited to contrast-detection with 9 points, adequate for stationary or slow-moving subjects but struggles with continuous focus tracking or fast action. Face detection helps portraiture but lacks sophistication by today’s standards.
The Nikon P950 steps up with an autofocus system offering both single and continuous AF, plus subject tracking - an enormous advantage when shooting wildlife or sports photography, where subjects move unpredictably. The 7 fps burst speed further empowers rapid capture, compared to 4 fps on the Canon.
Thanks to this, if your photography involves birds, sports, or active street scenes, the Nikon’s autofocus and burst capability will serve you much better in maintaining sharp focus and capturing decisive moments.
Lens and Zoom Range: Versatility at Your Fingertips
Both cameras feature fixed zoom lenses designed for maximum versatility without swapping optics.
Spec | Canon SX1 IS | Nikon P950 |
---|---|---|
Focal Length | 28–560 mm equivalent (20x zoom) | 24–2000 mm equivalent (83.3x zoom) |
Maximum Aperture | f/2.8 – f/5.7 | f/2.8 – f/6.5 |
Macro Focus Range | 0 cm | 1 cm |
Optical Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
The Nikon P950’s colossal 24-2000mm range eclipses the Canon’s 28-560mm zoom dramatically. This makes the P950 a powerhouse for wildlife and extreme telephoto use, allowing you to get closer to distant subjects without expensive tele lenses or additional gear.
The P950 also supports close macro focusing from 1 cm, great for detailed close-ups, whereas the SX1 lacks a defined macro range, limiting its versatility for macro macro photography.
Both lenses share an f/2.8 aperture wide open at the shortest focal length, ensuring good brightness in wide-angle shots, but the P950 narrows to f/6.5 at the longest reach, slightly less light gathering capacity in telephoto shots compared to the Canon’s f/5.7.
The optical image stabilization on both cameras is crucial for avoiding shake, especially at long focal lengths, and our testing confirms strong stabilization performance on the Nikon, with minor edge in reliability across focal ranges.
Real-World Performance Across Photography Genres
Let’s assess how each camera performs in key photographic disciplines, helping you see where one outshines the other depending on your interests.
Portrait Photography
- Canon SX1 IS: The camera’s face detection and fully articulating screen aid framing and focusing on subjects. However, with only 10 MP resolution and basic AF, skin tone rendition is good but lacks refined color gradation. Shallow depth of field and creamy bokeh are limited by sensor size and lens aperture.
- Nikon P950: Higher resolution results in sharper portraits, with reliable face detection and tracking Focus helping maintain sharpness on eyes and faces. Background blur is still modest due to sensor size, but the camera’s longer focal lengths allow better subject isolation.
Landscape Photography
- Canon SX1 IS: Decent results at base ISO, but limited dynamic range and lower resolution cap ultimate image quality. No weather sealing limits outdoor rugged use.
- Nikon P950: Improved sensor and processing yield better dynamic range and color depth. The 16 MP sensor adds cropping flexibility for composed landscape shots. Unfortunately, no weather sealing means you’ll need to shield it from harsh conditions.
Wildlife Photography
- Canon SX1 IS: The 20x zoom covers moderate telephoto needs but falls short for distant wildlife. Basic AF and slower burst rates impede capturing fleeting movements.
- Nikon P950: The star here, with its 83.3x zoom lens and advanced AF tracking, plus faster continuous shooting. Perfect for birders and wildlife enthusiasts wanting to shoot from a distance.
Sports Photography
- Canon SX1 IS: AF and shooting speed limit action capture potential.
- Nikon P950: Handles sports better due to rapid burst rates, continuous AF, and superior zoom reach for sidelines or spectator shots.
Street Photography
- Canon SX1 IS: Compact size and lighter weight offer discretion; articulated screen is helpful. The lower resolution means faster image handling.
- Nikon P950: Bulkier and heavier, the P950 stands out less in urban environments. However, its extended zoom can capture candid shots without getting close.
Macro Photography
- Canon SX1 IS: Limited macro capabilities; no true close focus range.
- Nikon P950: Superior with 1 cm minimum focus distance, allowing you to explore intricate details with good sharpness.
Night and Astro Photography
- Canon SX1 IS: Limited ISO range and lower resolution impair night and star image quality.
- Nikon P950: Higher max ISO and longer shutter speeds allow better astrophotography, though sensor size limits deep sky detail.
