Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH3
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98111/98111a0b7c2ad20df355c7415ff9f3db6009ee5f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 front"
94 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Announced October 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-500
- Newer Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 165g - 98 x 55 x 24mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FS11
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH3 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic FH3, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FH3 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FH3 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-500 was launched 5 years before the FH3 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FH3 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-500 grades versus the FH3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-500 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Panasonic FH3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FH3
E-500 | FH3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH3 over the Olympus E-500
FH3 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2010 | ![]() | October 2005 | Fresher by 51 months |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FH3
E-500 | FH3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 features outer measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Panasonic FH3 has sizing of 98mm x 55mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic FH3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the E-500 against the FH3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2f84/d2f84f90de0381cd9b140a1887856ce4fa40b868" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH3 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH3 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and FH3 is 70 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e82d/4e82db30d1157d8677c9ae964cccb2d9829dd3b8" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading technical specs. The graphic below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and FH3.
As you can tell, the two cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-500 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic FH3 will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34cad/34cad39d9d98de44b9accb34c7128240936daabf" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46a89/46a89ee12ac8003821756cbbaa3786a5daab5ceb" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH3 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-500 | Lumix DMC-FS11 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2005-10-21 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-6.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 6.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479 gr (1.06 lbs) | 165 gr (0.36 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 98 x 55 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $600 | $160 |