Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-H10
86 Imaging
40 Features
45 Overall
42
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-H10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-448mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 291g - 111 x 73 x 44mm
- Introduced June 2013
- Earlier Model is Canon SX150 IS
- Newer Model is Canon SX170 IS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Introduced June 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-H10 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Canon SX160 IS versus Casio EX-H10, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and Casio. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the SX160 IS (16MP) and EX-H10 (12MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SX160 IS was announced 4 years after the EX-H10 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the SX160 IS matches up versus the EX-H10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-H10 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX160 IS & Casio Exilim EX-H10. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon SX160 IS Gallery & Casio EX-H10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX160 IS over the Casio EX-H10
| SX160 IS | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2013 |  | June 2009 | Newer by 50 months |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Canon SX160 IS
| EX-H10 | SX160 IS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX160 IS and Casio EX-H10
| SX160 IS | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-H10 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX160 IS has got outer measurements of 111mm x 73mm x 44mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.7") with a weight of 291 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Casio EX-H10 has dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX160 IS versus Casio EX-H10 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the SX160 IS versus the EX-H10.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the SX160 IS and EX-H10 is 86 and 93 respectively.
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-H10 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions simply by checking specs. The pic below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the SX160 IS and EX-H10.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Canon SX160 IS to resolve greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots much more aggressively. The more recent SX160 IS is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-H10 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-H10 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX160 IS | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Casio |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX160 IS | Casio Exilim EX-H10 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-06-21 | 2009-06-11 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-448mm (16.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.2-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/2000s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 291 gr (0.64 lb) | 194 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 73 x 44mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.7") | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | - |
| Form of battery | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | NP-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $199 | $300 |