Video Capabilities
Feature | Canon SX1 IS | Nikon P950 |
---|---|---|
Max Resolution | Full HD 1080p @ 30fps | 4K UHD 2160p @ 30fps |
Video Format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Built-in Mic | No mic port | Microphone port available |
Screen | Fully Articulated, 230k dots | Fully Articulated, 921k dots |
Image Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
The Nikon P950 decisively wins the video battle. It supports 4K UHD recording at 30fps and has a microphone port, allowing for enhanced audio capture - an essential for serious videographers and content creators. The Canon maxes out at 1080p and lacks a mic input.
Build Quality, Weather Resistance, and Battery Life
Neither camera offers environmental sealing, so if shooting in moisture, dust, or extreme temperatures is a priority, you’d need extra protection or consider different gear.
The Nikon is heavier and larger, which might tire you out quicker during hikes or travel but also suggests a more robust chassis supporting its extensive zoom mechanism.
Battery life differs slightly:
- Canon SX1 IS: No official CIPA ratings available.
- Nikon P950: Approx. 290 shots per charge, a decent endurance considering the larger sensor and power-hungry zoom.
Connectivity and Storage
Feature | Canon SX1 IS | Nikon P950 |
---|---|---|
Wireless | None | Built-in WiFi and Bluetooth |
Storage Medium | SD/SDHC/MMC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
USB | USB 2.0 | USB charger (EN-EL20a Battery) |
HDMI | Yes | Yes |
The Nikon P950 provides modern wireless connectivity options, adding convenience for transferring photos to smartphones or remote camera control. The Canon SX1 IS, launched earlier, has no wireless features, which may slow workflow for digital sharing today.
Summary of Performance Scores and Genre Ratings
From our detailed testing and user feedback aggregated here, it’s clear:
- Nikon P950 excels in telephoto zoom, autofocus sophistication, video capabilities, and versatility.
- Canon SX1 IS remains relevant for enthusiasts seeking lightweight, straightforward bridge camera usage with moderate zoom needs and classic manual controls.
Hands-On Image Quality Gallery
Seeing sample images side by side reveals real differences:
- Canon photos exhibit warmth and vivid tone but softer fine detail.
- Nikon images offer finer detail, better clarity at long zoom, and superior low-light rendering.
Which Camera Is Right For You?
User Type | Recommendation | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
Beginner / Casual Shooter | Canon SX1 IS | Easier handling, lighter, affordable |
Wildlife Photographer | Nikon P950 | Massive zoom, advanced AF, faster shooting |
Travel Photographer | Canon SX1 IS (if weight-sensitive) / Nikon P950 (if zoom valued) | Balance portability vs. zoom power |
Sports Photographer | Nikon P950 | Faster burst speed and AF tracking |
Videographer / Vlogger | Nikon P950 | 4K video, mic port, articulated screen |
Macro Photographer | Nikon P950 | Close focusing and high resolution |
Landscape Photographer | Nikon P950 | Higher resolution, better image quality |
Final Thoughts: Embrace the Superzoom Adventure
Both the Canon PowerShot SX1 IS and the Nikon Coolpix P950 demonstrate the versatility and excitement of bridge cameras with small sensors and big zooms. The SX1 IS offers classic, accessible imaging with respectable performance suitable for casual enthusiasts or those new to superzoom photography. Its compact size and intuitive controls help you focus on creativity without complexity.
The Nikon P950 is a powerhouse for advanced enthusiasts and professionals needing extreme reach and speed, modern video features, and robust AF systems. Its substantial weight and dimensions come with major performance benefits, making it ideal for wildlife, sports, and exploration photography.
Before deciding, consider what kinds of photography inspire you most and which features will best unlock your creative vision. We highly recommend trying these cameras in person if possible, testing their ergonomics, controls, and image quality firsthand - nothing replaces hands-on experience in revealing how a camera truly feels in your artistic flow.
Explore Your Creative Horizons
No matter which camera you pick, the bridge superzoom genre offers tremendous flexibility and a joyful learning curve. Pair your new camera with quality accessories like a sturdy tripod, extra batteries, and a fast SD card. Join photography communities and share your creations to fuel your development.
Get started, experiment across genres, and capture the world in ways only a superzoom can provide.
Good shooting!
Article images sourced from respective product shoots and in-house testing sessions.
Canon SX1 IS vs Nikon P950 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX1 IS | Nikon Coolpix P950 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Nikon |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX1 IS | Nikon Coolpix P950 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-03-27 | 2020-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-560mm (20.0x) | 24-2000mm (83.3x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus range | 0cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 2.8 inch | 3.2 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 90% |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 300 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.20 m | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/500 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | EN-EL20a lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 615 gr (1.36 lbs) | 1005 gr (2.22 lbs) |
Dimensions | 128 x 88 x 88mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 3.5") | 140 x 110 x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec or custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $600 | $797 |