Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z800
86 Imaging
40 Features
45 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af213/af21359bdfa4f28ab8b439e5e28d6933f307906a" alt="Canon PowerShot SX160 IS front Canon PowerShot SX160 IS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72ae3/72ae3cba5d945c4704b022d857d153f91ef6548c" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z800 front Casio Exilim EX-Z800 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-448mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 291g - 111 x 73 x 44mm
- Launched June 2013
- Replaced the Canon SX150 IS
- Renewed by Canon SX170 IS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Released August 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z800 Overview
Here is a complete review of the Canon SX160 IS versus Casio EX-Z800, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Canon and Casio. The sensor resolution of the SX160 IS (16MP) and the EX-Z800 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The SX160 IS was introduced 2 years later than the EX-Z800 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Canon SX160 IS being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the SX160 IS matches up versus the EX-Z800 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z800 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX160 IS & Casio Exilim EX-Z800. The whole galleries are provided at Canon SX160 IS Gallery & Casio EX-Z800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX160 IS over the Casio EX-Z800
SX160 IS | EX-Z800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2013 | ![]() | August 2010 | Fresher by 36 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Canon SX160 IS
EX-Z800 | SX160 IS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX160 IS and Casio EX-Z800
SX160 IS | EX-Z800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z800 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon SX160 IS provides outer dimensions of 111mm x 73mm x 44mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.7") with a weight of 291 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Casio EX-Z800 has measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX160 IS versus Casio EX-Z800 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the SX160 IS vs the EX-Z800.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/806ea/806ea9bc7341e0d93e280288eb861f9acc260918" alt="Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z800 size comparison Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z800 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX160 IS and EX-Z800 is 86 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/144aa/144aa711496b0cd552247943e5b1d618a159993e" alt="Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z800 top view buttons comparison Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z800 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z800 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading a spec sheet. The photograph here may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX160 IS and EX-Z800.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Canon SX160 IS to deliver extra detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more recent SX160 IS should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25d51/25d51a1a748272d59f12f79a3e13c29158e11bd4" alt="Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z800 sensor size comparison Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z800 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z800 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd93a/dd93ade2b916b01830161f7c2997b36f1b8e0405" alt="Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z800 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z800 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z800 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX160 IS | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Casio |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX160 IS | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2013-06-21 | 2010-08-03 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 4 | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-448mm (16.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 291g (0.64 pounds) | 124g (0.27 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 73 x 44mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.7") | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 images | - |
Battery style | AA | - |
Battery model | 2 x AA | NP-120 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $199 | $150 |